Fear of the dark
Fear of the dark
I have a constant fear that something's always near
Fear of the dark
Fear of the dark
I have a phobia that someone's always there
You know you've listened to too much Maiden when you can read the title and suddenly start hearing the first few measures of the song playing in your head...
That was probably one of the first Iron Maiden Albums I did not buy. It was a lousy album and they just continued to go down hill from there.
Edit: I think this was about the time the brought in that blond guy who thinks he's a guitar hero on stage, but actually really sucks at playing.
Also Bruce Dickinson is a satanist.
It’s click bait. And the faggots pushing it (Autists who haven't slept all night most likely) are down voting me for stating the obvious. They want to make it into a big story by using us as the pawns to get it trending.
At least be honest. That’s all I ask. I’ll read about it and share it if it’s worthwhile, but don’t treat me like a fucking sheep.
I haven’t actually slept (catnaps only) since the election. Gotta be honest, I’m feeling pretty miserable. SPEZ: thanks for the concern. I see how ridiculous I’m being. Taking your advice. Signing off until noon tomorrow. Hope this is all over by then.
yes because people who commit voter fraud stop at one, that's why only one dead person votes every election, only one person who moved to a different state, only one person with their maiden name. Get real!
What's actually low energy is making allegations without proof.
This woman has not posted any actual evidence whatsoever.
I hope all of us start to realize sooner or later that there's a cottage industry of so-called pro-Trump websites out there that are wallowing in the high traffic they are getting from claiming "evidence" of fraud, but they never fucking post the evidence.
I'm simply saying that all the breathless claims without any evidence whatsoever are actually doing more harm than good, by distracting everyone from the real fuckery going on.
This might be a substantial avenue to pursue finding evidence of fraud. Other than this all we've pursued is Dominion flipping 7,000 votes per County in like 8 States, and the dead voting in 5 Counties.
There’s plenty more out there. Out of state voting, illegal ballot harvesting in certain states, ballots being falsely postmarked, ballots without legitimate birthday information, boxes of ballots in the middle of the night, large ballot drops that go 100% for Biden, hundreds of thousands of votes that only were for Biden without any down ballot choices made, the testimony of countless poll workers and watchers of voting manipulation, the exclusion of Republican poll watchers, number of ballots exceeding registered voters in certain areas, alleged copies of military and absentee ballots being used, manipulation of provisional ballots and denying many of them their votes, unexplained statistical anomalies involving voter turnout and ballot count distributions, and non-citizens and unregistered voters casting ballots.
I’m sure there’s even more avenues of election fraud which I haven’t included off the top of my head. Stealing an election is an extremely multi-faceted process, and required fraud big and small at all levels to carry out. All of it is important, though given the tight margins in key states like Wisconsin and Georgia, only a fraction of it needs to be proven. Every avenue must be investigated to ensure elections can never be stolen again (at least on this scale).
Hey fellow trump supporter... Does the number of people making the claim have anything to do with its veracity? Why are you not inquisitive enough to want this avenue investigated?
Yeah this site is getting real stupid real fast. The quest (which I generally agree with) to be 100% energy, maga, upbeat is great but we're starting to drift from reality on some of these.
Last night it was "19000 votes overturned by computer glitch" and then it turns out the story is that someone saw 19000 votes disappear during part of CNN or whoever's broadcast.
It really fucks the story. It is big news if someone spotted 19000 votes going away on screen. But it is news for further digging. Nothing has come of it yet. Just like this story.
I want to focus on things that will get the election overturned.
If something might lead to that, then let's label it clearly as something to investigate. Acting like it is now an accepted fact and Fox and CNN have reported it and twitter "is blowing up with it" etc is just false hope and muddies the water.
I thought the same was true about Sharpie-gate in AZ until a lawsuit came from it.
Using maiden names is a brilliant strategy for vote fraud, and if they're pulling off voting with cats and service dogs, I can see the validity. For even a handful of people to notice that someone is getting absentee ballots and voting in their name is indicative of a broader network who is using databases to pull off this fraud.
Margins are so tight in so many states, that even if they didn’t prove “widespread” voter fraud (which they will), they could get more than enough votes invalidated to flip states. Every aspect of fraud needs to be brought to the light, no matter how big or small.
this article is subject af. Gettysburg patriots alone showed up in 7 vehicles and there were HUNDREDS at the rally at Harrisburg. Right Side Broadcasting Network showed the crowd. This ass rag said dozens and tightened the frame.. this is bullshit
I read the story. The whole thing is poo-pooed at the end, citing lack of hard evidence.
On Twitter, "L" gets blown out because she can't answer whether or not her mother's maiden name was actually used to cast a vote, or whether or not she just got a phone call asking her to vote.
One is voter fraud. The other is not.
Yet she can't tell us which of those happened. Meanwhile, we get all spun up about #Maidengate, there is ZERO evidence, and the rest of the world mocks the shit out of us for being conspiracy theorists.
Oooohhh I only ever use my maiden name. I know people don't know me if they call me either by my full name or my husband's. I would be pissed if someone voted for me under another name
I'm going to make a comment that is inspired by your comment, but please don't think I am criticizing you personally. I just tend to see something and want to make a general comment.
When I got married the second time, my wife wanted to keep her maiden name, especially since she had gotten married the first time, and changed her name, then changed it back. But I had a problem with that. I feel that the idea that women in American culture not take their husband's name at marriage is a modernist innovation and part of the "plan" to undo familial norms starting in the early 1960s. I say American culture, because I understand the customs differ in other places. That being said, I believe Anglo-Saxon culture is normative for America, even if others are welcome (and no, I am not fully Anglo-Saxon, and my wife is Hispanic; these are all just general comments).
For instance, if man and woman become one, and then they have children, there is something unifying about everyone having the same family name (as opposed to "married" name).
My wife eventually conceded, although she was annoyed at first (oh well, she makes me do things that annoy me, too. LOL)
That being said, again, I am not criticizing you or anyone else who didn't take their husband's name. It's America; I believe in freedom. That being said, I would hope people reconsider as this is a symptom of the culture degeneracy the left implemented in the 1960s.
Well, in pre-modernist culture, family names were honored and not considered a "choice," or part of one's "self-expression," so I would imagine the advice would be to just suck it up.
That being said, I wouldn't have a problem with the names being changed to something else, as long as the husband and wife change it to the same thing.
My main concern is the family be united, not that women "submit" to their husband.
