3305
Comments (77)
sorted by:
69
CLaRGe 69 points ago +69 / -0

The MSM, whoever controls them, is not thinking this through. What do they think is going to happen? Do they really think that they can hide a supreme court decision that flips states to President Trump and delivers him four more years in the White House?

74
WishdoctorsSong 74 points ago +74 / -0

Color revolution. They're riling up the lefties so when they find out they actually lost they'll believe they had the election stolen and start a civil war.

44
undef 44 points ago +44 / -0

A teeny tiny percentage of leftists are armed. You get to see them on TV sometimes, usually right after they shoot themselves as a result of negligent discharge.

An overwhelming majority of Trump voters are armed. Most combat veterans fall into this category. Most people that kill wild animals hundreds of yards away for fun and food fall into this category.

If those two groups go to war against each other it will be a very brief and totally lopsided conflict.

20
hloblart 20 points ago +20 / -0

"fun and food"

Don't forget people who shoot herds of feral hogs to keep them from destroying things and hurting people.

12
undef 12 points ago +12 / -0

An excellent point! I have several friends that do that, and while it is work and is very necessary to their livelihood, it is also loads of good fun. Nothing beats shooting feral pigs at night with thermal and NVG.

12
hloblart 12 points ago +12 / -0

They are bad in west Texas. A practical peace-time civilian reason for a fully automatic, I have known people who were rich enough to acquire one for just for hogs. Known less well off people who rented a helicopter ride that apparently supplied a full-auto to use for the duration of the ride for pigs. Many ranchers allow others to do it if they pay for the ride, they are happy to lose the hogs.

12
undef 12 points ago +12 / -0

It is amazing how much damage feral hogs can do to a property in just one night. They are a nightmare for farmers and ranchers.

The very fact that buying night vision equipment, COTI (clip on thermal imager), a transferable machine gun, ammo, and renting a helicopter is completely cost justified to eradicate them from a large tract of agricultural property shows just how bad they are. Most people won't donate $100k to defeat leftist politicians, but to get rid of pigs it is a bargain.

2
thebigbear 2 points ago +3 / -1

Demorats and feral pigs, your difference was what again????????????

WWG1WGA

3
freewilltrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

sometimes from helos lol

1
CheekyBastard 1 point ago +1 / -0

See also: "fun".

0
IthoughtIwalked 0 points ago +1 / -1

Woah, calm down. It's BLM, not feral hogs

11
BoffoTheClown 11 points ago +11 / -0

I would not put it past them to call in the UN to police their 'stolen' victory, using the world media to report GEOTUS's "loss" in court (that was actually a series of wins). They have to know they can't win a civil war on their own. They know theyre outnumbered by superior troops. Crying for help whilst lying about the source of the trouble is exactly the sort of thing in which they specialize.

6
undef 6 points ago +6 / -0

There is less of a chance of the UN deploying foreign troops on American soil to settle an election dispute than there is of the electoral college, on December 14, 2020, electing FDR to a 5th term as president.

6
Liberty123 6 points ago +6 / -0

you are correct. It would be an act of war for any nation to send troops against us and none of them have the stones to try it, including china. The un has pitiful troops of its own and won't do anything but talk

7
undef 7 points ago +7 / -0

If you combined every soldier, airman, seaman, and marine from the world's top 29 militaries, including our own, you would have a force that is still roughly 1 million short of just the number of Americans that file for hunting permits every year.

Think about that for a moment.... every military member from China, India, United States of America, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Pakistan, Republic of Korea, Iran, Vietnam, Egypt, Myanmar, Indonesia, Thailand, Turkey, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Sri Lanka, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, France, Eritrea, Morocco, South Sudan, Germany, Afghanstan, Italy, and Israel combined doesn't even add up to how many Americans pay money to get a permit to kill wild animals for food or fun each year.

Now consider that only about 1/3 of American gun owners go hunting.

1
thebigbear 1 point ago +2 / -1

Absolute STONES, dude, STONES

WWG1WGA

6
day221 6 points ago +6 / -0

What the right is missing is a good way to organize. With that though, it would be game over.

