20443
posted ago by TrumanBlack (edited) +20443 / -0

Hello brothers, I just wanna use this space to thank the hundreds and hundreds of patriots that helped the many groups and teams that exposed election fraud. You worked day and night, with sleep, no food, no rest, no pay. You did all this because you love this country and you deserve that people know what you did.

TY, ChesterAnthem, Epic, Bucky, Snow, Sailor, King and all the hundreds of you working behind the scenes thank you. You're the true heroes.

Patriots the 6 is the most important day of your life and if you're not in DC you're gonna regret it forever. Whatever happens that day will determine the future of our nation.

Warriors, stand together and pray to God. We will get through this together. I love you all.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

OG POST: EVERY THING YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ IS VERIFIED AND WAS MADE BY THIS PEDE [CENTIPEDE] HE DID ALL THE HEAVY WORK

πŸ† https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/ πŸ†

🚨🚨🚨🚨EDIT NOV 12: 🚨🚨🚨

UPDATED LIST: https://pastebin.com/X6sW2aew

EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it'll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it'll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I'm also confident in the results it gives.

https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script.

https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used.

Place both in the same folder.

FULL THREAD: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XQIWRs/-happening-ive-updated-the-switc/

The data shows serious IREGULARITIES and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened on election

🚨"Switched did happen for Biden to Trump, as some of you have pointed out, and they also happened from 3rd party to (mainly Biden) both.🚨 The results should disturb everyone.

.

REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR.

.........

I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json] and I found this damning evidence [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all.

EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far.

EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know.

Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.

Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.

There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes.

🚨🚨🚨WE DECIDED TO LEAVE THIS NUMBERS UP SO YOU CAN SEE HOW OUR RESEARCH HAS EVOLVED.🚨🚨🚨

Dominion Voting Systems :

Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248

New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20

Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456

Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882

New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213

Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574

Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102

Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023

California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989

Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0

Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650

Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0

Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0

Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730

Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408

Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0

Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0

New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116

Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477

New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610

Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730

Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.

Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557

Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154

Election Systems & Software :

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849

Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748

South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119

Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276

South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1

North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681

Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0

North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15

District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Unknown Systems:

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272

Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51

Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0

Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408

Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0

Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35

Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13

West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300

Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0

Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.

VERIFIED!!!!:

I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ]

And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ]

You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere.

EDIT: Those 2,324 were moved from Trump to Jorgensen.

Jorgensen votes = Total votes * (1 - Trump share - Biden share)

Nr.27 : 573,857 * (1 - 0.578 - 0.401) = 12,051

Nr.28 : 574,417 * (1 - 0.568 - 0.406) = 14,935

Jorgensen vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 14,935 - 12,051 = 2,884

Total vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 574,417 - 573,857 = 560

Jorgensen vote increase - Total vote increase = 2,884 - 560 = 2,324

SOURCES: Here is the data I used:

EDISON DATA: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p

The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well.

🚨🚨FROM THE EDISON WEBSITE "Vote Count The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races" 🚨🚨

httpss://i.maga.host/wvRRA9m.png

I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json ] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead.

Take this picture for example. [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]

It's like this:

Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888

Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32

Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost.

I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes.

Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh

[pede444wow] I took the json files that are included here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel:

python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N

result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK

[montag] Here's a GitHub repo of the same data source taken at incremental time periods. https://github.com/favstats/USElection2020-NYT-Results

[ComeAndTakeIt_Texas] Hey TrumanBlack, I crunched the 27/28 timestamp data you posted (specifically this - https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png), and uploaded a spreadsheet analysis here (https://i.maga.host/xbwnVuk.png). I do a worst-case and best-case rounding error to generate Max T Vote, Min T Vote, and Max B Vote and Min B Vote that shows if you have 0.578 share, the max number that would represent would be 0.57849999999, and the min number would be 0.5775. The specific pic highlighted here allows no possible way whatsoever that Trump did not lose votes. The smallest number of votes he could have lost assuming in 27 there is a worst case rounding error and in the 28 step there is a best case rounding error (extremely unlikely), Trump lost a 4846.353. In worst case, he lost 5994.627 votes. There is literally NO way anyone can explain this away. They can also not explain that away as an asynchronous issue, as the timestamp itself is later (1), and (2), the total vote count increased. This single time step is proof alone.