I totally understand your point. Before we married I asked my husband if it was important to him and would have changed it if it was. I simply could not see the point of the hassle and few educated women of my generation took their husbands names. Even in my church (Mormon) outside Utah it is common for women of my generation to keep their names. It flipped back afterwards. I also saw it as a symbol of being possessed or owned, rather than of unity. We have been very much a partnership. Early on my husband wore a wedding ring to make me happy because of what it symbolized to me. At this point mostly neither of us wears a ring out of laziness mostly, plus we are over the hill. My husband would not know if a woman was hitting on him anyway, he is oblivious.
Both my husband and I had lived out of the country before marriage and did not view name changing the same as many do. I agree that to some it is a symbol of rejection of unity and that is not healthy. Hyphenating just annoys me. The pendulum has swung and few of the younger generation keep their names, but the divorce levels are as high as ever. What I see more than anything is a stupid idealism and inability to commit for the long term. This is very sad and tears apart our society
Had a friend decide the reasonable thing to do would be to take a new name. Divorced parents on both sides, they didn't want to bring their familial history of failure into a new relationship on either side, and so decided to simply agree on a new last name together. It was surprisingly a lot more work to change both names at the same time, than just change one (like, way more than double, with assessments and everything). But it symbolized a rejection of the divorce culture, and solidifying their union.
I don't think idealism is an issue. I think the opposite is the case: Dysmalism. People assume the future is dysmal, not ideal. The world will only ever get worse, so why commit and work hard for the future? If more people believed hard work, effort, and a positive mindset would bring about a good future... More people would do those things even if it is idealistic to believe so.
I believe the biggest contribution to divorce is no fault divorce laws. When people have a contract they should not be able to just walk away because they feel like it. Aside to that people fail to commit. If that is what the name change means to them, then it is the right thing to do for those people
Oh, gawd don't get me started on the "Hispanic" women who do this now. Like Ocasio-López. In Spanish countries, no woman takes her husband's last name. There is no such thing as a "maiden name." Her two last names are her parents' last names. Her kids will take their parents' two last names. There is literally no fucking reason for these third-generation "Hispanic" women to hyphenate their names and the fact that they do shows they have no fucking idea about Hispanic culture or tradition.
EDIT for below comment. You're right. I was thinking in Spanish, where padres means both parents and father. It's a false cognate mistake I made. English isn't my first language. Thanks for the assist, pede.
A child's name is not their dad's two last names, it's their father's last name followed by their mother's last name. Traditionally, when a woman got married, she would eliminate or minimize the use of her mother's last name, and add "de" (of) + her husband's last name. This is still how it is done in many Central American countries, while I acknowledge that in may other Hispanic countries, it is no longer followed, but it is inaccurate to say that no woman takes her husband's name.
Example from traditional practice:
Carlos García López marries Elena Lema Castillo
Elena becomes Elena Lema de García
Their child Juan is named Juan García Lema
The hyphenation thing sometimes is imposed by government authorities who didn't know how to handle double last names back in the day. Happened to some of my friends.
I agree, by the third generation, it should disappear. My daughter does not legally have her mother's last name as her second last name, although on extremely formal traditional invitations and things I will use it as a nod to cultural tradition.
In Spain it's a bit different - everybody has 2 last names, and a child takes the first last name of the father and the first last name of the mother. The last names of the child are in that order. Married women don't typically take their husband's name.
I am currently registered to vote in 3 possibly 4 different states. My ex husbands last name, my current husbands last name, and my maiden name. #maidengate
That's nice but boy oh boy good luck overturning an election based on that.
We have the most suspect, diabolical, owned by Clinton, used in all the key swing states, voting machines that we already know can flip votes. And we're pretending this is big? It's just another string to pull on and see if there is a bigger fraud to expose.
been reading up on it last half hour. does not seem that big so far. Literally haven't seen a single case of anyone confirmed a ballot cast in their name from
maidengate situation.
bit unfortunate it trended at night when most people slept
The topic isn't whether or not your wife should be able to vote, it's whether ALL women should be able to vote.
On a macro level there is no question that as a voting bloc, women voting has ruined our country. Keep in mind that even if it's only 60% of women that are irresponsible with their vote, and 40% of women that aren't - that still means the country is better off if women didn't vote.
Taking a macro level issue and arguing it from the micro perspective is what the left does, and it's not only a logical fallacy it's intentionally dishonest. For example when we bring up the very real mathematical problem of having open borders and letting anyone come into the country at any point - stressing out infrastructure and civic systems, the left will not argue that fact. Instead they highlight one family with a single mother who came to America with her 6 kids to escape her abusive husband and made a better life for themselves. It makes no sense.
National policies need to be discussed on a macro level because that's how they operate in practice.
Wasn't there a movement recently to lower the voting age to 12 or some such silliness? I want to say it had something to do with Greta The Climate Goblin, but I'm not sure. In any case, it would seem like the push in this country is to get more clueless voting, not less.
You are completely correct, policy should be based on averages and your personal interactions while informed by averages should ultimately come down to your own instincts.
Another words, we should base policy on how the group behaves on average, but not automatically assume every individual in that group will behave that way while still being aware they have a predilection towards behaving that way,
I'll take it a step further though. Not only should women not be allowed to vote but they shouldn't be allowed to work either. Putting women to work was a scam to increase the amount of taxes collected, take women away from the home and their children hence having to leave them in the care of the state to be indoctrinated with commie propaganda as well as deny the man the right to fulfil his biological role of providing for his family.
After second wave feminism achieved this it doubled the labor market which had the effect of cutting wages in half and making it much harder for men to find jobs. Back in the day you could have just an average wage and it would be enough to pay a mortgage, have 2 cars, adorn your wife nicely, go on a holiday each year and still have enough left over to save for your kids college fund, etc.
Now, the amount most men earn can't cover all of this and your wife has to go to work as well. Which leaves your kids as fodder to be brainwashed with commie propaganda by the state instead of being taught by their mothers.
Allowing women to vote and work is objectively bad for the fabric of society and a big part of why White birth rates have plummeted.
I'm with you 100%. The funny part is that if you ask women today if they'd like to quit their job and have their husbands salary doubled so they can stay home and raise the kids, the overwhelming answer would be "YES PLEASE WHEN DOES IT START?!".
They never thought it through though, and let the feminists destroy their preferred way of living.
You sound like the type that would take away the right to vote based on skin color as well. Democrats do that. Democrats didn't want women to vote either.
ROFL does that nonsense usually work here? The democraps bread and butter is black and women voters.
But do tell us more about how the founding fathers of the United States wanted those parties having a say in the running of the country, strangely all I can find is references to White men - like them.
