It's going to be too late to organize a reelection. Like Florida, we have to clean up the mess for the next time. Dead people voting in Philly is pretty much a meme, but they got too bold this time
They can try a new election, if they think they can get it together in time, but the constitution says the election is on the first Tuesday of November. It's more likely all the ballots will be thrown out and they just don't count. Oopsie.
SCOTUS has the authority to modify that deadline to remedy the deprivation.
The Constitution is not designed or intended to railroad a deprivation under it.
A toss out of the post Election Day ballots is the correct remedy. But if the PA criminals have spoiled segregation of them, it has to be a re-vote. The Court cannot declare a victor. And the deprivation cannot stand.
I think its less likely that they redo the election and more likely that they call the count after election night irrevocably damaged. Hopefully that would mean that the election night count stands.
Yes. This is the case with the longest legs to do real damage to the fraudsters.
All ballots after election night voided, with Trump +700,000.
And God help them if they can’t sequester now, or we’re looking at a new PA election.
It's going to be too late to organize a reelection. Like Florida, we have to clean up the mess for the next time. Dead people voting in Philly is pretty much a meme, but they got too bold this time
Not true. SCOTUS has extraordinary equitable powers if a Constitutional deprivation occurs.
And if the theft is allowed to stand, there will not be a ‘next time’. This is the last hill.
They can try a new election, if they think they can get it together in time, but the constitution says the election is on the first Tuesday of November. It's more likely all the ballots will be thrown out and they just don't count. Oopsie.
SCOTUS has the authority to modify that deadline to remedy the deprivation.
The Constitution is not designed or intended to railroad a deprivation under it.
A toss out of the post Election Day ballots is the correct remedy. But if the PA criminals have spoiled segregation of them, it has to be a re-vote. The Court cannot declare a victor. And the deprivation cannot stand.
We won. No redo.
Why would SCOTUS call a re-vote rather than saying that the count after election night is irrevocably damaged, and the election night tally stands?
I think its less likely that they redo the election and more likely that they call the count after election night irrevocably damaged. Hopefully that would mean that the election night count stands.
Exactly.