[warpigpede] Re: the data displayed inhttps://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png

I calculated number of lost Trump votes as 5738.57, exactly 1% of the total number of votes (573857) at record 27:

votes 27: 573857

trump fraction: 0.578

trump votes: 331689.346

biden fraction: 0.401

biden votes: 230116.657

votes 28: 574417

trump fraction: 0.568

trump vote: 325950.776

biden vote: 232985.942

biden fraction: 0.406

votes change: +560

trump votes change: -5738.57

Exactly 1% is an awfully curious value. I wonder if it is consistent across the entire dataset

Hello brothers, I just wanna use this space to thank the hundreds and hundreds of patriots that helped the many groups and teams that exposed election fraud. You worked day and night, with sleep, no food, no rest, no pay. You did all this because you love this country and you deserve that people know what you did. TY, ChesterAnthem, Epic, Bucky, Snow, Sailor, King and all the hundreds of you working behind the scenes thank you. You're the true heroes. Patriots the 6 is the most important day of your life and if you're not in DC you're gonna regret it forever. Whatever happens that day will determine the future of our nation. Warriors, stand together and pray to God. We will get through this together. I love you all. 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 OG POST: EVERY THING YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ IS VERIFIED AND WAS MADE BY THIS PEDE [CENTIPEDE] HE DID ALL THE HEAVY WORK πŸ† https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/ πŸ† 🚨🚨🚨🚨EDIT NOV 12: 🚨🚨🚨 UPDATED LIST: https://pastebin.com/X6sW2aew EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it'll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it'll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I'm also confident in the results it gives. https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script. https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used. Place both in the same folder. FULL THREAD: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XQIWRs/-happening-ive-updated-the-switc/ The data shows serious IREGULARITIES and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened on election 🚨"Switched did happen for Biden to Trump, as some of you have pointed out, and they also happened from 3rd party to (mainly Biden) both.🚨 The results should disturb everyone. . REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR. ......... I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json] and I found this damning evidence [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all. EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far. EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know. Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes. 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden. Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates. There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes. 🚨🚨🚨WE DECIDED TO LEAVE THIS NUMBERS UP SO YOU CAN SEE HOW OUR RESEARCH HAS EVOLVED.🚨🚨🚨 >Dominion Voting Systems : Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248 New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20 Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456 Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882 New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213 Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574 Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102 Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023 California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989 Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0 Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650 Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0 Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0 Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730 Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408 Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0 Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0 New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116 Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477 New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610 Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730 Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems. Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557 Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154 Election Systems & Software : Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50 Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849 Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748 South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119 Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276 South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1 North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681 Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0 North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15 District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 >Unknown Systems: Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50 Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272 Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51 Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0 Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408 Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0 Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35 Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13 West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300 Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0 Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall. VERIFIED!!!!: I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ] And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ] You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere. EDIT: Those 2,324 were moved from Trump to Jorgensen. Jorgensen votes = Total votes * (1 - Trump share - Biden share) Nr.27 : 573,857 * (1 - 0.578 - 0.401) = 12,051 Nr.28 : 574,417 * (1 - 0.568 - 0.406) = 14,935 Jorgensen vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 14,935 - 12,051 = 2,884 Total vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 574,417 - 573,857 = 560 Jorgensen vote increase - Total vote increase = 2,884 - 560 = 2,324 SOURCES: Here is the data I used: EDISON DATA: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well. 🚨🚨FROM THE EDISON WEBSITE "Vote Count The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races" 🚨🚨 httpss://i.maga.host/wvRRA9m.png I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json ] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead. Take this picture for example. [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ] It's like this: Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888 Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32 Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost. I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes. Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh [pede444wow] I took the json files that are included here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel: python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK [montag] Here's a GitHub repo of the same data source taken at incremental time periods. https://github.com/favstats/USElection2020-NYT-Results [ComeAndTakeIt_Texas] Hey TrumanBlack, I crunched the 27/28 timestamp data you posted (specifically this - https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png), and uploaded a spreadsheet analysis here (https://i.maga.host/xbwnVuk.png). I do a worst-case and best-case rounding error to generate Max T Vote, Min T Vote, and Max B Vote and Min B Vote that shows if you have 0.578 share, the max number that would represent would be 0.57849999999, and the min number would be 0.5775. The specific pic highlighted here allows no possible way whatsoever that Trump did not lose votes. The smallest number of votes he could have lost assuming in 27 there is a worst case rounding error and in the 28 step there is a best case rounding error (extremely unlikely), Trump lost a 4846.353. In worst case, he lost 5994.627 votes. There is literally NO way anyone can explain this away. They can also not explain that away as an asynchronous issue, as the timestamp itself is later (1), and (2), the total vote count increased. This single time step is proof alone. [warpigpede] Re: the data displayed inhttps://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png I calculated number of lost Trump votes as 5738.57, exactly 1% of the total number of votes (573857) at record 27: votes 27: 573857 trump fraction: 0.578 trump votes: 331689.346 biden fraction: 0.401 biden votes: 230116.657 votes 28: 574417 trump fraction: 0.568 trump vote: 325950.776 biden vote: 232985.942 biden fraction: 0.406 votes change: +560 trump votes change: -5738.57 Exactly 1% is an awfully curious value. I wonder if it is consistent across the entire dataset
Comments (4385)
sorted by:
3465
deleted 3465 points ago +3486 / -21
1930
Doth 1930 points ago +1937 / -7

