That's exactly what the assumption is right now. They put the counting on pause when they know it will put Trump over the top and they use the Dominion software to figure out how many fraudulent mail-in ballots they need to count to offset the rise in Trump votes.
No, that's why you need evidence. Timestamps, witnesses, video footage, documents, election software fault proof etc. Once you get those things, you can make your case. That's why Steve keeps saying the Biden campaign is very worried about discovery in court.
The rules are "Election Day". A gentleman's agreement provided for an "Election Week." The agreement was disrespected, so we should revert to the written law - election DAY. Trump wins.
A pause on counting with no explanation MUST look suspicious to any reasonable judge or justice. Will that suspicion color the case?
Fucking right it's suspicious. Especially since, AFAIK, counting only stopped in states where Trump was leading. Did they arbitrarily stop anywhere Biden was up, other than to call the state for him?
That's exactly what the assumption is right now. They put the counting on pause when they know it will put Trump over the top and they use the Dominion software to figure out how many fraudulent mail-in ballots they need to count to offset the rise in Trump votes.
No, that's why you need evidence. Timestamps, witnesses, video footage, documents, election software fault proof etc. Once you get those things, you can make your case. That's why Steve keeps saying the Biden campaign is very worried about discovery in court.
The rules are "Election Day". A gentleman's agreement provided for an "Election Week." The agreement was disrespected, so we should revert to the written law - election DAY. Trump wins.
Fucking right it's suspicious. Especially since, AFAIK, counting only stopped in states where Trump was leading. Did they arbitrarily stop anywhere Biden was up, other than to call the state for him?