Pure gaslighting.
The massive undervote pattern doesnt apply to absentee, provisional ballots, in person voting, election day voting, early night mail in votes, then the other issue is that they are regionally constricted to where joe biden needs it as well lol
they too only happen where dems block the GOP from observing the count properly or at all, only in urban centers infamours for election fraud, where democrats have been caught in the past to rigg elections and on the state level the mail in votes in other areas don't show that pattern either
You never get a 98% or 99% turnout in an honest election. You just don't.Voting is compulsory in Gabon, but it is not enforced; even in Australia where it is enforced, where you can vote by post or online and can be fined for not voting, turnout only reaches 90-95%.
Joe what are you doing?
I once reported on an election in the Niger Delta where some areas had a turnout of more than 120%. "They're very healthy people round here, and very civic-minded," a local official assured me.
Joe Got 100% routinely, 200% in many wards of the counties infamous for ballot stuffing
A high turnout in specific areas
Even where the turnout is within the bounds of possibility, if the figure is wildly different from the turnout elsewhere, it serves as a warning.
Why would one particular area, or one individual polling station, have a 90% turnout, while most other areas register less than 70%?
Exactly joe. Why did blacks in Illinois not give a fuck but blacks in Detroit did at such extreme rates?
Large numbers of invalid votes
We got a large number of valid mail in votes in comparsion to other elections
Results that don't match Mobile phones have made elections much more transparent.
It is now standard practice to allow party agents, observers and sometimes even voters to watch the counting process and take photographs of the results sheet with their phones.
They then have proof of the genuine results from their area ‒ just in case the ones announced later by the electoral commission don't match.
It has clearly taken crooked politicians some time to catch up with the fact that people will now know if they change the results.
Just glitches
Delay in announcing results Finally something that is not necessarily a sign of rigging, but it is often assumed to be so.
This is a point I was making to somebody yesterday. State boundaries can indirectly affect the way people behave, but soft boundaries are not like the Berlin Wall. The cultures, priorities, socioeconomic conditions, and broad political tendencies almost always bleed across state lines, such that places like Eastern Ohio and Western Pennsylvania should have similar voting patterns.
Notice the language "it's common" oh yeah how fucking common exactly is it? Not common anywhere near to the numbers we are seeing.
Then they throw in the "Journalists say" okay that makes it true now, journalist would never lie.
They really take us for assholes thinking we believe their bullshit headlines are evidence but meanwhile we have video of numbers of massive amounts of cheating and they cover their eyes ears and mouths.
It's common for assholes like jack to actually begin believing their own fake polls so badly that they massively under cheat and say oh shit let me fill out 169,000 ballots for one candidate at 4am
Oh, like it's completely consistent to hate Trump and the republican party so much that when it comes time to vote, you completely disregard the house and senate candidates.. because.. okay.
Ballot harvesting. Done by very low IQ individuals that paid a guy 10 bucks to just fill in Joe on the ballot, because they didn't know what they were doing. Sucks to be them right now. DNC is going to give them shit for a long time. It's like in the classic bad vs good stories when the minions are so retarded they screw up the evil guys plans.
Whats funny about this is, that there are no credible sources for these claims. This has to be the dumbest explanation yet. In a blind test, im willing to bet $1,000 that a groupd of 10 monkeys would fill in every bubble with a pen before they started stabbing each other.
bullshit, it's human nature to want to fill in as many of those little boxes as you can. I especially don't believe actual democrat voters only fill in president, because they made a major push for voting left down the ballot after Obama got blocked in his terms. And they made another huge push for it in the 2018 midterms.
Republicans might only vote for Trump, but liberals aren't just voting for Biden.
That. I'm in OK and found at least a dozen Kendra Horn signs (and over one hundred different Bice signs!), But I saw two Biden signs. Two signs and one bumper sticker. I'm doubtful that Democrats in other states are significantly more driven to vote Biden compared to local positions.
For the first few elections when I could vote (in the 80s) I disliked the candidates enough I only voted for local initiatives (I missed Reagan, and the idea of electing a former CIA director - get real). Trump was the first one I didn't just vote for because 'the other guy was worse'.
I wanted Trump to bring his unique brand of shit-kicking into the White House. I wasn't disappointed. Hell, it even made up for me being 2 years younger than being able to vote for Ronald in 1984. This so-called 'election' is the perfect stage to create more havoc than I ever dreamed of.
And if he goes full wrecking ball ala Styxenhammer's suggestions - woah momma.
