Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
It's not in the way you say you care
It's not in the way you've been treating my frenz
It's not in the way that you'll stay till the end
It's not in the way you look or the things that you say that you do
It's not in the words that you told me
It's not in the way you say you're mine, oooh
It's not in the way that you came back to me
It's not in the way that your love set me free
So, you're telling me that Delaware is the only state thus far to certify? Imagine that, Nov 5th, just two days after the election... Oh, and look, Virginia, where I am sure nothing untoward took place, certifies tomorrow. How convenient!
There are several different dates. Each state has their own deadline, but the federal Electoral Count Act specifies the "safe harbor" date for certification of EVs -- which is December 8, 2020.
A state can still certify EVs after that. But, if they meet the safe harbor deadline and follow their legal process, Congress cannot challenge it during the EV count in January.
If certified after the safe harbor date, a Congressman or Senator can submit a challenge. If the state doesn't follow a legal process, they can also challenge. Pennsylvania in particular could be interesting, as they ignored an order from SCOTUS prior to election day to segregate the ballots that arrived late. There are lots of legal questions in both PA and WI.
But, the challenge process probably won't help Trump. The House and Senate would vote separately whether to accept PA's EVs. Even presuming that Republicans would vote against it (a very narrow majority at the moment, and I think only one squishy RINO could block it), the tiebreaker vote would go to the PA (or WI) governor, and you can guess how that would turn out.
I'll reiterate that this is during the counting of EVs. This is a process that must be completed before it could be determined whether either Trump or Biden have a majority of EVs (and potentially put the election in the hands of Congress).
If there are issues with the electors sent to congress on the 14th, we enter a Constitutional crisis.
My take months ago was that regardless of the election outcome, the commies would cause a stink with electors on the 14th to throw the whole process into complete chaos.
I'm betting win over 270 prior to Dec 14th, but some swing States will still send democrat (communist) electors to gum up the works.
I hope I am right about a Trump win, but wrong about the commies....
First post here. Thanks to my brother for turning me on to this site. Sitting on the toilet just now and taking a democrap (legit, can send pics if needed), and I’m recalling my feelings of despair in 2008 when Obama won (in hindsight we were fucked if McCant won anyways)....I don’t have those those today. We won a week ago. We are going to prove it. And Obama’s weak ass fraud machine is going to lose. So yeah, you are a PUSSY ASS BITCH.
Make him sign the fuckinnewguy papers and read the disclaimer:
Due to extraneous circumstances beyond our control, all .win-lings are subject to a probationary period where they may be cast back out into the wild, uncivilized savagery of the otherwebs (also referred to as loserweb). Any acts of shillery, doomerism, cuckery, or other forms of impropriety will ensure the loss of your status as "new fren". Should you prove your mettle at winning, you will be rewarded with a new status as "comfy fren" and will be given all benefits heretofore, forthwith, and henceforth even. Good luck!
It was an absolute nightmare to navigate around that place. Walking miles and standing in the cold rain to watch his inauguration was still one of the greatest memories I have though. I’d easily pick that day as my Groundhog Day loop.
You are correct. And if they try to force him out of the White House on January 20th the military will have his back (note Esper got canned today...new military leadership now in place).
Mil is an incredibly diverse organization, stateside operations would likely pose a great risk to the Obama benedict arnolds. We could begin pulling units back home yesterday so they could connect with friends and retired brothers. They are not risking life and limb so we can effectively suspend elections via massive fraud.
I saw some places with a 20:1 that trump gets the inauguration. I wasn't able to take that bet because I'm a leaf, looking for places here that'll match those odds or give me better. 500$ in = 10k out at that rate...
Through augur, crypto betting, and was a total PITA to get it set.
Think I scooped up the last bets for Trump to win there, but check betfair exchange or DDG best political betting sites, I'm sure there's more out there, I had to use offshore bc my state doesn't allow betting through stateside servers, only int'l.
How many Biden votes would you gander are fraudulent? My bet is at least 10 million. There’s no motherfucking way in hell Sleepy Joe, who had more Trump supporters showing up to his events than his own, got more votes than Obama in 2008. If you’re going to cheat, at least go through the effort of making it seem possible.
Yep. It's SO over the top - the number could shock even us. I don't know anyone that voted for him (in 2016, I actually knew people that voted for crooked) Also, the number of ballots for Trump that were probably thrown in the garbage.
I love your optimism with those numbers, but that would be by far the most lopsided popular vote tally since 1820 when James Monroe won re-election unopposed. If I’d put a number on it, I’d put Trump at ~75 million votes and Biden at ~55 million votes, which would be the largest since 1984.
Most people that voted Blue was only because of anti-Trump TDS.
Also, I personally have no problem with legalizing marijuana in NJ, but Democrats dangled that in front of voters this year like a carrot & stick to vote Blue.
But also remember that state election boards don't decide the election either. The state legislatures choose electors. We must pressure them to not call anything until the lawsuits are complete.
Honestly, who the hell knows what's going to happen at this point. Not saying your wrong, not saying I'm right, but we're in some uncharted waters right now. Let's see how things play out.
If the vote comes down to the house voting instead if the electors which Trump would have advantage, what would happen if drunk Pelosi decided to not hold a vote?
It’s the greatest party number of all the representatives from each state.
California has 55 representatives. 35? Are Democrats and 20? are Republican. Therefore the state has a Democrat delegation. Each delegation gets one vote.
There are more representatives total from blue states, but republicans control more states. California and Wyoming have the same power if it goes to delegations.
Id rather rely on court cases throwing out illegal votes and Trump winning states. I’ll never forget that in 2016 the left held on to the hope that the electors would go against, and always thought that was pathetic. I refuse to do that now
Forget the electors, the state legislatures have final authority, but the republicucks are too busy helping Biden win. They don't have the balls to Stop the Steal themselves.
If the courts fail the system with massive evidence of illegality and voter fraud and election Fraud by officials in certain states then it’s the state representatives duty to not certify at all and send no electors or choose the rightful electors (Trump). That was not the case in. 2016, no matter how much the left and media screamed Russia bs.
Wasn't the left banking on the electors themselves to flip? We're talking about something else entirely. The state legislatures decide which electors to send. So there's nothing stopping a state legislature from a stolen state to say "fuck you Joe" and send Trump electors to the electoral college. Granted it depends on how the state constitution says they're supposed to pick electors (I think in PA it's based on the popular vote) Also I'm not particularly banking on this because even though the legislatures in the swing states are Republican it would take a level of cajones to do that I don't think Republicans are capable of having.
