I would not put it past them to call in the UN to police their 'stolen' victory, using the world media to report GEOTUS's "loss" in court (that was actually a series of wins). They have to know they can't win a civil war on their own. They know theyre outnumbered by superior troops. Crying for help whilst lying about the source of the trouble is exactly the sort of thing in which they specialize.
There is less of a chance of the UN deploying foreign troops on American soil to settle an election dispute than there is of the electoral college, on December 14, 2020, electing FDR to a 5th term as president.
you are correct. It would be an act of war for any nation to send troops against us and none of them have the stones to try it, including china. The un has pitiful troops of its own and won't do anything but talk
If you combined every soldier, airman, seaman, and marine from the world's top 29 militaries, including our own, you would have a force that is still roughly 1 million short of just the number of Americans that file for hunting permits every year.
Think about that for a moment.... every military member from China, India, United States of America, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Pakistan, Republic of Korea, Iran, Vietnam, Egypt, Myanmar, Indonesia, Thailand, Turkey, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Sri Lanka, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, France, Eritrea, Morocco, South Sudan, Germany, Afghanstan, Italy, and Israel combined doesn't even add up to how many Americans pay money to get a permit to kill wild animals for food or fun each year.
Now consider that only about 1/3 of American gun owners go hunting.
I would not put it past them to call in the UN to police their 'stolen' victory, using the world media to report GEOTUS's "loss" in court (that was actually a series of wins). They have to know they can't win a civil war on their own. They know theyre outnumbered by superior troops. Crying for help whilst lying about the source of the trouble is exactly the sort of thing in which they specialize.
There is less of a chance of the UN deploying foreign troops on American soil to settle an election dispute than there is of the electoral college, on December 14, 2020, electing FDR to a 5th term as president.
you are correct. It would be an act of war for any nation to send troops against us and none of them have the stones to try it, including china. The un has pitiful troops of its own and won't do anything but talk
If you combined every soldier, airman, seaman, and marine from the world's top 29 militaries, including our own, you would have a force that is still roughly 1 million short of just the number of Americans that file for hunting permits every year.
Think about that for a moment.... every military member from China, India, United States of America, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Pakistan, Republic of Korea, Iran, Vietnam, Egypt, Myanmar, Indonesia, Thailand, Turkey, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Sri Lanka, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, France, Eritrea, Morocco, South Sudan, Germany, Afghanstan, Italy, and Israel combined doesn't even add up to how many Americans pay money to get a permit to kill wild animals for food or fun each year.
Now consider that only about 1/3 of American gun owners go hunting.
Absolute STONES, dude, STONES
WWG1WGA