4184
Comments (237)
sorted by:
402
WildStar 402 points ago +402 / -0

Someone forgot the golden rule of court cases.

Every lawyer knows it. Everyone going to court should know it.

DON'T PISS OFF THE JUDGE

375
JohnBarron 375 points ago +376 / -1

This is why I'm leaning more and more to the notion that the dems were doing this blatantly and they knew they would get caught, because winning wasn't the end game. The end game was to trick the sheep into thinking they won, then have SCOTUS overturn it to Trump. The end game is civil unrest and mass violence across the cities.

233
undef 233 points ago +236 / -3

Your terms are accepted.

64
deleted 64 points ago +64 / -0
25
just_me_01 25 points ago +25 / -0

Don't say that! They'll start mailing fake bombs to themselves again.

51
fapoo 51 points ago +54 / -3

No. CHINA WOULD LOVE A CIVIL WAR.

Stuck the rule of law. If you don't play by Americas.law then America wont exist.

Same as if you don't play by the rules of football, are you really still playing football?

47
Butter_and_Meatloaf 47 points ago +47 / -0

It wouldn't be a civil war. It would be unrest that would very quickly be quelled by very skilled men.

11
unclebobinator 11 points ago +11 / -0

If a 17 yr old could easily smoke 3 felons and effectively stop rioting in a city I'm not worried at all. No civil war, minor unrest. Mostly in Democrat run cities and states because suburban and rural Americans in red cities and states won't put up with that shit for a minute.

And all those rioters and thugs will scatter like cowardly cockroaches.

0
6ft7WeighsAnFingTon 0 points ago +1 / -1

very skilled men

And at least one moderately skilled woman!

(Me)

35
undef 35 points ago +35 / -0

Victory is all that matters.

Winners write the history books.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
15
FuckYouAsWell 15 points ago +15 / -0

IMO we will literally never have a civil war in the original sense.It would simply be the beginning of WW3.

Globalists vs freedom fighters.

Every eurofag in the EU and nato will intervene on behalf of the democrats.

Nothing they do however will help short of them sending in literally millions of troops to our shores. Even then, I wish them the best of luck.

6
meals23 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've said it before in some of my other posts in the last week

About half the country has been waiting their entire lives for this moment

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
fapoo 7 points ago +7 / -0

I definitely would want to avoid a civil war but understand it is an option.

5
AngryAsian 5 points ago +5 / -0

WRONG, the US Military is literally strong enough to concurrently fight the rest of the world. At the end of the day, nobody likes China stealing their IP, and the second we remove the Democrat filth from our country, we remove China's ability to compete because we'll be able to destroy their economy.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
5
PraiseBeToScience 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hit their fucking dam with a JSOW and put them where they belong.

2
no_name 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. I have many friends and they all run faster than me.

-1
TheWinningNeverStops -1 points ago +1 / -2

I can already smell the stench of cowardice from these replies.

114
deleted 114 points ago +114 / -0
65
NostalgicFuturist 65 points ago +65 / -0

Exactly, a seditious DS fuck who issued a veiled public threat to Trump in the early days of rioting in DC

33
deleted 33 points ago +34 / -1
10
NostalgicFuturist 10 points ago +10 / -0

LOLOL

There shall be a new birth of freedom....

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
6
K-Harbour 6 points ago +6 / -0

Lincoln had the same exact problem as Trump.

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKYlJpZ/1864-lincoln-had-to-deal-with-de/c/

4
HockeyMom4Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Four score and seven years ago, GEOTUS time traveled and saw the glitches

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
SnowflakeJuice 2 points ago +2 / -0

He was also drawing up plans to rename military basis named after confederate soldiers in opposition of POTUS's orders

3
spezisacuckold 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good riddance!

56
deleted 56 points ago +56 / -0
19
TheHoeAndJoe420 19 points ago +19 / -0

watching a documentary and they mention how no ones been there in 10 years but trump will probably change that.. Lmao

3
RussianAgent13 3 points ago +3 / -0

Care to link a fellow pede? I've been curious about the renovations for a while.

2
TheHoeAndJoe420 2 points ago +2 / -0

wasn't a documentary actually just a little small video.. the prisoners loved obama.. They cheered for him.. really shows the true colors.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ny1-qSHysaQ guaranteed laughs at 25 seconds

1
RussianAgent13 1 point ago +1 / -0

thanks!

