It's called genie inequality you bigot. Because of your unconscious bias towards white male privileged genies you failed to understand their pain and suffering of being shackled for 1000 of years.
We must come together and distribute the genie wishes across the table so everyone has their fair share of wishes.
"Yep, your kindergarten teacher was so nice to push you through despite your inability to do the 4 panel cause effect assignments." Which gives me a damning good idea for a meme.
Thats what im saying all these ppl have no understanding how thus country works. These ppl think if the media calls it its over..... That shows how little they understand about the process. They keep rubbing it in my face and i just keep saying just wait...... Im my boof in my pants when trump exposes this.
"That vertical jump was just the mail-in ballots being added to Biden's total. Never mind that they spent the next 3 days continuing to count mail-in ballots without a similar vertical jump, or that it happened at 4am when counting was supposedly halted, or that it's statistically impossible that Biden would receive 130,000+ mail-in votes in a batch without Trump receiving even a single one, or that..."
If this election had happened in some third-world dictatorship, there wouldn't be a single person saying it looked legitimate. The UN would be dispatching observers and demanding a do-over. But because it's America, everyone buries their head in the sand and insists that fraud simply can't happen here, despite Democrats actively resisting absolutely any precautions against fraud being implemented because "muh voter suppression!" The simple fact that the aptly-named "Dominion" tabulation software has been shown in at least two instances to have "glitched" and given Trump votes to Biden should be grounds enough to completely void the results.
I know. Your quote included it and this thread in general is on Philadelphia. I’m pro-Trump and have worked with Dominion before. I want to make sure pedes are informed
An even bigger coincidence is that Montgomery County at the top of the list of anomalies is represented by Madeleine Dean who also sits on the House Judiciary providing FBI oversite AND she voted for impeachment knowing it was a hoax.
And that Kathy Barnette, a Black woman who had signs everywhere and tons of events, lost to Madeline Dean. I maybe saw one Madeline Dean sign.
They memory holed Kathy's Facebook page already too.
Another weird thing is that people in the first half of the alphabet had to wait in 1.5 h lines while no wait for the second half. Not sure if this happened elsewhere, but it seemed like both lines should be of a similar length.
The person overseeing me feeding the ballot into the machine made some comment to not use the privacy folder when feeding the ballot and that she wouldn't look. The video instructions said to keep the ballot covered. I was allowed to feed the ballot in upside down.
Yep, I easily saw 50 Barnette signs for every Dean sign. I must live in an area surrounded by white supremacists...actually The Main Line where Dean gets all her support is loaded with elitist bigots
IIRC there were precincts in 2012 in Philadelphia where Obama got 100%, not 99% or 95%, but 100% of the vote over Romney and nothing was ever made of it.
Because the Republicans used to give up. It was like they looked at the whole thing as pro wrestling...I honestly wonder if Trump’s real sin isn’t that he is such an outsider that he didn’t realize it was all supposed to be fake and he showed up playing the game for real and they don’t know how to deal with it.
Because that is the political theater that Trump threatens to up end. This has gone on for decades. They yell and insult on camera and then have dinner together hours later while their wives boyfriends fuck them in the back bedroom.
Its the same thing we've been saying all along. Biden vote counts are a statistical improbability but he went even further to identify 10 suspect (and 4 extremely suspect counties) where the cheating occurred.
This is just my first pass and I'm by no means a data expert, so someone else please verify that I interpreted the report correctly in my summary. Some areas confused me, like the 6th and 7th graphs, which even in my highly advanced 81 IQ mind was word salad.
First graph: They point out that it is rather interesting that contested Allegheny county "found" ~32k more ballots for Biden than any Dem has ever gotten, while securely blue Philadelphia county "lost" ~31k ballots. Almost like votes from "reliably won" areas were siphoned into "oh shit we're losing" areas.
Second and third graph: There's very little differential between this election and previous, in terms of voting patterns. For a "Biden blowout" you'd expect unprecedented voter turnout across the board, but curiously, the few counties that deviate within reason from the norm show lower-than-average, antipathic / unenthusiastic turnout for Biden compared to past Democrats.
Despite this, there are giant "spikes" where unusual outlier votes for Biden just suddenly show up. In essence, you'd expect a steady upward curve for Biden to have won, but the actual data is a downward curve with randomly placed, mountainous leaps straight up to offset the overall loser trend.