PROJECT VERITAS JUDICIAL WATCH DJT Jr. James Woods Bonginarino

Any of these people can help get more eyes on this--help me @ them, guys... Try to avoid using any keywords that trigger censorship tech. Break the word up with punctuations, misspell them, whatever it takes.

1047
CokeOrPepe 1047 points ago +1053 / -6

upvoting for Bonginarino

674
OldGamerGuy 674 points ago +676 / -2

Put my in the screenshot for the Library of Congress archives.

447
Texas_Rangers 447 points ago +454 / -7 (edited)

Spread this infographic to EVERYONE:

https://imgur.com/a/ZoDUx8N

131
deleted 131 points ago +132 / -1
114
Texas_Rangers 114 points ago +115 / -1

Work now? I forgot the 45

83
deleted 83 points ago +85 / -2
55
Gwot0412 55 points ago +55 / -0

Can you do this at state level? If Dems are emboldened enough to do this on a Presidential election, then they have been doing it for awhile in the Senate and House races.

How awesome would it be to discover we have a 70% majority in the Senate and House too?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
127
DefundCNN 127 points ago +128 / -1

I think the Nebraska switch is actually the smoking gun in all of this.

189
deleted 189 points ago +192 / -3 (edited)
120
PiratePatriot 120 points ago +120 / -0

88% is an unusually high voter turnout. That alone deserves an audit.

https://www.1011now.com/2020/11/04/live-at-130pm-recap-of-nebraska-general-election/

Nebraska exceeded its previous turnout record in terms of total votes cast, which was in the 2016 Presidential General Election, by about 68,000 votes. The unofficial overall turnout was 936,106, which is 74 percent of votes cast.

Thirty-four counties had a turnout of more than 80 percent. Four counties had a turnout of 88 percent. The turnout will increase as 20,000 - 25,000 early ballots that were dropped off Tuesday still need to be processed along with provisional ballots.

Early ballots that were mailed in or dropped off totaled 436,269.

73
Texas_Rangers 73 points ago +74 / -1

Send this to to your legislatures.

72
PlzCoolerMe 72 points ago +72 / -0

Nebraskan here... Nobody I know understood how in the world Sasse could get more votes than Trump. Half the republicans here despise Sasse. It didn’t pass the eye or smell test.