Because men largely vote well while women largely vote poorly. The founding fathers built a system for us to all be represented well, not be represented by a mob. They feared a mobocracy more than a monarchy
the original system was set up so that people who had skin in the game could vote. as voting privileges were expanded throughout our history, up until women were allowed to vote it was because their contribution and personal risk to society kept expanding, and they demanded representation to follow suit
women contribute far less in taxes, own far less property, make far less money, and don't sign up for selective service. if every single woman in the country lost the ability to vote tomorrow, their interests would still be protected because they have to far less to lose than men do through the election of incompetent and corrupt people.
Because women are more easily manipulated by bad actors. It also creates an opposition between a man and his wife which should never be allowed.
Soyboy betacucks are a massive problem as well, but one can't deny that since women have been allowed to vote things have gone backwards pretty hard. It also means that scumbag politicians can pitch policies towards the individual instead of the family. When only men could vote most of those guys were married and they voted for what was most beneficial to their families. Now everyone gets to vote and that's why we see bullshit policies for foreigners and LGBTBBQs that are destructive to the American family.
Just look at what's happening in Sweden, it's a feminist govt that is run by women and they are mass importing rapists from Muslim countries and then cover up crimes against women and children because "racism". It's insane.
I agree things have gone backwards but not all women are dense af. I know some pretty based women and I know some pretty stupid ones too. I do agree with their natural emotions getting in the way of the stoicism required to make really tough decisions.
I never said they were, but essentially you're using the "they're not all like that" argument which is very leftist in nature.
Stereotypes exist for a reason and when assessing group impact we are forced to generalise by going off how the majority of that group behaves, not off the statistical outliers.
I could say not all blacks are degenerate criminals and that would undoubtedly be true. But when you've got 13% of the population committing over 50% of the violent crime and murders that's a real problem that needs to be addressed.
If she is a good wife and understands the situation, then like my wife she will happily give up the right to vote if it meant all the skanks of the world having to do the same.
Women voting is a problem. They are emotional and easily swayed by feelings-based arguments.
I actually would also give up my right to vote - however it’s wouldn’t be for being a “good wife” but for being a “good Patriot”.
Sadly, most of the women I know vote emotionally & voted for Biden so I do believe there is some credence to this thought. It would suck for all of us lady pedes out here to be grouped in with these stupid broads but many would gladly do it in order to save America.
Anyone who willingly gives up their right to vote based only on happenstance of biology is an idiot. What other rights are they going to give up 'just because'? Men and women are equal in the stupid department, education is the key.
there is no right to vote it's a privilege which can clearly be taken away as evidenced by the fact that ex-cons are not allowed to vote
originally land owners were the ones that were allowed to vote because they actually had skin in the game with regards to what the government could do, especially with regards to levying taxes. this is long before something like an income tax existed. the more men were given the right to vote because large scale conscription became common place, if you were expected to die for your country the least you could do is have a hand in selecting a government that wasn't blood thirsty
all this to say, what do women have to lose? they don't sign up for selective service and statistically they are net drains on the system. what i mean by that is that women are the recipients of government money to a greater extent than they pay out in taxes. what skin do they have in the game? ask a woman and the only thing you will ever hear them screech about is abortions.
It goes beyond just education though. More than half the women I know that voted for Biden are well educated (college degrees) yet still voted based on emotions. Sad but true.
Don’t appreciate being called an idiot either. I would do it if it meant to secure a future for America & for future generations.
Can we secretly combine them? Say - fine them $1M, give them a 10 yr prison sentence, and after a week or two of them being someone's bitch but thinking they will live - just execute them.
Go to your states voter page. Duck duck go it. If you lived in a different state before you were married you check your maiden there and see if it was "active" in the voter registration and if it got a ballot or not. It's also important to check your current state of residence where you voted to make sure someone didn't send in a ballot in your name while you voted in person.
They are targeting the names of women who married and moved out of state.
Not sure, I am not sexually attracted to anyone with the last names lopez, jamal, or hussian so I would not consider marrying them. As for a Clinton, there's at least one Clinton family I would avoid going to the gym with, too.
Its ok.. we do not punish connected politicians who want to destroy our country in the name of a religion who’s greatest proffit is a mass murdering pedophile.
In Florida you can also see the political party to which a person is registered. You only need a first and last name and the DOB. What's worse is it also shows their current address. I can see that being abused by stalkers or people with restraining orders.
You need to document it. See if your local PD can come over and you show them both (if you still have it) and take your sworn statement and note that he witnessed it.
You now have an Affidavit you can do something with.
Dems registers womans maiden name in the state that they move out of, possibly sends a political call inquiring if they plan to vote, and if not they steal the womans identity and vote in the state that they move out of.
Things like this happen because the GOP doesnt do anything. They need to getup off their asses even once. We have Mitt Romney's in our party (good for nothing people).
I just checked my wifes registration under her maiden name and she still on the voter roll for the state we moved out of and a ballot was mailed to our old address. It does say no ballot was returned but still doesnt stop someone using her name on a fake ballot elsewhere.
I'm sure they can rationalize it to themselves as if they "smashed the patriarchy by using one of its tools of oppression to speak truth to power" or some such nonsense.
I registered to vote in Colorado years ago, then had a legal name change. I check ALL of my names (maiden, married, and final) during presidential elections. I don't even live in Colorado anymore, but I'm still going to check.
Unfortunately, Texas doesn't have a vote tracker, so I can't check there, and I'm not registered in my new state yet. If I can help it, they will NEVER use my info. Fuck Democrats.
Woo! Lads! This Trump Curse is quick. All those women that showed up in costumes to try and stop ACB being confirmed. Will they now put up a fight for their birth identity or cuck out to the patriarchy cause "orange man bad" ?
Oh god, I would kill to see Trump do a series of parodies appearances for a troll vid to kill these fucking 'protest' franchises. Like splice him into a scene from that awful hulu series, she starts to turn around and it's him in costume saying "I can't have your baby, but I appreciated your vote. Very big. Uge win coming!"
Then do that for every progressive series, ending with Murphy Brown reboot, giving his side of her character's bullshit story. This will forever taint everything they like and make them instantly hate it.
Wait......what I miss? Maiden gate?
Run for your liiiiiiiiiuvvvvvvveeeeeeesssss
Fear of the dark Fear of the dark I have a constant fear that something's always near Fear of the dark Fear of the dark I have a phobia that someone's always there
One of my favorite songs. Especially the live recordings with the audience singing along.
Agreed.
Relevant
Asshole communists blocked it
Man is that crowd amped and insanely loud.
Nothing is like their old stuff though. Hallowed be thy name, revelation..
Just about all the Bible verses I know, I know due to Iron Maiden.
You know you've listened to too much Maiden when you can read the title and suddenly start hearing the first few measures of the song playing in your head...
