7768 “We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden” – Sidney Powell (www.thegatewaypundit.com) posted 158 days ago by TP4bunghole 158 days ago by TP4bunghole +7770 / -2 249 comments share 249 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (249) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 90 ▼ – deleted 90 points 158 days ago +91 / -1 ▲ 46 ▼ – 1776ThereIsaidIt 46 points 158 days ago +46 / -0 AcShUaLly,tHeRe Is nO eViDeNcE oF wIdEsPrEaD fRaUd. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 11 ▼ – doug2 11 points 158 days ago +12 / -1 I'm not wasting energy doing the updown thing so use your imagination... Ackshually there is no proof the fraud affected the outcome! -next permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – WhoWasThatMaskedMan 5 points 158 days ago +5 / -0 Lol. I like using the updown thing at times, but it is a pain in the ass type out. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – lifeisahologram 7 points 158 days ago +7 / -0 Here’s an example of fraud! “that’s just a small example it couldn’t overturn the election! Let’s put that aside” Here’s another example of fraud!” “That’s just a small example it couldn’t overturn the election! Let’s put that aside” repeat for 6 days “Here’s another example of fraud “That’s just a small example of fraud! Let’s put....that....aside....” behind the Dems, a room full of fraud overflowing and piles falling down from their own weight permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – mnguy12000 2 points 158 days ago +2 / -0 all added up equals HUGE numbers. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Titanium 1 point 158 days ago +1 / -0 More like a large amount of democrats switched only their presidential vote, so adding more ballots that were completely filled out would make the fraud even more obvious. permalink parent save report block reply
AcShUaLly,tHeRe Is nO eViDeNcE oF wIdEsPrEaD fRaUd.
I'm not wasting energy doing the updown thing so use your imagination...
Ackshually there is no proof the fraud affected the outcome!
-next
Lol. I like using the updown thing at times, but it is a pain in the ass type out.
Here’s an example of fraud!
“that’s just a small example it couldn’t overturn the election! Let’s put that aside”
Here’s another example of fraud!”
“That’s just a small example it couldn’t overturn the election! Let’s put that aside”
repeat for 6 days
“Here’s another example of fraud
“That’s just a small example of fraud! Let’s put....that....aside....”
behind the Dems, a room full of fraud overflowing and piles falling down from their own weight
all added up equals HUGE numbers.
More like a large amount of democrats switched only their presidential vote, so adding more ballots that were completely filled out would make the fraud even more obvious.