Oh my god this is too easy. You can easily see who is registered and NEVER FUCKING votes... just TAG all the non-voters, use them to fill out the mail in voting ballots and BIDEN wins.
That site can be kind of useful because you can estimate the price for a dataset and it will tell you how many records are in it
Also maybe someone might want to buy the same dataset for 2016 and do historical cross analysis I dunno. Speaking of that:
This dataset is 64,289 records.
Whereas 2016 is 139,757 records.
Why such a huge difference? I have heard people talking about low turnout in Milwaukee but I don't know what it could mean. Also you never know when they are making errors or "glitches" or tabulate things in some dumb way. But could be meaningful
The state abuses your tax money, runs out, then has to charge you for everything because they aren't fiscally responsible. Then hides it under... yadda yadda server/middle management costs.
Interesting, for some reason the "Absentee Data" has a different number of records, for the same county and election. Not sure why that would be. Not actually going to purchase this; I just clicked to create the request so I could show these two side by side
^^ This one is statewide absentee data but only for applications made after 11/01/2020 (I was curious about absentee apps coming in at the last second, and with a larger date range it becomes expensive quickly; but at least now we know which fields are available for this "Absentee data" in contrast to the other)
The non-voters have been a key part of Democrat election fraud for decades. And remember, this is, and always has been a professional operation. We can see who the non-voters were in recent elections. But understand that the professionals who are perpetrating this fraud have their own databases. They can see not only the non-voters that we see, but also the we-voted-for-thems that the professionals used to cast fraudulent absentee ballots in recent elections. They can also see which of the non-voters and we-voted-for-thems are either completely fake registrations or registrations done by Democrat-run voter registration drives in which people who obviously have no interest in voting or registering to vote are pressured by workers to fill out and sign registration forms
This is why I always pipe up in the "we need voter ID" threads to say just forget about that for the foreseeable future. The percentage of vote fraud that happens in-person at the polls is miniscule. As long as we have absentee voting of any kind, our election security is a complete joke. Exceptions are needed for US government and military personnel and their dependents who are stationed outside the country, but other than that, voting should be in-person only. Citizens should have the right to go to a polling place and vote, not a right to "vote" anywhere without making any effort at all.
Secret ballot voting is a critical element of election integrity, and as long as people have the "right" to request and use absentee ballots, there will be millions of vulnerable people whose registrations are abused to churn out absentee votes in their names, mostly without their knowledge (think nursing homes), and there will plenty more who are pressured by employers, union bosses, landlords to whom rent is overdue, etc, to request absentee ballots, complete them as directed, and show or give them to the pressuring party before mailing.
subtract any non voters you find from the denominator of the "turnout rate" fraction they report to get that turnout ratio. (eligible to vote = eligibile people that vote + eligible people that don't vote)
that's where you're wrong, kiddo. A zombified child sniffin' swamp monster who managed to pull massive crowds of 15+ during his campaign "rallys" managed to inspire these non-voters for the first time in decades, even moreso than Obama did!
The non-voters have been a key part of Democrat election fraud for decades. And remember, this is, and always has been a professional operation. We can see who the non-voters were in recent elections. But understand that the professionals who are perpetrating this fraud have their own databases. They can see not only the non-voters that we see, but also the we-voted-for-thems that the professionals used to cast fraudulent absentee ballots in recent elections. They can also see which of the non-voters and we-voted-for-thems are either completely fake registrations or registrations done by Democrat-run voter registration drives in which people who obviously have no interest in voting or registering to vote are pressured by workers to fill out and sign registration forms
This is why I always pipe up in the "we need voter ID" threads to say just forget about that for the foreseeable future. The percentage of vote fraud that happens in-person at the polls is miniscule. As long as we have absentee voting of any kind, our election security is a complete joke. Exceptions are needed for US government and military personnel and their dependents who are stationed outside the country, but other than that, voting should be in-person only. Citizens should have the right to go to a polling place and vote, not a right to "vote" anywhere without making any effort at all.
Secret ballot voting is a critical element of election integrity, and as long as people have the "right" to request and use absentee ballots, there will be millions of vulnerable people whose registrations are abused to churn out absentee votes in their names, mostly without their knowledge (think nursing homes), and there will plenty more who are pressured by employers, union bosses, landlords to whom rent is overdue, etc, to request absentee ballots, complete them as directed, and show or give them to the pressuring party before mailing.