Oh oh oh oh oh
That was probably one of the first Iron Maiden Albums I did not buy. It was a lousy album and they just continued to go down hill from there. Edit: I think this was about the time the brought in that blond guy who thinks he's a guitar hero on stage, but actually really sucks at playing. Also Bruce Dickinson is a satanist.
Oh whoa oh oh oh Oh whoa oh oh Oh
This is lyrically correct.
Not the place I'd expect to see Iron Maiden but I'll take it.
Correction: Run for your wiiiivvvveeeees!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbity554pSg
Run for your wiiiiivvvvvvvvvvveeeeessss
.
I love, love, love Triumph's Never Surrender. Reminds me off good times past and those to come....
Who calling it maiden gate? I’m Confused.
The chick uncovering it, @SomeBitchIKnow
She's badass
Almost 9k followers agree with her badassery.
Just subscribed.
absolute, total badass.
Haha....
OP Posting clickbait then.
EVERYWHERE!!!
Haven’t seen it anywhere but this post.
It was all over the place here 3 hours ago. Trump Train moves fast.
No brakes
Get On or Get Rekt
maidengate2020
It’s click bait. And the faggots pushing it (Autists who haven't slept all night most likely) are down voting me for stating the obvious. They want to make it into a big story by using us as the pawns to get it trending.
At least be honest. That’s all I ask. I’ll read about it and share it if it’s worthwhile, but don’t treat me like a fucking sheep.
Hahaha...she’s now posting directly here about her maiden gate. Lmao
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8SgEuhz/hello-its-l-somebitchiknow-disco/c/
Oh sweaty, that's been deboonked. now go back.
Dude, why are you always calling clickbait?
Whoa, account is suspended.
and her backup. She has a parler I think, but yeah, twitter smashed the hashtag and her account right quick
This just came out overnight, so people are now just keeping up with it. Follow @SomeBitchIKnow and goto the hashtag #maidengate to find out more.
Account suspended. Go figure.
Oooh... fitting song and good pun on the band!
Run for your lives
if you sleep, you lose
I haven’t actually slept (catnaps only) since the election. Gotta be honest, I’m feeling pretty miserable. SPEZ: thanks for the concern. I see how ridiculous I’m being. Taking your advice. Signing off until noon tomorrow. Hope this is all over by then.
GO TO SLEEP!
And you lose!
Lmao
Dude, get some rest! We need all pedes at their best. We are going to win, so you can sleep soundly.
You got 71 million frens holding your spot. Well update you. Go get some rest. We’re gonna have record amounts of salt to mine real soon.
Nice warm shower, clean bedding and some Nyquil.
Sleep is the cousin of death.
I thought biden was a zombie android, not Freddy Krueger.
I thought he was the creepy preacher from Poltergeist.
Ask Biden he knows
Story from RT
https://www.rt.com/usa/506290-maidengate-voter-fraud-claims/
yes because people who commit voter fraud stop at one, that's why only one dead person votes every election, only one person who moved to a different state, only one person with their maiden name. Get real!
Um....see if you can think of a reason why she wouldn't share personal identifying information on a hostile social media platform.
I bet you can figure it out.
Fuck off with this zero energy bullshit. 1 count of fraud isn't mud, it means keep digging.
This is worth crowdsourcing, even just for a day.
What's actually low energy is making allegations without proof.
This woman has not posted any actual evidence whatsoever.
I hope all of us start to realize sooner or later that there's a cottage industry of so-called pro-Trump websites out there that are wallowing in the high traffic they are getting from claiming "evidence" of fraud, but they never fucking post the evidence.
Glitches!
Stolen votes!
Fraud! Fraud! Fraud!
Soon...
That means ALL the allegations of voter fraud are low energy?... okay doomer
I didn't say that, bro.
I'm simply saying that all the breathless claims without any evidence whatsoever are actually doing more harm than good, by distracting everyone from the real fuckery going on.
I can agree with that, wheres the proof? I would imagine she's not going to want to list her moms name... hmmm
Ok she wont give it to any right wing source also.
This might be a substantial avenue to pursue finding evidence of fraud. Other than this all we've pursued is Dominion flipping 7,000 votes per County in like 8 States, and the dead voting in 5 Counties.
There’s plenty more out there. Out of state voting, illegal ballot harvesting in certain states, ballots being falsely postmarked, ballots without legitimate birthday information, boxes of ballots in the middle of the night, large ballot drops that go 100% for Biden, hundreds of thousands of votes that only were for Biden without any down ballot choices made, the testimony of countless poll workers and watchers of voting manipulation, the exclusion of Republican poll watchers, number of ballots exceeding registered voters in certain areas, alleged copies of military and absentee ballots being used, manipulation of provisional ballots and denying many of them their votes, unexplained statistical anomalies involving voter turnout and ballot count distributions, and non-citizens and unregistered voters casting ballots.
I’m sure there’s even more avenues of election fraud which I haven’t included off the top of my head. Stealing an election is an extremely multi-faceted process, and required fraud big and small at all levels to carry out. All of it is important, though given the tight margins in key states like Wisconsin and Georgia, only a fraction of it needs to be proven. Every avenue must be investigated to ensure elections can never be stolen again (at least on this scale).
Quite a list! I agree, pursuing ALL of it is ideal. Fair elections and rule of law are the bedrock of our society. Both are challenged
Hey fellow trump supporter... Does the number of people making the claim have anything to do with its veracity? Why are you not inquisitive enough to want this avenue investigated?
Yeah this site is getting real stupid real fast. The quest (which I generally agree with) to be 100% energy, maga, upbeat is great but we're starting to drift from reality on some of these.
Last night it was "19000 votes overturned by computer glitch" and then it turns out the story is that someone saw 19000 votes disappear during part of CNN or whoever's broadcast.
It really fucks the story. It is big news if someone spotted 19000 votes going away on screen. But it is news for further digging. Nothing has come of it yet. Just like this story.
Keep fighting the good fight
Buh-cuz I needs me my super valuable internet points!
Did we not leave you idiots who think everything is about upvotes back on Reddit?
They want us to not be able to flag shills with downvotes.
Surprised you didn't add a "let's be honest...." to your shill campaign here.
I want to focus on things that will get the election overturned.
If something might lead to that, then let's label it clearly as something to investigate. Acting like it is now an accepted fact and Fox and CNN have reported it and twitter "is blowing up with it" etc is just false hope and muddies the water.
I thought the same was true about Sharpie-gate in AZ until a lawsuit came from it.
Using maiden names is a brilliant strategy for vote fraud, and if they're pulling off voting with cats and service dogs, I can see the validity. For even a handful of people to notice that someone is getting absentee ballots and voting in their name is indicative of a broader network who is using databases to pull off this fraud.
