It's a statistical impossibility that people would only vote for Biden, with the stakes at other levels of government. Democrats tend to vote Democrat down ballot. Republicans tend to vote Republican down ballot.
If you want a Democrat president because you support Democrat policies, you'd want to give that Democrat president a Democrat House & Senate, and you'd want your other local elections to be Democrat winners.
How it proves fraud, is the mere fact of how easy it is to fake a large amount of ballots by having to check just one box. It would take a lot longer to fill out a full ballot. Too long to actually commit any reasonable amounts of fraud. There's also other measures for local government on the ballot. Things like tax increases or decreases. If you had a ballot where people only voted for Biden, but didn't vote for a local tax increase measure, that would clearly be odd. (In fact, exactly that happened in IL. There was a measure on the down ballot to increase taxes on the rich, but it failed by a huge margin, which makes no sense if people were voting Biden.)
It's all about the time saving. If it takes 60 seconds to fill out a complete ballot and put some randomness to the down ballot, one person can only realistically manufacture several hundred ballots a day (accounting for down time) if they work at it 12 hours straight without breaks (which means they'd likely produce even less).
At that rate, even a team of 100 people faking ballots, would only realistically bring in about 7000 fake ballots a day, combined, which is nowhere near enough speed to stuff enough ballots. It would take them over 1000 people working over the same time, to fake just 70K ballots. And they'd need at least that many if not more in every state. So well over 50K people forging ballots would be needed across the country, which is an unrealistically large operation to be running.
So the solution? Make people take like 5 seconds to fill out the ballot for just Biden. Then you're working 12 times faster. Now a single person can forge over 8000 ballots in 12 hours. 10 people can forge 80,000 in the same time. Then keep the results held up for a week, and with all that, they have enough time to stuff more than a half a million ballots or more in any state, with just a team of 10 operatives in each state!
They won't need that many for every state, so they can do it with even less people in total. 50,000 person operation VS 500 person or less operation....probably more realistically, under 200 people across the whole country. That's much more manageable and easier to hide.
So in conclusion, the votes for only Biden is indicative of an operation to fill out as many ballots as possible as fast as possible. This is also why they wanted the elections to go on for a week, they needed time. This is why we generally call elections on election night, because doing so makes it harder to commit massive amounts of ballot stuffing without a large operation that would likely be difficult to manage and be discovered.
It's more then just that though. If the ballot is filled out in other elections, the ballot can be challenged by those elections. So if there is a super close senate race that ballot may have to get inspected in a recount. By only voting for Biden they remove this risk.
Considering that the retarded commies (yes, I know, that's a pleonasm) said "Math is white supremacist", they won't even think twice before saying "Statistics is racist!"
Everything you said makes sense but it all seems like circumstantial evidence and I’m not convinced we could prove that in court beyond a shadow of a doubt purely on “it’s highly unlikely”.
What do we know about liberals? They’re shortsighted and not bright. A large contingent who don’t usually pay attention to politics have been brainwashed into thinking orange man bad and getting rid of him is all that matters. I don’t think it’s implausible that thousands of uniformed liberals did the minimum amount of work to vote for Biden only, and were like “ok I did my part. Now let me get back to my life”. It’s statistically improbable to happen in any other time but now.
You wouldn't need to prove it's beyond a shadow of a doubt ("beyond a reasonable doubt" legal standard.) That's for criminal cases. What you need here is "a preponderance of the evidence." Or in other words, is what the plaintiff saying more likely to be true.
All the math and stats show it's almost impossible for all those good breaks to happen for Biden and none to happen for Trump. Also, details on the ballots highly suggest fraud (Biden's votes violated Benford's law). We also have hundreds of people willing to swear under oath that they witnessed voter fraud, plus video evidence of Republican poll watchers being kicked out of vote tabulation rooms.
So it's more than likely that vote fraud happened here, and I think the Supreme Court will easily rule for us.
I asked my Dad the same thing. I said did you vote down the ticket...YES, why he said the same thing you did. I than said "so you're telling me all these people couldn't take an extra minute to bubble in D down the left side?, It doesnt add up"
crazy how that works huh? Just stop all the states Trump has a heavy lead in until "ballots" show up... for biden.. not for any other representatives.. it takes a long time to fill out ballots so they just notch the biden and move to the next
I mean there are definitely SOME people who only vote for president. My gf's 1st gen Korean mother had no idea who the downballot reps were, so she just voted Trump and left it at that.
THIS FUCKING MANY THOUGH!?!? Stupid, obvious, arrogant cheating dems think we have shit for brains.
This would be a great SNL skit. They already cheated but miscalculated and only added a bazillion fake mail in votes for Biden and destroyed a bazillion of Trump’s.
They cheated in 2016 as well (explains why Killary never even visited WI, doesn't it?), but didn't cheat enough, and didn't have the infrastructure in place to create more on the fly.
Taking advice fromThe Who, they had people ready to go.
I had a strange theory that Hillary was so arrogant, confident, and greedy that she would win on her own she didn’t fork over the millions it takes to activate the hammer computer system and the scorecard program. Just my thought the other night. While all these people are on the same team, everything has a price tag and the Clintons love money.
There was something in the works. Look back to 2016, and Pedodesta's statement at her victory party, something along the lines of "there won't be a decision tonight, go home". Very similar to the message used this year.
Also, FL took FOREVER to count, then the lady that looks like Ursula loses her position shortly after the election. They were holding it out, trying to generate enough votes to win.
Total presidential votes - total senator votes blows this narrative out of the water.
In Michigan there were 77k more votes cast for president than for senator, if people were crossing the aisle to vote for Biden then there still wouldn't be a gap like that.
