3021
Comments (98)
sorted by:
167
deleted 167 points ago +167 / -0
113
deleted 113 points ago +113 / -0
43
GeneticsGuy 43 points ago +46 / -3

I kept telling people that Q was likely a 4chan LARP. You'd think after Sessions they'd be like "Ok, nevermind." But nope, they've just doubled down on Q. I don't disagree with the goals of Q Anon, but to me it seems very very fake... kind of like the latest supposed "sting" operation about Trump having watermarks placed on all ballots, which turns out to have been a made up story. It made people feel special about the supposed 4D chess going on they had supposed inside info on... When I first heard it though I realized it had to be a garbage story because ballot printing is done at literally hundreds of places and you have to have a special kind of printer to do a hidden watermark and sure as hell they didn't coordinate the replacement of thousands of printers for this election and then infiltrate the print files of every ballot run by individual states and counties. It's just not realistic... but oh man did it spread as legit.

10
deleted 10 points ago +13 / -3
9
GeneticsGuy 9 points ago +9 / -0

Ya this I think is a real possibility... a controlled opposition to get people into complacency.

4
Opticsplanet 4 points ago +4 / -0

And it worked beautifully for them which is sad.

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
-4
deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
eagle123 4 points ago +6 / -2

Even if Q was wrong about Sessions being brave enough to do much, if Q is true, it just means that military intelligence was wrong about Sessions.

Q has provided evidence to prove that he is who he says he is which is almost undeniable: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z15Xt1vGXns&t=5455s&ab_channel=ConspiracyNoMore

0
GeneticsGuy 0 points ago +1 / -1

If Q were real and SMART, they wouldn't be dropping supposed "truths" and conspiracies about big events about to happen on the internet for anyone to read. Hell, even Trump would think so as he believes that telegraphing your moves ahead of time is stupid, which it is. This is why I think it's all bogus. Something as big and as important as that is not going to get dropped on your latest conspiracy forum threads. The whole thing stinks, imo. And that's what it is, my opinion. But, if Q were who he says, they wouldn't be wrong 9 times out of 10. if you say "Big events are going to happen in the next 2 weeks" over and over, and you end up wrong over and over, when finally 1 event happens, that's just a coincidence because you keep pushing back the clock. You can't them claim it as evidence you predicted it or knew it was coming through inside info.

Again, I have nothing wrong with the people who believe in it as they are just hoping for a better America, but I can't deny the fact that the Q Anon lies about Sessions lul'd people into complacency against the deep state with promises of 4D chess to snare them. It's never happened. It was all lies.

There's a saying we all know... Fool me Once... - I think you know the rest.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
38
GunTottinPatriot 38 points ago +38 / -0

When they find the glitch do they automatically update the count and reverse the votes? why aren't we seeing it flipped than just curious

42
deleted 42 points ago +47 / -5
31
Aluminoti 31 points ago +31 / -0

Definitely need hard evidence, but even one small "glitch" should be enough to examine the whole state. It's like catching a suspected serial rapist and charging only the one rape you caught him on. It should be enough to investigate even if it was a hundred votes.

11
MAGARondonmonson 11 points ago +11 / -0

If Mich. found it to be EXACTLY 3000 votes each way, and the others are seen on TV to be the EXACT SAME VOTE EACH WAY, then it's going to show up on the Hard drives and data.

Good things the Republicans control these state Legislatures.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
KickingPugilist 5 points ago +6 / -1

The half the size they mean could be that if the glitch is 6000 votes, it takes 3000 away from Biden and adds those 3000 to Trump, making it a 6000 vote difference.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
ReignOfTyphon 5 points ago +5 / -0

The VA Secretary of State STILL hasn't updated the 'glitches' from election day that flipped 100k+ Trump votes to Biden...right now the VA total stands at a 300k lead by Biden which is 200k larger than Hillary's, of whom outperformed Biden in every category except in Fairfax and Louden Counties.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
10
Td1234 10 points ago +10 / -0

Rock county WI went dem in similar margins in 2016 FWIW.

9
iamherefortheluls 9 points ago +9 / -0

I would like to see confirmation for all these aside Antrim County. That one was confirmed by the county.

I've not seen any of these others.

89
namechangearoo 89 points ago +89 / -0

DNC has investigated themselves and have found no widespread voter fraud. Move along.

34
lordvon 34 points ago +34 / -0

in addition, all fraud claims are baseless and have no evidence. 100% sparkly clean, 0% chance of wrongdoing. RACISS!