Margins are so tight in so many states, that even if they didn’t prove “widespread” voter fraud (which they will), they could get more than enough votes invalidated to flip states. Every aspect of fraud needs to be brought to the light, no matter how big or small.
this article is subject af. Gettysburg patriots alone showed up in 7 vehicles and there were HUNDREDS at the rally at Harrisburg. Right Side Broadcasting Network showed the crowd. This ass rag said dozens and tightened the frame.. this is bullshit
AH yes, the Russia Times.
Very credible.
I read the story. The whole thing is poo-pooed at the end, citing lack of hard evidence.
On Twitter, "L" gets blown out because she can't answer whether or not her mother's maiden name was actually used to cast a vote, or whether or not she just got a phone call asking her to vote.
One is voter fraud. The other is not.
Yet she can't tell us which of those happened. Meanwhile, we get all spun up about #Maidengate, there is ZERO evidence, and the rest of the world mocks the shit out of us for being conspiracy theorists.
You're aware many of the articles from RT are beneficial to Trump and have proven to be accurate right? I know I know Russia BOO!
Thats clever for a bunch of tards
the tards are talented with fraud, that's all
Oooohhh I only ever use my maiden name. I know people don't know me if they call me either by my full name or my husband's. I would be pissed if someone voted for me under another name
I'm going to make a comment that is inspired by your comment, but please don't think I am criticizing you personally. I just tend to see something and want to make a general comment.
When I got married the second time, my wife wanted to keep her maiden name, especially since she had gotten married the first time, and changed her name, then changed it back. But I had a problem with that. I feel that the idea that women in American culture not take their husband's name at marriage is a modernist innovation and part of the "plan" to undo familial norms starting in the early 1960s. I say American culture, because I understand the customs differ in other places. That being said, I believe Anglo-Saxon culture is normative for America, even if others are welcome (and no, I am not fully Anglo-Saxon, and my wife is Hispanic; these are all just general comments).
For instance, if man and woman become one, and then they have children, there is something unifying about everyone having the same family name (as opposed to "married" name).
My wife eventually conceded, although she was annoyed at first (oh well, she makes me do things that annoy me, too. LOL)
That being said, again, I am not criticizing you or anyone else who didn't take their husband's name. It's America; I believe in freedom. That being said, I would hope people reconsider as this is a symptom of the culture degeneracy the left implemented in the 1960s.
Honest question, what if the husband had an unfavorable last name?
Well, in pre-modernist culture, family names were honored and not considered a "choice," or part of one's "self-expression," so I would imagine the advice would be to just suck it up.
That being said, I wouldn't have a problem with the names being changed to something else, as long as the husband and wife change it to the same thing.
My main concern is the family be united, not that women "submit" to their husband.
Let’s say for example, your husband is a pedo who sends dick pix and his last name is Weiner. Is that what you mean?
True, true, true. But are we sure the name "Huma Abedin" isn't any more disgraceful?
Like lipshitz or finklestein?
I totally understand your point. Before we married I asked my husband if it was important to him and would have changed it if it was. I simply could not see the point of the hassle and few educated women of my generation took their husbands names. Even in my church (Mormon) outside Utah it is common for women of my generation to keep their names. It flipped back afterwards. I also saw it as a symbol of being possessed or owned, rather than of unity. We have been very much a partnership. Early on my husband wore a wedding ring to make me happy because of what it symbolized to me. At this point mostly neither of us wears a ring out of laziness mostly, plus we are over the hill. My husband would not know if a woman was hitting on him anyway, he is oblivious.
Both my husband and I had lived out of the country before marriage and did not view name changing the same as many do. I agree that to some it is a symbol of rejection of unity and that is not healthy. Hyphenating just annoys me. The pendulum has swung and few of the younger generation keep their names, but the divorce levels are as high as ever. What I see more than anything is a stupid idealism and inability to commit for the long term. This is very sad and tears apart our society
Had a friend decide the reasonable thing to do would be to take a new name. Divorced parents on both sides, they didn't want to bring their familial history of failure into a new relationship on either side, and so decided to simply agree on a new last name together. It was surprisingly a lot more work to change both names at the same time, than just change one (like, way more than double, with assessments and everything). But it symbolized a rejection of the divorce culture, and solidifying their union.
I don't think idealism is an issue. I think the opposite is the case: Dysmalism. People assume the future is dysmal, not ideal. The world will only ever get worse, so why commit and work hard for the future? If more people believed hard work, effort, and a positive mindset would bring about a good future... More people would do those things even if it is idealistic to believe so.
I believe the biggest contribution to divorce is no fault divorce laws. When people have a contract they should not be able to just walk away because they feel like it. Aside to that people fail to commit. If that is what the name change means to them, then it is the right thing to do for those people
Thanks for sharing your story!
Better check.
You are right
Can't be that srs, right? Who would marry those hags?
TBF they are divorced but still have two names.
They are probably also the retarded kind that uses a hyphen in their last name
Oh, gawd don't get me started on the "Hispanic" women who do this now. Like Ocasio-López. In Spanish countries, no woman takes her husband's last name. There is no such thing as a "maiden name." Her two last names are her parents' last names. Her kids will take their parents' two last names. There is literally no fucking reason for these third-generation "Hispanic" women to hyphenate their names and the fact that they do shows they have no fucking idea about Hispanic culture or tradition.
EDIT for below comment. You're right. I was thinking in Spanish, where padres means both parents and father. It's a false cognate mistake I made. English isn't my first language. Thanks for the assist, pede.
Flat out dont marry a woman who wont change their name to yours. Setting yourself up to be a cuck.
This
A child's name is not their dad's two last names, it's their father's last name followed by their mother's last name. Traditionally, when a woman got married, she would eliminate or minimize the use of her mother's last name, and add "de" (of) + her husband's last name. This is still how it is done in many Central American countries, while I acknowledge that in may other Hispanic countries, it is no longer followed, but it is inaccurate to say that no woman takes her husband's name.
Example from traditional practice:
The hyphenation thing sometimes is imposed by government authorities who didn't know how to handle double last names back in the day. Happened to some of my friends.
I agree, by the third generation, it should disappear. My daughter does not legally have her mother's last name as her second last name, although on extremely formal traditional invitations and things I will use it as a nod to cultural tradition.
In Spain it's a bit different - everybody has 2 last names, and a child takes the first last name of the father and the first last name of the mother. The last names of the child are in that order. Married women don't typically take their husband's name.
Oh, they have a reason: ancient pride of Spain, upholding the privilege of the Nobility. They’re all descended from white colonizers! (kek)
Relevant username
Possibly many more, depending on how many poor beta males they fucked over.