2
MageGills 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe it was referring to a specific area of gitmo. my brother-in-law was on guard duty there a year ago. Also he said it's basically vacation for all the terrorists there. They were being brought in TVs and Xbox's to play and crap like that. Also, he wasn't allowed to call them "prisoners", they must referred to as "guests'...

4
TheHoeAndJoe420 4 points ago +4 / -0

yeah and they take tranquilizers to sleep.. there have been prisoners who have been offered to leave and they wanted to stay.. so it can't be that bad

3
MageGills 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks, Obama.

8
Darkheartisland 8 points ago +8 / -0

Just in time

7
NECC_EOD 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nobody is going to Gitmo unfortunately.. They'll have to settle on the American penal system.. Kamala should be familiar with it already..

7
Zoepop 7 points ago +8 / -1

Not so. Tribunals. Remember when graham questioned kavanaugh at his class nfirmation hearing? Treason by an American gets you “enemy combatant “ status. You forfeit due process by courts. It’s coming.

2
NECC_EOD 2 points ago +2 / -0

Be realistic, nobody will be tried for treason..If they where to do so there is no way in hell they would do it in a military court..It would be done in our judicial system with proper due process..Tribunals of Americans who did not join some foreign force to commit either war or acts of terrorism against America, is something you would see in a third world country..

1
Zoepop 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2018-amendments-manual-courts-martial-united-states/

When/If Marshal Law is proclaimed, UCMJ kicks in. Once trump is called winner (soon) all heel will break loose. He foresaw this. That's why this executive order was written two years age. Read carefully.

1
NECC_EOD 1 point ago +1 / -0

If marshal law is implemented then perhaps, but it won't be..Why would Trump bring in the military during a potential coup attempt via the Dems little Antifa puppets? Why allow field general's or other leftist leaders that opportunity to claim he is using the military to fire upon civilians or other such nonsense... There is a reason he gutted the DOD yesterday, he fears having a military coup against him.. Local law enforcement will be used to stop Antifa, if that doesn't work federal law enforcement would be plenty sufficient..

1
NECC_EOD 1 point ago +1 / -0

There will be no tribunal, no gitmo..Stop it with this regressive bullshit, it makes us look like idiots..For 4 years it's been Delta will be rounding Obama up, Military Tribunals are coming any day, trust the plan bullshit..

47
DonJrJr 47 points ago +47 / -0

Bingo

46
deleted 46 points ago +46 / -0
20
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 20 points ago +20 / -0

I'm right there with you. There is a difference between expecting it in theory and seeing it so blatant right in front of your face.

10
Pede3 10 points ago +10 / -0

They aren't that swift. Animals don't shit where they eat. Granted some of the rioters are bused in, but the people who live there and destroy business can thank themselves when they live in a food desert with their new Nikes. Businesses arent all going to rebuild.

50
Texas_Rangers 50 points ago +50 / -0

Alito, Kavanaugh, Thomas.

Question is: ACB, Gorsuch, Roberts... can we get two of three of these...

And turn GA and AZ separately.

51
MeSewCorny 51 points ago +51 / -0

ACB and Gorsuch. They were chosen because they are strict Constitutionalist. I wouldn't count on Robert's for shit.

49
Wood_Shampoo1 49 points ago +49 / -0

0 chance on Roberts. Hes full blown cucked/deepstate

29
logan34 29 points ago +29 / -0

Pedo Roberts is as cucked as Romney

6
DJT_JR6544 6 points ago +6 / -0

This

22
deleted 22 points ago +23 / -1
10
Texas_Rangers 10 points ago +12 / -2

Honestly, I wasn't referring about the issue of post 8 pm ballots.

Only like 3,000 ballots will be affected, and of course the USSC will find they can't be counted.

I'm referring to the bigger case--denial of equal protection. Many votes at stake.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
5
FUCK_DemonRATS 5 points ago +6 / -1

Kavanaugh joined the libs? Do you think we'll be able to trust him with these upcoming rulings?

9
Raos044 9 points ago +9 / -0

Did you forget who smeared him and called him a rapist in front of the whole country for weeks and almost made the man cry tears of pure anger? He's out for blood.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
tonysoprano 1 point ago +2 / -1

I read his second order but can't find it right now. I think he ordered ballots received after 8pm to be sequestered vs. midnight, as OP stated. I only mention that because it would almost assuredly strike down more illegal ballots than a later deadline.

<edit>oops, several other people already noted the 8pm deadline!

13
MisterKag 13 points ago +13 / -0

Roberts is lost. Totally compromised.