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
DeadMenSmellToenails 2 points ago +2 / -0

DEBOOONKED DRUMPFTARD!!!!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
74
circusmonkey 74 points ago +74 / -0

If you audit every single vote in the US, you will find that Trump had an EXPLOSIVE victory. Probably the biggest in history.

That's why they had to stop the vote count to assess the situation.

36
spezisacuckold 36 points ago +36 / -0

AUDIT ALL VOTES

2
DeadMenSmellToenails 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the way

12
SpezDispenser 12 points ago +12 / -0

Biden won LA legit. Thats how fucked Commiefornia is.

Brain rot.

With that being said, 4% gain from '16 in the county. MAGa

2
stagolee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can't audit the ones that were shuffled into the pile, unfortunately. Some states, PA in particular, are simply spoiled elections and need to be tossed out altogether. Trump can't fix the vote in PA, he's just going to get the whole state tossed.

3
circusmonkey 3 points ago +3 / -0

Then vote again but in person with ID + voting ink on index finger after voting.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
43
1sketchyv 43 points ago +43 / -0

Can we please stop calling them 'glitches'

16
unclebobinator 16 points ago +16 / -0

Too late really. That ship has sailed.

5
pede-o-saurus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not too late. "Switch".

10
Here_we_go 10 points ago +10 / -0

We call them glitches but reappropriating the meaning to be FEATURE

1
WildStar 1 point ago +1 / -0

But we should always make sure to put "glitch" in quotes.

-3
Capitalism_Fuck_Yeah -3 points ago +2 / -5

Glitches is pretty appropriate. Most glitches are people admitting they don't know why it happened or from bad programming.

2
Thanagor 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the term implies the intent was honest and the execution was fumbled. With Dominion Systems at the least, there's quite a few red flags regarding corellation (but not causation) between outcome and those overseeing the system.

Intent is less important than abject lack of investment in impartiality and stability. Allowing one party's most prominent leaders and their representatives to own/operate companies doing the vote count, and then tallying up dozens to hundreds of major integrity-killing violations of the election process at the very least shows that abject lack of investment. Compare the principle to a child suffering at the hand of a parent - their intent is less important than the ongoing abject abuse/neglect that is demonstrable in its deviation from what actions should have occurred.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
36
GlitchyMcGlitchface 36 points ago +36 / -0

I think I am going to very much enjoy my new user name for the next 4 years

30
dataonly 30 points ago +30 / -0

Glitches only operate one direction. It goes way back to the Daly machine and possibly before.

Nixon likely won the 1960 election. Was very clear evidence it was stolen for Kennedy.

12
Aluminoti 12 points ago +12 / -0

Losing our freedom one glitch at a time

13
NeverInterruptEnemy 13 points ago +13 / -0

We are done.

If Trump gets back in on January 21, as an entire community, we absolutely fucking must demand election reforms and secure elections. vote by mail must be banned, voter registries must be updated and enforced, must require ID (and establish a free government ID so Democrats with low expectations of minorities will be happy), establish standards and a full auditing process, must ban the use of machines who share owners have conflicts of interest with the results (like everyone), just to make sure this never happens again.

Establishment on both sides will fight it. But Trump has ONE CHANCE to fix it if the results of this bullshit end up in his favor. While it ts a hot topic and while the dem base is mad.

10
RocksCanOnlyWait 10 points ago +10 / -0

You need ID for most welfare. The "poor people can't get ID" is a Democrat lie to stop voter ID.

5
NeverInterruptEnemy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Mostly. You need an ID or some verification for welfare (SNAP, WIC, or TANF). You don't need a specific gov issued ID.

Also, social systems aren't a right.

The better comparison is that Dems want Gun Buyer ID laws, but insist Voter ID laws are racist and would stop people from exercising their rights.

3
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 3 points ago +3 / -0

I loved watching a video of that where they went a a majority black area and asked if they thought it was racist to ask for id, and if they had it. They also explained why they were asking.

I think every one of them were offended, and were like "Of course I have ID?, Do they think we are stupid?"

4
DeadMenSmellToenails 4 points ago +4 / -0

100% this, what happened in this election can never happen again. Free Voter ID, absentee only upon request and for legitimate reasons (I voted by mail this year because I was working out of state on Nov. 3), all voting machines must be secured, have no online access, and must be tested before and after votes are tallied to ensure accuracy, all counting rooms monitored by election officials and CCTV, hell I'd even go so far as to have peoples' fingers dipped in ink after they vote to ensure they aren't going somewhere else to vote again.