Yes, we need to have a large core group of people who can understand all the Words and Stuff, but distilling that into an easy to understand message that can spread organically is also important. We need to focus on conveying the concept that every single fraudulent vote represents a disenfranchised real voter. The left has successfully beaten it into the heads of their followers that voter disenfranchisement is an absolutely horrible and unacceptable thing. We need to piggyback on that foundation that they've laid for us.
This is probably why the democrats text their supporters and check how and when they voted. To make sure they fake ballots for people they know are not voting.
(They think I voted biden, lol)
It would be interesting if someone can subpoena these text messages to verify the democrats knew someone did not vote.
Please spread this around for the purposes of distributed autism.
My gut feeling is that this data could be critical for exploring the hypothesis put forward here.
I only have so much time to look into the data myself so please share around for data-interested pedes so nobody interested needs to spend the money on this again.
I am happy to set one up. There would be some things to sort out first though. Unclear what data to buy so one thought would be just buy it all. https://badgervoters.wi.gov/
Voter Data
Total Count : 6.984.980
Total Cost : $12,500.00
Absentee Data
Total Count : 7.492.661
Total Cost : $12,500.00
I think some people were going to try to reach out to trump team contacts or something and see if anybody had already bought this data. I'll try to close the loop with those folks and see where we're at
What the fuck.. this data should be free to download. It is public information, our government works for US and we have a right to access OUR government's data.
I can see charging for having the data mailed on USB or DVD.. but internet downloads should be free.
Would it be viable to get a court order for a copy of it, and compel them to provide it for free? Then instead of donating $12.5k to the government, someone can host the data for $5 for all to use?
NO prior Vote History, or has not voted in the past 12 years.
Did they vote Absentee?
These types of voters would be the best candidates for mass mail in voting fraud. Since they are basically "never voters" but are still registered, illegal ballots could be submitted using their names and the likelihood they showed up to vote in person or submit their own legal ballot is about a 0% chance. This would also explain the massive INCREASE in voter turnout, but in reality it is simply the criminals that are using these types of lists to find their most likely victims.
Attorneys can request anything for free. In reality, they will likely need to pay for it.
The costs for this data can be explained as the organization and compilation costs.
But 12k is nothing in terms of legal costs. The legals costs of this whole litigation strategy will be in the tens of millions at the very least.
The problem though is that the attorneys aren't generally allowed to leak evidence to the public. We need this data in advance of their court cases so that they can benefit from our independent investigation.
If you can sort the date by registration date, examine the earliest dates to find the older voters. Then look for these older voters who have only voted absentee on Nov 3, 2020 and no prior voting history for the last 2-3 election cycles.
Those people will be the biggest targets for mailin voting identify fraud.
easy to fix with this crap (this is why no other country does mail-in because its so obvious when the fix comes in) tag all the dead make them vote biden, tag all the people that never vote (but registered) and they vote biden. pair this with postal workers and government employees actively ADMITTING they've thrown out hundreds of thousands of trump votes and the fix is in....
Hey this wiki page is developing as a list of datasets; for example i've linked added a link to the data in the original post under Absentee Records -> Wisconsin
Good stuff!
I need these absentee data for all 50 states eventually. There are certain patterns for mailin fraud. Please share if someone knows if there is a bigger collection. That'll help me. But I will start with these.
Pull the emails, mass notify everyone that their vote was counted! If they did not actually cast a vote, then they are victim of mail and voter fraud, they should immediately contact their office of elections and report being a victim!
Something similar is available for PA here for $20. You are not allowed to share it online according to the page where you order it, but if interested, here is the link.
Yea not sure why it is that way, but it makes you do a couple digital signatures prior to processing the purchase. I bought the data and will be running through it tonight to see if anything pops out. I think this will be most useful for identifying voters that did not participate in the past and did vote this time, or dead voters still on the rolls. Will report back if I find anything, but I encourage any PA pedes with more experience and technical know how to look into these as well. At least it is cheaper than WI info!
Just because you signed something doesn't necessarily mean you are bound by it. Just FYI. An illegal contract is illegal.
If you have some flexibility in your life, you should contact the PA lawyers for Trump group, and ask for a free consultation on the PA data you bought. One of them may be willing to defend you in sharing the data online. I would love to help connect you, but I only have contacts in WI.
Often times what this looks like is that they will tell you what your risk profile looks like, your chances of actually going to court, and they will help translate a "cease and desist" letter, which is often just a hollow threat.
