3518
posted ago by queenicarius ago by queenicarius +3522 / -4

Should reveal the different count from that of the Dominion software.

Comments (82)
sorted by:
110
deleted 110 points ago +111 / -1
99
HuggableBear 99 points ago +100 / -1

There's not one because the headline is wrong.

A hand count has not been called.

A hand count has been called for by Trump's team.

The Secretary of State has not agreed to it.

17
mixednuts86 17 points ago +18 / -1

We probably won't get a handcount without SCOTUS.

10
networkingkyle 10 points ago +10 / -0

we fhkin better!

5
Midwestsyde 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is what I think is the biggest tell that there’s something fishy. Want to clear things up? Doing a hand count is an easy way to start. Yes it’ll cost money, but a lot less than half the country thinking we’ve become a banana republic.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
CalVotesMatter 4 points ago +4 / -0

He is just calling it early. It happens.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Aisle-is-closed 1 point ago +1 / -0

How can there be a hand count? GA has 100% electronic ballots.

6
HuggableBear 6 points ago +6 / -0

Georgia's system takes electronic inputs, then prints a paper ballot with all votes listed and a QR code with all that info. You deposit that paper ballot into a drop box and it is scanned as it passes through.

So, while the information is wholly digital, there is a physical backup that it can be checked against in the case of a hand recount.

1
KristiNoemFaceFuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is fantastic news.

1
Leatherwood 1 point ago +1 / -0

They also tell the voter their ballot number on the day voted at each voting location so theoretically each ballot could be tied to the person who voted.

1
NvADolphin 1 point ago +1 / -0

So I wonder if these print out before or after the code "glitch" takes place, per vote

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only cords I saw on the machines were power cords, so I don't imagine any tabulation is occurring before the paper goes into the scanners, although it's certainly possible that the printout doesn't match what the QR code tells the scanner. It's not like we can read those the way we can English.

25
deleted 25 points ago +34 / -9
28
deleted 28 points ago +30 / -2
8
WhyWhyWhyWhyWhy 8 points ago +10 / -2

OP cited a link below, however, the recount has NOT been ordered. It's likely to come this week. What OP cited is just the president's press release stating what they want.

OP cited a link below, however, the recount has NOT been ordered. It's likely to come this week. What OP cited is just the president's press release stating what they want.

OP cited a link below, however, the recount has NOT been ordered. It's likely to come this week. What OP cited is just the president's press release stating what they want.

6
SvixGale 6 points ago +6 / -0

Easy with the chanting. Commies chant, not pedes. :-)

2
AlphaQup 2 points ago +2 / -0

Name checks out.

43
DonaIdTrump 43 points ago +48 / -5

Stop being a faggot and share a link with a claim like this.

26
PewPew_ThaDuK 26 points ago +26 / -0

hand counts all they do is validate illegal votes. They first need to audit the entire thing first otherwise its just going to be another loss

4
Ih8leftists 4 points ago +4 / -0

Absolutely

26
Ssue1216 26 points ago +27 / -1

Don’t post without link and proof. There are too many noobies on our site - we are credible - not like the shills at Fox News

0
15
WhyWhyWhyWhyWhy 15 points ago +17 / -2

The recount has NOT been ordered. It's likely to come this week. What you cited is just the president's press release stating what they want.

The recount has NOT been ordered. It's likely to come this week. What you cited is just the president's press release stating what they want.

The recount has NOT been ordered. It's likely to come this week. What you cited is just the president's press release stating what they want.

The recount has NOT been ordered. It's likely to come this week. What you cited is just the president's press release stating what they want.

1
Joeret 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re 100% correct but technically it has been “called for”. Unfortunately it was called for by the Trump administration only not the state of Georgia.

19
FullAutoFlintlock 19 points ago +21 / -2

THIS JUST IN!

"OP COULD STOP SUCKING COCK BUT REFUSES!"

MOAR AT 11!!

5
GreatFunana 5 points ago +5 / -0

Source?

1
3
novanleon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ricky click

2
FullAutoFlintlock 2 points ago +2 / -0

Adblock, Ublock, Disconnect, Privacy Badger, Last Pass, Bitdefender, Malwerebytes.

All assuming on windows, as most are. using Brave or FireCuck

16
Puglosi4Prison 16 points ago +16 / -0

For the whole state ? Source ? Hand count takes ages and will change everything lol

14
deleted 14 points ago +18 / -4
20
ChocolateEvryday 20 points ago +20 / -0

Doug Collins is working for the campaign. He can demand something be done but he cannot order it.

10
Puglosi4Prison 10 points ago +10 / -0

I hope it’s true lol can’t believe half the stuff these people say. As per Georgia SOS there were only 50k to count on 4th morning and then it went to 100k lol

It could also be for a county

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
6
ArmyLady 6 points ago +6 / -0

What about all the ballots that were thrown away??