Fourth graph: From Obama to Hillary we saw a huge drop in blue voters, and given how much excitement there was for Obama (muh first clean and articulate black president, etc.) compared to Hillary, and then comparing how little excitement from Hillary to Biden (at least she actually TRIED to GOTV and campaign in a few states...), you'd expect a similar plummet.
Instead, the data shows that Biden was apparently VASTLY MORE POPULAR than Obama, despite generating nothing even in the same ballpark in terms of excitement and turnout.
Several of the contested counties had turnouts higher than the maximum increases in turnout that Obama saw -- phrased another way, every county that Obama blew out the vote and set new records never seen before? Biden beat him by a mile... but only in different counties which reliably never swing that dramatically.
(This also incidentally disservices the idea that the new bloc of Biden votes were allegedly "anybody-but-Trump" votes, because if so we would have seen some evidence of building up to that in Hillary voters.)
Fifth graph: In ALL counties, Biden won a vastly larger share of the vote than there are registered Democrats. It is unprecedented (by now you're probably tired of that word) for a Democrat to turn out that many more Democrat votes than there are Democrats to vote for him. A few hundred, maybe a thousand or so vote-flippers from Republican and Independent to Democrat, sure, but not only is that normally offset by a comparable number of reverse conversions, but it is unheard of for a net profit of tens of thousands (~38k) voters to suddenly abandon their core party principles and vote for the other guy like that.
Sixth and seventh graph: Essentially, just plotting out that approximately 70% of registered D voters voted for Biden, which is unusual, but not outlandish -- except in the contested counties, which were 76%+. It may not seem like much, but a +6% increase is HUGE DEVIATION in terms of realistic turnout.
It's fascinating to note that they had to drop Philly and Allegheny to keep the chart "unbiased", otherwise the chart would get ridiculously fucked up by including those outliers. You should NEVER have to drop data to fit a graph -- when that happens, either your sampling method is fucked up (unlikely, since these are all counties in the same area), or the data itself has been massaged (aka fraud.)
In relatable terms, it'd be like trying to plot a 1000-point graph of average annual income in America, and having for your sample 998 regular guys making $20-$100k a year, and then just for giggles, some asshole decided to include Jeff Bezos and Warren Buffet as the last two data points in the "blind" sample. (So now the average annual income for guys like you and me is several hundred million a year, woohoo!)
To directly quote the issue here: "The conclusion is that in these ten suspect counties, 76% of PA registered Democratic voters supposedly voted. We have something of a contradiction. In counties that delivered increase votes for Biden a higher proportion of registered Democrat voters voted than otherwise in the state (which was 70%±)."
Eighth chart: Benford's Law. Buckle up and obey the number limit, it's the Law.
It's a mathematical certainty used in accounting and data entry to check for fraud and make sure nobody is fucking around and just entering random blurbs to populate the data. In essence, hard disciplines that deal with numbers regularly are "biased" towards certain numbers, like "1" being overwhelmingly the leading digit of any column (it's weird but makes sense, the majority of large numbers will on average start with 1 as the "overflow digit"), and this is so reliable that auditors can always tell when random number generation or manual manipulation is involved because it DOESN'T follow Benford's Law.
Which... Biden's vote tallies don't. If the IRS were looking at Biden's votes, they'd be flagging that shit for a full audit because it doesn't pass the sniff test. (The vote totals, not championship sniffer Biden himself.)
Benford test can easily fail just from the polling locations being mostly similarly sized. It's not a good test, it won't detect systemic cheating like +100 in every precinct across the board, or a counter throwing out all the Trump ballots, or a single huge fraud in one field.
The other report is much better especially the chart with Chester county. A county with more republicans that went big for Biden - no way. I bet they just swapped the Biden/Trump results so Biden got Trump's votes.
Obama who said Trump would never be President who now has to watch Trump destroy the DNC and undo everything Obama did in half the time it took him and outvote him in his prime with the entire system fighting him.
