So, I took a look at DeKalb and calculated what percentage of people left the presidential race blank compared to the two senate races. I also calculated the amount of presidential votes that went to Trump and senate votes to Perdue for his race. The second senate race had too many contestants.
DeKalb made multiple vote count reports throughout the week as they finished batches of votes. Interestingly, they sorted the batches for different types of ballots (election day, early, absentee, provisional).
My main question is why is Trump support lower in absentee ballots processed earlier? At the same time, earlier absentee ballots were much more likely to have a vote for president. Can there be a legitimate reason for this?
The rest of the data shows different patterns as well that may be interesting to discuss.
This is what usually happens without fraud being present: The lower-population areas are counted the fastest, since there's less people to count, and therefore report first. These areas are usually red, which this year of course means "for Trump." This results in a lot of square mileage turning red quickly. In DeKalb county, I guess those would also be the areas farthest from Atlanta. Eventually the higher-population, bluer areas finish their counts and report later that night. One major exception to this pattern is wealthy suburbs of large cities - those tend to go red. These are just general American patterns - DeKalb might have things going on that make it different. They're also large enough patterns that fraud could still happen without disrupting them.
Per a suggestion by ThreeGuysGameStudio (https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EeVh7D/if-youve-been-around-since-befor/), I decided to analyze voter count data from DeKalb County in Georgia (https://www.dekalbcountyga.gov/voter-registration-elections/election-results-1). He was thinking that folks filling out illegal ballots would be too lazy and/or just not have time to fill in bubbles for whole ballots if making many, so they'd just bubble in a vote for president.
So, I took a look at DeKalb and calculated what percentage of people left the presidential race blank compared to the two senate races. I also calculated the amount of presidential votes that went to Trump and senate votes to Perdue for his race. The second senate race had too many contestants.
DeKalb made multiple vote count reports throughout the week as they finished batches of votes. Interestingly, they sorted the batches for different types of ballots (election day, early, absentee, provisional).
My main question is why is Trump support lower in absentee ballots processed earlier? At the same time, earlier absentee ballots were much more likely to have a vote for president. Can there be a legitimate reason for this?
The rest of the data shows different patterns as well that may be interesting to discuss.
Nice job. You need to get this to the dot win action group or whatever they’re called.
(I think they have a Discord)
Thanks.
This is what usually happens without fraud being present: The lower-population areas are counted the fastest, since there's less people to count, and therefore report first. These areas are usually red, which this year of course means "for Trump." This results in a lot of square mileage turning red quickly. In DeKalb county, I guess those would also be the areas farthest from Atlanta. Eventually the higher-population, bluer areas finish their counts and report later that night. One major exception to this pattern is wealthy suburbs of large cities - those tend to go red. These are just general American patterns - DeKalb might have things going on that make it different. They're also large enough patterns that fraud could still happen without disrupting them.
That makes sense, but do you think they sorted the mail-in ballots and processed certain ones first?