Would need a complete audit not just a recount.

5
Spartan117 5 points ago +5 / -0

They need a damn audit

5
Redpill-notCommieRed 5 points ago +6 / -1

Hand counts need to include an audit too. Illegal votes should not be hand counted

3
DeplorableWeWin 3 points ago +3 / -0

All recounts should be hand counted and audited. Do AZ and WI next with mad recount and audit

3
dahdahdah_dahditdah 3 points ago +3 / -0

Misleading headline. Trump's campaign said there should be a hand count, however there is no reason to expect one to happen (yet).

3
BowelSharpton 3 points ago +3 / -0

My question in all these recounts is still relevant - will REPUBLICAN monitors be allowed within realistic viewing proximity? (oh, you're a conservative [insert Resting Bitch Face] - get to the back of the bus.....)

2
sir_rockness 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whose hands will be doing the counting?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Burmeister 2 points ago +2 / -0

Source?

2
jackwerntz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Big, if true. We gonna count them like it's 1780!

2
hisnamewasjeff 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dems be like:

"Alright, WE AGREE TO THIS!

I have..one hand...two hands..

That's it, nothing suspicious here, I've counted my hands, let's pack it up!"

1
adam_schiff 1 point ago +1 / -0

We demand an audit!!!

1
patriotic_wow_player 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do they have to let republicans poll watchers count too?

1
OhShnigums 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unless they continue to employ these ballot ripping up fucks

1
Mathetai 1 point ago +1 / -0

You hear that? Hear the train? Better watch out. I hear it has no breaks.

1
titsandwich 1 point ago +1 / -0

Audit!

1
grapenuts 1 point ago +1 / -0

who is watching the hand counters?!

1
Ih8leftists 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need to invalidate ALL the illegal votes before the re count.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
kornesque 1 point ago +2 / -1

Bro, I get the excitement at the thought but you've really got to lead with whatever sauce you have, even if you at least say you just saw it on TV. Sorry bout your dogpile.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
EvanOnTheFly 1 point ago +2 / -1

Just a upvote whore, move along.

1
Mostprobably 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anything on a computer can be hacked. The end. Why anyone would trust voting software is beyond me.

1
Serah123 1 point ago +1 / -0

People (Trump's team and other patriots/MAGA supporters) have been calling for it in Georgia, you mean. There has been no announcement that a hand count is gonna occur in Georgia as of yet.

1
HazelHen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every counter needs to be recorded. There must be traceability and accountability.

Every counter needs to be reminded that each fraudulent vote is 10+ years in federal penitentiary.

1
GodzillaTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need an audit too though

1
Shakakka99 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who's keeping an eye on all the ballots so they don't go into dumpsters/shredders/the backs of Neon Leafs?

1
AcAirman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your, Hey look at me syndrome has failed.

1
Scumbag-reddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kemp is a faggot. Watch for faggotry from him.

1
CantStumpTheTrump20 1 point ago +1 / -0

Time to just have an election redo. In person. No mail in votes. Trump wins fucking BIG.

1
darkhorsereddit3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let’s fuckin go!!!!

1
Polks_Corps 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need a fucking audit too

1
SoAngryRanger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tighten down on poll workers too.

I want a GOP rep standing over shoulders watching every vote. And none of these faggot joggers tearing up Trump ballots.

1
JebBushEnergy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fraudulent ballots have been mixed in. They need an audit and then a recount.

0
thereal____ 0 points ago +1 / -1

This is where it gets interesting. No one, logically, could say this has a negative.

Unless you know there are dupes, fraud, and/or computer manipulation.

1
spezisacuckold 1 point ago +1 / -0

Recount is not the way.

Audit is the way.

1
thereal____ 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think a lot of us here assume that a recount is an audit. Of course, as you’re recounting if you see an issue, you look (audit) into it.

1
spezisacuckold 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, recounts are not the way. Counts are done by some of the dumbest motherfuckers on the face of the planet. What makes you think they’d A) be trustworthy to admit irregularities, or B) be smart enough to even recognize what they look like?

Audits at least generally pull in some outside personnel, of which we would demand Trump Campaign officials to help oversee the audit process.

1
thereal____ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your describing an audit is exactly what I assumed a recount was.

1
spezisacuckold 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure you can pull outside personnel to help with a recount, but an AUDIT has the explicit GOAL of finding illegal actions.

-1
BumpForTrump -1 points ago +1 / -2

This wont be of much help, im afraid.

There is a way to find fraudulent votes. Scan for finger prints. Each ballot will have a unique finger print that shouldnt be on any others. If a person really mailed it and it wasnt "stuffed".