In Georgia there were 98k more votes cast for president than for senator.
They claim to be the party of intellectualism but their brains turn to mush the moment that it is politically expedient to do so.
It's not the length of time, it's the down ballot obviousness.
Take two areas, congress district 1 and 2.
Area 1 is stuffing the box for Joe, area 2 isn't.
If area 1 has joe +others, then there are 50k votes for the Congress critter in 1, but in district 2, there's a normal amount. This is a YUGE red flag.
It's voter fraud if the republican candidate gets any votes for any reason; it's undeniably legitimate if the democrat gets votes for any reason in every circumstance no matter what and everyone that thinks otherwise is a bigoted, murdering, racist.
Yep. And predictably this always leads to them playing both sides. One on hand: "it never happens" (because it isn't caught)
On the other hand, when it is discovered: "see it happens at such a small rate we shouldn't worry about it."
Don't even need to do that. Just compare to the other supposed swing states like OH, MN, IA, FL. Voters in these states should have a similar attitude towards this election and if there is a high amount of voters that literally just wanted to vote for Biden and no one else, they should show up here as well, no?
Don't even need to do that. Just compare the ballots counted earlier in the night versus later in the night. If the ballots counted after midnight, when all of the poll watchers had "gone home for the night", show wildly disproportionate absence of down-ballot votes, then you're looking at fraudulent manufactured votes.
Compare the non swing states, where there's no incentive to cheat. If it's common to vote for just the president, then it should be in a comparable rate in ... Well, really every state.
If you make the effort to show up, surely you spend an extra 15 seconds to vote for everything. I can imagine it being different if voting was mandatory as it is in my country (Aus) but when it's your choice? You fill out the whole ballot.
I guess you could make an argument that 450,000 idiots thought that a vote for president was a "straight ticket" vote. That's the only thing I can think of as an excuse.
How many "just Trump" votes were there? If 50-150k then these scream fraud. As the number gets higher the counterargument becomes "Because people who hate politics also HATE Trump".
Context is king. And without the "just Trump" numbers, we lack context.
it was pretty low (5.1-6.8%) until McGovern in 1968 when it spiked to 9.7%. It remained above 8.4% until it peaked at 1984 at 11%, and remained high in 1988. Since then it's been 4.7 (1996) - 6.9% (1992) range. Last year it was 5.9%. This year, so far based on results received, it's 3.8% - the lowest on record.
Edit: It's even lower in Michigan and Georgia, 2% in Michigan and 2.2% in Georgia.
Edit 2: Low means very few votes which voted for President but not the House.
Yes true, common even if 450,000 arrived in a van at 4AM and these vans only arrived at democrat pole stations in states that biden ( or any other looser Democrat ) is loosing in. Extremely common form of cheating that occurs during every election. So common we talk about it every two years.
What's frustrating is people actually agree with this statement, and don't think it's suspicious that there's such a large gap between senate/house votes and presidential votes
More like a large amount of democrats switched only their presidential vote, so adding more ballots that were completely filled out would make the fraud even more obvious.
That voting software taking votes from Trump and adding the exact difference to Biden on live television is disgusting. No wonder they are attempting to purge all of the election night footage. I do think that is a big key to revealing this fraud.
How do they possibly explain Trump LOSING 19000+ votes right before our very eyes and then having the exact number lost added straight onto Biden's tally?
Clerical error at the precinct level while reporting. There's PLENTY of evidence of fraud, and those responsible should be hanged, but the from one to another on live tv isn't on the list of things that matter.
A vote fraud expert used a live (and by definition inaccurate) running vote tally during a hectic night to "prove" vote fraud? I'm more skeptical of this expert than I am of JOE, and that fucker is as twisted as they come.
We're presumably fighting for the same thing. My suggestion is simply to not post hopes on an unofficial running tally that could be explained away with " Our data guy had two columns, one for Trump, and one for biden. He put the number for Biden in the wrong spot, and corrected it once discovered".
Let's see them explain away the same thing happening multiple times all over the country in court. Multiple states, down to specific counties in which this 'clerical' error occurred... repeatedly. The courts will rule.
If only someone had evidence of this software working in real time and sent it to Trump's team... hmm.
It’s great to see their gears whirling when you tell them that fox isn’t conservative enough and they can’t put words around how big of a nazi they think you are.
There were 70,953 more votes for Biden than John Hickenlooper (D) received (this is the 1 Senate flip). Trump votes are much more in line with Gardner’s (R) results.
Interesting that with the amount of money they spent trying to take out Lindsey that they couldn't find a similar poll station to do the same in. I guess their big cities aren't blue enough or don't have the population to defraud the rest of the state
Some think thisIs because the establish GOP cut a deal with the Dems. Trump out in exchange for overwhelming gains in the house and maintaining control of the senate. The Supreme Court will rule against GEOTUS, guaranteed.
Could you imagine the leftists melt downs if our side suddenly found a box of ballots with 450,000 trump votes inside. They would be screaming fraud, instead they are cheering it on when their candidates votes are "found"
That is a huge red flag. What is the probability that at least 450 thousand average voters would fail to follow instructions and vote only on the Presidential race and not the other races? The answer, close to zero when numbers are this large.
Probability does not work quite like that. A better way to think about it: what percentage of ballots are normally for only the president in past elections and is this a normal outcome?