Desperate fools with large funko pop collections?
Right question tbh
They're all married to each other.
I think the story is more that dems used women's maiden names to create their fake voters. in multiple states
situations like this https://twitter.com/5hitjustgotreal/status/1326050077471731718
That's nice but boy oh boy good luck overturning an election based on that.
We have the most suspect, diabolical, owned by Clinton, used in all the key swing states, voting machines that we already know can flip votes. And we're pretending this is big? It's just another string to pull on and see if there is a bigger fraud to expose.
been reading up on it last half hour. does not seem that big so far. Literally haven't seen a single case of anyone confirmed a ballot cast in their name from
maidengate situation.
bit unfortunate it trended at night when most people slept
🤦♂️
And to be even more fair I think there’s a good percentage of men that shouldn’t vote either.
Or at the very least net positive taxpayers.
Both. Property owners pay taxes.
Net positive tax, and can answer at least 1 basic question about who they're voting for.
I’d compromise at only property owners, women included.
If you've owned property at any point in the past four years.
I don't want to penalize people for selling their house to move and renting for a while before buying again.
Fuck that. I'm a military vet and you think I shouldn't get to vote because I don't own land? Either rethink your stance or get bent.
The topic isn't whether or not your wife should be able to vote, it's whether ALL women should be able to vote.
On a macro level there is no question that as a voting bloc, women voting has ruined our country. Keep in mind that even if it's only 60% of women that are irresponsible with their vote, and 40% of women that aren't - that still means the country is better off if women didn't vote.
Taking a macro level issue and arguing it from the micro perspective is what the left does, and it's not only a logical fallacy it's intentionally dishonest. For example when we bring up the very real mathematical problem of having open borders and letting anyone come into the country at any point - stressing out infrastructure and civic systems, the left will not argue that fact. Instead they highlight one family with a single mother who came to America with her 6 kids to escape her abusive husband and made a better life for themselves. It makes no sense.
National policies need to be discussed on a macro level because that's how they operate in practice.
Wasn't there a movement recently to lower the voting age to 12 or some such silliness? I want to say it had something to do with Greta The Climate Goblin, but I'm not sure. In any case, it would seem like the push in this country is to get more clueless voting, not less.
You are completely correct, policy should be based on averages and your personal interactions while informed by averages should ultimately come down to your own instincts.
Another words, we should base policy on how the group behaves on average, but not automatically assume every individual in that group will behave that way while still being aware they have a predilection towards behaving that way,
I'll take it a step further though. Not only should women not be allowed to vote but they shouldn't be allowed to work either. Putting women to work was a scam to increase the amount of taxes collected, take women away from the home and their children hence having to leave them in the care of the state to be indoctrinated with commie propaganda as well as deny the man the right to fulfil his biological role of providing for his family.
After second wave feminism achieved this it doubled the labor market which had the effect of cutting wages in half and making it much harder for men to find jobs. Back in the day you could have just an average wage and it would be enough to pay a mortgage, have 2 cars, adorn your wife nicely, go on a holiday each year and still have enough left over to save for your kids college fund, etc.
Now, the amount most men earn can't cover all of this and your wife has to go to work as well. Which leaves your kids as fodder to be brainwashed with commie propaganda by the state instead of being taught by their mothers.
Allowing women to vote and work is objectively bad for the fabric of society and a big part of why White birth rates have plummeted.
I'm with you 100%. The funny part is that if you ask women today if they'd like to quit their job and have their husbands salary doubled so they can stay home and raise the kids, the overwhelming answer would be "YES PLEASE WHEN DOES IT START?!".
They never thought it through though, and let the feminists destroy their preferred way of living.
You sound like the type that would take away the right to vote based on skin color as well. Democrats do that. Democrats didn't want women to vote either.
ROFL does that nonsense usually work here? The democraps bread and butter is black and women voters.
But do tell us more about how the founding fathers of the United States wanted those parties having a say in the running of the country, strangely all I can find is references to White men - like them.
Exactly I don’t understand the wanting woman not to vote. Soy “males” offend me more than women with different political opinions
Because men largely vote well while women largely vote poorly. The founding fathers built a system for us to all be represented well, not be represented by a mob. They feared a mobocracy more than a monarchy
It's true - I'm surrounded by all the suburban moms who voted for Biden because "Orange Man Bad".
the original system was set up so that people who had skin in the game could vote. as voting privileges were expanded throughout our history, up until women were allowed to vote it was because their contribution and personal risk to society kept expanding, and they demanded representation to follow suit
women contribute far less in taxes, own far less property, make far less money, and don't sign up for selective service. if every single woman in the country lost the ability to vote tomorrow, their interests would still be protected because they have to far less to lose than men do through the election of incompetent and corrupt people.
Because women are more easily manipulated by bad actors. It also creates an opposition between a man and his wife which should never be allowed.
Soyboy betacucks are a massive problem as well, but one can't deny that since women have been allowed to vote things have gone backwards pretty hard. It also means that scumbag politicians can pitch policies towards the individual instead of the family. When only men could vote most of those guys were married and they voted for what was most beneficial to their families. Now everyone gets to vote and that's why we see bullshit policies for foreigners and LGBTBBQs that are destructive to the American family.
Just look at what's happening in Sweden, it's a feminist govt that is run by women and they are mass importing rapists from Muslim countries and then cover up crimes against women and children because "racism". It's insane.
I agree things have gone backwards but not all women are dense af. I know some pretty based women and I know some pretty stupid ones too. I do agree with their natural emotions getting in the way of the stoicism required to make really tough decisions.
I never said they were, but essentially you're using the "they're not all like that" argument which is very leftist in nature.
Stereotypes exist for a reason and when assessing group impact we are forced to generalise by going off how the majority of that group behaves, not off the statistical outliers.
I could say not all blacks are degenerate criminals and that would undoubtedly be true. But when you've got 13% of the population committing over 50% of the violent crime and murders that's a real problem that needs to be addressed.
Statistics.
If she is a good wife and understands the situation, then like my wife she will happily give up the right to vote if it meant all the skanks of the world having to do the same.
Women voting is a problem. They are emotional and easily swayed by feelings-based arguments.
I actually would also give up my right to vote - however it’s wouldn’t be for being a “good wife” but for being a “good Patriot”.
Sadly, most of the women I know vote emotionally & voted for Biden so I do believe there is some credence to this thought. It would suck for all of us lady pedes out here to be grouped in with these stupid broads but many would gladly do it in order to save America.
