Why do I see a lot of people talking about Dominion, even Rudy Guliani? But nobody is bringing up the fact that Dianne Feinstein is the majority shareholder. That's one of the biggest red flags.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Why do I see a lot of people talking about Dominion, even Rudy Guliani? But nobody is bringing up the fact that Dianne Feinstein is the majority shareholder. That's one of the biggest red flags.
Because you need to show that Dominion did something wrong first. It doesn't matter who runs it, if you can't prove they did something wrong it will just make you look bad for calling them out. Once it's proven that Dominion purposely screwed up, you'll hear more about who runs it. Just not from MSM. Additionally, electronic malfeasance like that is very hard to prove. That's why the media has been saying there's no evidence of fraud so much. Because the evidence is near impossible to come by when it comes to software.
There's a reason you haven't heard POTUS mention these machines publicly. The mail in fraud is much easier to prove.
Dominion is only relevant to me at this moment because it would be possible to preserve voting equipment in its current state, specifically the GEMS instances with forensics images of the systems running them, for future investigation. If that doesn’t happen that evidence is gone.