What a coincidence? I mean this smacks of fraud because if a fraudster filled out every ballot completely they'd still be doing it. It took 5 minutes to complete my ballot and I researched every candidate all the way down to the most local county position. For the judges, I actually brought a sheet so I could remember party affiliation. Then I took care to fill in my ovals so I don't fuck up and have to start over. I made sure each oval was nice and filled in. It took me 5 minutes and I was prepared. Now if you needed 1000 completed ballots think how long that'd take. That's why they did top ticket only...only it's a dead giveaway. One a few hundred fine, but 450.000 and all now biden. No sir, you might as well have been filming it.
It gets even more interesting. If they choose to fill in all the races while cheating, how do they do that? A half million identical straight blue tickets would be an anomaly. Random votes would be an anomaly. They would have to mirror the current percentages and randomize some local choices. It gets impossibly complicated to pull off convincingly.
I believe they have been war gaming this out. In some sense, I am sure they expected this.
My guess is that if trump fights and wins we will have some form of color revolution. Could just be media and pols calling him an illegitimate traitorous dictator and firing up the stochastic lone wolfs, could be two presidents, could be secession, could be war in the streets.
Guys, I'm not an expert at handwriting analysis, but consider this. If that many ballots were faked by only a few people, say 1-6 people filled them out many, many times, would not forensic analysis possibly reveal a pattern with close examination? Like the swirl pattern of the pen ink? Or oils of the hands touching them might have a pattern on the paper all the same shape, or pH levels, or other measurable commonalities???
I thought about it. Just need a photo of each bubble and anyone with some azure or aws experience can actually answer that with a little pre-canned ai.
The important thing is and will be the comparison to previous years, and to the rest of the country. People sometimes vote the top of the ticket only; are they voting the top of the ticket more than usual? More than can be explained by differences between this election and others?
My experience is yes. In Presidential years the President who wins typically makes ground in both the House and the Senate. You see a similar trend down ballot.
The fact that the enthusiasm didn't continue down ballot is unusual. Definitive proof of cheating? No, but definitely one of many unusual things this election.
That is clearly fishy and a significant find, but people are going to be asking for smoking guns.... eyewitness testimony (i.e. I was at the ballot counting center and at 4am a truck pulled up with these ballots), hard evidence (camera footage of these ballots being dropped off or emails between dem leaders ordering these ballots made etc, etc). Just this is really good, but is it enough for courts?
Dems will go..."So what" "Joe was loved much more than the fascist deplorables realize". It might be unusual to you, but not us PLUS you can't prove they're fake"
Yeah switched off my danish vpn - I’m still in Europe - cyprus.
But now I can see it.
This is another thing Americans must understand when much of Europe hates trump and republicans and all that...
They are censoring every single piece of information outside the USA - making you guys the villains.
So many Europeans through whatever policy.. from big tech or their own governments... cause an insurmountable amount of election tampering..
How? Well reddit social media - all that... it’s people from around the world - marketing free based on the reality they see of the world. Everyone is commenting on US politics. Not just Americans. And frankly if you think democrats are brainwashed - many Europeans - even completely based conservative Europeans are even more brainwashed than even democrats - because Americans at least still have local news stations other countries can’t reach that do report truth sometimes.
Being unable to access truth - means they also become Democrat puppets.
I didn't know Europe was so bad with media control too...Australia seems to have the best mainstream media. America has a bright future with NewsMax and OAN among others...revolver.news is a good replacement for what DrudgeReport used to be before Drudge became a sellout cuck
Sorry bro - but Australia is rooted. We have free to air channels 7,9,10 - commercial chans all owned by CNN/MSNBC etc.
We have the ABC (taxpayer funded) so fucking leftist we are trying to get it defunded or kill it with fire. Think BBC (totally overtaken by inner city hipster tossers)
We have SBS (the channel of diversity eg: shitty French soft porn films etc - think they have partial funding). Skews left but has good doco's.
We have one channel (pay but also on YT) Sky News Australia - that are expert on triggering lefties and cause much REEEEEEing - all pedes should subscribe to them on YT.
Newspapers here are either News Corp (Murdoch right leaning) or Fairfax (lefty cucks). At the moments lefties are trying to initiate an enquiry into Murdoch papers, simply because they have opinions that don't fall in line with soy narrative.
The majority of our news skews to the left. I never watch TV news as I generally fly into a rage at the level of utter bs ORANGE MAN BAD shit.
I find when I look at your local small news stations that aren’t international, which are often completely blocked in Europe because of “GDPR” and often need American vpn...
Well those guys are also reporting a lot more truthful.
I did a check on Alexa on traffic on that pundit website for example - I found more traffic on gateway pundit website from the USA than even CNN.
But obviously CNN is still a premier international network.
This awakening is also happening in Europe. But good sources on the state of America are much more rare.
Even conservatives in the uk who voted boris and boris himself - are complete sell out idiots. In some sense can’t completely blame them - but on other side they are also much more in the dark with less exposure. Although they still have news like the sun and express.
Yeah i forgot to mention gateway pundit they are awesome. Their traffic has skyrocketed since they are one of the only ones highlighting voter fraud. They are pretty much focusing on it, great to see they have more traffic than CNN! That warrants a post actually, you should write a post about the pundit beating CNN pedes will dig that!
Wtf! Yeah and they have literally created an Orwellian dystopia, also not unlike Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron. Fuck these commie bitches they will die soon. And we will help free the rest of the West, and then the world
Now so-called journalists are trying to say this is totally normal and not a sign of fraud. 2-3% is normal historically, not the 18-20% we're seeing this year, localized to specific districts in swing states.
Dems still stupid enough to vote only for Biden tbh, some of these are sadly legit. They don't really care about politics, just that Trump has to lose because "he says bad things".