Mobile site was a pain in the ass to navigate, so here's the Summary:
(located on the last page of the document)
Philadelphia and Allegheny Counties are unusual. They have high Democratic registration. Allegheny precinct votes fail the Benford Law* test (a standard voter fraud method) whereas Trump does not
The votes for Biden are unusually high for eleven counties, reporting over 299,000 votes in excess of expectations. These deviations are legitimate reasons to insist on closely monitored recounts.
70%± of registered PA Democrat voters vote in a national election. After elimination of Allegheny County, 76% of PA registered Democratic voters voted in the nine suspect counties. That is a unexpected statistical aberration.
Another way to track down fraudulent votes is to look closely at how many of the votes did little or no down-ticket voting. When manufacturing votes, it is too time consuming to vote for other office holders
Thank you. Using a desktop computer I'm discovering there are so many smartphone zombies out there the Internet itself is becoming difficult to navigate. Since I had a hand in creating it the first time around, I think I'll start building a new Internet that -- specifically -- doesn't work on smartphones. They'll only get a blank page. Like old USENET discussion the average IQ will be immense.
Ah well to be fair, the website itself was beautiful. The annoying parts were the exclusive mobile scrolling ads and the lock of full features behind an app that you have to download and pay a subscription for.
Here's a tip for the web devs that are trying to reduce navigation difficulty:
As long as you don't intentionally neuter mobile functionality for the sole reason of selling more app supscriptions, you will probably be A-OK
You're right of course. But I'd still like to play the rabid old geezer who emerges from nowhere and starts breaking kids' toys with websites that are faster loading than fast-loading apps simply because they don't throb and attack the back end with 100 parallel loads and recursive dependencies. "Internet, just like it used to be, with no arr-tee-ficial preservatives!"
Soooo.... can we officially call it bullshit?!?!?! I can only imagine the courts saying, okay so i flip a coin 100 times and get heads, it's still not proof.
The law has to give room to credible statistical analysis as proof. Today's world is ruled by software that works in the unseen shadows of the cyberweb. You cannot pressure a software that changes day-by-day to give up it's secrets!
someone needs to make the #CoinFlipChallenge go viral. Try and record yourself flipping coin, if you get to say, 5, dye your hair pink and scream high score! Challenge others to beat that, maybe have a prize pool if someone can get to 100....have all the idiots who flipped water bottles be proving the statistical anomalies.
All the people on earth could try this for the rest of their entire loves and statistically there is not even a remote chance it would happen. Numbers are cool.
People need to look at the history of the Tartaglione crime family in Philadelphia.
Marge Tartaglione was an icon in Philly politics, having been elected for 40 consecutive years to the City Commissions Office, making history for women. She also made history by receiving more cumulative votes than anyone in the history of Philadelphia. In her tenure as city commissioner, she success-fully implemented computerized voting without a glitch. She also loved her employees very much and protected them fiercely. She served the Democratic party for 52 years as an elected ward leader, committee person, state committee person and served with the national committee.
One last thing about Philadelphia, how did two guys show up with guns and fake ballots driving a hummer, get caught, and no one talks about the story. IMHO- they are related.
My guess is they will(the dems) will say oops we messed up the count to keep from letting it get out ...thats If trump and we keep ighting to the courts because the fraud they had to have committed is so huge that if exposed would destroy the dem party for years. Thats what i think needs to happen.
For those who are interested, it’s called a binomial distribution. What it is analogous to is flipping a coin, which may not be a fair coin, some number of times and counting the number of heads that occurs. So, if I flipped a fair coin twice and counted the number of heads, the chance of getting 0 heads is 25%, chance of 1 is 50%, and chance of 2 is 25%.
How do we counter the argument, "Trump told people to show up on Election Day, while Dems encouraged voting by mail/absentee. That's why the mail ins skewed so much toward Trump"?
I am not a concern troll. I just have liberal friends and family who are willing to talk to me about the voter fraud.
It is not just philly, but Allegheny county. Please someone look at this seriously.
Why did Allegheny county in pennsylvania add about 130k votes at a ratio of 5:1 towards biden (or 104k total for biden) on 13 instances from nov 4 - nov 6.
these are at a nearly exact rate of .8 while the county as a whole averages low to mid .7 130k votes at an EXACT ratio of .8 come on man.
Why do people keep using analogies of coin flips? Coin flips are random, voting isn't. You could ask people if they would rather be shot or get a cookie and 100% will pick the cookie, has nothing to do with a coin landing heads 100% of the time.
