8569
Comments (283)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
71
deleted 71 points ago +72 / -1
25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
26
deleted 26 points ago +27 / -1
19
butte_weippe 19 points ago +19 / -0

More like False: 2.2m is not enough to be considered widespread fraud. Joe Biden won th pOpUlARlr vOtE by 4 million.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
lifeisahologram 6 points ago +6 / -0

Snopes: Widespread Voter Fraud is labeled FALSE. Republicans claim it a major issue involving many people, however while instances of voter fraud exist, each instance of voter fraud have at maximum only involved a single person, as each vote is only associated with a single person, and there are no known examples of 2 or more people entering a polling station to request the right to submit a single ballot together simultaneously as a shared entity.

The People: “How many instances of fraud exist?”

Snopes: “uh, uh...SHUT UP YOU BIGOT

5
ChickenFried 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe not widespread, but heavily concentrated with huge numbers.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
ThePowerOfPrayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's already happened...

Chris Wallace: So far there is not evidence of fraud large enough to overturn election results

https://archive.is/yoBMU

2
Hamadryad 2 points ago +2 / -0

"No evidence of widespread voter fraud, just voter fraud occurring over a large amount of the country."