2
thebigbear 2 points ago +3 / -1

Simple, shoot on site, hide. Attrition does not favor the offence.

WWG1WGA

2
arentbaby 2 points ago +2 / -0

reminder that if you are a libertarian/prepper boomer with dozens of guns and thousands of rounds, organize a plan with family,friends, and community members you trust to distribute some of your ammo and firearms out to the group. taking your moving-truck-sized armory and going to live in the woods is not only not feasible, but not effective either. community is key in these situations.

2
ClownTamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bay Area pede checking in. My neighbors are only armed with the noodles they call arms. I’ve got enough ammo to hold up where I’m at against multiple cities. High ground too. I hope there’s no civil war for their sake.

12
scottfree 12 points ago +12 / -0

How many of them would really fight? They had to have a revolving door on the jails just to have enough bodies to keep the riots going. Meanwhile, 70 million voted for Trump; including some who are publically celebrating Biden "win".

7
ClarenceBeeks 7 points ago +7 / -0

The problem is that they form large groups and then pick on smaller groups. Individually they are weak but they have a strong collective mentality while we tend towards individualism. 1000 of them marching down your street terrorizing would be tough for anyone to deal with

0
thebigbear 0 points ago +1 / -1

Target rich environment, Hit and Hide, Multiple sources, multiple players, throw in some IED and Molotov cocktails and we have game time. Ham radio operators are very effective along with CBs and Truckers. We tend to be individuals in getting rid of the RATS but collectively we know the cause. Yea, there will be losses but in Hit and run/hide with the grid down and no trucks to deliver food in the city it is a VERY SHORT FIGHT. No Elec, no food storage or water. The RATS will be eating themselves after about 3 days.

WWG1WGA

1
ClarenceBeeks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hypothetical full war scenarios favor the right. Maybe by a large margin especially if the infrastructure of the world degrades. But thankfully there’s a long road between that and where we are now. I’m not willing to hurt anybody else intentionally just because they march into my neighborhood and destroy a few things. Measured responses.

11
glow-operator-2-0 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fuck them then.

Shoot back.

12
FragrantDude 12 points ago +12 / -0

Me reacting to this post: Yeah!

Me noticing user name: Waitasecond....

2
glow-operator-2-0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Poor choice, LOLZ

But I am Deep State-ish, just not in the field operations division.

8
Dragofireheart 8 points ago +8 / -0

Bingo.

Biden winning is a bonus. Their game plan is to burn it all down when they lose.

2
CLaRGe 2 points ago +2 / -0

That would be the shortest and weakest civil war ever. Pedes would come prepared for real war and Pantyfa wouldn’t know what hit them. It’d be over so fas the MSM could ignore it even happened.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
14
rebelde_sin_causa 14 points ago +14 / -0

They forced him to fight by threatening to ruin his life after he left office. He has no other choice.They forgot what Sun Tzu said about leaving your enemy an escape route.

11
Dragofireheart 11 points ago +11 / -0

"When you surround the enemy

Always allow them an escape route.

They must see that there is

An alternative to death."

6
iamherefortheluls 6 points ago +6 / -0

Do they really think that they can hide a supreme court decision that flips states

they do and they are not wrong to think that because that's how it went last time SCC found election to be fraudulent in 2000.

They said 'this is wrong, but we can't think of a just remedy at this point'.

This is the current Dem. tactic - they need to stall as much as possible so that by the time SCC ruling is out, it's too late.

Also that's how 2010 court proceedings for a senate seat went too. Courts found election was fraudulently won through illegal ballots cast by felons. But than they allowed it to stand

5
ClarenceBeeks 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’m not familiar with this 2010 case. If the fraud was large enough to turn the election then why wouldn’t they just invalidate the vote? Or was it the case that the fraud was smaller than the margin?

7
iamherefortheluls 7 points ago +7 / -0

no, it definitely pushed it over the margin.

https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2010/07/20/al-franken-may-have-won-his-senate-seat-through-voter-fraud

Problem was that the decision came 6 months after election. The fraudulently elected Senator was already in office and everyone just decided to let it slide.