The issue is proving all of this. We all know they cheated but it’s on the lawyers to prove it. The left will just say well the numbers are up because of muh division and covid.
As much as I hate to say it statistical abnormality isnt proof. We have to show it with hard evidence. Fortunately, this seems to be so wide-spread that I think it shouldn't be that hard to prove.
SHOCKER! No one saw this coming! Maybe the populace will do something about it in the weeks and monrhs following the election. The populace. Not the people in government we asked to stop and prevent this. BRILLIANT IDEA!
This happened to me. After 100 flips and got heads, the Genie granted me 138K empty ballots.
That's it? The genie didn't give you 3 wishes or anything? What a ripoff
Three states.
But two terms will beat three states.
Doing the lords work things move so fast around here it's good we keep each other posted.
Philadelphia uses ES&S, not Dominion
It's called genie inequality you bigot. Because of your unconscious bias towards white male privileged genies you failed to understand their pain and suffering of being shackled for 1000 of years.
We must come together and distribute the genie wishes across the table so everyone has their fair share of wishes.
Or some shit like that
If you rub your nipples counter-clockwise while doing this it is said you can gain an extra 50k out of it.
I'm gonna coooooom
Ooooooooffff.......meeee toooooooooo.....bin
Did that, now they are protruding in a very disrespectful way.
That you Cuomo?
MASSIVELY underrated.
I heard you get 100 ballots per stocking during Christmas.
Ok Barney Frank. Now I know why your nipples are protruding disrespectfully.
That's where he's been. Hunter knew it!!
He gave you 138k ballouts out of 100k available.a true genie when you can pop 38k ballouts out of nowhere
Nah, you wished for 3 more wishes so you could wish for ballots every night.
LOL
They won’t accept it. It’ll be back to Orange Dictator.
They’ve called Trump a dictator this whole time, so if they wanna run with it again, fuck em.
But wow, it’s wild... Trump must be the first dictator in world history to lose a rigged election.
He's not ugly as fuck take that back. In his prime he was beautiful.
He's still beautiful!! Be still my beating heart - I love strong men - and that dgaf what you think attitude woohoo!
He’s curvy and sassy dammit
He is a cheeto, but not a cheater. Plus he is delicious.
How dare you sir. The sun pales in comparison to the orange light from our dude.
who the fuck cares what they think
Don’t focus on maths. Focus on the “smell”
How could Joe Biden break Obama’s 2008 record but still not actually win by very much at all ... I don’t get it
When Obama won in 2008 he gained seats everywhere but Joe’s gone backwards everywhere.
It’s weird. More Black people voted for some old white guy than Hope & Change Obama.
"Yep, your kindergarten teacher was so nice to push you through despite your inability to do the 4 panel cause effect assignments." Which gives me a damning good idea for a meme.
Thats what im saying all these ppl have no understanding how thus country works. These ppl think if the media calls it its over..... That shows how little they understand about the process. They keep rubbing it in my face and i just keep saying just wait...... Im my boof in my pants when trump exposes this.
"That vertical jump was just the mail-in ballots being added to Biden's total. Never mind that they spent the next 3 days continuing to count mail-in ballots without a similar vertical jump, or that it happened at 4am when counting was supposedly halted, or that it's statistically impossible that Biden would receive 130,000+ mail-in votes in a batch without Trump receiving even a single one, or that..."
If this election had happened in some third-world dictatorship, there wouldn't be a single person saying it looked legitimate. The UN would be dispatching observers and demanding a do-over. But because it's America, everyone buries their head in the sand and insists that fraud simply can't happen here, despite Democrats actively resisting absolutely any precautions against fraud being implemented because "muh voter suppression!" The simple fact that the aptly-named "Dominion" tabulation software has been shown in at least two instances to have "glitched" and given Trump votes to Biden should be grounds enough to completely void the results.
I’ve mentioned in another comment. Philadelphia uses ES&S, not Dominion
I...never said it did.
I know. Your quote included it and this thread in general is on Philadelphia. I’m pro-Trump and have worked with Dominion before. I want to make sure pedes are informed
The willingly retarded believe that.
What an amazing coincidence that all these weighted coins are weighted to the left. Conservatives are so unlucky.