My only concern is Gorsuch. I hear he has been enjoying the DC society thing. Hopefully he stays true.

All the rest should be solid.

SCOTUS sides with the PA legislature on this one.

2
meals23 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it's wise to be apprehensive about trusting anybody in government at this point, however think of it like this

If Gorsuch rules in favor of the Democrats, he's committing career, and possibly literal, suicide. When the Dems seize power they will do everything they can to prevent any non Democrat from ever being elected to any office in the country ever again, and when they have done that they will expand the size of the SCOTUS so that all Justices, including Gorsuch, would have significantly less power and influence than they have right now. Furthermore, I highly expect every Judge ever appointed by President Trump to be given a Nuremberg style kangaroo court sham impeachment trial.

Gorsuch, by virtue of how he came to be on the SCOTUS, has a target on his back. Any Justice appointed by a Republican President would, at the end of the day, be right to consider it self-preservation to rule against Biden and the Democrats.

2
MisterKag 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm looking from the 30,000 foot perch.

If Gorsuch betrays the Constitution, it won't matter so much about him anymore. Or the Court for that matter.

The country will be effectively lost, and it won't be won back by the ballot box ever again.

The peaceful power of the People is exerted by the ballot. The not so peaceful power of the People exerts under the Second Amendment.

All was planned for by the Founders. Brilliant men.

0
Texas_Rangers 0 points ago +4 / -4

On that narrow issue yes. That's not really a big deal though... like 3k ballots are at stake there.

I think it's honestly a red herring, and other issues should be focused on.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
14
donotclickjim 14 points ago +15 / -1

Don't forget who we are messing with. These are the same people who had the family of the federal judge over the ghislaine maxwell case murdered. And then suicided that killer. They likely had Scalia murdered too. This is why they laugh off SCOTUS orders.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
9
FamburgerHelper 9 points ago +9 / -0

Especially a Supreme Court Judge!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
176
deleted 176 points ago +178 / -2
57
AmericaFirstMAGA88 [S] 57 points ago +57 / -0

Damn straight

21
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 21 points ago +21 / -0

In due time. They have been all over this for months. Let them do their audit, Trump wins Pennsylvania.

8
concealedaces 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's what I say. If it doesn't get resolved, vote for the president

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
155
DangleBarry 155 points ago +155 / -0

If there's one thing that courts despise most, it's willfully ignoring and disobeying their orders.

The cheaters are in trouble.

58
AmericaFirstMAGA88 [S] 58 points ago +65 / -7

I think this is why RCP recalled Penn in their election projection

43
CovefefeREEEE 43 points ago +43 / -0

Don't mess with a SCOTUS justice. Bad move.

38
AmericaFirstMAGA88 [S] 38 points ago +38 / -0

Especially don't mess with one who's closest colleagues survived career assignation attempts by biden and the left.

I hope justice Thomas and Kavanaugh join Alito in absolutely destroying the Pennsylvania leftys

16
Mavdick96 16 points ago +16 / -0

I wouldn't want to DREAM of pissing of a state Supreme Court but pissing off THE Supreme Court of the nation? Oh boy, you're up shit fucking creek with no paddle.

11
BecMonTchew 11 points ago +11 / -0

Who in the world thinks it's a good idea to defy a SCJ twice, especially when his constitutional alignment is the majority? This is crazy.

18
league_of_fail 18 points ago +18 / -0

Same party that performed a wetworks on on one without repercussions?

13
BecMonTchew 13 points ago +13 / -0

Shit, you're right. I hope they all double their security and don't spend the night at any Dems' houses, even after this is over.

30
kebabdrogo 30 points ago +31 / -1

Apparently they didnt recall anything. RCP hadnt had any candidate hit 270 all week.

17
AmericaFirstMAGA88 [S] 17 points ago +17 / -0

Oh, I thought they had Penn shaded Blue as a likely biden state. Then they moved it back to grey tonight

7
kebabdrogo 7 points ago +9 / -2

That may be true. Others have been wording the RCP story as something much bigger, meanwhen their projections have 13 grey electoral states or districts still unclaimed, nothing close enough for calling it for a candidate.

6
BecMonTchew 6 points ago +6 / -0

Whether they took it back or not, RCP is still the only correct msm site.

3
kebabdrogo 3 points ago +4 / -1

"Correct" insomuch they are keeping the close or contested states grey for now. Will it be correct after many lawsuits and the fraudulent votes discarded? Who knows

5
BecMonTchew 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Correct" in that they're not putting Biden over 270 is what I meant. I should have been more clear. He should end up with way less states if this works out fairly.