Anyone who willingly gives up their right to vote based only on happenstance of biology is an idiot. What other rights are they going to give up 'just because'? Men and women are equal in the stupid department, education is the key.
there is no right to vote it's a privilege which can clearly be taken away as evidenced by the fact that ex-cons are not allowed to vote
originally land owners were the ones that were allowed to vote because they actually had skin in the game with regards to what the government could do, especially with regards to levying taxes. this is long before something like an income tax existed. the more men were given the right to vote because large scale conscription became common place, if you were expected to die for your country the least you could do is have a hand in selecting a government that wasn't blood thirsty
all this to say, what do women have to lose? they don't sign up for selective service and statistically they are net drains on the system. what i mean by that is that women are the recipients of government money to a greater extent than they pay out in taxes. what skin do they have in the game? ask a woman and the only thing you will ever hear them screech about is abortions.
It goes beyond just education though. More than half the women I know that voted for Biden are well educated (college degrees) yet still voted based on emotions. Sad but true.
Don’t appreciate being called an idiot either. I would do it if it meant to secure a future for America & for future generations.
Women will also tend to vote for the best looking candidate, assuming no serious political differences.
I see men salivating all over the good looking female candidates. They are no different. Possibly worse due to small brain 'thinking'.
Phtt!
Sure, men will oogle, but not actually vote for the foxy candidate.
Tulsi, for example.
Sure they are. They actually give a shit whether the candidate they vote for is a good leader or not.
The difference is men will oogle, but not vote for the hot commie.
AOC for example.
We all admire dem tiddies on her, but no way we'd vote for her.
hello, based department?
Letting women vote early and often
TBF, my dad votes however my mom fills out the sample ballot—which is great as she’s more conservative than him.
Anecdote doesn't change the statistics. Women vote to destroy America on average
LEFTISTS vote to destroy America. They come in all colors and BOTH genders. Keep that in mind.
It's actually white men that let us down this time. That was the only group where geotus lost votes
Assuming the data is even remotely accurate, which it probably isn't.
White “men”
Members of the homo sapien species whose skin is lighter than the global average and who have a penis
👌
Jail them!
There are a few more - fines and imprisonment.
Can we secretly combine them? Say - fine them $1M, give them a 10 yr prison sentence, and after a week or two of them being someone's bitch but thinking they will live - just execute them.
Jail ? Public execution
Not only that they used old voter records to request mail in through public records and vote with other womens ballots.
I felt like I've been on top of this and I missed this one also lol
Married ladypedes should check voting registration under their maiden name. They could be hijacked by Dems.
I checked. It says I'm registered to vote under my maiden name at my current address, but I did live here before I was married.
It does not show that I submitted an absentee ballot under my maiden name.
How can I check?
Go to your states voter page. Duck duck go it. If you lived in a different state before you were married you check your maiden there and see if it was "active" in the voter registration and if it got a ballot or not. It's also important to check your current state of residence where you voted to make sure someone didn't send in a ballot in your name while you voted in person.
They are targeting the names of women who married and moved out of state.
This article tells you everything you need to know. It also includes the relevant links by state to check if anyone has voted using your former name:
https://www.somebitchtoldme.com/post/ballot-status-check
Call and see if [entering unknown pronoun territory] royal you [good enuff?] voted.
FL ladypede here - no voter registration under my maiden name.
its worse than that. Anyone who moved, should start checking if their id was used to vote in other states.
This lady here https://twitter.com/5hitjustgotreal/status/1326050077471731718
is alleging someone registered her in 3 other states.
You take just one look at her and you know why she's divorced.
I’ve lived in several states because my husband was military so this is a pain in the ass thanks Democrats.
Karens running around using their maiden name and new married name.....ehhh. I’d have to admit someone agreed to marry them though?
Just look for all the women with hyphenated names and you'll find the culprits.
Exactly. Hyphen names are a sure sign of a female being an unsufferable cunt bitch. Probably unfuckable, too.
Gotta say, as a ladypede, I fucking hate hyphenated names. They look and sound like shit.
Thankfully I believe at least 95% of people agree with you/us and it's only the hyper-woke who:
think they are erasing their past and family identity by taking the husband's last name as has always been done throughout all of history in the West,
see keeping their own name as some kind of confirmation of power and refusal to submit to patriarchy, and
see it just one more example of Conservativism that they can smash and be public about it.
Cheers to normal women like you and my Fiance
Right. I don't even care which one of us takes the others name, but the hyphen bullshit just looks stupid and is unwieldy.
What do you do after 4 generations of that when you have smith-lopez-jamal-clinton and they marry a sanders-brown-jamal-hussian.
You get a Brown-Clinton-Hussian-Jamal-Jamal-Lopez-Sanders-Smith obviously, bigot!
Alphabetical order? What are you, a fascist?
Obviously, the surnames get ordered according to the progressive stack.
I'm thinking Hussian-Jamal-Jamal-Lopez-Brown-Clinton-Sanders-Smith.
Not sure, I am not sexually attracted to anyone with the last names lopez, jamal, or hussian so I would not consider marrying them. As for a Clinton, there's at least one Clinton family I would avoid going to the gym with, too.
And a sign that a man is a beta.
George Carlson was right!
Very common out here in CA
My general rule of thumb is not to trust anyone with 2 last names. They must prove that they aren't a cunt. Like Amy Barrett
Is this why they do it? Always knew they had screws loose....
Ilhan married her brother.
She sure as fuck did! But he's gay.
Name checks out.
Its ok.. we do not punish connected politicians who want to destroy our country in the name of a religion who’s greatest proffit is a mass murdering pedophile.
Someone check if ilhan voted twice... Ilhan Omar and Ilhan nur said Elmi
Jerry nadler belt fund 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What state, if you don't mind sharing?
Yep. Florida has cleaned up more than other states but you still have thousands of snowbirds voting in two states.
In Florida you can also see the political party to which a person is registered. You only need a first and last name and the DOB. What's worse is it also shows their current address. I can see that being abused by stalkers or people with restraining orders.
Yeah. There is definitely a privacy price to pay with transparency.
You need to document it. See if your local PD can come over and you show them both (if you still have it) and take your sworn statement and note that he witnessed it.
You now have an Affidavit you can do something with.
I bet they register their cats and vote for them
You mean their old previously married name.
This woman https://twitter.com/5hitjustgotreal/status/1326050077471731718
EDIT: she was still registered in 3 other states. confirmed she didn't vote in Texas, and checking the other 2.
is saying someone used her identity to vote in 3 other statesmaidengate — BLM and Planned Parenthood form a nonprofit that identifies married women and casts fake absentee votes in their maiden name.
EDIT: Here's the nonprofit: https://supermajority.com
wait this wasn't just a bunch of voter fraud? It was a mass, centrally organized electioneering? wow
Any idea the scope of this? How significant?