An even bigger coincidence is that Montgomery County at the top of the list of anomalies is represented by Madeleine Dean who also sits on the House Judiciary providing FBI oversite AND she voted for impeachment knowing it was a hoax.
Just #DemPrivilege type of shit
And that Kathy Barnette, a Black woman who had signs everywhere and tons of events, lost to Madeline Dean. I maybe saw one Madeline Dean sign.
They memory holed Kathy's Facebook page already too.
Another weird thing is that people in the first half of the alphabet had to wait in 1.5 h lines while no wait for the second half. Not sure if this happened elsewhere, but it seemed like both lines should be of a similar length.
The person overseeing me feeding the ballot into the machine made some comment to not use the privacy folder when feeding the ballot and that she wouldn't look. The video instructions said to keep the ballot covered. I was allowed to feed the ballot in upside down.
Yep, I easily saw 50 Barnette signs for every Dean sign. I must live in an area surrounded by white supremacists...actually The Main Line where Dean gets all her support is loaded with elitist bigots
IIRC there were precincts in 2012 in Philadelphia where Obama got 100%, not 99% or 95%, but 100% of the vote over Romney and nothing was ever made of it.
Luckily Trump isn’t the cuck that Romney is.
Romney is happy to bend over and take it!
Before 2016 Trump could have said “Mitt, drop to your knees” and he would have dropped to his knees
Because the Republicans used to give up. It was like they looked at the whole thing as pro wrestling...I honestly wonder if Trump’s real sin isn’t that he is such an outsider that he didn’t realize it was all supposed to be fake and he showed up playing the game for real and they don’t know how to deal with it.
Yeah and this time there's 70 million patriots fucking fed up with the cheating.
Because that is the political theater that Trump threatens to up end. This has gone on for decades. They yell and insult on camera and then have dinner together hours later while their wives boyfriends fuck them in the back bedroom.
2012 was an absolute sham election, and I'm certain Obama cheated
The danger in a statistic like that, is you only need to find one registered person in the county that says “I didn’t”
Riggers going to rig. Word!
The chance of getting heads 100 times in a row is 1 in 7^31.
If it were 1 in 7,000 that would be nuts. But it's higher than that.
It's not 1 in 7 million...
It's not 1 in 7 billion...
It's not even 1 in 7 trillion
Not 1 in 7 quadrillion, quintillion, sextillion, septillion, octillion or nonillion either.
It's not 1 in 7 decillion...
Not 1 in 7 tredecillion
It's almost 1 in 7 duodecillion... but it's actually:
1 in 700 duodecillion chance
Or 1 in 700000000000000000000000000000000000000000
It is settled then, Biden won. /$
Liberals on reddit and twitter:
"So TECHNICALLY there is a chance!!"
For context, that is the same probability of picking randomly the same atom in your body twice, and then do that again 1000 times.
So this, my friends, is why math is racist.
What’s the ebonics equivalent of math?
Maff
So you're saying it's not impossible? This proves that Trump is just a poor loser to demand recounts! /s
I wish someone would give me head 100 times, that's more plausible then this shitshow of an election.
...kamala enters the room
OK monkey paw, I take it back!
Followed by Barry
There's actually a way to flip coins and always get the same result. It's called cheating.
I have an IQ of 80, man. Can you break down what all those graphs mean?
Its the same thing we've been saying all along. Biden vote counts are a statistical improbability but he went even further to identify 10 suspect (and 4 extremely suspect counties) where the cheating occurred.
It’s gonna take more than that to flip some of these things in court. I hope (and suspect) they’ve got more actual evidence
Those voters in those counties need to be polled by phone, and any trump voters need to asked if they'll go on record.
This is just my first pass and I'm by no means a data expert, so someone else please verify that I interpreted the report correctly in my summary. Some areas confused me, like the 6th and 7th graphs, which even in my highly advanced 81 IQ mind was word salad.
First graph: They point out that it is rather interesting that contested Allegheny county "found" ~32k more ballots for Biden than any Dem has ever gotten, while securely blue Philadelphia county "lost" ~31k ballots. Almost like votes from "reliably won" areas were siphoned into "oh shit we're losing" areas.
