People think that this could be a distraction and want to distance from it which I understand.
I'm just trying to follow everything and thought that this was interesting. Others have stated that all ballot printing and distribution is handled at the local level and paper that uses MIC watermarking is invalid since it is so decentralized.
This is interesting because it's the first story I've seen of one printing house handling 31,000,000 mail in ballots.
I get it to an extent.
People think that this could be a distraction and want to distance from it which I understand.
I'm just trying to follow everything and thought that this was interesting. Others have stated that all ballot printing and distribution is handled at the local level and paper that uses MIC watermarking is invalid since it is so decentralized.
This is interesting because it's the first story I've seen of one printing house handling 31,000,000 mail in ballots.