19
Comments (12)
sorted by:
2
Potatriot [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is from their site. Also it is discoverable from their “fixing rumors” post.

1
well_misinformed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn't the issue that any illegal votes would be printed with the same process and paper as legit votes?

1
Potatriot [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t know....they utilize water marks in some form or fashion and for the purpose of authentication. How it works or they expect to utilize it I don’t know. But this confirms simply that watermarks do exist on ballots.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Potatriot [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thoughts? If only some of them have it, how does it work? I’ve been hopeful and skeptical of the whole watermark story

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Potatriot [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

It would be cool. I’m not super convinced, but at least this confirms water marks exist as a form of authentication.

1
Cacciali_Via 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which states use them? Probably only red states.

1
Potatriot [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t know. All I could find is that they exist and some ballots have them. How many, where and if it is a “sting” I don’t know. But it isn’t at least AS far fetched as it was before. It exists.

1
Cacciali_Via 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think states print their own ballots so it would be a voluntary thing. I doubt blue states would opt in to anything that makes ballots more secure.

1
Averon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also, I think most of the fraudulent ballots are just harvested or requesting ballots for people from the obituary our wherever, which would be real ballots, just fraudulently obtained.

0
Potatriot [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Certainly possible. I’m pointing out more that the water marks do actually exist. On what scale or how they are utilized I don’t know and don’t have evidence.