Second and third graph: There's very little differential between this election and previous, in terms of voting patterns. For a "Biden blowout" you'd expect unprecedented voter turnout across the board, but curiously, the few counties that deviate within reason from the norm show lower-than-average, antipathic / unenthusiastic turnout for Biden compared to past Democrats.
Despite this, there are giant "spikes" where unusual outlier votes for Biden just suddenly show up. In essence, you'd expect a steady upward curve for Biden to have won, but the actual data is a downward curve with randomly placed, mountainous leaps straight up to offset the overall loser trend.
Fourth graph: From Obama to Hillary we saw a huge drop in blue voters, and given how much excitement there was for Obama (muh first clean and articulate black president, etc.) compared to Hillary, and then comparing how little excitement from Hillary to Biden (at least she actually TRIED to GOTV and campaign in a few states...), you'd expect a similar plummet.
Instead, the data shows that Biden was apparently VASTLY MORE POPULAR than Obama, despite generating nothing even in the same ballpark in terms of excitement and turnout.
Several of the contested counties had turnouts higher than the maximum increases in turnout that Obama saw -- phrased another way, every county that Obama blew out the vote and set new records never seen before? Biden beat him by a mile... but only in different counties which reliably never swing that dramatically.
(This also incidentally disservices the idea that the new bloc of Biden votes were allegedly "anybody-but-Trump" votes, because if so we would have seen some evidence of building up to that in Hillary voters.)
Fifth graph: In ALL counties, Biden won a vastly larger share of the vote than there are registered Democrats. It is unprecedented (by now you're probably tired of that word) for a Democrat to turn out that many more Democrat votes than there are Democrats to vote for him. A few hundred, maybe a thousand or so vote-flippers from Republican and Independent to Democrat, sure, but not only is that normally offset by a comparable number of reverse conversions, but it is unheard of for a net profit of tens of thousands (~38k) voters to suddenly abandon their core party principles and vote for the other guy like that.
Sixth and seventh graph: Essentially, just plotting out that approximately 70% of registered D voters voted for Biden, which is unusual, but not outlandish -- except in the contested counties, which were 76%+. It may not seem like much, but a +6% increase is HUGE DEVIATION in terms of realistic turnout.
It's fascinating to note that they had to drop Philly and Allegheny to keep the chart "unbiased", otherwise the chart would get ridiculously fucked up by including those outliers. You should NEVER have to drop data to fit a graph -- when that happens, either your sampling method is fucked up (unlikely, since these are all counties in the same area), or the data itself has been massaged (aka fraud.)
In relatable terms, it'd be like trying to plot a 1000-point graph of average annual income in America, and having for your sample 998 regular guys making $20-$100k a year, and then just for giggles, some asshole decided to include Jeff Bezos and Warren Buffet as the last two data points in the "blind" sample. (So now the average annual income for guys like you and me is several hundred million a year, woohoo!)
To directly quote the issue here: "The conclusion is that in these ten suspect counties, 76% of PA registered Democratic voters supposedly voted. We have something of a contradiction. In counties that delivered increase votes for Biden a higher proportion of registered Democrat voters voted than otherwise in the state (which was 70%±)."
Eighth chart: Benford's Law. Buckle up and obey the number limit, it's the Law.
It's a mathematical certainty used in accounting and data entry to check for fraud and make sure nobody is fucking around and just entering random blurbs to populate the data. In essence, hard disciplines that deal with numbers regularly are "biased" towards certain numbers, like "1" being overwhelmingly the leading digit of any column (it's weird but makes sense, the majority of large numbers will on average start with 1 as the "overflow digit"), and this is so reliable that auditors can always tell when random number generation or manual manipulation is involved because it DOESN'T follow Benford's Law.
Which... Biden's vote tallies don't. If the IRS were looking at Biden's votes, they'd be flagging that shit for a full audit because it doesn't pass the sniff test. (The vote totals, not championship sniffer Biden himself.)
Benford test can easily fail just from the polling locations being mostly similarly sized. It's not a good test, it won't detect systemic cheating like +100 in every precinct across the board, or a counter throwing out all the Trump ballots, or a single huge fraud in one field.
The other report is much better especially the chart with Chester county. A county with more republicans that went big for Biden - no way. I bet they just swapped the Biden/Trump results so Biden got Trump's votes.