Yes, I want 4 more years - but this has been stunning every day - and will be right up to my birthday (Jan 20 - yes every 4 years I've had it spoiled by all the bozos sworn in - until Trump).
I purposely went down the ballot selecting every single candidate I wanted, because I knew it would be too easy for them if I just filled in the R party circle.
Even years ago when I was still plugged in to the matrix and I had no idea just how bad the Democrat party is I would still cast a vote for every office. My first time voting was to re-elect W. I liked him because of his funny cowboy personality and I felt sympathetic for all the bad press he got, and all my whiny annoying friends (I would later learn these people are "liberals") hated him. Also, John Kerry is a creepy man who looks like Frankenstein's monster.
This was how I decided who to vote for President in my first election: looks and personality. I literally didn't know who was who in the down ballot elections so I voted like it was a beauty contest, judging the candidates by their thumbnail portrait on my ballot guide and by how much I liked their name. But I still voted and filled the whole ballot out. I was a lazy and ignorant citizen but it never occurred to me to ONLY vote for the President.
How many ballots like this are for just Trump and nobody else? It should be at least similar right? Funny how these statistical anomalies always seem to benefit Biden...
My grandma did this, I was so annoyed when my mom told me. I'm like wtf Trump's gonna win Ohio anyway, we gotta vote red all the way down! I didn't have a guide but I used my phone to look every candidate up as I voted and texted my wife in the booth next to me who all the Republicans are lol
Let me apply the "AP STYLE GUIDE RULES" to this for you Pedes.
"Fake news asserts, without evidence, that it's common for people to only vote for a presidential candidate on their ballot." SLOPES Fact check: FALSE.
In statistics an event that occurs by random chance less than 5% of the time is classified as a significant event due to how rare it is for it to occur. The chance that upon repeated experimentation the same result comes up makes it uncommon and thus significant.
To only vote for president occurs roughly 3% of the time in all elections up to now.
Somewhere around 15% of all Biden votes did not have a down ballot candidate marked.
I really, really think you should be making big igloos in Minecraft for them. The level of smugness is unbearable. But despite my foreign doomer pessimism, I trust you guys. Thanks to you I've been at peace knowing this isn't over despite what the international media gaslighting wants me to think.
New here....long time lurker. I remember seeing how to post links properly but could never find it back. Assuming this is what you're trying to say.....how does it work to create and post from archived? Kind of confused.
Why do they lie about shit that is so easily verifiable? Probably because most people are too fucking stupid to actually look anything up abs they just accept these headlines gospel.
Yeah. Only about 2 to three percent of the time, and even then there are usually more than just the top line votes recorded.
Last I heard, nearly 18-21% of ballots didn't vote down ballot.
Pure gaslighting. The massive undervote pattern doesnt apply to absentee, provisional ballots, in person voting, election day voting, early night mail in votes, then the other issue is that they are regionally constricted to where joe biden needs it as well lol
they too only happen where dems block the GOP from observing the count properly or at all, only in urban centers infamours for election fraud, where democrats have been caught in the past to rigg elections and on the state level the mail in votes in other areas don't show that pattern either
https://archive.vn/TPTh5
Joe what are you doing?
Joe Got 100% routinely, 200% in many wards of the counties infamous for ballot stuffing
Exactly joe. Why did blacks in Illinois not give a fuck but blacks in Detroit did at such extreme rates?
We got a large number of valid mail in votes in comparsion to other elections
Just glitches
FUCKING days later than other regions
Exactly. I live in Ohio, where we did not see this pattern. Our votes were counted without too many problems in hours.
Michigan is NOT that much different that we are, nor Pennsylvania.
Indeed. As much as we rag on our Michigan neighbors, we're very much alike.
Michigan isn't THAT retarded, only slow....:)
And it isn't about Detroit, because we have Cinci, Cleveland, and Columbus. and to a lesser degree, Toledo.
This is a point I was making to somebody yesterday. State boundaries can indirectly affect the way people behave, but soft boundaries are not like the Berlin Wall. The cultures, priorities, socioeconomic conditions, and broad political tendencies almost always bleed across state lines, such that places like Eastern Ohio and Western Pennsylvania should have similar voting patterns.
The heart of America is based. Thank you Ohio pede.
Absolutely. We are being gas lighted to think that the rabid TDS/Marxists are not going to hand their Presidential candidate the Senate?
Give me a fucking break. This isn't even hard to see at all that it is complete bullshit.
