We can do both. We can challenge the fraud AND gear up for a critically important election. But you're talking about losing to progressives ON PURPOSE.
He said he disagrees that we should vote for them, and later, he says about consequences. I'm saying I agree there should be consequences, but that should involve a primary challenge: not letting progressives win.
If we don't support our candidates in Georgia, then we will be trading away Swampy cuckservatives in exchange for socialist rule of America.
We can do both. We can challenge the fraud AND gear up for a critically important election. But you're talking about losing to progressives ON PURPOSE.
Where did he say he wants to lose to progressives on purpose?
He said he disagrees that we should vote for them, and later, he says about consequences. I'm saying I agree there should be consequences, but that should involve a primary challenge: not letting progressives win.
If we don't support our candidates in Georgia, then we will be trading away Swampy cuckservatives in exchange for socialist rule of America.