88
Comments (18)
sorted by:
8
orange_dit 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think Benford's law wasn't applied properly in this case. You cannot run the formula on total numbers. You have to run it on the batches of numbers that are reported and added together. If they are smudged you would see an unnatural distribution.

In case of this election you have to run it on the batches of votes that are reported. If the counts are manipulated they would look differently. When people make up numbers they are not completely random.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
Trumptastic [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, so how would I change it to be more accurate? Not split into R and D?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Trumptastic [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh I see what you mean. Hmmm, okay I may mess around with those.

2
RamboToaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Benford's law would apply here if there were no human intervention.

1
permissible_missile 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually it works across magnitudes just fine

1
orange_dit 1 point ago +1 / -0

but that's only one sample per state. That would only work is the entire count of a state was 100% made up. Don't forgot this law is only about first digits.

1
Trumptastic [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I dunno. I just took the numbers as of right now to see how the graphs looked.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Trumptastic [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

2
thekindlyman555 2 points ago +2 / -0

I made a spreadsheet last night for something else, decided to adapt it to do a similar analysis comparing 2016 and 2020.

https://i.imgur.com/UaIwZDv.png

1
Trumptastic [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very nicely done!

2
Brundlefly78 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those graphs are Biden's law

2
thekindlyman555 2 points ago +2 / -0

Small suggestion: might be useful to include a line for the expected value to compare it to.

The formula should be: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Feventlogxp.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F03%2Fbenfordlaw-formula.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

1
Trumptastic [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice, thanks pede!

2
muslimporn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do it for individual counties or matches of votes in updates in the time series.

Between states it's very poor. It'll most drown out anomalies and it's also a smaller sample set at the same time meaning it should deviate more from Benford's law.

Also do Benford's over time do see if it deviates then when.

0
Trumptastic [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Got the numbers from Decision Desk HQ's site as of 11/10/20. If any pede would like the file, feel free to ask!