I suppose you’re correct: it’s a bit different because we know for a fact that some of the states have been stolen, rather than just “oh shock, bad man orange pls vote Crooked.”
However I agree that I don’t expect the legislatures to just go ahead and do it- I suppose my opinion is that if it’s the right thing for the electors to vote Trump they’ll be able to prove that he won the states in court. It’s not about optics, but It would be nice to have legal rulings to rely on
I am not talking about the electors being faithless. I am saying the legislatures from the states can choose Trump electors based on them not believing the election had any integrity.
I think I’m misunderstanding- if the “official count” (I know, we all know it’s fraudulent but humor me) has Jim Crow Joe winning the state then wouldn’t the electors technically be faithless if they vote Trump?
I talked to my PA rep and he is a full go if it comes down to this being needed. Trust me the area I live in he would have to move if the party was going this way and he decided to vote against it.
It used to be in most states that the legislatures themselves would directly allocate their state’s EVs, instead of by popular vote. The legislature would say, “all of our electoral votes go to this candidate”, or “fine, we’ll give six of our electoral votes to this candidate and four to the other.” In 1788, only three out of eleven states (Rhode Island and North Carolina hadn’t yet ratified the Constitution, and thus were technically not part of the Union) held popular votes to allocate electors, iirc.
Every state currently relies on the popular vote to appoint the electors (Nebraska and Maine have a slight variation).
The state legislature MAY get involved if there is a disputed result that cannot be resolved by the safe harbor date (2020-12-08). But, I don't think any state allows the state legislature to override the popular vote.
This is enshrined in state law. Ignoring the law is a leftist tactic... don't fall for it.
They can change the law. Anyways the constitution is the law. This is the way. Do you think in 16 if Trump would have won a blue state and it was needed to get him over 270 that they would have sent Trump electors? Fuck no. We can not allow them to use our decency against us as they fuck us in the ass. No red state should ever send a democratic elector again. This includes PA, WI, MI, AZ, GA, NC.
We will use every legal remedy we have available to us. The head of the PA state GOP has all ready suggested this is as an option so I will take his interpretation of the law over yours.
The questions and hypotheticals being stoked by The Atlantic are pure conjecture. I have had zero contact with the Trump campaign or others about changing Pennsylvania’s long-standing tradition of appointing electors consistent with the popular vote. 1/
The General Assembly is obligated to follow the law and the law is the Election Code, which clearly defines how electors are chosen and does not involved the legislature. 2/
My goal as a policymaker continues to be working in a bipartisan manner to fulfill our constitutional obligation to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to vote, that voters confidence that the system is fair and that the votes are counted in a timely manner. 3/3
So, are you going to accept a legislator's publicly stated interpretation of the law, instead of a bogus claim by The Atlantic? Or are you going to downvote this comment, too?
At the general election to be held in the year 1940, and every fourth year thereafter, there shall be elected by the qualified electors of the Commonwealth, persons to be known as electors of President and Vice-President of the United States, and referred to in this act as presidential electors, equal in number to the whole number of senators and representatives to which this State may be entitled in the Congress of the United States.
The Senate majority leader was not the one quoted in the article. So I don't really care what Corman said in September when they were talking hypotheticals. We now have a real-world situation where the law was broken and votes were counted that arrived after Nov 3rd at 8pm. If these ballots have been comingled with other ballots and the legislature feels that the election was not run fairly, then they will make that decision. I understand what the PA law says, however, the constitution gave the legislatures the power to choose the electors. The PA law may be unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause or there may be other ways to circumnavigate the PA law. All I am saying is it is on the table and we should use it if we can. I'm not sure why you are going from thread to thread concern trolling.
The Atlantic was recounting alleged conversations with the GOP chairman, the Senate Majority Leader and a third Republican leader they didn't name. Corman is quoted in that same article:
Although the article was in the "November" issue, it was published on September 23, 2020. You can find that information in the metadata buried in the source.
Corman's tweets (dated 2020-09-24) were in response to the publication of the article on their website.
If you want to remain willfully ignorant of both the law and the on-the-record statements of the PA Republican Senate Majority Leader, that's your choice. But, stop pretending it has any basis in reality.
I'm not "concern trolling". I'm explaining the process to you and anyone else that actually cares. I can point to actual citations of the law, and you have... nothing except wishful thinking.
Sidney Powell a few days ago regarding the election fuckery: “It’s got to be investigated probably by the president’s most trusted military intelligence officials.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQl9eC782Hc
Trump today: Fires Secretary of Defense Mark Esper
Miller's resume includes: "responsible for overseeing the employment of special operations forces in counterterrorism, Military Information Support Operations (MISO), Information Operations, unconventional warfare, irregular warfare, direct action, special reconnaissance, foreign internal defense, counter proliferation, sensitive special operations, and personnel recovery/hostage issues"
Sounds like he could be a good man to be in charge if we are dealing with information & electronic warfare and a domestic terrorist organization that wants to start a civil war.
🤣 Lol says the organization that put Iran, China, and North Korea on its Human Rights Council and runs child prostitution rings in Haiti and the Congo.
The UN has about as much credibility as Hitler when it comes to human rights.
This is a key point. She chooses her words very carefully, and if she chose to bring up military intel leadership in an interview with such a limited time to speak, it's a very important part of the case.
I’m conflicted about this. On the one hand, they’d probably do a bang-up job because they probably have a lot of experience dealing with voter fraud and election integrity in countries we’ve attempted to democratize, like Afghanistan and Iraq. On the other, it would make it seem to some (mostly libtards, but also probably some in the middle) like the military is taking sides in an American election, which is what stops us from becoming shitholes like Mali. (A few months ago, Mali’s twice-democratically elected president was ousted in a coup by the military, which is currently ruling the country under the leadership of the general who lead said coup.) I’m not saying it would be a coup, but some people in the middle might be alienated by it and it could start the US on a very bad slippery slope.
I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).
Which is ironic, because the Framers intended the federal government to have a very limited impact on our lives. They’d probably have gone with a monarchy if they saw the incestuous public-private bureaucratic oligarchy that currently runs (or prevents the running of, depending on the circumstance) our country.
