3305
Comments (77)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
74
WishdoctorsSong 74 points ago +74 / -0

Color revolution. They're riling up the lefties so when they find out they actually lost they'll believe they had the election stolen and start a civil war.

44
undef 44 points ago +44 / -0

A teeny tiny percentage of leftists are armed. You get to see them on TV sometimes, usually right after they shoot themselves as a result of negligent discharge.

An overwhelming majority of Trump voters are armed. Most combat veterans fall into this category. Most people that kill wild animals hundreds of yards away for fun and food fall into this category.

If those two groups go to war against each other it will be a very brief and totally lopsided conflict.

20
hloblart 20 points ago +20 / -0

"fun and food"

Don't forget people who shoot herds of feral hogs to keep them from destroying things and hurting people.

12
undef 12 points ago +12 / -0

An excellent point! I have several friends that do that, and while it is work and is very necessary to their livelihood, it is also loads of good fun. Nothing beats shooting feral pigs at night with thermal and NVG.

12
hloblart 12 points ago +12 / -0

They are bad in west Texas. A practical peace-time civilian reason for a fully automatic, I have known people who were rich enough to acquire one for just for hogs. Known less well off people who rented a helicopter ride that apparently supplied a full-auto to use for the duration of the ride for pigs. Many ranchers allow others to do it if they pay for the ride, they are happy to lose the hogs.

3
freewilltrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

sometimes from helos lol

1
CheekyBastard 1 point ago +1 / -0

See also: "fun".

0
IthoughtIwalked 0 points ago +1 / -1

Woah, calm down. It's BLM, not feral hogs

11
BoffoTheClown 11 points ago +11 / -0

I would not put it past them to call in the UN to police their 'stolen' victory, using the world media to report GEOTUS's "loss" in court (that was actually a series of wins). They have to know they can't win a civil war on their own. They know theyre outnumbered by superior troops. Crying for help whilst lying about the source of the trouble is exactly the sort of thing in which they specialize.

6
undef 6 points ago +6 / -0

There is less of a chance of the UN deploying foreign troops on American soil to settle an election dispute than there is of the electoral college, on December 14, 2020, electing FDR to a 5th term as president.

6
Liberty123 6 points ago +6 / -0

you are correct. It would be an act of war for any nation to send troops against us and none of them have the stones to try it, including china. The un has pitiful troops of its own and won't do anything but talk

6
day221 6 points ago +6 / -0

What the right is missing is a good way to organize. With that though, it would be game over.

2
thebigbear 2 points ago +3 / -1

Simple, shoot on site, hide. Attrition does not favor the offence.

WWG1WGA

2
arentbaby 2 points ago +2 / -0

reminder that if you are a libertarian/prepper boomer with dozens of guns and thousands of rounds, organize a plan with family,friends, and community members you trust to distribute some of your ammo and firearms out to the group. taking your moving-truck-sized armory and going to live in the woods is not only not feasible, but not effective either. community is key in these situations.

2
ClownTamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bay Area pede checking in. My neighbors are only armed with the noodles they call arms. I’ve got enough ammo to hold up where I’m at against multiple cities. High ground too. I hope there’s no civil war for their sake.

12
scottfree 12 points ago +12 / -0

How many of them would really fight? They had to have a revolving door on the jails just to have enough bodies to keep the riots going. Meanwhile, 70 million voted for Trump; including some who are publically celebrating Biden "win".

7
ClarenceBeeks 7 points ago +7 / -0

The problem is that they form large groups and then pick on smaller groups. Individually they are weak but they have a strong collective mentality while we tend towards individualism. 1000 of them marching down your street terrorizing would be tough for anyone to deal with

0
thebigbear 0 points ago +1 / -1

Target rich environment, Hit and Hide, Multiple sources, multiple players, throw in some IED and Molotov cocktails and we have game time. Ham radio operators are very effective along with CBs and Truckers. We tend to be individuals in getting rid of the RATS but collectively we know the cause. Yea, there will be losses but in Hit and run/hide with the grid down and no trucks to deliver food in the city it is a VERY SHORT FIGHT. No Elec, no food storage or water. The RATS will be eating themselves after about 3 days.

WWG1WGA

1
ClarenceBeeks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hypothetical full war scenarios favor the right. Maybe by a large margin especially if the infrastructure of the world degrades. But thankfully there’s a long road between that and where we are now. I’m not willing to hurt anybody else intentionally just because they march into my neighborhood and destroy a few things. Measured responses.

11
glow-operator-2-0 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fuck them then.

Shoot back.

12
FragrantDude 12 points ago +12 / -0

Me reacting to this post: Yeah!

Me noticing user name: Waitasecond....

2
glow-operator-2-0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Poor choice, LOLZ

But I am Deep State-ish, just not in the field operations division.

8
Dragofireheart 8 points ago +8 / -0

Bingo.

Biden winning is a bonus. Their game plan is to burn it all down when they lose.

2
CLaRGe 2 points ago +2 / -0

That would be the shortest and weakest civil war ever. Pedes would come prepared for real war and Pantyfa wouldn’t know what hit them. It’d be over so fas the MSM could ignore it even happened.