Could someone run a sample batch through and see the results? Say we ran 1000 ballots split exactly 50/50. Would the results show 51/49 or whatever it was coded for ?
Not only that, but we need to audit the votes to weed out illegitimate votes. Unfortunately, they also destroyed ballots, contrary to their own states' document retention laws.
I really hope you're right but with technology and how lazy people are I wouldn't be surprised if one tries to argue that the computers are trust worthy and it's not worth the time to go manually back count by hand
ALSO... NOT A SINGLE 'GLITCH' WENT IN TRUMPS FAVOR.
Could someone run a sample batch through and see the results? Say we ran 1000 ballots split exactly 50/50. Would the results show 51/49 or whatever it was coded for ?
When was this?
Not only that, but we need to audit the votes to weed out illegitimate votes. Unfortunately, they also destroyed ballots, contrary to their own states' document retention laws.
There is no possible way that the SCOTUS is going to allow computer only results that have not been matched against paper.
I really hope you're right but with technology and how lazy people are I wouldn't be surprised if one tries to argue that the computers are trust worthy and it's not worth the time to go manually back count by hand
SCOTUS is not dumb. They already know about the Democrat-owned Dominion software company that keeps flipping votes to Democrats.
The head of elections in Michigan already admitted it happened.
They also backdated a shit ton of ballots. So we also have to deal with that with a hand count
as a CS student,
kek