Here. 7000 is considered within the normal range by experts. Biden though had a whopping 60,000!
https://twitter.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1325077538755014656
The inconsistencies just go on and on....
I can't count the number of times I have only voted for president and no one else on a ballot BECAUSE I HAVE NEVER FUCKING DONE IT.
Also just because it's 'usual' doesn't mean it isn't usually fraud.
It's not like democrats cities haven't been rigging things for years, they just never went anywhere close to this far before.
Notice the language "it's common" oh yeah how fucking common exactly is it? Not common anywhere near to the numbers we are seeing.
Then they throw in the "Journalists say" okay that makes it true now, journalist would never lie.
They really take us for assholes thinking we believe their bullshit headlines are evidence but meanwhile we have video of numbers of massive amounts of cheating and they cover their eyes ears and mouths.
And how common that it only happens in the 2 most corrupt cities, which also are in the 2 battlegrounds that decide the election?
Detroit and Philly.
Michigan had a straight party vote bubble in the partisan section on the ballot, which would make Biden-only votes MORE suspicious, not less.
"Journalists report" is a hilarious tagline
Through extensive research they have determined it happens at least one time out of millions of votes every election year!
It's totally common.
You know what else is common, guys?
1,000,000 votes coming in and 99.98% are for Biden.
Super common.
"it's common"
like "sources say"
"Anonymous sources familiar with the thinking of voters say..."
It's common for assholes like jack to actually begin believing their own fake polls so badly that they massively under cheat and say oh shit let me fill out 169,000 ballots for one candidate at 4am
Journalist also reported Biden will sweep the elections and president teunp won’t stand a chance... so fuck journalist
Biden winning has been Debunked. Think Big. Landslide victory.
Oh, like it's completely consistent to hate Trump and the republican party so much that when it comes time to vote, you completely disregard the house and senate candidates.. because.. okay.
I think we need to point out timing though too. Why was it all of the later "found" ballots that only had Joe? What are the odds of that?
Hundreds of thousands of Joe votes with no downballot action?
"Yes"
At this time of night?
"Yes"
In these specific, contested parts of the country?
"Yes"
Localised entirely within dem controlled, access restricted counting areas?
"Yes"
May I see them?
"No"
Ballot harvesting. Done by very low IQ individuals that paid a guy 10 bucks to just fill in Joe on the ballot, because they didn't know what they were doing. Sucks to be them right now. DNC is going to give them shit for a long time. It's like in the classic bad vs good stories when the minions are so retarded they screw up the evil guys plans.
joUrinalists - lol
Biden winning has been DEBUNKED
twitter: it's common for dead people to vote in elections. its fair and a normal part of our democracy.
edit: remember when democrats say "our democracy", they just mean their democracy.
Whats funny about this is, that there are no credible sources for these claims. This has to be the dumbest explanation yet. In a blind test, im willing to bet $1,000 that a groupd of 10 monkeys would fill in every bubble with a pen before they started stabbing each other.
"Official sources have called the election" twitterdrone, believe, we put it right there in blue text!
bullshit, it's human nature to want to fill in as many of those little boxes as you can. I especially don't believe actual democrat voters only fill in president, because they made a major push for voting left down the ballot after Obama got blocked in his terms. And they made another huge push for it in the 2018 midterms.
Republicans might only vote for Trump, but liberals aren't just voting for Biden.
That. I'm in OK and found at least a dozen Kendra Horn signs (and over one hundred different Bice signs!), But I saw two Biden signs. Two signs and one bumper sticker. I'm doubtful that Democrats in other states are significantly more driven to vote Biden compared to local positions.
(!) This claim of being journalists is disputed.
Jack knows the hammer is about to drop on his company
MC HAMMER
(!) This claim of election fraud is disputed
Is it common for ONE person to do this thousands of times? Probably in Dem shitholes.
Like hell.
For the first few elections when I could vote (in the 80s) I disliked the candidates enough I only voted for local initiatives (I missed Reagan, and the idea of electing a former CIA director - get real). Trump was the first one I didn't just vote for because 'the other guy was worse'.
I wanted Trump to bring his unique brand of shit-kicking into the White House. I wasn't disappointed. Hell, it even made up for me being 2 years younger than being able to vote for Ronald in 1984. This so-called 'election' is the perfect stage to create more havoc than I ever dreamed of.
And if he goes full wrecking ball ala Styxenhammer's suggestions - woah momma.
Yes, I want 4 more years - but this has been stunning every day - and will be right up to my birthday (Jan 20 - yes every 4 years I've had it spoiled by all the bozos sworn in - until Trump).