What's the nonprofit called?
https://supermajority.com
Wtf is maidengate
'Busted' out? I see you.
Glitch, please.
You said that as if people should know or care who that is.
mofos got busted registering women under their maiden names when they voted under their married names
Identity theft for ballot harvesting.
Woman marries and moves out of state.
Dems registers womans maiden name in the state that they move out of, possibly sends a political call inquiring if they plan to vote, and if not they steal the womans identity and vote in the state that they move out of.
What is #maidengate?
mofos got busted registering women under their maiden names when they voted under their married names
Pedes are asking what it is over and over again in the thread and it is easier to answer the same way each time rather than re-type.
FOLKS YOU TOO CAN SEARCH THE INTERNET
#maidengate on Twitter and elsewhere
You can do this
I just wanted to make everyone aware lol
No worries mate . Not sure why others downvoted you lol
Evidently someone on Twitter got this going viral here’s the site to see if votes were cast by women’s maiden name. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TboRp8IDHYaMSgPzzoxCyqAEHMUbLfR6eWNEaectiIU/mobilebasic
Seems fishy.
Whole bunch of liberal women were caught double voting.
Every ballot.
Basically a way for married female Dems to vote twice. Once under their married name and once through absentee under their maiden name.
Same cheating, different board game ♟
(Also Apple doesn’t have any white chess piece emojis? Racist much?)
Phrasing!
i love you
mofos got busted registering women under their maiden names when they voted under their married names
Also a way to get an inactive voter record. the use a married woman’s maiden name to get absentee and vote.
The more people who are the voter rolls the more fraud they can commit.
The turnout percentage cannot exceed 100%.
PRISON sentences are ALL that matters?
Public execution
LOL! Yeah right! As if a court would ever execute a woman.
Hopefully felony sentences so most of those double voters can never vote again in most states.
All Crimes Matter
Confused Gandalf: maidengate?
ask and you shall receive
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8NyPu54/woke-up-like-this/c/
Thanks.
Fuckers are using women’s maiden names to fake votes when the women in question voted under their married names
noddinggandalf.gif
LOLZ, weaponzied autist reporting for duty. Let's dig into this boys
Sounds promising. Non qanon people showing photos of texts
My wife's "mating name" isn't even part of her legal name anymore, she kept her middle name and we don't hyphenate anything.
I just never changed mine. Married 32 years, could not be bothered
Me neither.
Shit apples
That's Ricky's pepperoni
Lol Jesus...what's the estimated number of fucking tarded Karen's who did this?
Wondering too
Fuckin ridiculous.
Things like this happen because the GOP doesnt do anything. They need to getup off their asses even once. We have Mitt Romney's in our party (good for nothing people).
This is the first election where it was legal for them to do anything.
For those not in the know.
https://newspunch.com/illegal-republicans-investigate-voter-fraud/
Tbh, they could have done something in 2018 but I hope they just took the pinches and are winding up for the knockout here in 2020.
Point is they have to start being a little PROACTIVE on these issue instead of being REACTIVE all the time.
THIS
Lmao wtf is maidengate
mofos got busted registering women under their maiden names when they voted under their married names
hang them from their stockings!
Hang them from the neck
My sister’s friend caught her maiden name registered in Georgia
Hand maids means something else in this household
I just checked my wifes registration under her maiden name and she still on the voter roll for the state we moved out of and a ballot was mailed to our old address. It does say no ballot was returned but still doesnt stop someone using her name on a fake ballot elsewhere.
Any Karen caught doing this MUST go to jail. Time to start treating voter fraud like the serious crime it is.
If we could steal this Handmaid's thing from the left it would make them REE so hard!
We got the best Memes don't we?
Wait lib women have two names? I thought the husbands took their last name in a lefty marriage.
Something to do with hyphens, too
YOOOO
Jokes aside check for something like this!
Maybe there are men who did this too!
Too bad we can’t find out their wives’ boyfriends’ last names as well
😂
I'm sure they can rationalize it to themselves as if they "smashed the patriarchy by using one of its tools of oppression to speak truth to power" or some such nonsense.
It's identity theft, not women double voting. Though this also opens up the possibility to check for that as well.
Probably both, yes.
BE QUICK OR BE DEAD #ironmaidengate
Another one already?
Ok. So what we know so far is that Dem pulled out all of the stops an committed every form of fraud they could think of!
You'd have to be a fool to believe Biden won at this point!
And, you'd have to be a bigger fool to do nothing and just accept it!!
Holy Moly!
I registered to vote in Colorado years ago, then had a legal name change. I check ALL of my names (maiden, married, and final) during presidential elections. I don't even live in Colorado anymore, but I'm still going to check.
Unfortunately, Texas doesn't have a vote tracker, so I can't check there, and I'm not registered in my new state yet. If I can help it, they will NEVER use my info. Fuck Democrats.
NoT EnOuGh To ChAnGe OuTcOmE!!! REEEEEEEEEEEE
Better archive this before Jack scrubs it from Twatter
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TboRp8IDHYaMSgPzzoxCyqAEHMUbLfR6eWNEaectiIU/mobilebasic
Trump needs to put them all in FEMA camps and give them a swift trial.
Fraud so obvious that even Justice Roberts might get this one right...
Anyone who votes twice deserves public execution
I think the key is those fraudulent mail-in ballots. They printed hundreds of thousands of them in favor of Biden.
Every single one must be audited.
That's the perfect meme on so many levels. Kudos to the creator.
REMEMBER CHECK YOUR LIBERAL FRIENDS TO SEE IF THEY WERE APART OF THIS SCAM.
Now this you do not do.Whizz off a bunch of women by wrongfully using their name. Revenge will be had.
Maybe we should ask for proof from the blogger
Single women are the Dem’s largest faction. Explains #maidengate
Can I post pictures? I got pictures. @somebitchiknow on Twat was posting about it last night. I will see if I can post it here...
Raiden from Mortal Kombat?
Woo! Lads! This Trump Curse is quick. All those women that showed up in costumes to try and stop ACB being confirmed. Will they now put up a fight for their birth identity or cuck out to the patriarchy cause "orange man bad" ?
Oh god, I would kill to see Trump do a series of parodies appearances for a troll vid to kill these fucking 'protest' franchises. Like splice him into a scene from that awful hulu series, she starts to turn around and it's him in costume saying "I can't have your baby, but I appreciated your vote. Very big. Uge win coming!"
Then do that for every progressive series, ending with Murphy Brown reboot, giving his side of her character's bullshit story. This will forever taint everything they like and make them instantly hate it.
Two minutes to midnight, assholes!