9000
Comments (1167)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
37
GayPedesAnonymous 37 points ago +39 / -2

So..... is this action or

16
FuckCommies 16 points ago +17 / -1

yes.

2
the_sky_is_falling 2 points ago +7 / -5

Meh.. I dont call this action

6
TheBigT03 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is it not at least a start??

2
the_sky_is_falling 2 points ago +3 / -1

I'm tired of 4 years of "iTs HaBBeniNg!!"

I want to see results.

This looks like nothing more than a "please do this"

I want "I'll fire you if you don't"

3
TheBigT03 3 points ago +3 / -0

I get that but I also think the facts are overwhelmingly on our side here. We have already seen numerous cases of fraud on camera, as well as many other forms of evidence that will be used in the courts. Even if that fails, we have the state legislatures to elect electors. Many angles to attack this from.

1
Desert_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anybody can be coercive. Great leaders command with a light touch.

0
NeverInterruptEnemy 0 points ago +2 / -2

It's an authorization for other people to consider action, if they feel like it.

0
the_sky_is_falling 0 points ago +2 / -2

If they feel like it.... so nothing is happening then, is it?

1
NeverInterruptEnemy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hard to say.

-1
Sumarongi -1 points ago +2 / -3

First they need to form a committee to set up appointments for scheduling

2
iamherefortheluls 2 points ago +2 / -0

it is a public step that put him next to Trump in front of the firing squad.

I don't know how effective Barr will be, but I am thinking he will be made to pay for this by the libs if he turns out to be not effective enough.