15
turdinthepunch 15 points ago +16 / -1

Never happemed

Stop making us work so hard to internally get rid of fake news.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Newsmax reported that it did, as did Bannon's Warroom.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
4
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 4 points ago +4 / -0

The timing doesn't match for that. I think it was either the state house GOP ordering the audit of the votes or the President's lawsuit that caused RCP to change their tune.

12
MeSewCorny 12 points ago +12 / -0

Exactly. Even if Robert's doesn't like Trump Pennsylvania just dishonored his court.

82
BeerMan 82 points ago +82 / -0

I think the counters in Philadelphia did not segregate the ballots. They may have counted the ballots separately, but we can't trust those counts without the actual ballot paper trail. And the GOP observers certainly can't claim to have witnessed ballots being segregated.

No, what happened is all of the ballots are going to be mixed together with no way to figure out where each ballot came from and when it arrived.

I think in that case it would be perfectly reasonable for SCOTUS to say, "Look, Philadelphia elected these local officials to run this election, and they made an absolute mess of it. There's no way to untangle it. So all of the Philadelphia votes are thrown out. Maybe next time Philadelphia should elect better local officials."

29
RussianAgent13 29 points ago +29 / -0

Yes, Alito probably suspected as much and that is why he gave the order in the first place.

11
PraiseBeToScience 11 points ago +11 / -0

They're probably ignoring the order because right now they're furiously putting all the Trump ballots into a big pile to say "these all arrived after 8PM!"

3
Kongol626 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is what I want to know. Who is watching and securing the machines and votes and trash etc. Why don't we have federal troops or something guarding them.

What have they been doing for a week with our votes. Can someone come 4am and slip things in or out?

11
chlofefe 11 points ago +11 / -0

Given what we know now...did Philadelphians actually elect these officials?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
AlphaNathan 3 points ago +4 / -1

Keep going I'm almost there

3
Granny 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow, yes that really could happen!

74
MisterKag 74 points ago +74 / -0

Yes. This is the case with the longest legs to do real damage to the fraudsters.

All ballots after election night voided, with Trump +700,000.

And God help them if they can’t sequester now, or we’re looking at a new PA election.

21
Pede3 21 points ago +22 / -1

It's going to be too late to organize a reelection. Like Florida, we have to clean up the mess for the next time. Dead people voting in Philly is pretty much a meme, but they got too bold this time

30
MisterKag 30 points ago +30 / -0

Not true. SCOTUS has extraordinary equitable powers if a Constitutional deprivation occurs.

And if the theft is allowed to stand, there will not be a ‘next time’. This is the last hill.

18
RussianAgent13 18 points ago +19 / -1

They can try a new election, if they think they can get it together in time, but the constitution says the election is on the first Tuesday of November. It's more likely all the ballots will be thrown out and they just don't count. Oopsie.

21
MisterKag 21 points ago +21 / -0

SCOTUS has the authority to modify that deadline to remedy the deprivation.

The Constitution is not designed or intended to railroad a deprivation under it.

A toss out of the post Election Day ballots is the correct remedy. But if the PA criminals have spoiled segregation of them, it has to be a re-vote. The Court cannot declare a victor. And the deprivation cannot stand.

7
HunterBidenCokeMirro 7 points ago +7 / -0

We won. No redo.

1
Ched 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would SCOTUS call a re-vote rather than saying that the count after election night is irrevocably damaged, and the election night tally stands?

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
1
Ched 1 point ago +1 / -0

That sounds warm and fuzzy, but I disagree that it should be assumed that a voter who willingly gives up custody of their ballot before seeing it counted has an honest and good faith belief that their vote would be counted. If they were susceptible to democratic propaganda, that's on them. I do realize that this is irrelevant to a SCOTUS decision. Has there ever been a court-ordered redo on an election? I just think that it's more likely that they allow the election night count to stand.

4
Ched 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think its less likely that they redo the election and more likely that they call the count after election night irrevocably damaged. Hopefully that would mean that the election night count stands.

1
artifex_mundi_x 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly.

66
rebelde_sin_causa 66 points ago +66 / -0

This will be their strategy. Defy court orders. Destroy evidence (ballots). Dare the courts to do anything about it. Then if the courts do actually do anything about it... "WHY ARE THE COURTS OVERTURNING THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE REEEEEE"

19
Pepedom 19 points ago +19 / -0

They are doing it for 2 reasons:

1: they either never segregated the votes or they segregated them and it's painfully obvious those ballots are fraud or...they already destroyed them.