My 2 theories on this are either they were rushing through filling out new ballots as fast as possible, or they didn’t want the Republican candidates also investigating the process, forming their own legal teams or assisting Trump’s, after the election was also stolen from those Republican candidates. They want to isolate Trump away from any Republican allies to make his loss look more legitimate.
They had to do fraud on such a massive scale that they didn't have time to fill out the rest of the ballot. I bet the Dems who lost races are pissed that they didn't get help from the fraudsters.
Is there a way to identify the ballots that were scanned after the miraculous dump in the middle of the night? Is there a ballot code and a time stamp when scanned? Sorry if I am asking something already discussed
They need some more context. It sounds like a lot but maybe that's normal, I don't know. Is it statewide, nationwide? Clustered in one city or district?
I did find it odd the senators won in georgia but will trigger a run off even though the republican looked to be decently ahead. Did they start to fill in the senators only after that?
I could totally see a batch of fake votes without down allot coming in in atlanta, then the next batch they realize they're going to lose senate so they need to trigger a runoff.
450,000 ballots that only have a vote for Joe. Serious question. I voted in person so I don't know. Do these ballots have any handwriting on them to compare? Names, addresses, that sort of thing?
CNN told me that it's totally normal for people only vote for the candidate with the lowest enthusiasm in recent history and no one else on the ballot.
drunk af rn but this is sime bullshit
Sober up pede, there’ll be plenty of time for drinking celebrations after the war is over.
WE NEED YOUR MAGA GAME BECAUSE TODAY WE GO ON THE OFFENSIVE!!!
it's night time where I'm at, I'm multi-tasking this shit and thx for the love
Be a samurai. be disciplined.
Dont drink. Be healthy.
Sometimes... Sometimes a drunken rager is what we need to get fired up. Lol
It’s 7am?
night time here, what do you take me for, a reprobate?
Drunk classification: smart guy. Aka the guy who not only uses big words, but uses them correctly when drunk.
the rarest of drunks in the wild
indubitably
Quite...
I bet you have an indelible hippocampus
Sure you can type it (indubitably with the help of Spellcheck), but can you say it?
So... somewhere in East Asia, huh?
TIL there is only one time zone in the world thanks to common core 👍
Z
GEOTUS Donald J. Trump doesn't drink at all.
More for us. Yet one more example of this man's selflessness and altruism.
I'm dead.
If you didn’t vote for joe, you ain’t dead!
Haha
lol
Awesome! I do the best I can with what little the good lord gave me.
Username checks out
my worst day sober is better then my best day drunk. Those words got me too quit and waking up feeling refreshed has never felt so good
Yup, I will never get drunk again. Maybe a beer every 6 months or so.
He is GEOTUS; we are mere mortals.
I know the one uncle had problems, and I think someone else did too. Donald learned early to stay away from it. Good for him.
Hijacking top comment to ask serious question, curious about the answer.
How can the existence of such ballots actually be classified as "fraud" (they are, but, legally) and thus, anything even done about it?
It's a statistical impossibility that people would only vote for Biden, with the stakes at other levels of government. Democrats tend to vote Democrat down ballot. Republicans tend to vote Republican down ballot.
If you want a Democrat president because you support Democrat policies, you'd want to give that Democrat president a Democrat House & Senate, and you'd want your other local elections to be Democrat winners.
How it proves fraud, is the mere fact of how easy it is to fake a large amount of ballots by having to check just one box. It would take a lot longer to fill out a full ballot. Too long to actually commit any reasonable amounts of fraud. There's also other measures for local government on the ballot. Things like tax increases or decreases. If you had a ballot where people only voted for Biden, but didn't vote for a local tax increase measure, that would clearly be odd. (In fact, exactly that happened in IL. There was a measure on the down ballot to increase taxes on the rich, but it failed by a huge margin, which makes no sense if people were voting Biden.)
It's all about the time saving. If it takes 60 seconds to fill out a complete ballot and put some randomness to the down ballot, one person can only realistically manufacture several hundred ballots a day (accounting for down time) if they work at it 12 hours straight without breaks (which means they'd likely produce even less).
At that rate, even a team of 100 people faking ballots, would only realistically bring in about 7000 fake ballots a day, combined, which is nowhere near enough speed to stuff enough ballots. It would take them over 1000 people working over the same time, to fake just 70K ballots. And they'd need at least that many if not more in every state. So well over 50K people forging ballots would be needed across the country, which is an unrealistically large operation to be running.
So the solution? Make people take like 5 seconds to fill out the ballot for just Biden. Then you're working 12 times faster. Now a single person can forge over 8000 ballots in 12 hours. 10 people can forge 80,000 in the same time. Then keep the results held up for a week, and with all that, they have enough time to stuff more than a half a million ballots or more in any state, with just a team of 10 operatives in each state!
They won't need that many for every state, so they can do it with even less people in total. 50,000 person operation VS 500 person or less operation....probably more realistically, under 200 people across the whole country. That's much more manageable and easier to hide.
So in conclusion, the votes for only Biden is indicative of an operation to fill out as many ballots as possible as fast as possible. This is also why they wanted the elections to go on for a week, they needed time. This is why we generally call elections on election night, because doing so makes it harder to commit massive amounts of ballot stuffing without a large operation that would likely be difficult to manage and be discovered.
It's more then just that though. If the ballot is filled out in other elections, the ballot can be challenged by those elections. So if there is a super close senate race that ballot may have to get inspected in a recount. By only voting for Biden they remove this risk.
Then they bring in one expert witness that says, "Racists!"
Considering that the retarded commies (yes, I know, that's a pleonasm) said "Math is white supremacist", they won't even think twice before saying "Statistics is racist!"