Someone from the campaign or an influencer close to Trump needs to come here and do this. The Campaign can get thousands of people to line up in the dark for hours just to get a glimpse of the President.
Until they take control of this motivated but aimless grassroots army, it's potential will go on wasted. Your best bet to actually organize us aside from big name personalities in the movement are the mods.
Remember, our job was to vote, donate, and try to convince those close to us to do the same.
We did it, and we did it alot.
So now it's time for the legal team to take the ball and run with it. While they do that we need to keep our eyes and ears open to anything that may help them. But ultimately while the political solution is pursued, there isn't much we can do. If that fails, then it will fall back to us in a helluva way, but we're not there yet.
Sure we could help them if they would come on here and let us know how, but that's on them to use us. Not the other way around. People want to be active because it helps you feel like you are in control, and you should. But right now we need guidance from the campaign to make sure our efforts are working in concert with theirs.
Otherwise we end up looking for watermarks on ballots and other BS that doesn't actually help them.
Biden's acting with a lot of hubris right now. If he was smart he'd be cagier about claiming a win. He's setting himself up to fail. Failing is what he does best.
Not hearing too much about states certifying their results. Could they be having cold feet about swearing to the results? I think they were banking on Trump conceding due to the pressure from media and their demoralization campaign aimed at his base. We’re in it for the long haul and so is President Trump. He’s got this
ok, what about all the timelines for SCOTUS to review information, and if it goes to House vote, or God Forbid, "Pelosi becomes acting President"?
It sounds like no matter what is going on, there's a hard deadline of Jan 20 where if there hasn't been a winner declared and ready for inauguration, Pelosi takes over as "Acting President" while shit continues to be resolved and she will end up calling shots.
We have to spread the word for people to stop watching fox over these next few weeks. Many repubs still take it as gospel and will believe this over. Must stop people from watching and continue spreading updated information.
The state's governor is required to deliver the "certificate of ascertainment" to electors before they cast their vote.
If there's a "controversy" or "contest", the certificate must explain how it was resolved. This is supposed to provide Congress with the info they need to decide whether the EVs are legitimate.
And if it's not resolved before Dec 14th to the point where enough electors cannot cast their vote for one candidate to get to 270, we must have a Contingent Election in the House, correct?
Don't forget about December 8th! States are required to settle any and all disputes about the electors 6 days before the electors cast ballots. My understanding is states must meet this deadline or Congress has the right to not accept that state's results!
The week of December 8th is shaping up to be a flashpoint for the violent left.
The 2000 Election was on 11/7, and the deciding vote in the SCOTUS was made on 12/12 by FEMALE CATHOLIC justice Sandra Day O'Connor, a Reagan appointee. (She was succeeded by Samuel Alito in 2005. His nickname was "Scalito," after Scalia.) See here:
Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), O'Connor joined with four other justices on December 12, 2000, to rule on the Bush v. Gore case that ceased challenges to the results of the 2000 presidential election (ruling to stop the ongoing Florida election recount and to allow no further recounts). This case effectively ended Gore's hopes to become president. Some legal scholars have argued that she should have recused herself from this case, citing several reports that she became upset when the media initially announced that Gore had won Florida, with her husband explaining that they would have to wait another four years before retiring to Arizona.[63] O'Connor expressed surprise that the decision became controversial.[64] Some people in Washington stopped shaking her hand after the decision, and Arthur Miller confronted her about it at the Kennedy Center.[64]
Serious debate: What is the gameplan here for the deep state?
They KNOW this wil go to the SCOTUS, and that justice will be made. Yet they are going all in on the bluff, on a global level. Which means they are probably not going to want to concede even after the SCOTUS decision. Are they seriously going to try to force the NWO through war?
Spitballing here, but I think this take has credibility.
I think the Dems planned to cheat, but I don't think all the efforts were coordinated. I think you had individual blue-haired Xims and Xers harvest/destroy/lose/create/chuck ballots, state level partisans having mail-in ballots created in response to Trump's vote tallies in the 11th hour (and in a panic, did not select any down-ballot votes in some states), and the big deep state flipping votes via the machines based on their targeted percentage or whatever algorithm they used. If the Biden campaign was in on any of them, it was likely that one.
I think the huge turnout for Trump actually caused these independent sources of fraud to panic and start overshooting each other, which made the fraud obscenely obvious. Normally when these three independent groups cheat, they do so on a much smaller scale which makes it that much harder to detect.
I have a feeling make it seem like Trump "steals the election," push their NPCs into mass riots and call for civil war, call for UN and other countries to invade US and overthrow Trump.
Besides China and Russia, every other country is too chicken shit (rightfully so) to declare war against the most powerful military in the world. If the UN does that, it will only show how little countries think of them because no one will answer that call.
And if China declares war on the US, that will only prove that we're on the right side of history and it will force the left to lift up their veil and show their support for a Communists regime.
The left will probably still plea with other countries to complete their coup. Its probably China's best interest to do it at that moment. The will get REKT with Trump's 2nd term.
I don't think the deep state is at the point of a shooting war in the USA yet. They are trying to steer the USA back on course through subversion obviously and they are concerned enough about populist nationalism to defraud Trump and us.
Even so they have been playing the long game and i think it will take a decade or more of America breaking away from the one world government plan before war breaks out. I could be wrong but i think they still have faith their machine can control peoples minds and return the status quo which is a slow march to totalitarianism.
If one Representative and one Senator objects, then they can not certify. It would then go to a vote in the House (by delegations) and Senate, to see who wins.
It would start a shooting civil war, with the left opening fire, if they did that. There are enough RINOs that they would just give it to Biden.
Serious question: Does Rudy and Geotus have time to get this through SCOTUS before the deadline? I was just listening to Dennis Prager and his guest sounded like the timeline was too tight to present all of the fraud so they have to focus on only certain types and only certain of the swing states.
Remember folks, Celebrities came out of the woodwork in 2016 and for a full month spent so much of their income to get electors to change their votes on Feelings....
The salt must flow.....lets kick these assholes in their 10,000 dollar teeth with the truth.
Everyone in my family and circle of friends (except my dad, who is hella based) thinks I'm bat shit crazy for saying Trump will still win. I've been called delusional, sore loser, ignorant, and every name in the book in the past week. This is the type of information warfare that the left wants. They want to discourage and isolate Trump's base. The fact that Trump is hinting at more rallies is a great counter to that tactic.
