7473
Comments (327)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
36
Snake 36 points ago +37 / -1

Sidney Powell a few days ago regarding the election fuckery: “It’s got to be investigated probably by the president’s most trusted military intelligence officials.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQl9eC782Hc

Trump today: Fires Secretary of Defense Mark Esper

Replaced by Christopher C. Miller

Background:

Mar 2020 Miller becomes Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Office of the Director of National Intelligence. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-intent-nominate-individual-key-administration-post-22/

Antifa declared a terrorist organization

Miller's resume includes: "responsible for overseeing the employment of special operations forces in counterterrorism, Military Information Support Operations (MISO), Information Operations, unconventional warfare, irregular warfare, direct action, special reconnaissance, foreign internal defense, counter proliferation, sensitive special operations, and personnel recovery/hostage issues"

https://www.defense.gov/Our-Story/Biographies/Biography/Article/2111192/christopher-c-miller/

Sounds like he could be a good man to be in charge if we are dealing with information & electronic warfare and a domestic terrorist organization that wants to start a civil war.

14
SordidPontification 14 points ago +14 / -0

Let's not forget: The military's charge is to protect the Constitution of these United States--above all else.

We might be witnessing this unfold.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
Snake 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Infiltration not invasion."

3
PikachuJohnson 3 points ago +3 / -0

🤣 Lol says the organization that put Iran, China, and North Korea on its Human Rights Council and runs child prostitution rings in Haiti and the Congo.

The UN has about as much credibility as Hitler when it comes to human rights.

4
philandy 4 points ago +4 / -0

He has probably completed a phase of something of which he now probably is confident to lead.

3
OconusLurex 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a key point. She chooses her words very carefully, and if she chose to bring up military intel leadership in an interview with such a limited time to speak, it's a very important part of the case.

2
PikachuJohnson 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m conflicted about this. On the one hand, they’d probably do a bang-up job because they probably have a lot of experience dealing with voter fraud and election integrity in countries we’ve attempted to democratize, like Afghanistan and Iraq. On the other, it would make it seem to some (mostly libtards, but also probably some in the middle) like the military is taking sides in an American election, which is what stops us from becoming shitholes like Mali. (A few months ago, Mali’s twice-democratically elected president was ousted in a coup by the military, which is currently ruling the country under the leadership of the general who lead said coup.) I’m not saying it would be a coup, but some people in the middle might be alienated by it and it could start the US on a very bad slippery slope.

3
Snake 3 points ago +3 / -0

I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

https://www.army.mil/values/oath.html

2
PikachuJohnson 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t disagree at all, and it is within the military’s preview, I’m just saying the optics wouldn’t be the greatest.