"Brooklyn College Education Prof. Claims Math Is ‘White Supremacist Patriarchy’" — Breitbart
"Professor: ‘Mathematics Itself Operates as Whiteness’" — National Review
"Teaching maths perpetuates white privilege, says university professor" — The Independent
Based analysis.
Everything you said makes sense but it all seems like circumstantial evidence and I’m not convinced we could prove that in court beyond a shadow of a doubt purely on “it’s highly unlikely”.
What do we know about liberals? They’re shortsighted and not bright. A large contingent who don’t usually pay attention to politics have been brainwashed into thinking orange man bad and getting rid of him is all that matters. I don’t think it’s implausible that thousands of uniformed liberals did the minimum amount of work to vote for Biden only, and were like “ok I did my part. Now let me get back to my life”. It’s statistically improbable to happen in any other time but now.
You wouldn't need to prove it's beyond a shadow of a doubt ("beyond a reasonable doubt" legal standard.) That's for criminal cases. What you need here is "a preponderance of the evidence." Or in other words, is what the plaintiff saying more likely to be true.
All the math and stats show it's almost impossible for all those good breaks to happen for Biden and none to happen for Trump. Also, details on the ballots highly suggest fraud (Biden's votes violated Benford's law). We also have hundreds of people willing to swear under oath that they witnessed voter fraud, plus video evidence of Republican poll watchers being kicked out of vote tabulation rooms.
So it's more than likely that vote fraud happened here, and I think the Supreme Court will easily rule for us.
I asked my Dad the same thing. I said did you vote down the ticket...YES, why he said the same thing you did. I than said "so you're telling me all these people couldn't take an extra minute to bubble in D down the left side?, It doesnt add up"
crazyyy
Lmao
crazy how that works huh? Just stop all the states Trump has a heavy lead in until "ballots" show up... for biden.. not for any other representatives.. it takes a long time to fill out ballots so they just notch the biden and move to the next
GuyS WheN I wAs a DemOcraT 18 YEAr OlD I DIDnT KnoW AnYThInG AbOuT thE DownBaLlot
Yeah 450,000 of ya
I mean there are definitely SOME people who only vote for president. My gf's 1st gen Korean mother had no idea who the downballot reps were, so she just voted Trump and left it at that.
THIS FUCKING MANY THOUGH!?!? Stupid, obvious, arrogant cheating dems think we have shit for brains.
This would be a great SNL skit. They already cheated but miscalculated and only added a bazillion fake mail in votes for Biden and destroyed a bazillion of Trump’s.
They frantically start filling out blank ballots.
Too bad SNL sucks.
SNL is still on? Neato
More truth to this than we know.
They cheated in 2016 as well (explains why Killary never even visited WI, doesn't it?), but didn't cheat enough, and didn't have the infrastructure in place to create more on the fly.
Taking advice fromThe Who, they had people ready to go.
Getting mail-in ballots was key for them
I had a strange theory that Hillary was so arrogant, confident, and greedy that she would win on her own she didn’t fork over the millions it takes to activate the hammer computer system and the scorecard program. Just my thought the other night. While all these people are on the same team, everything has a price tag and the Clintons love money.
There was something in the works. Look back to 2016, and Pedodesta's statement at her victory party, something along the lines of "there won't be a decision tonight, go home". Very similar to the message used this year.
Also, FL took FOREVER to count, then the lady that looks like Ursula loses her position shortly after the election. They were holding it out, trying to generate enough votes to win.
That would suggest a landslide for those legislators...which didn't happen
Then they would fucking vote for them lol
Total presidential votes - total senator votes blows this narrative out of the water.
In Michigan there were 77k more votes cast for president than for senator, if people were crossing the aisle to vote for Biden then there still wouldn't be a gap like that.
In Georgia there were 98k more votes cast for president than for senator.
They claim to be the party of intellectualism but their brains turn to mush the moment that it is politically expedient to do so.
Blm.
Lol. Insane. Their base in particular thinks anyone not fully left is a Nazi.
It's not the length of time, it's the down ballot obviousness.
Take two areas, congress district 1 and 2.
Area 1 is stuffing the box for Joe, area 2 isn't.
If area 1 has joe +others, then there are 50k votes for the Congress critter in 1, but in district 2, there's a normal amount. This is a YUGE red flag.
It’s is only done in the blue counties where they don’t need the extra votes for the congressional candidates. That’s why it’s ok to just check Biden.
we have never seen a more blatantly fraudulent election since the Battle of Athens
I’d seriously like to know the historical % of this. Can’t imagine it’s a popular thing to do.
There are NYT articles from 2012 that say fraud and inconsistencies increase when absentee and mail in’s are widely used to vote.
Now none of these fake news media talk a word about the risks of mail in voting ...
As per Twitter the voter fraud percentage is 0.0005%. I don’t know what constitutes fraud by twitters definition.
If a county voting for trump gets switched to pedo now because of a glitch , that’s fraud and it’s damn more than 0.0005% FFS
It's voter fraud if the republican candidate cheats.
It's voter fraud if the republican candidate gets any votes for any reason; it's undeniably legitimate if the democrat gets votes for any reason in every circumstance no matter what and everyone that thinks otherwise is a bigoted, murdering, racist.
Underrated.
Imagine if we had an honest media. Imagine the things we could accomplish.
We’d have a colony on Mars by now.
This is such BS. There is no way to know this.
Plus probabilities mean jack shit when it is a decision. With the stakes of this election the probability was 100%.
what a bullshit number they pulled straight out of their asses lol
fraud, by definition, is often difficult to catch - that's why people do it
Yep. And predictably this always leads to them playing both sides. One on hand: "it never happens" (because it isn't caught) On the other hand, when it is discovered: "see it happens at such a small rate we shouldn't worry about it."