My uneducated and uninformed guess is that the state may be unwilling to actually bring you to court if you shared the date publicly because it may invalidate the contract for others if they lose. And I would guess that if you ended up being blocked by the system afterwards, your attorney could make them reverse with a well-worded cease-and-desist of their own. If you want an educated and informed opinion, contact the lawyers for Trump PA group.
I'll look into the data first and see if anything jumps out, and how worth it, it might be to get others involved. In the end it is $20 for any others interested in taking a look prior to that. Appreciate the advice though pede and will reach out to them if I need to. Have already been in contact with a similar group for the Philly fraud investigations.
I agree - This seems to be absentee only, If this is those who applied for Absentee, even still, only .11% going to the polls seems low. I'd expect at least a 1% undelivered mail/wrong address/coffee spilled on mail in ballot rate.
Ah yes I think I see. So this rate being so low could possibly indicate an organized operation to mass-submit illegitimate absentee ballots. Since otherwise the in person rate would be much higher
I mean, it is post-covid hysteria and so that could drive the percentage down somewhat but i dunno about 10-fold
We need to contact these people. If we can contact all these people and get sworn affidavits from them stating that they did not vote in this election, the floodgates can open so fast.
We really can start an intense ground game on this. PII for nearly all American citizens is readily available on the Internet. I think we can do it in a way where people aren't doxxed in a harmful manner. But I'm thinking a list like this is something we need to take to the street.
We need some sort of guidance from above. Trump's legal team needs to understand that we are willing to knock on doors to get these sworn affidavits. It needs to happen YESTERDAY.
Trumps legal team needs to do this. I'll send the info I've accumulated later today once I can verify additional items. This is just a small subset, but seems very odd from a mathematical perspective.
If we contact them, we may spoil them as witnesses, this needs to go through the legal process and Trumps legal team needs to get out to them.
Excellent point. That's why I'm suggesting we need Trump's legal team to unleash us for this type of ground game if necessary. We don't want to do this in a witch hunt manner. You and I and all here know that this is the righteous path.
Yeah puzzling. The funny thing is-- assuming you wanted to regularly ETL the data from WI in order to keep your own database current, you would theoretically have to pay $12.5K each time
There was another pede on here a couple days ago looking for this info.
Someone directed him to where to purchase.
If you are not that guy it would me good to get you two in contact.
Search isnt functional so i couldnt locate the previous post.
1033 People registered to vote Jan 1, 1918. Just shy of 103 years ago. They all voted absentee. 303 of those did not vote absentee at all between beginning of pandemic AND november 2016. (Excluding military and permanently overseas).
I checked into some of these and it just looks like really shit recordkeeping. These people are 40 years old, but for some reason registered with no record of where/when and they defaulted to 1918, and no requested location.
1033 People registered to vote Jan 1, 1918. Just shy of 103 years ago. They all voted absentee. 303 of those did not vote absentee at all between beginning of pandemic AND november 2016. (Excluding military and permanently overseas).
You might find this thread interesting if you haven't seen it:
Kinda funny (but not "Ha Ha" funny) that we have "Gurpreet Singh", "Sandeep Kaur", and "Amandeep Kaur" voting in three wards each, and 141 others with exact name matches voting in two wards.
Anyone else a previous auditor? I went thru these rolls, according to their records, 250 people voted in person in Milwaukee on election day. Seems a little light for what 70k votes?
So...1039 voter applications with the date 1-1-1918? Some have addresses and phone numbers. Should we look for obituaries and death records, start calling phone numbers asking to speak to the voter and find out if they're alive or if they voted? What's the right thing to do?
Oh my god this is too easy. You can easily see who is registered and NEVER FUCKING votes... just TAG all the non-voters, use them to fill out the mail in voting ballots and BIDEN wins.
Wow good point. I have mostly been thinking along the lines of people who relocated to other states but your never-voter hypothesis is terrific
Btw the data comes from here: https://badgervoters.wi.gov/
That site can be kind of useful because you can estimate the price for a dataset and it will tell you how many records are in it
Also maybe someone might want to buy the same dataset for 2016 and do historical cross analysis I dunno. Speaking of that:
This dataset is 64,289 records.
Whereas 2016 is 139,757 records.
Why such a huge difference? I have heard people talking about low turnout in Milwaukee but I don't know what it could mean. Also you never know when they are making errors or "glitches" or tabulate things in some dumb way. But could be meaningful
Why does a dataset have to be purchased????