1
NeverInterruptEnemy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ink isn’t needed if we have ID and a required precinct. But...

I think it brings up a good point. We can have a new school (encryption and hashing confirmations) as well as old school (all paper records).

People talk about blockchain are 80% nonsense but the short story is must push HARD on this coming up.

13
Trumper926 13 points ago +13 / -0

Can someone with infinitely more Wisdom than myself, with the guiding hand of the Holy Spirit, PLEASE tell me how real this is and how likely it is that these are reversed?

17
no_further 17 points ago +17 / -0

Several of these are based off of viewers noticing numbers reversing on the Tuesday livestreams. Technically they could be reporting anomalies and not counting anomalies. We will see.

6
Trumper926 6 points ago +6 / -0

so: how did they find the original Michigan Glitch that WAS corrected?

11
no_further 11 points ago +11 / -0

The clerk of Antrim County came public with that herself. I believe they double checked because it’s normally a red county and it went blue. So they manually double checked and found the error. I believe they also technically say it was a user error.

7
Trumper926 7 points ago +7 / -0

OK, so I guess the next question is, can these be detected manually now after the fact? The answer seems "yes"?

6
PigBeenBorn 6 points ago +6 / -0

The answer is definitely yes, just need a manual recount. But we want an audit more than a recount

4
renault829 4 points ago +4 / -0

Are all recounts 100% manual and What does the audit entail over a recount?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
no_further 3 points ago +3 / -0

yes, manual counting (be ethical counters) seems to be a surefire way to reverse these "glitches"

8
SurfandTurf 8 points ago +8 / -0

The Twitter comments are AIDS!

8
NeverInterruptEnemy 8 points ago +8 / -0

Always have been.

6
Choppermagic 6 points ago +6 / -0

so when will any of these "glitches" actually turn into votes being corrected? just stories so far.

5
Here_we_go 5 points ago +5 / -0

Waiting for link confirmation or trump tweet

3
Rustbeltkulak 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here is the Gateway Pundit's post on it with the captured images.

5
PanhandleTrumpsted 5 points ago +5 / -0

Please be real.

3
12gauge 3 points ago +3 / -0

I need proof before I sprout a boner over this.

3
DeplorableWeWin 3 points ago +3 / -0

So a hand recount in GA, WI, MI, PA, AZ should discover all these “glitches” and correct the count I assume

3
tx_patriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Glad found this but when do we move from the talking about it phase to the show me the results stage?

3
Loc12 3 points ago +3 / -0

After we get 3000 posts about it, and then move onto the next thing

3
Farage_massage 3 points ago +3 / -0

So we had this “news” about AZ last night - WHERE ARE THESE BEING OFFICIALLY REPORTED?

I see no change in the number in AZ, so is this alleged or is this the state giving these numbers out? If PA has flipped I feel that’s big news?

3
svlem 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why do they keep pumping out votes?

2
pbarnett865 2 points ago +2 / -0

So they can steal the election?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
qawsedrftg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where is he getting these numbers from? I'm trying to find them and I can't get anything. I'd like to see this data and source for myself.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
IroWide 2 points ago +2 / -0

If we don't arrest all those responsible for this blatant election interference, we're only buying ourselves four years here. There won't be a Trump to stop it in 2024, and the corruption will continue. These animals MUST. BE. PUT. AWAY.

2
pede-o-saurus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Use "switch". Stop using the term "glitch", it's an intentional switch (there's no such thing as "glitches" that go in one direction. Don't let them soft-pedal the language.

2
WildStar 2 points ago +2 / -0

We should use "glitch", but always keep it in quotes. That lets us reverse the enemy's narrative.

2
Vla1ne 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wonder how all these indiscriminate "glitches" and "clerical errors" only favor one candidate.

2
Damadhatter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are the states updating their sec state pages with these new totals so we can follow? Is anyone giving us the running total for an accurate vote count as these "glitches" are corrected?

2
Aluminoti 2 points ago +2 / -0

If we allow them to keep using the term"glitch" we are lending credibility to this steal. Our answer in every instance should be "you are naming this a glitch without evidence that it in fact was a glitch"

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-9
tracer12 -9 points ago +2 / -11

this is fake news i believe

8
Natethegreat 8 points ago +8 / -0

You cannot call fake news and not back up why.