Don't even need to do that. Just compare to the other supposed swing states like OH, MN, IA, FL. Voters in these states should have a similar attitude towards this election and if there is a high amount of voters that literally just wanted to vote for Biden and no one else, they should show up here as well, no?
This needs to be highlighted
Nah it was just a few counties that were conveniently enough to win key states.
Don't even need to do that. Just compare the ballots counted earlier in the night versus later in the night. If the ballots counted after midnight, when all of the poll watchers had "gone home for the night", show wildly disproportionate absence of down-ballot votes, then you're looking at fraudulent manufactured votes.
Compare the non swing states, where there's no incentive to cheat. If it's common to vote for just the president, then it should be in a comparable rate in ... Well, really every state.
If you make the effort to show up, surely you spend an extra 15 seconds to vote for everything. I can imagine it being different if voting was mandatory as it is in my country (Aus) but when it's your choice? You fill out the whole ballot.
I guess you could make an argument that 450,000 idiots thought that a vote for president was a "straight ticket" vote. That's the only thing I can think of as an excuse.
How many "just Trump" votes were there? If 50-150k then these scream fraud. As the number gets higher the counterargument becomes "Because people who hate politics also HATE Trump".
Context is king. And without the "just Trump" numbers, we lack context.
Last time I checked Georgia it was 1000 Trump. 10,000 Biden. Only a 10x diference. No big deal guys. /s
Essentially zero. People were more likely to vote for Republican down ballot and skip trump than they were to vote for trump and skip downballot
it was pretty low (5.1-6.8%) until McGovern in 1968 when it spiked to 9.7%. It remained above 8.4% until it peaked at 1984 at 11%, and remained high in 1988. Since then it's been 4.7 (1996) - 6.9% (1992) range. Last year it was 5.9%. This year, so far based on results received, it's 3.8% - the lowest on record.
Edit: It's even lower in Michigan and Georgia, 2% in Michigan and 2.2% in Georgia.
Edit 2: Low means very few votes which voted for President but not the House.
Yes true, common even if 450,000 arrived in a van at 4AM and these vans only arrived at democrat pole stations in states that biden ( or any other looser Democrat ) is loosing in. Extremely common form of cheating that occurs during every election. So common we talk about it every two years.
Can't tell if your post is satire or if they actually made that tag.
They did !! Click on one of this Twitter warnings lol it takes you to a page that claims voter fraud is rare , only 0.001% and all that lol
What's frustrating is people actually agree with this statement, and don't think it's suspicious that there's such a large gap between senate/house votes and presidential votes
It's so common that the difference for people who only voted for Trump and those that only voted for Biden are measured in the hundreds of thousands.
AcShUaLly,tHeRe Is nO eViDeNcE oF wIdEsPrEaD fRaUd.
I'm not wasting energy doing the updown thing so use your imagination...
Ackshually there is no proof the fraud affected the outcome!
-next
Lol. I like using the updown thing at times, but it is a pain in the ass type out.
Here’s an example of fraud!
“that’s just a small example it couldn’t overturn the election! Let’s put that aside”
Here’s another example of fraud!”
“That’s just a small example it couldn’t overturn the election! Let’s put that aside”
repeat for 6 days
“Here’s another example of fraud
“That’s just a small example of fraud! Let’s put....that....aside....”
behind the Dems, a room full of fraud overflowing and piles falling down from their own weight
all added up equals HUGE numbers.
More like a large amount of democrats switched only their presidential vote, so adding more ballots that were completely filled out would make the fraud even more obvious.
That voting software taking votes from Trump and adding the exact difference to Biden on live television is disgusting. No wonder they are attempting to purge all of the election night footage. I do think that is a big key to revealing this fraud.
How do they possibly explain Trump LOSING 19000+ votes right before our very eyes and then having the exact number lost added straight onto Biden's tally?
Please tell me someone have archived the footage. It will be big evidence in our court cases.
Yes, it's very archived, multiple websites and safe uploaders.
They used so many methods there is a big janitor key chain of keys to proving this fraud lol.
Clerical error at the precinct level while reporting. There's PLENTY of evidence of fraud, and those responsible should be hanged, but the from one to another on live tv isn't on the list of things that matter.
Yes it fucking is lol. Dont speak about shit you're ignorant on. A vote fraud expert used this exist same thing in an older election to show fruad.
A vote fraud expert used a live (and by definition inaccurate) running vote tally during a hectic night to "prove" vote fraud? I'm more skeptical of this expert than I am of JOE, and that fucker is as twisted as they come.
We're presumably fighting for the same thing. My suggestion is simply to not post hopes on an unofficial running tally that could be explained away with " Our data guy had two columns, one for Trump, and one for biden. He put the number for Biden in the wrong spot, and corrected it once discovered".
-The End.
Let's see them explain away the same thing happening multiple times all over the country in court. Multiple states, down to specific counties in which this 'clerical' error occurred... repeatedly. The courts will rule.
If only someone had evidence of this software working in real time and sent it to Trump's team... hmm.
Interesting take none the less!
Let's see what happens.
Its directly connected to the tally system.
If the issue occured during upload, then a manual count and a manual tally will correct it.
Serious question though, do they reconcile to anything? How do they know the machine count is righ
https://streamable.com/31zhlj
Nothing to see here
I love using that name. Especially when dipshits try to argue and act like I LOVE Faux News. No, it's ass.
It’s great to see their gears whirling when you tell them that fox isn’t conservative enough and they can’t put words around how big of a nazi they think you are.