Do you need it in Somalian?
And they did it alone in a locked room and think we are dumb enough to take their word for it.
They've done nothing but lie for four years, and now they think we should trust them to count votes lol
Obama who said Trump would never be President who now has to watch Trump destroy the DNC and undo everything Obama did in half the time it took him and outvote him in his prime with the entire system fighting him.
Hopefully he watches from a prison cell
!00 flips - it landed on edge every time.
Leftists: "And? You have no evidence!"
I mean these are the same people who say that having a penis is not evidence that you are a man.
Mobile site was a pain in the ass to navigate, so here's the Summary: (located on the last page of the document)
Thank you. Using a desktop computer I'm discovering there are so many smartphone zombies out there the Internet itself is becoming difficult to navigate. Since I had a hand in creating it the first time around, I think I'll start building a new Internet that -- specifically -- doesn't work on smartphones. They'll only get a blank page. Like old USENET discussion the average IQ will be immense.
Ah well to be fair, the website itself was beautiful. The annoying parts were the exclusive mobile scrolling ads and the lock of full features behind an app that you have to download and pay a subscription for.
Here's a tip for the web devs that are trying to reduce navigation difficulty: As long as you don't intentionally neuter mobile functionality for the sole reason of selling more app supscriptions, you will probably be A-OK
You're right of course. But I'd still like to play the rabid old geezer who emerges from nowhere and starts breaking kids' toys with websites that are faster loading than fast-loading apps simply because they don't throb and attack the back end with 100 parallel loads and recursive dependencies. "Internet, just like it used to be, with no arr-tee-ficial preservatives!"
Soooo.... can we officially call it bullshit?!?!?! I can only imagine the courts saying, okay so i flip a coin 100 times and get heads, it's still not proof.
The game was honked from the start.
Easy when the coin has heads on both sides..
Someone let the Lutece twins know.
The law has to give room to credible statistical analysis as proof. Today's world is ruled by software that works in the unseen shadows of the cyberweb. You cannot pressure a software that changes day-by-day to give up it's secrets!
In other words, statistically impossible that it's not election fraud? Are we allowed to notice it's widespread yet?
someone needs to make the #CoinFlipChallenge go viral. Try and record yourself flipping coin, if you get to say, 5, dye your hair pink and scream high score! Challenge others to beat that, maybe have a prize pool if someone can get to 100....have all the idiots who flipped water bottles be proving the statistical anomalies.
All the people on earth could try this for the rest of their entire loves and statistically there is not even a remote chance it would happen. Numbers are cool.
I got even luckier when I flipped a coin 100 times and got actual head.
ExpectedBigMike.win
Just like the 9/11 or shuttle challenger report, this needs to be a like 1000 page of evidence report.
🚨🚨🚨🚨
The numbers don’t lie and they spell disaster for Joe in the courts
Mean Value Theorem!
Who put in the voting machines?
People need to look at the history of the Tartaglione crime family in Philadelphia.
Marge Tartaglione was an icon in Philly politics, having been elected for 40 consecutive years to the City Commissions Office, making history for women. She also made history by receiving more cumulative votes than anyone in the history of Philadelphia. In her tenure as city commissioner, she success-fully implemented computerized voting without a glitch. She also loved her employees very much and protected them fiercely. She served the Democratic party for 52 years as an elected ward leader, committee person, state committee person and served with the national committee.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.legacy.com/obituaries/philly/obituary.aspx%3fn=margaret-tartaglione-marge&pid=193367818&fhid=4349
Marge received criticism for mixing politics with elections work — but by all accounts, elections were run without many hiccups under her reign. She said she once wore a wire to help the FBI nab a voting machine vendor who was trying to bribe her with a house at the Jersey shore. https://billypenn.com/2019/07/09/marge-tartaglione-former-philly-city-commissioner-and-political-matriarch-dies-at-86/
Marge Tartaglione is survived by PA Senator: Senator Christine Tartaglione http://www.senatortartaglione.com/about-me
Another Tartaglione’s recent history of corruption. Stole $2 Million. Got 8 years. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.inquirer.com/philly/news/pennsylvania/philadelphia/philadelphia-politico-renee-tartaglione-sentenced-7-years-in-prison-20180712.html%3foutputType=amp
Who else is a famous Tartaglione we know? Oh yeah the steroid using, former cop, murderer that was a cell mate with Epstein. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.lohud.com/amp/2691611001
Nicholas just got the death penalty. Kill the witnesses: For Epstein’s former cell mate, he just got the death penalty on Thursday. https://www.nwfdailynews.com/videos/embed/3213870002/?placement=mobileweb-amp&cst=news%2Flocal%2Fcrime&series=news%2Fcrime&keywords=
Tartaglione is no stranger to crime syndicates: https://aboutthemafia.com/bonanno-family-capo-turned-rat-james-tartaglione-takes-the-stand-at-ny-mafia-trial/
One last thing about Philadelphia, how did two guys show up with guns and fake ballots driving a hummer, get caught, and no one talks about the story. IMHO- they are related.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/11/07/us/pennsylvania-convention-center-arrests/index.html
My guess is they will(the dems) will say oops we messed up the count to keep from letting it get out ...thats If trump and we keep ighting to the courts because the fraud they had to have committed is so huge that if exposed would destroy the dem party for years. Thats what i think needs to happen.