I've been presenting it as stuff like, "Let's not celebrate too soon" or "we shouldn't count our chickens before they're hatched." Just to plant the seed that it's not a done deal.
Bush vs. Gore was decided on December 12th, last day to certify.
That was Florida's final cert date correct?
Officially it is the 23rd of November, but I think granted with extensions, any state can go to the 12th (for such reasons as this). https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results_certification_dates,_2020
We can sing this too: "Carry on my wayward son, there'll be peace when we are done Lay your weary head to rest, don't you cry no more"
Whoa whoa whoa
It's not in the way you say you care It's not in the way you've been treating my frenz It's not in the way that you'll stay till the end It's not in the way you look or the things that you say that you do
It's not in the words that you told me It's not in the way you say you're mine, oooh It's not in the way that you came back to me It's not in the way that your love set me free
Oh I never knew that was called that or that it was by Toto.
I bless the votes down in Floriiidaaaaaa.
Woah woah woah
I came here just for this. Thank you, pede. :)
So, you're telling me that Delaware is the only state thus far to certify? Imagine that, Nov 5th, just two days after the election... Oh, and look, Virginia, where I am sure nothing untoward took place, certifies tomorrow. How convenient!
Well ill laugh if they reverse it
They won't. Dems have majorities in both houses of the VA legislature.
There are several different dates. Each state has their own deadline, but the federal Electoral Count Act specifies the "safe harbor" date for certification of EVs -- which is December 8, 2020.
A state can still certify EVs after that. But, if they meet the safe harbor deadline and follow their legal process, Congress cannot challenge it during the EV count in January.
If certified after the safe harbor date, a Congressman or Senator can submit a challenge. If the state doesn't follow a legal process, they can also challenge. Pennsylvania in particular could be interesting, as they ignored an order from SCOTUS prior to election day to segregate the ballots that arrived late. There are lots of legal questions in both PA and WI.
But, the challenge process probably won't help Trump. The House and Senate would vote separately whether to accept PA's EVs. Even presuming that Republicans would vote against it (a very narrow majority at the moment, and I think only one squishy RINO could block it), the tiebreaker vote would go to the PA (or WI) governor, and you can guess how that would turn out.
I'll reiterate that this is during the counting of EVs. This is a process that must be completed before it could be determined whether either Trump or Biden have a majority of EVs (and potentially put the election in the hands of Congress).
Legal battle seems to end on December 14th, beyond that date it looks like its a political battle.
If there are issues with the electors sent to congress on the 14th, we enter a Constitutional crisis.
My take months ago was that regardless of the election outcome, the commies would cause a stink with electors on the 14th to throw the whole process into complete chaos.
I'm betting win over 270 prior to Dec 14th, but some swing States will still send democrat (communist) electors to gum up the works.
I hope I am right about a Trump win, but wrong about the commies....
This election may be decided by congress on January 6th, 2021.
Better watch their ass, or it will be decided by We the People shortly thereafter.
A fraudulent Congress put in place by fraudulent votes?
Not happening.
I’m a pussy ass bitch.
That's why big Mike married you. Kek
Obama out here dropping truth bombs with his regular bombs, damn.
O'Bomb-Uh
Watch this whole sketch- https://youtu.be/yeFDxsWBhaw
Its really him, you cant change my mind.
I'm still trying to get to the bottom of things...
Thank you Barry, very cool! 👍
First post here. Thanks to my brother for turning me on to this site. Sitting on the toilet just now and taking a democrap (legit, can send pics if needed), and I’m recalling my feelings of despair in 2008 when Obama won (in hindsight we were fucked if McCant won anyways)....I don’t have those those today. We won a week ago. We are going to prove it. And Obama’s weak ass fraud machine is going to lose. So yeah, you are a PUSSY ASS BITCH.
I'll updoot you but we got our eye on you newbie! :)
Make him sign the fuckinnewguy papers and read the disclaimer:
Due to extraneous circumstances beyond our control, all .win-lings are subject to a probationary period where they may be cast back out into the wild, uncivilized savagery of the otherwebs (also referred to as loserweb). Any acts of shillery, doomerism, cuckery, or other forms of impropriety will ensure the loss of your status as "new fren". Should you prove your mettle at winning, you will be rewarded with a new status as "comfy fren" and will be given all benefits heretofore, forthwith, and henceforth even. Good luck!
Any pics of the turds you dropped? Do they look like me?
Agreed
WATCHING GEOTUS TAKE THE OATH OF OFFICE IS GOING TO BE ESPECIALLY SWEET THIS TIME, CAN'T WAIT!!!
I live in Commiefornia, so DC is a long way away. But I will attend Trump's 2nd inauguration.
Shit, I'm from a whole other country and if the border is open, there's no way I'm missing it.
Americans First
Maybe we can make a swap - get this patriot here and drop one of our resident commies out of the helicopter on the way over to get this guy.
Well that's not very fair to the ground below the commie.
haven't even thought of this!!!!!!! i wanna go!
I will not miss it for the world! From there forward, I’ll be celebrating that day as a National holiday.
I'll go also.
My understanding is there is not a pomp and circumstance event for a reelection? Can someone confirm?
We need to all be there this time. Fake that time lapse bitches.
Hopefully they won't have those BS security checkpoints which turned away so many people last time
I'd bet my bottom dollar they will use Covid to do this though
now we'll have covid checkpoints no doubt...
It was an absolute nightmare to navigate around that place. Walking miles and standing in the cold rain to watch his inauguration was still one of the greatest memories I have though. I’d easily pick that day as my Groundhog Day loop.
And Trump will be there to make sure they actually keep protestors from blocking the checkpoints.
Bernie Bros will rage so hard they shit them selves!
First set of States starts Certifying the vote counts TOMORROW. NOT one vote has been certified yet.
I guarantee you Biden will lose this election. I say this to everyone I know, and they look at me like I'm nuts. Take it to the bank, we are winning.
You are correct. And if they try to force him out of the White House on January 20th the military will have his back (note Esper got canned today...new military leadership now in place).
Love the switcheroo. Takes out one of their contingency plans. I expect to see more of these "haha we saw you coming, idiots" moves
not just canned, but terminated. Blasted out of Trump's orbit.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE!
pussy ass bitch
"I would like to thank him for his service." ...but I won't.
Hasta la Vista
Yeah when he fired Esper that was ANOTHER BOMBSHELL. THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF THE END. THE WALLS ARE CLOSING IN ON THE DEMS.