It is a public record, the data made using our tax dollars.
It costs no money for them to provide a download.
What IT company is pocketing this money under the pretense of IT costs???
This data should be free for anyone to download.
The state abuses your tax money, runs out, then has to charge you for everything because they aren't fiscally responsible. Then hides it under... yadda yadda server/middle management costs.
Something something clerical costs, I guess
AT&T? Seems they have their fingers in everything.
https://redstate.com/neil_stevens/2018/01/25/att-wins-huge-nsa-contract-n83556 This was back in 2018..
(Ball) handling fees?
Interesting, for some reason the "Absentee Data" has a different number of records, for the same county and election. Not sure why that would be. Not actually going to purchase this; I just clicked to create the request so I could show these two side by side
https://i.maga.host/fLA2E70.png
In contrast to the dataset I link to in the original post, the "Absentee Data" has different fields, as follows:
https://i.maga.host/K6nwVtQ.png
https://i.maga.host/q6bvRbE.png
I got these from another small request I made, available here: https://gofile.io/d/5ls9fL
^^ This one is statewide absentee data but only for applications made after 11/01/2020 (I was curious about absentee apps coming in at the last second, and with a larger date range it becomes expensive quickly; but at least now we know which fields are available for this "Absentee data" in contrast to the other)
Cross reference with other states to see who moved and then has votes in their former state.
The non-voters have been a key part of Democrat election fraud for decades. And remember, this is, and always has been a professional operation. We can see who the non-voters were in recent elections. But understand that the professionals who are perpetrating this fraud have their own databases. They can see not only the non-voters that we see, but also the we-voted-for-thems that the professionals used to cast fraudulent absentee ballots in recent elections. They can also see which of the non-voters and we-voted-for-thems are either completely fake registrations or registrations done by Democrat-run voter registration drives in which people who obviously have no interest in voting or registering to vote are pressured by workers to fill out and sign registration forms
This is why I always pipe up in the "we need voter ID" threads to say just forget about that for the foreseeable future. The percentage of vote fraud that happens in-person at the polls is miniscule. As long as we have absentee voting of any kind, our election security is a complete joke. Exceptions are needed for US government and military personnel and their dependents who are stationed outside the country, but other than that, voting should be in-person only. Citizens should have the right to go to a polling place and vote, not a right to "vote" anywhere without making any effort at all.
Secret ballot voting is a critical element of election integrity, and as long as people have the "right" to request and use absentee ballots, there will be millions of vulnerable people whose registrations are abused to churn out absentee votes in their names, mostly without their knowledge (think nursing homes), and there will plenty more who are pressured by employers, union bosses, landlords to whom rent is overdue, etc, to request absentee ballots, complete them as directed, and show or give them to the pressuring party before mailing.
subtract any non voters you find from the denominator of the "turnout rate" fraction they report to get that turnout ratio. (eligible to vote = eligibile people that vote + eligible people that don't vote)
see what the rate is then
that's where you're wrong, kiddo. A zombified child sniffin' swamp monster who managed to pull massive crowds of 15+ during his campaign "rallys" managed to inspire these non-voters for the first time in decades, even moreso than Obama did!
The non-voters have been a key part of Democrat election fraud for decades. And remember, this is, and always has been a professional operation. We can see who the non-voters were in recent elections. But understand that the professionals who are perpetrating this fraud have their own databases. They can see not only the non-voters that we see, but also the we-voted-for-thems that the professionals used to cast fraudulent absentee ballots in recent elections. They can also see which of the non-voters and we-voted-for-thems are either completely fake registrations or registrations done by Democrat-run voter registration drives in which people who obviously have no interest in voting or registering to vote are pressured by workers to fill out and sign registration forms
This is why I always pipe up in the "we need voter ID" threads to say just forget about that for the foreseeable future. The percentage of vote fraud that happens in-person at the polls is miniscule. As long as we have absentee voting of any kind, our election security is a complete joke. Exceptions are needed for US government and military personnel and their dependents who are stationed outside the country, but other than that, voting should be in-person only. Citizens should have the right to go to a polling place and vote, not a right to "vote" anywhere without making any effort at all.
Secret ballot voting is a critical element of election integrity, and as long as people have the "right" to request and use absentee ballots, there will be millions of vulnerable people whose registrations are abused to churn out absentee votes in their names, mostly without their knowledge (think nursing homes), and there will plenty more who are pressured by employers, union bosses, landlords to whom rent is overdue, etc, to request absentee ballots, complete them as directed, and show or give them to the pressuring party before mailing.