And

2: they'd rather throw out the election than be found out as to what actually happened. If they ar e forced to just abandon the votes counted after a certain time, then Trump wins the state and, they hope, there would be no need to further look into all of the shenanigans

60
deleted 60 points ago +61 / -1
38
PatriotTech 38 points ago +38 / -0

Yep through philly out, tell people to thank their election officials for breaking the law and ignoring a court order.... consequences are a bitch.

15
spezisacuckold 15 points ago +15 / -0

Not just ignoring a court order, but 2 court orders, from the United States Supreme Court.

34
AmericaFirstMAGA88 [S] 34 points ago +34 / -0

Philly is corrupt as hell and something like this is long overdue

14
kebabdrogo 14 points ago +15 / -1

Just the district(s) that ignored direct lawful orders.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

All Dem votes are thrown out nationwide. Followed by Dem politicians. And then Dem voters.

47
Micdrop2017 47 points ago +47 / -0

Three outcomes:

  1. Any mail-in ballots after Nov 3 thrown out..even Republican ones--
  2. PA Legislature will come in and gave electors to Trump
  3. SC will intervene again...
31
AmericaFirstMAGA88 [S] 31 points ago +31 / -0

I hope it is number 1 followed by number 2. Trump was up over 700k on midnight of election night!

10
mzog 10 points ago +10 / -0

Number 1 will never happen without the SC ordering it.

37
bubble_bursts 37 points ago +37 / -0

iirc the day after there was approx a million for Biden

22
RIPIsaacKappy 22 points ago +22 / -0

Maaaagic!

14
Kekistan_United 14 points ago +14 / -0

biden did it! he dunked on lebron on a 30ft goal!

31
deleted 31 points ago +31 / -0
20
Darkheartisland 20 points ago +20 / -0

There is something called contempt of court

31
deleted 31 points ago +31 / -0
12
SilverStarv5 12 points ago +12 / -0

It’s a bold move Cotton

31
Quoc01 31 points ago +31 / -0

I think you're right, the more they show contempt for the court... the more reason Alito will ask them to throw them out.

28
Choppermagic 28 points ago +28 / -0

Contempt of court. Throw them in jail. Throw out the votes after the 3rd

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
2
TheWinningNeverStops 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those will be audited.

20
Atlantapede 20 points ago +20 / -0

You are not wrong and Philadelphia will burn in the resulting peaceful protests

11
Pede3 11 points ago +11 / -0

I hope the national guard shuts it down During the day the young people are actually mostly peaceful, but the fiery and looting starts at dusk. Cold and rainy weather slows them down too, but it's >70F now.

17
Kekistan_United 17 points ago +17 / -0

so

philly. chicago. detroit. minneapolis. portland. atlanta. et al.

the day they all burn and fall.

the US becomes one of the, if not THE safest places with over 300 Million.

15
308win 15 points ago +15 / -0

This shit is so obvious what they are doing.

14
YUNG_GUAC 14 points ago +14 / -0

Democrats ignoring the law? Who would've thought?

Party of history-defining Election Fraud.

13
Diotima 13 points ago +13 / -0

I'm pretty sure the PA is setting the foundation for purposely throwing the election

12
Redpill-notCommieRed 12 points ago +12 / -0

Alito is going to come into this case pissed!

8
Submariner 8 points ago +8 / -0

I hope so. They need to come down hard to set the tone for future generations to come. This kind of bullshit must not be allowed.

8
darthmohawk1 8 points ago +8 / -0

Delightful! So they've effectively screwed themselves via contempt of court. I admit I was wondering if the judge would coward out in the name of "upholding status quo", but that's way less likely if the judge has been given an axe to grind.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
FILIPINOSFORTRUMP 7 points ago +7 / -0

THE MSM ARE JUST SETTING UP THESE FAKE NARRATIVES. THAT BIDEN WON. BUT WHEN TRUMP WINS THESE CONTEST. THE MSM WILL THEN HAMMER HIM AGAIN WITH THE NARRATIVE THAT HE HAS STOLEN THE ELECTION AND THAT HE IS NOT STEPPING DOWN HIS OFFICE. AN OBVIOUS PLAY FROM THESE COMMIES.