Yep, the NPCs are already freaking the fuck out.
https://i.maga.host/KThqXRv.png
There's no escape!
Get patriot Kyle Rittenhouse on the phone.
Kyle crossed state lines which means it's a federal crime. I can see POTUS pardoning him very quickly once all the dust has settled.
Even with a new SOD I wouldnt bank on the military backing GEOTUS; much of the Kenyan-appointed beta progressive cucks are in senior leadership now.
Mil is an incredibly diverse organization, stateside operations would likely pose a great risk to the Obama benedict arnolds. We could begin pulling units back home yesterday so they could connect with friends and retired brothers. They are not risking life and limb so we can effectively suspend elections via massive fraud.
I love the confidence! Feels good to read...I̶ ̶h̶o̶p̶e̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶ ̶a̶r̶e̶ ̶r̶i̶g̶h̶t̶ ̶:̶)̶ you ARE right!
edit: ditched the last part
If I can sneak in here. Everything up to feels good to read was on point. You can ditch that last part imo.
I took odds on Trump 10 to 1 over the weekend.
The other half went to his defense fund.
Where did you place it? I want some of that.
I saw some places with a 20:1 that trump gets the inauguration. I wasn't able to take that bet because I'm a leaf, looking for places here that'll match those odds or give me better. 500$ in = 10k out at that rate...
Through augur, crypto betting, and was a total PITA to get it set.
Think I scooped up the last bets for Trump to win there, but check betfair exchange or DDG best political betting sites, I'm sure there's more out there, I had to use offshore bc my state doesn't allow betting through stateside servers, only int'l.
dang sorry i asked! lol!!!! "your winnings sir!"
Yes! I tell everyone the same. He won, YUGE!
How many Biden votes would you gander are fraudulent? My bet is at least 10 million. There’s no motherfucking way in hell Sleepy Joe, who had more Trump supporters showing up to his events than his own, got more votes than Obama in 2008. If you’re going to cheat, at least go through the effort of making it seem possible.
Yep. It's SO over the top - the number could shock even us. I don't know anyone that voted for him (in 2016, I actually knew people that voted for crooked) Also, the number of ballots for Trump that were probably thrown in the garbage.
Yup. Either way Trump won the legal popular in a landslide.
I would say Biden got a comfy 30mil votes and Trump got 90-100mil.
Based purely on bidens youtube rallies, usually maxed at 3k live viewers and 70% were MAGA trolling them.
I love your optimism with those numbers, but that would be by far the most lopsided popular vote tally since 1820 when James Monroe won re-election unopposed. If I’d put a number on it, I’d put Trump at ~75 million votes and Biden at ~55 million votes, which would be the largest since 1984.
But I’m no expert and I’m just spitballing.
Let me look it up, I saw a handy graphic somewhere, I know VA is tomorrow and AK is the 25th.
Didn’t they file lawsuits in VA?
I don't know the answer
https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results_certification_dates,_2020
New Jersey - 12/18/20
Most people that voted Blue was only because of anti-Trump TDS.
Also, I personally have no problem with legalizing marijuana in NJ, but Democrats dangled that in front of voters this year like a carrot & stick to vote Blue.
I voted down ballet republican and to legalize weed. Fuck the dems I changed from independent to republican this year
https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/after-the-voting-ends-the-steps-to-complete-an-election.aspx
But also remember that state election boards don't decide the election either. The state legislatures choose electors. We must pressure them to not call anything until the lawsuits are complete.
Every one of those grey lines needs to be fucking OWNED by MAGA. Not a single day where nothing is accomplished!!!
Day 1: Feelin cute. Might just fire my Sec of Defense and bump the Dow to 30k
Kek
I'm sure something will happen each day. But those of us not on the legal team will probably not be privy to a lot of it unfortunately.
If it's anything like 2000, your tale would be correct.
I'd say this mess is exactly like 2000, except all different and shit.
Love isn't always on time !
Pedocrats have a tendency for premature electuation.
🤣🤣🤣
whoa whoa whoa
Every single time I read "hold the line"
Oh oh oh
Ooooooooooh, Mike Pence has to certify the results. That's promising!
yeah but I'm sure he can't just unilaterally decide "I'm not signing this"
Honestly, who the hell knows what's going to happen at this point. Not saying your wrong, not saying I'm right, but we're in some uncharted waters right now. Let's see how things play out.
Agreed.
Uncharted waters is exactly it. America has never before had an “election” that is unbecoming even of the most fruity banana republics.
Pence: Well, you dirty fucking commies have been cheating at everything for decades. Now it's my turn, motherfuckers.
SILVER FOX IN FOR THE KILL
If the vote comes down to the house voting instead if the electors which Trump would have advantage, what would happen if drunk Pelosi decided to not hold a vote?
It’s not “the house” it’s the house delegation. So Alaska gets one vote, Texas gets one vote, California gets one vote, etc.
There are more Republican delegations than Democrat ones. 26v24 iirc
I think it's more than that. Don't we have like 32?
Iirc Reps control 26, Dems 22, and 2 are evenly split (Pennsylvania and Michigan, ironically).
Can you explain this to me further? What exactly is a delegation and how do we know we have more than the Dems?
It’s the greatest party number of all the representatives from each state.
California has 55 representatives. 35? Are Democrats and 20? are Republican. Therefore the state has a Democrat delegation. Each delegation gets one vote.
There are more representatives total from blue states, but republicans control more states. California and Wyoming have the same power if it goes to delegations.
She can't. The Constitition specifies the quorum rules.
Consitution specifies the election be held on
Yet, here we are. With Biden getting creamed on the Tuesday after the first Monday in the month of November, and then stealing the election afterwards
i mean who's gonna say no
Could be the reason why we haven’t seen or heard a peep out of him.
We did. He said that we're going to win.
It is, but I hope that is not a formality.
Pence only presides over the electoral vote count. He does not participate.
Yup
Also, remember state legislatures choose the electors and choose who they want.
Id rather rely on court cases throwing out illegal votes and Trump winning states. I’ll never forget that in 2016 the left held on to the hope that the electors would go against, and always thought that was pathetic. I refuse to do that now
Forget the electors, the state legislatures have final authority, but the republicucks are too busy helping Biden win. They don't have the balls to Stop the Steal themselves.