Yes, we need to have a large core group of people who can understand all the Words and Stuff, but distilling that into an easy to understand message that can spread organically is also important. We need to focus on conveying the concept that every single fraudulent vote represents a disenfranchised real voter. The left has successfully beaten it into the heads of their followers that voter disenfranchisement is an absolutely horrible and unacceptable thing. We need to piggyback on that foundation that they've laid for us.
Biden-No Swiping!
This is probably why the democrats text their supporters and check how and when they voted. To make sure they fake ballots for people they know are not voting.
(They think I voted biden, lol)
It would be interesting if someone can subpoena these text messages to verify the democrats knew someone did not vote.
Are you implying that I died before the election and did not realize it?
If Trump team is smart, they will set up call centers, confirm whether or not people voted, and get an affidavit team to go get a record of it.
Imagine how the President feels when he sees that we are spending our own money to help him. MAGA!
Bet he gets warm fuzzies 🐸🐸🐸
Please spread this around for the purposes of distributed autism.
My gut feeling is that this data could be critical for exploring the hypothesis put forward here.
I only have so much time to look into the data myself so please share around for data-interested pedes so nobody interested needs to spend the money on this again.
I like this 4chan-style information sharing. 👍🇺🇸
Truth will out
Repost this again every 6 hrs to get more eyes on this.
Thank you!! Do you have a gofundme so we can chip in?
I am happy to set one up. There would be some things to sort out first though. Unclear what data to buy so one thought would be just buy it all. https://badgervoters.wi.gov/
Voter Data
Total Count : 6.984.980
Total Cost : $12,500.00
Absentee Data
Total Count : 7.492.661
Total Cost : $12,500.00
I think some people were going to try to reach out to trump team contacts or something and see if anybody had already bought this data. I'll try to close the loop with those folks and see where we're at
A disc with that data should cost $5....
I know it's supposed to go to the government but why do I feel like this is some money laundering bullshit?
Because it is
Great info thanks, we got to steer clear of the globo tech cabal
Good suggestion
What the fuck.. this data should be free to download. It is public information, our government works for US and we have a right to access OUR government's data.
I can see charging for having the data mailed on USB or DVD.. but internet downloads should be free.
Would it be viable to get a court order for a copy of it, and compel them to provide it for free? Then instead of donating $12.5k to the government, someone can host the data for $5 for all to use?
Thank you for your service!!
If you don't mind me askin, how do you just have $25K to blow like that! lol. That's half my yearly salary.
Anyways, thanks again! I've downloaded your data and will preserve\spread it around.
All our shoulders pede. Let us help.
Using this list look for the following:
NO prior Vote History, or has not voted in the past 12 years. Did they vote Absentee?
These types of voters would be the best candidates for mass mail in voting fraud. Since they are basically "never voters" but are still registered, illegal ballots could be submitted using their names and the likelihood they showed up to vote in person or submit their own legal ballot is about a 0% chance. This would also explain the massive INCREASE in voter turnout, but in reality it is simply the criminals that are using these types of lists to find their most likely victims.
And we have heard stories of people that did show up, so then they just let them usually vote and acted like their mail in would be amended
Everyone be sure to download a copy because, sure as shit, the Left will be trying to get this pulled.
You can request it here https://badgervoters.wi.gov/
Maybe be wary of us all flooding them with requests. Try to share as much as possible if you buy a dataset
I wouldn't be surprised if we just eventually buy their entire dataset; we'll see
Can’t the attorney’s request this and get it for free? As part of their discovery or something? Then post it here for the autists?
Attorneys can request anything for free. In reality, they will likely need to pay for it.
The costs for this data can be explained as the organization and compilation costs.
But 12k is nothing in terms of legal costs. The legals costs of this whole litigation strategy will be in the tens of millions at the very least.
The problem though is that the attorneys aren't generally allowed to leak evidence to the public. We need this data in advance of their court cases so that they can benefit from our independent investigation.
If you can sort the date by registration date, examine the earliest dates to find the older voters. Then look for these older voters who have only voted absentee on Nov 3, 2020 and no prior voting history for the last 2-3 election cycles.
Those people will be the biggest targets for mailin voting identify fraud.
Money where your mouth is. Respect.