4
ClarenceBeeks 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh I see. Thank you.

In can’t imagine this one lasting that long. Every eye is on it.

5
iamherefortheluls 5 points ago +5 / -0

problem is that the case we have mostly been hearing about that was taken to SCC in PA - that was initiated pre-election and SCC couldn't rule on it due to split 4-4.

But most of the fraud evidence that showed up since - those would have to be new cases. A new case cannot just head straight to SCC, it has to jump through state level courts first.

And for example, PA courts have been very unfair to Trump campaign so far. All they need it to put the breaks on the courts they seem to be in control of.

I don't know how other states, but PA seems to have activist judges and I think they will be able to hold PA for dems by simply running out the clock.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
darkhorsereddit3 4 points ago +4 / -0

They think they can get the Supreme Court to cave if a large enough portion of the country simply doesn’t believe in it. It’s stupid as fuck ... but that can be the only play.

Either that or they think they have scotus in the bag too

19
bubble_bursts 19 points ago +19 / -0

I remember this, and I was thining - damn there is a good possibility of this!

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
13
GEOTUS_JR [S] 13 points ago +14 / -1

I didn't see anyone say it so clearly and eloquently. The man is a deep thinker.

14
untumulted 14 points ago +14 / -0

This is the main problem, the Dems have nothing to lose by even getting caught cheating.

Getting caught, unfortunately, actually helps them.

They have nothing left: their platform is gone and in 4 years, the option to be globalists cocksuckers will not be viable. Their only hope is to divide the country beyond reconciliation and one of the best ways is to get caught cheating.

Their base is retarded and will swallow whatever their globalist media friends feed them.

Hard to believe, but getting caught cheating is the best platform the Dems have going.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
10
AngeredKabar 10 points ago +10 / -0

Biden has already filmed the inauguration ceremony.

The crowds of Democrats celebrating this weekend will be spliced in.

The internet will suffer an outage for the week of Jan. 20

Did I just make this up? Yes.

6
just2groovy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Frightening.

"Prison Planet" was right on target the whole time.

5
whiskey_shitz 5 points ago +5 / -0

Except the process for certifying an election doesn't involve the media. We can move on with or without them. Their denial only highlights their deception.

3
Jarlason10 3 points ago +3 / -0

They can say it all they want but at the end of the day it doesn't matter so long as Trump is in the White House and the government acknowledges it.

3
Jasongraham503 3 points ago +4 / -1

Remember folks, when the shooting starts journalist lives are sacred.

4
You_Aint_Black 4 points ago +4 / -0

Does that mean they're worth more points?

2
glow-operator-2-0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Score em all!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
thewordwolf 2 points ago +3 / -1

Total prophet.

2
DisjointedHunstville 2 points ago +2 / -0

They just demonstrated that they could push through a corpse running for POTUS :/

2
InTheArmsOfThePepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

And, let's not forget... Not only do they have the power to "disappear" things, they also have the power to "appear" things. Like Muh Russia, Muh PeeGate, etc etc.

2
GEOTUS_JR [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Jimmy_Russler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Holy shit he nailed it

2
KAG_FTW 2 points ago +2 / -0

Uh... Because the media are completely irrelevant here.

It's not up to them who wins. That was up to us.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
redinmn 1 point ago +1 / -0

One of my favorite tv shows was Dilbert. I wish it had more than 1 season but what we got was great.

1
Zude 1 point ago +1 / -0

They haven't proved it's feasible YET. They're trying to though.

1
OneBigMaga 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope, this will only happen to the people who rely on the media for their information.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
LiberalismIsTheVirus 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's the red wave narrative that Trump warned us about.

1
VetforTrump2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Been telling all this was the plan for 2 years. It was obvious

1
YukonQuismias 1 point ago +1 / -0

These silly people cannot see the inevitable checkmate. Trump won! The more they drag it out, the more amusing it becomes.

1
Squeakyguy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought this guy cucked over the proud boys?

1
NYCforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

And all Biden supporters (who aren't corrupt insiders) are mindless media followers who parrot everything "the news" says. "If it's on TV, it must be true!"

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0