582
posted ago by undergroundceo +582 / -0

Why do I see a lot of people talking about Dominion, even Rudy Guliani? But nobody is bringing up the fact that Dianne Feinstein is the majority shareholder. That's one of the biggest red flags.

Comments (19)
sorted by:
10
MuhSoy 10 points ago +10 / -0

remember that Chinese driver she had for years - the spy? i don't believe for a second that it was an "accident".

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
7
iamherefortheluls 7 points ago +7 / -0

Don't dilute public attention with details that do not matter right now. Now one is going to be winning themselves a vote audit because of long chain of links of the software to one of the parties.

so don't go there until this election is in the bag, pede. RIght this moment we need to maintain maximum focus on the provable crimes where we have evidence to bring it home.

Think of it like a battle - if you got a breach in the enemy lines, you push in on that breach. Don't pull back reinforcements and send them to march of to another battle that's months away.

6
TONY_DANZA_ 6 points ago +6 / -0

Because you need to show that Dominion did something wrong first. It doesn't matter who runs it, if you can't prove they did something wrong it will just make you look bad for calling them out. Once it's proven that Dominion purposely screwed up, you'll hear more about who runs it. Just not from MSM. Additionally, electronic malfeasance like that is very hard to prove. That's why the media has been saying there's no evidence of fraud so much. Because the evidence is near impossible to come by when it comes to software.

There's a reason you haven't heard POTUS mention these machines publicly. The mail in fraud is much easier to prove.

1
acasper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dominion is only relevant to me at this moment because it would be possible to preserve voting equipment in its current state, specifically the GEMS instances with forensics images of the systems running them, for future investigation. If that doesn’t happen that evidence is gone.

6
TheJake 6 points ago +6 / -0

Its known, along with Obama, Clinton's, and Romney

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
3
undergroundceo [S] 3 points ago +5 / -2

Apparently, you haven't looked into this. There is plenty of evidence against Dominion

4
deleted 4 points ago +7 / -3
0
undergroundceo [S] 0 points ago +3 / -3

you right. you know me so well

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
Comanche_Moon 2 points ago +2 / -0

They all got rich selling our integrity.

2
CantStumpTheTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't she the one who was actively employing a Chinese spy?

Like that should have been REAL fucking news. A sitting member of the hosue or senate had an actual spy on their payroll.

Barely heard a peep about it. Weird.

1
knewter 1 point ago +1 / -0

do you have a source on this? I've spent over 8 hours researching Dominion and I've seen this mentioned lots but never seen evidence. I see people talking about her ownership of avid, but I don't understand the claimed connection there

1
isellmacs2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plenty of people bring it up, but naming the software to the point where people understand what it is that Feinstein (D-China) owns is important too.

Just keep spreading the word.

1
mintscape 1 point ago +1 / -0

I heard Dominion were mentioned on the Clinton Foundation website also, not sure if true?

1
bluedevilga 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe that's what she was threatening Lisa murkowski with, and just noticed that the Alaska vote is still bollocked up. I don't know if Alaska has Dominion, so if I'm wrong, I apologize.