If the courts fail the system with massive evidence of illegality and voter fraud and election Fraud by officials in certain states then it’s the state representatives duty to not certify at all and send no electors or choose the rightful electors (Trump). That was not the case in. 2016, no matter how much the left and media screamed Russia bs.
“It’s the states’ representatives duty not to certify”
Did not know that, do they vote on that as an entire legislative body, or is it a smaller group? How does that work?
Wasn't the left banking on the electors themselves to flip? We're talking about something else entirely. The state legislatures decide which electors to send. So there's nothing stopping a state legislature from a stolen state to say "fuck you Joe" and send Trump electors to the electoral college. Granted it depends on how the state constitution says they're supposed to pick electors (I think in PA it's based on the popular vote) Also I'm not particularly banking on this because even though the legislatures in the swing states are Republican it would take a level of cajones to do that I don't think Republicans are capable of having.
I suppose you’re correct: it’s a bit different because we know for a fact that some of the states have been stolen, rather than just “oh shock, bad man orange pls vote Crooked.”
However I agree that I don’t expect the legislatures to just go ahead and do it- I suppose my opinion is that if it’s the right thing for the electors to vote Trump they’ll be able to prove that he won the states in court. It’s not about optics, but It would be nice to have legal rulings to rely on
I believe the legislature can just change the rules around how they choose the electors before doing so.
I am not talking about the electors being faithless. I am saying the legislatures from the states can choose Trump electors based on them not believing the election had any integrity.
I think I’m misunderstanding- if the “official count” (I know, we all know it’s fraudulent but humor me) has Jim Crow Joe winning the state then wouldn’t the electors technically be faithless if they vote Trump?
Youre a good person
I hope no one is counting on this. This is a last stop gap measure, that I doubt would hold anyway as most of our politicians are cucked.
I talked to my PA rep and he is a full go if it comes down to this being needed. Trust me the area I live in he would have to move if the party was going this way and he decided to vote against it.
Wrong, they have only let that happen if it didn't affect the winner.
Read the constitution, the legislature from each state chooses the electors, however, they see fit.
I didn't mean the legislatures, I meant if there are faithless Electors - the Electors themselves.
Ex post facto (retroactive) laws are also unconstitutional.
It used to be in most states that the legislatures themselves would directly allocate their state’s EVs, instead of by popular vote. The legislature would say, “all of our electoral votes go to this candidate”, or “fine, we’ll give six of our electoral votes to this candidate and four to the other.” In 1788, only three out of eleven states (Rhode Island and North Carolina hadn’t yet ratified the Constitution, and thus were technically not part of the Union) held popular votes to allocate electors, iirc.
Every state currently relies on the popular vote to appoint the electors (Nebraska and Maine have a slight variation).
The state legislature MAY get involved if there is a disputed result that cannot be resolved by the safe harbor date (2020-12-08). But, I don't think any state allows the state legislature to override the popular vote.
This is enshrined in state law. Ignoring the law is a leftist tactic... don't fall for it.
They can change the law. Anyways the constitution is the law. This is the way. Do you think in 16 if Trump would have won a blue state and it was needed to get him over 270 that they would have sent Trump electors? Fuck no. We can not allow them to use our decency against us as they fuck us in the ass. No red state should ever send a democratic elector again. This includes PA, WI, MI, AZ, GA, NC.
No, they can't change their state law, without providing an opportunity for challenge. It has to be pursuant to law enacted before the election.
If you use leftist tactics against leftists, you become them.
We will use every legal remedy we have available to us. The head of the PA state GOP has all ready suggested this is as an option so I will take his interpretation of the law over yours.
Tbh the retroactive reinterpretation of election law during this election is exactly what lead to the shitshow in Pennsylvania rn.
The PA Senate Majority Leader actually said:
https://twitter.com/jakecorman/status/1309276095984939010?s=21
So, are you going to accept a legislator's publicly stated interpretation of the law, instead of a bogus claim by The Atlantic? Or are you going to downvote this comment, too?
Here's what PA law actually says:
https://govt.westlaw.com/pac/Document/NEB4AE6C0343011DA8A989F4EECDB8638?viewType=FullText&originationContext=documenttoc&transitionType=CategoryPageItem&contextData=(sc.Default)
(emphasis is mine)
The Senate majority leader was not the one quoted in the article. So I don't really care what Corman said in September when they were talking hypotheticals. We now have a real-world situation where the law was broken and votes were counted that arrived after Nov 3rd at 8pm. If these ballots have been comingled with other ballots and the legislature feels that the election was not run fairly, then they will make that decision. I understand what the PA law says, however, the constitution gave the legislatures the power to choose the electors. The PA law may be unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause or there may be other ways to circumnavigate the PA law. All I am saying is it is on the table and we should use it if we can. I'm not sure why you are going from thread to thread concern trolling.
Did you not bother to read the article?
The Atlantic was recounting alleged conversations with the GOP chairman, the Senate Majority Leader and a third Republican leader they didn't name. Corman is quoted in that same article:
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/11/what-if-trump-refuses-concede/616424/
Although the article was in the "November" issue, it was published on September 23, 2020. You can find that information in the metadata buried in the source.
Corman's tweets (dated 2020-09-24) were in response to the publication of the article on their website.
If you want to remain willfully ignorant of both the law and the on-the-record statements of the PA Republican Senate Majority Leader, that's your choice. But, stop pretending it has any basis in reality.
I'm not "concern trolling". I'm explaining the process to you and anyone else that actually cares. I can point to actual citations of the law, and you have... nothing except wishful thinking.
Sidney Powell a few days ago regarding the election fuckery: “It’s got to be investigated probably by the president’s most trusted military intelligence officials.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQl9eC782Hc
Trump today: Fires Secretary of Defense Mark Esper
Replaced by Christopher C. Miller
Background:
Mar 2020 Miller becomes Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Office of the Director of National Intelligence. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-intent-nominate-individual-key-administration-post-22/
Antifa declared a terrorist organization
Miller's resume includes: "responsible for overseeing the employment of special operations forces in counterterrorism, Military Information Support Operations (MISO), Information Operations, unconventional warfare, irregular warfare, direct action, special reconnaissance, foreign internal defense, counter proliferation, sensitive special operations, and personnel recovery/hostage issues"
https://www.defense.gov/Our-Story/Biographies/Biography/Article/2111192/christopher-c-miller/
Sounds like he could be a good man to be in charge if we are dealing with information & electronic warfare and a domestic terrorist organization that wants to start a civil war.
