477
posted ago by undergroundceo +477 / -0

Let's not downplay the 6000 votes thing. Those 6000 votes account for 35% of all votes in that county. If it happened to 35% of each county that uses that software then Trump won by the biggest landslide in history. Theoretical and unlikely but the principle remains.

Comments (11)
sorted by:
5
overtotheright 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’d go further and audit all 50 states. I’ve never heard such positive things from my Cali and NYC friends. They were strongly confident that Trump had flipped them both.

3
tragician 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah no way is trump up 700k and 400k in ohio and magically in the key states tied AFTER THE FUCKING ELECTION.

1
overtotheright 1 point ago +1 / -0

I couldn’t agree more!!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Cali_Republican 3 points ago +3 / -0

47x6 Would be a slaughtering in MI. Then let's audit the other 30 states, Trump ends up with 85mil votes. Biden ends up with maybe 50

2
Whoopies_tds 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup, I still say looking back at other elections which had around 125 million total votes, Biden is lucky if he gets 55 million legal votes

2
GodSpeedTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also remember that General Flin's attorney who I can't remember her name said the dominion software is changing possibly 3% of the vote in every county across all states!

1
FL2PC72LE 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what I just sent to Senator Mike Shirkey

([email protected]) of the Michigan Legislature:

It's clear that the Legislature is the only hope Michigan voters have of being heard. Judge Kenney has simply swept aside all reports of ballots flipping by computer "glitch" (and always flipping toward Biden), ignored all reports of poll watchers being prevented from participating, waved away even the reasonable request of retaining the ballots for a re-count. This is shocking... he is allowing evidence to be destroyed to prevent it being brought in, and then dismissing calls for justice on the grounds that there is no evidence.

I know I speak for hundreds of thousands of voters when I beg the Legislature to make it absolutely, publicly clear, that if issues of voter transparency are not addressed, Michigan has no duty to appoint electors who will cast their vote in support of a fraudulent count.


I urge anyone with the time and inclination to send some variant of this message to our Michigan legislature. It just takes a moment to cut and paste, and you have nothing to lose; they never answer or argue. But maybe we can make an impact if we keep clamoring for justice.

1
y_do_i_need_to_hide 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll give you theoretical, but why do you believe it is unlikely?

1
CLaRGe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great point! Should have more evidence to this point soon.

1
JerryNadlerBeltFund 1 point ago +1 / -0

6,000 switched yields a 12,000 vote swing in a 17,000 vote county. This is massive , and the same NUMBER of votes across a dozen of the 30+ counties using the same tool would swing Michigan. . . that's before discarding unsupervised ballots, late/backdated ballots, forged ones, etc.

I will be interesting to see how an audit swings house seats, senate races, etc.