I purposely went down the ballot selecting every single candidate I wanted, because I knew it would be too easy for them if I just filled in the R party circle.
SAME HERE
Same
They are losing the narrative already and it is only Monday.
It accounts for 1-2% normally. Now we're seeing 15% in PA alone.
Yeah, "common" since NOW apparently.
Didn't you know? There have been 46.500.000.000 genders all along too!
Yes, it is common, on dead of night ballots when thousands are needed and there's no time to spare on down-ballot candidates.
It’s not. :-)
"Journalists report" is NewSpeak for "Propagandists say" or "Liars lie"
gaslight city. How fucking hard do they think it is to compare the numbers this year with years past? My god they are panicking. Sloppy propaganda.
Oh well if journalists say so...
These mother fuckers are using themselves as sources.
Media gets the gallows
This is a lie, and everyone knows it. Try again.
Twitter and Facebook just gaslight the American public and the Dems are the enablers!!!
Without evidence
I am really wondering what made him a traitor? Money? Communism?
And how can all this media get away with it? And what can we do about this?
They must have made a deal with biden. If trump wins, they know they're fucked.
Even years ago when I was still plugged in to the matrix and I had no idea just how bad the Democrat party is I would still cast a vote for every office. My first time voting was to re-elect W. I liked him because of his funny cowboy personality and I felt sympathetic for all the bad press he got, and all my whiny annoying friends (I would later learn these people are "liberals") hated him. Also, John Kerry is a creepy man who looks like Frankenstein's monster.
This was how I decided who to vote for President in my first election: looks and personality. I literally didn't know who was who in the down ballot elections so I voted like it was a beauty contest, judging the candidates by their thumbnail portrait on my ballot guide and by how much I liked their name. But I still voted and filled the whole ballot out. I was a lazy and ignorant citizen but it never occurred to me to ONLY vote for the President.
Yeah it’s common on all the votes they’ve fabricated in the past
How many ballots like this are for just Trump and nobody else? It should be at least similar right? Funny how these statistical anomalies always seem to benefit Biden...
If it is common why didn't it happen as much in all other states... Common is a tricky word
Wooooow...common on fraudulent ballots
My grandma did this, I was so annoyed when my mom told me. I'm like wtf Trump's gonna win Ohio anyway, we gotta vote red all the way down! I didn't have a guide but I used my phone to look every candidate up as I voted and texted my wife in the booth next to me who all the Republicans are lol
It’s also common for the media sycophants dedicated to aiding and abetting a coup to run cover for those seizing power.
Let me apply the "AP STYLE GUIDE RULES" to this for you Pedes.
"Fake news asserts, without evidence, that it's common for people to only vote for a presidential candidate on their ballot." SLOPES Fact check: FALSE.
In statistics an event that occurs by random chance less than 5% of the time is classified as a significant event due to how rare it is for it to occur. The chance that upon repeated experimentation the same result comes up makes it uncommon and thus significant.
To only vote for president occurs roughly 3% of the time in all elections up to now.
Somewhere around 15% of all Biden votes did not have a down ballot candidate marked.
I really, really think you should be making big igloos in Minecraft for them. The level of smugness is unbearable. But despite my foreign doomer pessimism, I trust you guys. Thanks to you I've been at peace knowing this isn't over despite what the international media gaslighting wants me to think.
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2020/10/21/large-shares-of-voters-plan-to-vote-a-straight-party-ticket-for-president-senate-and-house/
Funny.....Pew says it's very uncommon and has the polls to back it
https://archive.is/9onyu
New here....long time lurker. I remember seeing how to post links properly but could never find it back. Assuming this is what you're trying to say.....how does it work to create and post from archived? Kind of confused.
Do you mean how to archive articles?
If so, just go here: https://archive.is
Paste a url in the top (red) box. Let it do its thing.
Then when it's done, it will poop out an archived page.
Then just copy the URL in the address bar, then you are good.
Is that what you were asking?
Yep. Thanks bro
Why do they lie about shit that is so easily verifiable? Probably because most people are too fucking stupid to actually look anything up abs they just accept these headlines gospel.
Not for Trump it isn’t. No Trump supporter would vote R down the ballot and not fill in Trump
"Journalists report that journalists always tell the truth."
Well, compare across states, and is there a discrepancy between in-person and absentee? Did Dems who voted in person just vote for prez?
EASY ENOUGH TO CHECK.
Yeah, so the whole Blue Wave 2018 campaign was all in my head, huh Jack?