The state's governor is required to deliver the "certificate of ascertainment" to electors before they cast their vote.
If there's a "controversy" or "contest", the certificate must explain how it was resolved. This is supposed to provide Congress with the info they need to decide whether the EVs are legitimate.
And if it's not resolved before Dec 14th to the point where enough electors cannot cast their vote for one candidate to get to 270, we must have a Contingent Election in the House, correct?
Fuck the AP. This doesn't take into consideration a Contingent Election https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contingent_election
I was gonna say... FUCK AP.
The contingent election only occurs if no candidate gets a majority of EVs.
The process has to play out until 2020-01-06. I explained the details here:
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EkAa7d/x/c/1ATVesxZeo?d=50
Aren't electors prevented from casting their ballots if there is litigation still in process?
The state's governor is required to deliver the "certificate of ascertainment" to electors before they cast their vote.
If there's a "controversy" or "contest", the certificate must explain how it was resolved. This is supposed to provide Congress with the info they need to decide whether the EVs are legitimate.
And if it's not resolved before Dec 14th to the point where enough electors cannot cast their vote for one candidate to get to 270, we must have a Contingent Election in the House, correct?
Thanks for answering, btw.