7
MakeLiberalsCryAgain 7 points ago +7 / -0

There's so many unbelievable things that've happened lately, but this takes the cake. How the FUCK do they just ignore an order from the Supreme Court? PA is just like, hey Alito, fuck off. There has to be some serious repercussions for this. If I were Alito, I'd be fuming.

6
suckmycorona 6 points ago +6 / -0

Arrest and convict

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
Jimmy_Russler 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hell yeah, every ballot counted after election night should be thrown out.

5
PaleIsTheNewTan 5 points ago +5 / -0

How do they accurately separate late arrivals from valid ballots? If all the backdating and shit happened? Genuinely curious.

2
NeverInterruptEnemy 2 points ago +2 / -0

There should be two timed evidence marks.

The post stamp which I do not trust, and in actually secure elections there would be a time the bin was delivered / processed.

3
PaleIsTheNewTan 3 points ago +3 / -0

But can’t both of those items be faked?

4
NeverInterruptEnemy 4 points ago +4 / -0

The whole system can be faked, it’s literally bullshit head to toe.

If Trump wins, we absolutely must put as much pressure on as possible to demand voting reforms. Establishment on both sides won’t want that happening though.

5
NeverGiveUpTrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Dems will probably prefer the mail in ballots gets thrown out. Gives them a chance to save face and not expose more of their voter fraud. It gives Trump the win but give dems ammo to fight with over the next 4 years.

5
UndercoverCentipede 5 points ago +5 / -0

I didn't see that Alito reissued it - wow

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
AmericaFirstMAGA88 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Totals reported after midnight on the 3rd are completely thrown out.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
Pedutoisacuck 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just what he said. Throw out all votes counted after 12:00am November 4th. President Trump was up 600,000-ish votes at that point so PA would go to him.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Recovered_Leftist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sure... But you know they mixed them in. Theyre not even remotely above destroying evidence either.

3
bangbangshootshoot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck China!

1
Salt-N-Pepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

What?

3
MakeAmericaGreat9 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah you Democratic fucking cunt mother fucking ballot stuffing assholes. Votes that you injected into the Biden "campaign" at 4am ON FUCKING WEDNESDAY.... Won't be counted.

Sorry about that -Management

3
americandrunk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wait, what? They ignored the supereme court not once, but twice? Alito actually had to REISSUE demand?

Who is that fucking stupid?

That is mind blowing.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Trumpditit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess in reality of things,, that woukld bve great,, accept, they mixed them with all the prior vote ballots, making that number obsolete, meaning, they have no clue, record, or information on how many to delete. Prove me wrong.

1
dahdahdah_dahditdah 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's worse than that. They will have a little token sacrificial pile they will claim were received after the deadline, but the motherlode, the big 100K's of ballots they will simply LIE ABOUT and claim were received before the deadline. They will demand the Republicans prove otherwise. And how can we prove anything when the criminals are running the whole operation from top to bottom and avoiding oversight?

2
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought it was after 8:00.

2
Azarak 2 points ago +2 / -0

It makes you realize the evidence of fraud is so damning the Dems are willing, even desperate, to defy a SCOTUS Judge. They made their bed.....and you know the thing.

2
Boxcarracer1478 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't find that he issued a second order? I'm trying to explain this to friends. Anyone got a link?

1
ViolaWilly 1 point ago +1 / -0

who ends up enforcing it? coz the local aint.

1
Truglow 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it goes to SCOTUS Trump will prevail as the court can't let themselves look weak. That and the Dems cheated.

1
dahdahdah_dahditdah 1 point ago +1 / -0

I really, really hope you're right. Where you may be wrong is in underestimating how evil the Dems are.

They will argue (in fact they are already arguing) -- where is the evidence that we failed to sequester the votes that arrived after the deadline? (Which I believe was 9pm, not midnight? Anyway.)

So they require Republicans to prove that they broke the law, while they lie their little fannies off and claim all the votes (perhaps except for a little token pile just to look good) were received BEFORE the deadline.

This is how they might still get away with it.

1
clampie 1 point ago +1 / -0

I doubt the gop judges would actually do anything.

1
NeverInterruptEnemy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can someone please give me a link that explains how they ignored the second order? My wife insists that they complied because all but four counties did so, philly being one that did, but I can’t find a link anywhere.

1
Spanishkay 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm literally listening to Free Bird while reading this thread! 😍💪💪🇺🇲. Let's GOOOOO!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
WestCelt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember he just fired the SEc of Defense who was a traitor and now has a new guy who will be on Americas side.