Red wave was real on election day. The truth will come out very soon.
South Carolina had 1,331 presidential voters not vote in the senate race. Michigan allegedly had 149,790. If you don’t think that’s suspicious, you’re delusional. This election was hacked. And Trump will win in the end. https://noqreport.com/2020/11/07/the-hammer-and-scorecard-smoking-gun-150000-michigan-presidential-voters-didnt-vote-for-senate/
Hey this happened in Colorado too!
There were 70,953 more votes for Biden than John Hickenlooper (D) received (this is the 1 Senate flip). Trump votes are much more in line with Gardner’s (R) results.
Interesting that with the amount of money they spent trying to take out Lindsey that they couldn't find a similar poll station to do the same in. I guess their big cities aren't blue enough or don't have the population to defraud the rest of the state
We don't use Dominion Voting Machines. ;-)
At least, that's based on the map I saw that showed which states used it.
Some think thisIs because the establish GOP cut a deal with the Dems. Trump out in exchange for overwhelming gains in the house and maintaining control of the senate. The Supreme Court will rule against GEOTUS, guaranteed.
3x10^-3 % or 0.003% in SC
1.5% of Michigan
Could you imagine the leftists melt downs if our side suddenly found a box of ballots with 450,000 trump votes inside. They would be screaming fraud, instead they are cheering it on when their candidates votes are "found"
That is a huge red flag. What is the probability that at least 450 thousand average voters would fail to follow instructions and vote only on the Presidential race and not the other races? The answer, close to zero when numbers are this large.
Probability does not work quite like that. A better way to think about it: what percentage of ballots are normally for only the president in past elections and is this a normal outcome?
You just have to compare it against the broader population. How many Trump only ballots are there ?
Why is it only alternative sites like American Thinker, GP, National File etc. covering this? Not a whisper from the MSM other that "Orangeman crazy."
JUST ANOTHER CLERICAL ERROR
Fucking hell, I was unsure about the likelihood of the fraud claims going anywhere at first, but this is getting seriously real.
What a coincidence? I mean this smacks of fraud because if a fraudster filled out every ballot completely they'd still be doing it. It took 5 minutes to complete my ballot and I researched every candidate all the way down to the most local county position. For the judges, I actually brought a sheet so I could remember party affiliation. Then I took care to fill in my ovals so I don't fuck up and have to start over. I made sure each oval was nice and filled in. It took me 5 minutes and I was prepared. Now if you needed 1000 completed ballots think how long that'd take. That's why they did top ticket only...only it's a dead giveaway. One a few hundred fine, but 450.000 and all now biden. No sir, you might as well have been filming it.
It gets even more interesting. If they choose to fill in all the races while cheating, how do they do that? A half million identical straight blue tickets would be an anomaly. Random votes would be an anomaly. They would have to mirror the current percentages and randomize some local choices. It gets impossibly complicated to pull off convincingly.
They never thought he would fight it. Every 4 years this happens and someone concedes. They never expected him to fight so hard. Now they are fucked.
I believe they have been war gaming this out. In some sense, I am sure they expected this.
My guess is that if trump fights and wins we will have some form of color revolution. Could just be media and pols calling him an illegitimate traitorous dictator and firing up the stochastic lone wolfs, could be two presidents, could be secession, could be war in the streets.
Guys, I'm not an expert at handwriting analysis, but consider this. If that many ballots were faked by only a few people, say 1-6 people filled them out many, many times, would not forensic analysis possibly reveal a pattern with close examination? Like the swirl pattern of the pen ink? Or oils of the hands touching them might have a pattern on the paper all the same shape, or pH levels, or other measurable commonalities???
Absolutely. Forensics could match a ball point pen easy but I don't know about a Sharpie. Probably the real reason they wanted people to use them.
I thought about it. Just need a photo of each bubble and anyone with some azure or aws experience can actually answer that with a little pre-canned ai.
This would take months.
And what's the number of ballots that only have trump? It needs to also be presented with this information.
The important thing is and will be the comparison to previous years, and to the rest of the country. People sometimes vote the top of the ticket only; are they voting the top of the ticket more than usual? More than can be explained by differences between this election and others?
My experience is yes. In Presidential years the President who wins typically makes ground in both the House and the Senate. You see a similar trend down ballot.
The fact that the enthusiasm didn't continue down ballot is unusual. Definitive proof of cheating? No, but definitely one of many unusual things this election.
That is clearly fishy and a significant find, but people are going to be asking for smoking guns.... eyewitness testimony (i.e. I was at the ballot counting center and at 4am a truck pulled up with these ballots), hard evidence (camera footage of these ballots being dropped off or emails between dem leaders ordering these ballots made etc, etc). Just this is really good, but is it enough for courts?
They use Ferrari's not trucks.
This is incorrect. You can fill out one race or all of them and the ballot is still valid.
There should be a “none of the above” box. If that box wins, we redo the election with new candidates and bar the old ones from holding any office.
Dems will go..."So what" "Joe was loved much more than the fascist deplorables realize". It might be unusual to you, but not us PLUS you can't prove they're fake"
The Demorats wanted it so bad they made it too easy to discover all their cheating.
Gateway pundit can’t establish secure connection?
Did they take it down or is it just me?
It's not down
Yeah switched off my danish vpn - I’m still in Europe - cyprus.
But now I can see it.
This is another thing Americans must understand when much of Europe hates trump and republicans and all that...
They are censoring every single piece of information outside the USA - making you guys the villains.
So many Europeans through whatever policy.. from big tech or their own governments... cause an insurmountable amount of election tampering..
