Now here's the rub. Such litigation is civil. It's purely whether or not the judge is convinced.
In a world where something is a 99.99% statistical impossibility no judge would allow the votes. However, they don't want to be seen as king-makers and prefer to say "Well...since you didn't witness it firsthand..."
Queue PA banning election monitoring. I wonder why that could be.
Yikes! That explains why Trump's legal team hasn't really talked about this and instead is going after PA to disqualify votes after 8 PM and those that were counted without allowing observers because it goes against PA's constitution. And that will vary state by state. The other thing I've heard Trump's legal team bring up is the voting machine discrepancies and dead voters and those out of state that voted illegally.
Hijacking top comment, a pede on twitter found out that some ballots were returned BEFORE they were mailed, guess how many such 'suspicious' mail in ballots he found in Philadelphia? 24,952
https://twitter.com/VC4351/status/1325538470593400832
I posted about this yesterday. I was scrolling through the batches and noticed 0%-100%. There are also many bug batches with less than 10% vites for Trump. Those doesn't see plausible either.
Exactly. There are many batches that have 3, 5, 20, etc. votes that go 100% for one or the other... I don't mind those. That is possible. Over 24k that go 100% one way can only happen in an utopian leftist fantasy.
Can statistics be used in court as evidence of fraud, or at least, of suspected fraud, to trigger the need for full audits?
Audits are already taking place.
Yes.
Now here's the rub. Such litigation is civil. It's purely whether or not the judge is convinced.
In a world where something is a 99.99% statistical impossibility no judge would allow the votes. However, they don't want to be seen as king-makers and prefer to say "Well...since you didn't witness it firsthand..."
Queue PA banning election monitoring. I wonder why that could be.
Yikes! That explains why Trump's legal team hasn't really talked about this and instead is going after PA to disqualify votes after 8 PM and those that were counted without allowing observers because it goes against PA's constitution. And that will vary state by state. The other thing I've heard Trump's legal team bring up is the voting machine discrepancies and dead voters and those out of state that voted illegally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zu9ZxzsWchg
Hijacking top comment, a pede on twitter found out that some ballots were returned BEFORE they were mailed, guess how many such 'suspicious' mail in ballots he found in Philadelphia? 24,952 https://twitter.com/VC4351/status/1325538470593400832
I posted about this yesterday. I was scrolling through the batches and noticed 0%-100%. There are also many bug batches with less than 10% vites for Trump. Those doesn't see plausible either.
Exactly. There are many batches that have 3, 5, 20, etc. votes that go 100% for one or the other... I don't mind those. That is possible. Over 24k that go 100% one way can only happen in an utopian leftist fantasy.