That site can be kind of useful because you can estimate the price for a dataset and it will tell you how many records are in it
Also maybe someone might want to buy the same dataset for 2016 and do historical cross analysis I dunno. Speaking of that:
This dataset is 64,289 records.
Whereas 2016 is 139,757 records.
Why such a huge difference? I have heard people talking about low turnout in Milwaukee but I don't know what it could mean. Also you never know when they are making errors or "glitches" or tabulate things in some dumb way. But could be meaningful
Wow good point. I have mostly been thinking along the lines of people who relocated to other states but your never-voter hypothesis is terrific
Btw the data comes from here: https://badgervoters.wi.gov/
That site can be kind of useful because you can estimate the price for a dataset and it will tell you how many records are in it
Also maybe someone might want to buy the same dataset for 2016 and do historical cross analysis I dunno. Speaking of that:
This dataset is 64,289 records.
Whereas 2016 is 139,757 records.
Why such a huge difference? I have heard people talking about low turnout in Milwaukee but I don't know what it could mean. Also you never know when they are making errors or "glitches" or tabulate things in some dumb way. But could be meaningful
Why does a dataset have to be purchased????
It is a public record, the data made using our tax dollars.
It costs no money for them to provide a download.
What IT company is pocketing this money under the pretense of IT costs???
This data should be free for anyone to download.
AT&T? Seems they have their fingers in everything.
https://redstate.com/neil_stevens/2018/01/25/att-wins-huge-nsa-contract-n83556 This was back in 2018..