6972
Read: Full text of Trump vs PA lawsuit (cdn.donaldjtrump.com) 🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
posted ago by QuandariusWashington ago by QuandariusWashington +6972 / -0
Comments (714)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
33
undef 33 points ago +33 / -0

Damn.

Wow. The only option is to toss the results and prohibit certification of the election. That would force the legislature to pick electors.

27
Phins360_FL 27 points ago +28 / -1

no.

they keep only those ballots counted by 8pm 3 Nov.

the toss any mail in ballot since it can not be certified as complying with the NLT 8pm election mandate.

i would NOT want the PA Legislature to select electors. that may not turn out well for us.

ONLY COUNT LEGAL VOTES. Its that simple.

24
undef 24 points ago +24 / -0

If we only count legal votes, nationwide, Trump is going to win with more than 80% of all legal votes.

Apply that standard everywhere and California turns red.

3
Pdjco658 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think they're alleging the ballots that came in after after the deadline were mixed in with the ballots that came in before the deadline. They were supposed to separate them but they didn't.

2
micaarzur 2 points ago +3 / -1

I didn't see anything in the lawsuit about ballots received after 8pm being illegal though?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

You said "counted" while you clearly meant "received". The problem is distinguishing what was received after the polls closed

3
MikePlacid 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only option is to toss the results and prohibit certification of the election. That would force the legislature to pick electors.

This is one of the options asked for. There are some alternatives suggested though.

  1. Accordingly, Plaintiffs seek an emergency order prohibiting Defendants from certifying the results of the General Election. In the alternative, Plaintiffs seek an emergency order prohibiting Defendants from certifying any results from the General Election that included the tabulation of absentee and mail- in ballots which do not comply with the Election Code, including, without limitation, the tabulation of absentee and mail-in ballots Trump Campaign’s watchers were prevented from observing or based on the tabulation of invalidly cast absentee and mail-in ballots which (i) lack a secrecy envelope, or contain on that envelope any text, mark, or symbol which reveals the elector’s identity, political affiliation, or candidate preference, (ii) do not include on the outside envelope a completed declaration that is dated and signed by the elector, or (iii) are delivered in-person by third parties for non-disabled voters. Lastly and in addition to the alternative requests for relief, Plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction requiring the County Election Boards to invalidate ballots cast by voters who were notified and given an opportunity to cure their invalidly cast mail-in ballot.
1
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 1 point ago +2 / -1

Does it say that? I am only on page 23.

2
undef 2 points ago +2 / -0

Read faster or skip to page 84.

4
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 4 points ago +4 / -0

Looks like they could just toss all the mail-in/absentee ballots

3
undef 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is definitely an option. If they do, Trump wins bigly.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0