3021 UPDATE: The spread in PA is 45k. They’ve now found enough “glitch” switches in PA to give the lead back to @POTUS . The most recent occurred in only 1 hour. (twitter.com) posted 156 days ago by foo_002 156 days ago by foo_002 +3021 / -0 98 comments share 98 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (98) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 7 ▼ – Trumper926 7 points 156 days ago +7 / -0 OK, so I guess the next question is, can these be detected manually now after the fact? The answer seems "yes"? permalink save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – PigBeenBorn 6 points 156 days ago +6 / -0 The answer is definitely yes, just need a manual recount. But we want an audit more than a recount permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – renault829 4 points 156 days ago +4 / -0 Are all recounts 100% manual and What does the audit entail over a recount? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 156 days ago +2 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – no_further 3 points 156 days ago +3 / -0 yes, manual counting (be ethical counters) seems to be a surefire way to reverse these "glitches" permalink parent save report block reply
OK, so I guess the next question is, can these be detected manually now after the fact? The answer seems "yes"?
The answer is definitely yes, just need a manual recount. But we want an audit more than a recount
Are all recounts 100% manual and What does the audit entail over a recount?
yes, manual counting (be ethical counters) seems to be a surefire way to reverse these "glitches"