The Senate majority leader was not the one quoted in the article. So I don't really care what Corman said in September when they were talking hypotheticals. We now have a real-world situation where the law was broken and votes were counted that arrived after Nov 3rd at 8pm. If these ballots have been comingled with other ballots and the legislature feels that the election was not run fairly, then they will make that decision. I understand what the PA law says, however, the constitution gave the legislatures the power to choose the electors. The PA law may be unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause or there may be other ways to circumnavigate the PA law. All I am saying is it is on the table and we should use it if we can. I'm not sure why you are going from thread to thread concern trolling.
The Atlantic was recounting alleged conversations with the GOP chairman, the Senate Majority Leader and a third Republican leader they didn't name. Corman is quoted in that same article:
Although the article was in the "November" issue, it was published on September 23, 2020. You can find that information in the metadata buried in the source.
Corman's tweets (dated 2020-09-24) were in response to the publication of the article on their website.
If you want to remain willfully ignorant of both the law and the on-the-record statements of the PA Republican Senate Majority Leader, that's your choice. But, stop pretending it has any basis in reality.
I'm not "concern trolling". I'm explaining the process to you and anyone else that actually cares. I can point to actual citations of the law, and you have... nothing except wishful thinking.
The Senate majority leader was not the one quoted in the article. So I don't really care what Corman said in September when they were talking hypotheticals. We now have a real-world situation where the law was broken and votes were counted that arrived after Nov 3rd at 8pm. If these ballots have been comingled with other ballots and the legislature feels that the election was not run fairly, then they will make that decision. I understand what the PA law says, however, the constitution gave the legislatures the power to choose the electors. The PA law may be unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause or there may be other ways to circumnavigate the PA law. All I am saying is it is on the table and we should use it if we can. I'm not sure why you are going from thread to thread concern trolling.
Did you not bother to read the article?
The Atlantic was recounting alleged conversations with the GOP chairman, the Senate Majority Leader and a third Republican leader they didn't name. Corman is quoted in that same article:
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/11/what-if-trump-refuses-concede/616424/
Although the article was in the "November" issue, it was published on September 23, 2020. You can find that information in the metadata buried in the source.
Corman's tweets (dated 2020-09-24) were in response to the publication of the article on their website.
If you want to remain willfully ignorant of both the law and the on-the-record statements of the PA Republican Senate Majority Leader, that's your choice. But, stop pretending it has any basis in reality.
I'm not "concern trolling". I'm explaining the process to you and anyone else that actually cares. I can point to actual citations of the law, and you have... nothing except wishful thinking.