For those who are interested, it’s called a binomial distribution. What it is analogous to is flipping a coin, which may not be a fair coin, some number of times and counting the number of heads that occurs. So, if I flipped a fair coin twice and counted the number of heads, the chance of getting 0 heads is 25%, chance of 1 is 50%, and chance of 2 is 25%.
More like 100,000 times
How do we counter the argument, "Trump told people to show up on Election Day, while Dems encouraged voting by mail/absentee. That's why the mail ins skewed so much toward Trump"?
I am not a concern troll. I just have liberal friends and family who are willing to talk to me about the voter fraud.
DYOR but I thought I saw registered Republicans requested just as many mail in ballots as Democrats
Look for, I think, a Twitter user by the name of ShylockHolmes. I believe he mathed it out prooving this is highly unlikely.
We have SO many leads to uncover fraud at an enormous scale. If nothing comes from that, I will be fucking pissed.
We always say "It's happening" and it rarely ever does. NOW is the time when it really needs to happen! We need to nail them to the cross!
It is not just philly, but Allegheny county. Please someone look at this seriously.
Why did Allegheny county in pennsylvania add about 130k votes at a ratio of 5:1 towards biden (or 104k total for biden) on 13 instances from nov 4 - nov 6. these are at a nearly exact rate of .8 while the county as a whole averages low to mid .7 130k votes at an EXACT ratio of .8 come on man.
https://alex.github.io/nyt-2020-election-scraper/battleground-state-changes.html#
We got the best autists don't we folks?
Monte Carlo Stimulation
1,267,650,600,228,229,401,496,703,205,376 / 1
With those odds if you bet just one dollar you would win maybe just about enough to pay off the national debt lol.
OK, so only like 1/10^33
Hardly incontrovertible evidence. /s
Hercules was right!
Sorbo 24'
Anyone got pdf/doc copies of these two analyses? I'd like to have them saved on my PC, just in case.
Why do people keep using analogies of coin flips? Coin flips are random, voting isn't. You could ask people if they would rather be shot or get a cookie and 100% will pick the cookie, has nothing to do with a coin landing heads 100% of the time.
The issue is proving all of this. We all know they cheated but it’s on the lawyers to prove it. The left will just say well the numbers are up because of muh division and covid.
Just like when the DNC chose Shrillery over Sanders !
As much as I hate to say it statistical abnormality isnt proof. We have to show it with hard evidence. Fortunately, this seems to be so wide-spread that I think it shouldn't be that hard to prove.
Welcome to Philly! Thank will be 5 bucks...
But but no cnn says....
SHOCKER! No one saw this coming! Maybe the populace will do something about it in the weeks and monrhs following the election. The populace. Not the people in government we asked to stop and prevent this. BRILLIANT IDEA!
I've been saying the same thing. Even flipping a weighted coin 138,000 times in a row you're bound to get at least one of the opposite side.
The fraud here is so obvious only a Democrat or a Federal Judge couldn't see it...
More like flipping a coin 138,000 times and getting heads every time.
Can we get the hard source data ?
Easy, use a two-headed coin!! RIGGED!