Can someone explain to me how someone can be absentee in both November 2020 and August 2020?
Maybe a Primary election or local election in August.
easy to fix with this crap (this is why no other country does mail-in because its so obvious when the fix comes in) tag all the dead make them vote biden, tag all the people that never vote (but registered) and they vote biden. pair this with postal workers and government employees actively ADMITTING they've thrown out hundreds of thousands of trump votes and the fix is in....
Thank you!🙏
Is there anywhere that has all of these listed I’m writing some scripts to auto check these but need more data sets.
Hey this wiki page is developing as a list of datasets; for example i've linked added a link to the data in the original post under Absentee Records -> Wisconsin
https://wiki.audittheelection.com/index.php/Datasets
Good stuff! I need these absentee data for all 50 states eventually. There are certain patterns for mailin fraud. Please share if someone knows if there is a bigger collection. That'll help me. But I will start with these.
Great stuff! Thanks!
This doesn't have any of the nyt time series data. Only collecting voter registration data here?
And the shiva ayyadurai that they got from FOIA requests? That looked like precinct-level voter data for a few counties, I think in MI.
Please support Trumpster Matt Braynard...he is doing this analysis and was kicked off of GoFundCommie
https://www.givesendgo.com/GX2V
Pull the emails, mass notify everyone that their vote was counted! If they did not actually cast a vote, then they are victim of mail and voter fraud, they should immediately contact their office of elections and report being a victim!
Something similar is available for PA here for $20. You are not allowed to share it online according to the page where you order it, but if interested, here is the link.
https://www.pavoterservices.pa.gov/Pages/PurchasePAFULLVoterExport.aspx
I hope someone fights that in court. The voter rolls are public information. They don't have the rights to put you on a license for the data.
Yea not sure why it is that way, but it makes you do a couple digital signatures prior to processing the purchase. I bought the data and will be running through it tonight to see if anything pops out. I think this will be most useful for identifying voters that did not participate in the past and did vote this time, or dead voters still on the rolls. Will report back if I find anything, but I encourage any PA pedes with more experience and technical know how to look into these as well. At least it is cheaper than WI info!
Just because you signed something doesn't necessarily mean you are bound by it. Just FYI. An illegal contract is illegal.
If you have some flexibility in your life, you should contact the PA lawyers for Trump group, and ask for a free consultation on the PA data you bought. One of them may be willing to defend you in sharing the data online. I would love to help connect you, but I only have contacts in WI.
Often times what this looks like is that they will tell you what your risk profile looks like, your chances of actually going to court, and they will help translate a "cease and desist" letter, which is often just a hollow threat.
My uneducated and uninformed guess is that the state may be unwilling to actually bring you to court if you shared the date publicly because it may invalidate the contract for others if they lose. And I would guess that if you ended up being blocked by the system afterwards, your attorney could make them reverse with a well-worded cease-and-desist of their own. If you want an educated and informed opinion, contact the lawyers for Trump PA group.
I'll look into the data first and see if anything jumps out, and how worth it, it might be to get others involved. In the end it is $20 for any others interested in taking a look prior to that. Appreciate the advice though pede and will reach out to them if I need to. Have already been in contact with a similar group for the Philly fraud investigations.
Get the Data to VC4351 on twitter, he just proved that 109k mail in ballots were received by the state before they were ever mailed out.
nice. i was thinking of doing this for Cobb county Georgia. they have August election voter rolls up (link below)
working with some people on data projects.
we could use a central repository so people don't buy the same stuff twice!! and we can crowd source funds.
https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/cobbcounty.org.if-us-west-2/prod/2020-08/2020Aug_RunoffElectionVoterList.pdf
out of 5038 Voters that have never voted in any other election besides the 2020 General. 5032 Voted Absentee, 6 Voted in person.
In otherwords, according to this document: 0.1190% of Milwaukee voters that had not previously voted in any election chose to go in person.
3819 (or 75%) of those on this document registered by mail or online.
At least 5 voters on this list registered by mail or online 5 days after the 10-14-2020 deadline and still cast an absentee ballot.
From the voters who voted (by any means) in 2016. Only 0.465% Cast their vote in person for 2020.Compare this to 53.7% in 2016.
note that this is among those who applied for absentee, i think, based on this being a dataset of just absentee voters of some kind or another
I agree - This seems to be absentee only, If this is those who applied for Absentee, even still, only .11% going to the polls seems low. I'd expect at least a 1% undelivered mail/wrong address/coffee spilled on mail in ballot rate.