Let's not forget: The military's charge is to protect the Constitution of these United States--above all else.
We might be witnessing this unfold.
"Infiltration not invasion."
🤣 Lol says the organization that put Iran, China, and North Korea on its Human Rights Council and runs child prostitution rings in Haiti and the Congo.
The UN has about as much credibility as Hitler when it comes to human rights.
He has probably completed a phase of something of which he now probably is confident to lead.
This is a key point. She chooses her words very carefully, and if she chose to bring up military intel leadership in an interview with such a limited time to speak, it's a very important part of the case.
I’m conflicted about this. On the one hand, they’d probably do a bang-up job because they probably have a lot of experience dealing with voter fraud and election integrity in countries we’ve attempted to democratize, like Afghanistan and Iraq. On the other, it would make it seem to some (mostly libtards, but also probably some in the middle) like the military is taking sides in an American election, which is what stops us from becoming shitholes like Mali. (A few months ago, Mali’s twice-democratically elected president was ousted in a coup by the military, which is currently ruling the country under the leadership of the general who lead said coup.) I’m not saying it would be a coup, but some people in the middle might be alienated by it and it could start the US on a very bad slippery slope.
https://www.army.mil/values/oath.html
I don’t disagree at all, and it is within the military’s preview, I’m just saying the optics wouldn’t be the greatest.
It's funny because it's still kind of a salt thread because they reveal how much their mental health depends on the federal government.
Which is ironic, because the Framers intended the federal government to have a very limited impact on our lives. They’d probably have gone with a monarchy if they saw the incestuous public-private bureaucratic oligarchy that currently runs (or prevents the running of, depending on the circumstance) our country.
Someone from the campaign or an influencer close to Trump needs to come here and do this. The Campaign can get thousands of people to line up in the dark for hours just to get a glimpse of the President.
Until they take control of this motivated but aimless grassroots army, it's potential will go on wasted. Your best bet to actually organize us aside from big name personalities in the movement are the mods.
But it's gotta be one of those types to do it.
Remember, our job was to vote, donate, and try to convince those close to us to do the same.
We did it, and we did it alot.
So now it's time for the legal team to take the ball and run with it. While they do that we need to keep our eyes and ears open to anything that may help them. But ultimately while the political solution is pursued, there isn't much we can do. If that fails, then it will fall back to us in a helluva way, but we're not there yet.
Sure we could help them if they would come on here and let us know how, but that's on them to use us. Not the other way around. People want to be active because it helps you feel like you are in control, and you should. But right now we need guidance from the campaign to make sure our efforts are working in concert with theirs.
Otherwise we end up looking for watermarks on ballots and other BS that doesn't actually help them.
A ballot rally?!
Exactly.
And it's not figured out by then, they won't have the certified votes, and then the Constitutional process for this is laid out.
OK... what should we do? What can we do?
we should also do it with no masks on
TWO WEEKS that's all
Pedes be patient things will turn around for GEOTUS very soon
and it's going to be BEUTIFUL
Someone should photoshop the Jan 20 part to "President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence are sworn in"
https://i.imgur.com/0T6yCLi.jpg the chart the MSM doesn't want you to see!
Hey guys, I turned my four boxes over and there's an actual date on the bottom!
Who knew?
Biden's acting with a lot of hubris right now. If he was smart he'd be cagier about claiming a win. He's setting himself up to fail. Failing is what he does best.
The left always gets loud and triumphant when they are losing.
Biden’s not making any decisions on his actions
It's all to persuade people to accept him. They are just setting an illusion that he won and is going to take office.
I argue that maybe he has never failed. His results may have been intended.
Not hearing too much about states certifying their results. Could they be having cold feet about swearing to the results? I think they were banking on Trump conceding due to the pressure from media and their demoralization campaign aimed at his base. We’re in it for the long haul and so is President Trump. He’s got this
Can't certify with litigation pending.
Good point!
YES SIR!! HOLDING!!
If anyone was wondering about specific state dates: Arizona 11/30 Georgia 11/20 Michigan 11/23 Pennsylvania 11/23 Wisconsin 12/01 Florida 11/17
NC and Alaska?
Florida is irrelevant. What about Nevada?
Certification dates?
ok, what about all the timelines for SCOTUS to review information, and if it goes to House vote, or God Forbid, "Pelosi becomes acting President"?
It sounds like no matter what is going on, there's a hard deadline of Jan 20 where if there hasn't been a winner declared and ready for inauguration, Pelosi takes over as "Acting President" while shit continues to be resolved and she will end up calling shots.
Wrong, we will take control of the house
We have to spread the word for people to stop watching fox over these next few weeks. Many repubs still take it as gospel and will believe this over. Must stop people from watching and continue spreading updated information.
Fuck the AP. This doesn't take into consideration a Contingent Election https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contingent_election
I was gonna say... FUCK AP.
The contingent election only occurs if no candidate gets a majority of EVs.
The process has to play out until 2020-01-06. I explained the details here:
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EkAa7d/x/c/1ATVesxZeo?d=50
Aren't electors prevented from casting their ballots if there is litigation still in process?
The state's governor is required to deliver the "certificate of ascertainment" to electors before they cast their vote.
If there's a "controversy" or "contest", the certificate must explain how it was resolved. This is supposed to provide Congress with the info they need to decide whether the EVs are legitimate.
And if it's not resolved before Dec 14th to the point where enough electors cannot cast their vote for one candidate to get to 270, we must have a Contingent Election in the House, correct?
Thanks for answering, btw.
No, that's not the next step.
The next step is counting the electoral votes in a joint session of the new Congress. I explain the process here:
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EkAa7d/x/c/1ATVesxZeo
The contingent election in Congress (Prez in the House, VP in the Senate) only happens if neither candidate has a majority of EVs.
And December 14 is total solar eclipse, the day trump born is total lunar eclipse. Im not superstitious but this is one hell of a coincidence
Yeah but no. We have a ton of work to do in the next 4 weeks. Trump needs every ounce of our energy.
The only "might" here is the might of GEOTUS.