How? Well reddit social media - all that... it’s people from around the world - marketing free based on the reality they see of the world. Everyone is commenting on US politics. Not just Americans. And frankly if you think democrats are brainwashed - many Europeans - even completely based conservative Europeans are even more brainwashed than even democrats - because Americans at least still have local news stations other countries can’t reach that do report truth sometimes.
Being unable to access truth - means they also become Democrat puppets.
I didn't know Europe was so bad with media control too...Australia seems to have the best mainstream media. America has a bright future with NewsMax and OAN among others...revolver.news is a good replacement for what DrudgeReport used to be before Drudge became a sellout cuck
Sorry bro - but Australia is rooted. We have free to air channels 7,9,10 - commercial chans all owned by CNN/MSNBC etc.
We have the ABC (taxpayer funded) so fucking leftist we are trying to get it defunded or kill it with fire. Think BBC (totally overtaken by inner city hipster tossers)
We have SBS (the channel of diversity eg: shitty French soft porn films etc - think they have partial funding). Skews left but has good doco's.
We have one channel (pay but also on YT) Sky News Australia - that are expert on triggering lefties and cause much REEEEEEing - all pedes should subscribe to them on YT.
Newspapers here are either News Corp (Murdoch right leaning) or Fairfax (lefty cucks). At the moments lefties are trying to initiate an enquiry into Murdoch papers, simply because they have opinions that don't fall in line with soy narrative.
The majority of our news skews to the left. I never watch TV news as I generally fly into a rage at the level of utter bs ORANGE MAN BAD shit.
Well shit...my perception of your news was entirely due to sky news
I find when I look at your local small news stations that aren’t international, which are often completely blocked in Europe because of “GDPR” and often need American vpn...
Well those guys are also reporting a lot more truthful.
I did a check on Alexa on traffic on that pundit website for example - I found more traffic on gateway pundit website from the USA than even CNN.
But obviously CNN is still a premier international network.
This awakening is also happening in Europe. But good sources on the state of America are much more rare.
Even conservatives in the uk who voted boris and boris himself - are complete sell out idiots. In some sense can’t completely blame them - but on other side they are also much more in the dark with less exposure. Although they still have news like the sun and express.
Yeah i forgot to mention gateway pundit they are awesome. Their traffic has skyrocketed since they are one of the only ones highlighting voter fraud. They are pretty much focusing on it, great to see they have more traffic than CNN! That warrants a post actually, you should write a post about the pundit beating CNN pedes will dig that!
I did on my banned reddit sub. Rofl.. it was r/doublespeak1984
Standing up for your guys mass voter fraud - led to mass bans across reddit.
They used the excuse that I was impersonating George Orwell! How ironic when they inpersonated dead people to steal the American election.
Wtf! Yeah and they have literally created an Orwellian dystopia, also not unlike Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron. Fuck these commie bitches they will die soon. And we will help free the rest of the West, and then the world
Now so-called journalists are trying to say this is totally normal and not a sign of fraud. 2-3% is normal historically, not the 18-20% we're seeing this year, localized to specific districts in swing states.
Dems still stupid enough to vote only for Biden tbh, some of these are sadly legit. They don't really care about politics, just that Trump has to lose because "he says bad things".
So what’s the news on how all this is going to come To llght?
I’m over here asking the same thing and getting no answers
My 2 theories on this are either they were rushing through filling out new ballots as fast as possible, or they didn’t want the Republican candidates also investigating the process, forming their own legal teams or assisting Trump’s, after the election was also stolen from those Republican candidates. They want to isolate Trump away from any Republican allies to make his loss look more legitimate.
Miracles for people who reject God. Miracles I tell ya.
It' called lying and deception... It's a sin in the Bible. No problem for leftists though. Hold tight and trust God my friend!
They had to do fraud on such a massive scale that they didn't have time to fill out the rest of the ballot. I bet the Dems who lost races are pissed that they didn't get help from the fraudsters.
Oh, that is because people just, like, really disliked Donald Trump amirite? Guise???
WHO CAST THESE VOTES
This is key. Are they even real people?
Is there a way to identify the ballots that were scanned after the miraculous dump in the middle of the night? Is there a ballot code and a time stamp when scanned? Sorry if I am asking something already discussed
They need some more context. It sounds like a lot but maybe that's normal, I don't know. Is it statewide, nationwide? Clustered in one city or district?
I did find it odd the senators won in georgia but will trigger a run off even though the republican looked to be decently ahead. Did they start to fill in the senators only after that?
I could totally see a batch of fake votes without down allot coming in in atlanta, then the next batch they realize they're going to lose senate so they need to trigger a runoff.
450,000 ballots that only have a vote for Joe. Serious question. I voted in person so I don't know. Do these ballots have any handwriting on them to compare? Names, addresses, that sort of thing?
Time is of the essence when you're making phony ballots
That's a bold claim, but it makes sense and should be thoroughly investigated.
Forensically analyze the inks, fingerprints, placement in the stack, origin of ballots. Patterns should emerge.
CNN told me that it's totally normal for people only vote for the candidate with the lowest enthusiasm in recent history and no one else on the ballot.
We've miraculously found 450,000 ballots that vote for CNN.
If you are printing up 450,000 ballots for Biden, why not just print them already marked?
So many miraculous things happened in the country, including the dead rising to vote!!!
Did the equivalent happen for Trump? Were there thousands of ballots that only voted Trump with no other votes on them?
His were in the statistical norms I read. I think it's 5 or ten thousand or less an election cycle
Supposedly they can tie those ballots into the 4am additions right? That's pretty damning if they can do that.
What can be done about it?
Which state?