Ah yes I think I see. So this rate being so low could possibly indicate an organized operation to mass-submit illegitimate absentee ballots. Since otherwise the in person rate would be much higher
I mean, it is post-covid hysteria and so that could drive the percentage down somewhat but i dunno about 10-fold
We need to contact these people. If we can contact all these people and get sworn affidavits from them stating that they did not vote in this election, the floodgates can open so fast.
We really can start an intense ground game on this. PII for nearly all American citizens is readily available on the Internet. I think we can do it in a way where people aren't doxxed in a harmful manner. But I'm thinking a list like this is something we need to take to the street.
We need some sort of guidance from above. Trump's legal team needs to understand that we are willing to knock on doors to get these sworn affidavits. It needs to happen YESTERDAY.
Trumps legal team needs to do this. I'll send the info I've accumulated later today once I can verify additional items. This is just a small subset, but seems very odd from a mathematical perspective.
If we contact them, we may spoil them as witnesses, this needs to go through the legal process and Trumps legal team needs to get out to them.
To add to my other reply, I'm bringing it up because time is of the essence here. We cannot wait.
Excellent point. That's why I'm suggesting we need Trump's legal team to unleash us for this type of ground game if necessary. We don't want to do this in a witch hunt manner. You and I and all here know that this is the righteous path.
Very interesting thanks for reporting
Criteria looks like this https://i.maga.host/wQynrP6.png
https://badgervoters.wi.gov/
No clue why it doesn't show up; we'll have to be vigilant not to assume that we know what the data represents or that it is always accurate
Yeah puzzling. The funny thing is-- assuming you wanted to regularly ETL the data from WI in order to keep your own database current, you would theoretically have to pay $12.5K each time
Legit, am Milwaukee resident who voted absentee, found my name
There was another pede on here a couple days ago looking for this info. Someone directed him to where to purchase. If you are not that guy it would me good to get you two in contact. Search isnt functional so i couldnt locate the previous post.
Does anyone have it?
I did see this one and have chatted with him already a bit
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpYiRaBK/
...
You can do that?
Bless you
Although these rats should be making this info publicly available,
Thank you, pede. You're an American hero.
1033 People registered to vote Jan 1, 1918. Just shy of 103 years ago. They all voted absentee. 303 of those did not vote absentee at all between beginning of pandemic AND november 2016. (Excluding military and permanently overseas).
I checked into some of these and it just looks like really shit recordkeeping. These people are 40 years old, but for some reason registered with no record of where/when and they defaulted to 1918, and no requested location.
You might find this thread interesting if you haven't seen it:
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/288853138#p288853138
and the video linked in there and the timestamp ranges
Thanks for the links!
u/bear__aware how do we buy absentee records?
A post explaining how to do this would be AMAZING so we can all chip in and buy some and share the data in the comments of that post
Relatively self-explanatory if you go here https://elections.wi.gov/clerks/svrs/voter-data -> https://badgervoters.wi.gov/
Otherwise check back on this page, the full data may eventually come along https://wiki.audittheelection.com/index.php/Datasets
Wait - isn't the law that if you vote in person, it overrides and invalidates a mail-in ballot?
There's nothing keeping them from filling out pro-Biden absentee ballots, and if someone votes in person, the absentee gets cancelled.
Kinda funny (but not "Ha Ha" funny) that we have "Gurpreet Singh", "Sandeep Kaur", and "Amandeep Kaur" voting in three wards each, and 141 others with exact name matches voting in two wards.
Downloaded!!! Cannot wait to see! You sir are a hero!
Hey, I found this to be odd in that file. https://i.maga.host/o2SNrHg.png
The application dates are from 07, 15 and 16?
I'll look more into it after work
Why would application dates from '07, '15, and '16 be odd? I think it is fine to submit an application whenever?
Thank you! I love that the number you paid ends in 45.😂
A man with money stops our system from going funny.
Anyone else a previous auditor? I went thru these rolls, according to their records, 250 people voted in person in Milwaukee on election day. Seems a little light for what 70k votes?
Mega pede
So...1039 voter applications with the date 1-1-1918? Some have addresses and phone numbers. Should we look for obituaries and death records, start calling phone numbers asking to speak to the voter and find out if they're alive or if they voted? What's the right thing to do?
I guys are good
Thank you, pede!
So proud of us!
Pede you want so have some of that investment back?