Marathon not a sprint boys. We're in a holding pattern for some time.
s1 h79 uM2b Xj w ioIzt TVYBs zg418 Zmj NI dH2 V0P FkYQecA5EHf Li C7zd wcIF4 zuawNnYDgRm7 FcCt akNv ZmdYT iVZ ELMTU r5i exah 1lq WEeaui aOtv 4f Mnn 46 Hs SxPz Jhl Mv9o6bjd v3 Nxym fY Ky LFEO Qw RDksDvtLL zF e7PbQP gCbM mO1F n9dez 0loav sXW 3mt7xVn ICw Ngga2AnH Am2 oVOagqGor zW tGP gD2YageEA
Don't forget about December 8th! States are required to settle any and all disputes about the electors 6 days before the electors cast ballots. My understanding is states must meet this deadline or Congress has the right to not accept that state's results!
The week of December 8th is shaping up to be a flashpoint for the violent left.
The 2000 Election was on 11/7, and the deciding vote in the SCOTUS was made on 12/12 by FEMALE CATHOLIC justice Sandra Day O'Connor, a Reagan appointee. (She was succeeded by Samuel Alito in 2005. His nickname was "Scalito," after Scalia.) See here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandra_Day_O%27Connor#Supreme_Court_jurisprudence
had a whooooolllleeeee lotta people ready to feint early on when the media first made their move.
Heaven is waiting to see how much help it will send. Pray, boys and girl.
Serious debate: What is the gameplan here for the deep state?
They KNOW this wil go to the SCOTUS, and that justice will be made. Yet they are going all in on the bluff, on a global level. Which means they are probably not going to want to concede even after the SCOTUS decision. Are they seriously going to try to force the NWO through war?
Spitballing here, but I think this take has credibility.
I think the Dems planned to cheat, but I don't think all the efforts were coordinated. I think you had individual blue-haired Xims and Xers harvest/destroy/lose/create/chuck ballots, state level partisans having mail-in ballots created in response to Trump's vote tallies in the 11th hour (and in a panic, did not select any down-ballot votes in some states), and the big deep state flipping votes via the machines based on their targeted percentage or whatever algorithm they used. If the Biden campaign was in on any of them, it was likely that one.
I think the huge turnout for Trump actually caused these independent sources of fraud to panic and start overshooting each other, which made the fraud obscenely obvious. Normally when these three independent groups cheat, they do so on a much smaller scale which makes it that much harder to detect.
I have a feeling make it seem like Trump "steals the election," push their NPCs into mass riots and call for civil war, call for UN and other countries to invade US and overthrow Trump.
Perhaps the reason why trump replaced the secretary of defense?
Christopher C. Miller seems like a very important key figure here.
The UN is not a country, and it doesn't have a single soldier.
If Trump is re-elected they'll just REEEE
Their plan is probably to stop the courts from deciding in our favor.
I'm just saying what the left will probably scream for. There will be REEEEEE
Good. Lets settle this once and for all.
Besides China and Russia, every other country is too chicken shit (rightfully so) to declare war against the most powerful military in the world. If the UN does that, it will only show how little countries think of them because no one will answer that call.
And if China declares war on the US, that will only prove that we're on the right side of history and it will force the left to lift up their veil and show their support for a Communists regime.
The left will probably still plea with other countries to complete their coup. Its probably China's best interest to do it at that moment. The will get REKT with Trump's 2nd term.
I would love for the left to side with China if it comes to a war. The veil will finally be lifted for the world to see.
I don't think the deep state is at the point of a shooting war in the USA yet. They are trying to steer the USA back on course through subversion obviously and they are concerned enough about populist nationalism to defraud Trump and us.
Even so they have been playing the long game and i think it will take a decade or more of America breaking away from the one world government plan before war breaks out. I could be wrong but i think they still have faith their machine can control peoples minds and return the status quo which is a slow march to totalitarianism.
More violence, Covid21, UN invasion...they're not out of tricks
Game plan? Divided we fall. Thats their gameplan.
Destroy trust in the system and create more groups than trump haters and lovers.
Destroy world trust in the United States due to destabilization of the country and boom. Chaos.
Its ok we will prevail. Pray and trust the process. Karma is coming to Biden in SCOTUS if it gets that far
HOLD THE LINE. THIS IS WAR. TRUMP WON AND WE ARE GOING TO CLOSE ON IT.
Inb4 AP scrubs this
Where do we MAGA? Can I start already or am I too early?
Can Pence choose to not certify the results?
If one Representative and one Senator objects, then they can not certify. It would then go to a vote in the House (by delegations) and Senate, to see who wins.
It would start a shooting civil war, with the left opening fire, if they did that. There are enough RINOs that they would just give it to Biden.
Lol, no, the left wouldn't just REEEE and spill their soy latte.
I don't believe that RINO will side with us, but it's because they are corrupted. Not because they fear the soyboys.
We are not stuck in this timeline with them. They are trapped in here with us!
Serious question: Does Rudy and Geotus have time to get this through SCOTUS before the deadline? I was just listening to Dennis Prager and his guest sounded like the timeline was too tight to present all of the fraud so they have to focus on only certain types and only certain of the swing states.
And why can not this be brought directly to SCOTUS? Would figure there has to be some sort of qualifier, and not knowing - I assume this would be one.
The left is absolutely giddy right now...not even thinking about the recounts & audits. This should be interesting
Wins aren’t always on time!
This is a great sticky
Overseas ballots? Didn't we already get those from China? Prefilled out for Biden?
I’m trying to remain optimistic. This will be a long month
Remember folks, Celebrities came out of the woodwork in 2016 and for a full month spent so much of their income to get electors to change their votes on Feelings....
The salt must flow.....lets kick these assholes in their 10,000 dollar teeth with the truth.
Thank you for sharing this pede!!!!!!!!!!
Everyone in my family and circle of friends (except my dad, who is hella based) thinks I'm bat shit crazy for saying Trump will still win. I've been called delusional, sore loser, ignorant, and every name in the book in the past week. This is the type of information warfare that the left wants. They want to discourage and isolate Trump's base. The fact that Trump is hinting at more rallies is a great counter to that tactic.
I've been presenting it as stuff like, "Let's not celebrate too soon" or "we shouldn't count our chickens before they're hatched." Just to plant the seed that it's not a done deal.
Buckle up, it's gonna be a wild couple of months!
False. Simply casting ballots does not elect the president. Congress must confirm!!
No no NO...TWITTER already told me that Joe Biden WON..it's OVER .... /s /s /s /ss
Your lack of faith disturbs me. /s /s /s /ss