47
dullcare 47 points ago +48 / -1

agree. its likely more of a dominion play... Nebraska probably runs a more honest operation at its polling / counting centers. It probably doesn't have Tamany hall-like egregious in your face fraud like in Philly. Not as many dead voters and torn up ballets etc. So the fraud is more of a pure play electronic fraud by Dominion / Scorecard / Hammer.

85
deleted 85 points ago +88 / -3
75
Cirruspede 75 points ago +76 / -1

Yep. I’m in Omaha and was confused how Biden won.

53
kekkk 53 points ago +53 / -0

LOL @ New York

I bet Cuomo was so terrified of Trump turning NY red.

48
Ladybug87 48 points ago +48 / -0

With that we don't need PA or MI.

229 + 3(AK) + 10(WI) + 16(GA) + 11(AZ) + 1 (NE2) = 270

31
DefundCNN 31 points ago +31 / -0

And it's in somewhere people would normally assume no one would care, and there is no easy way to rationalize another explanation for why it happened, but proportionally, the vote swing is Massive compared to the others, and it just happened to be in a hard red area that was a key area for the electoral college despite no campaiging. There was also a much bigger difference between Trump's vote vs the GOP vote there.

12
Pickles 12 points ago +12 / -0

I picked a random precinct in Douglas County(Nebraska), 8-12. Here is the breakdown for Rep, Dem and Ind (the 47 total votes for the Libertarian is close enough to the # of registered Libertarians so I didn't include them in this analysis)....

8-12 Registered R - 813 Registered D - 833 Registered I - 635

Voter turnout was 72%, so as unscientific as it is, lets just assume 72% across the board. And lets assume ALL Rs vote R and ALL Ds vote D.

Where the INDEPENDENTS voted: Trump 32% Biden 68% Republican Bacon 51.5% Democrat Eastman 48.5%

The Presidential and Congressional races were within 2 votes of eachother. Just for

For some reason the participation in the SENATE race for Douglas Co 8-12 was only 64.7% (compared to 72% for Pres and Con). Using the data in the same way would mean for the Senate race in Douglas Co 8-12, Independents voted....

Republican Sasse 73% Democrat Janicek 9.7% Libertarian Siadek 17.3%

This was 1 precinct that I chose randomly because the registration seemed to be pretty even and my theory would have been that Trump would get 95% of Republicans, 10-15% of Democrats and 50%++ of Independents and that voter turnout for Republicans would be higher than Dems because of enthusiasm, but I of course had a biased opinion, but I live in Nebraska and I see what I see.

40
Circus4One 40 points ago +40 / -0

Just curious why you think NE is the smoking gun. I live in Nebraska and couldn’t believe one of our votes went to Biden. Thanks.

45
arkylady 45 points ago +45 / -0

Not sure what he meant, but maybe since NE doesn't have massive election fraud from every direction happening at the same time, it would be easier to highlight the election software "glitch".

24
Wefoundyouremails 24 points ago +24 / -0

Not OP, but I don't even live in NE and I couldn't believe it! Makes me feel vindicated hearing it from someone else who lives there.

22
dullcare 22 points ago +23 / -1

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2xUQg/is-any-one-else-bothered-by-the-/

The fact that the republican in the NE2 congressional race got more votes in Douglas county than Trump is mighty fishy.

Living in Nebraska, can you explain why there would be a disconnect with the downballet voting? Do you think there are that many cross ballet voters?

16
Jeezy1879 16 points ago +17 / -1

Laughs in West Virginia

13
Ladybug87 13 points ago +13 / -0

With that we don't need PA or MI.

229 + 3(AK) + 10(WI) + 16(GA) + 11(AZ) + 1 (NE2) = 270

4
trumpmixtape 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think virginia and new york are.

Look how fucking close new york was. Imagine if democrats didnt have that hub of influence.

And Virginia is home to basically every dc crony. Look how overwhelmingly desperate they are.

Those states worry me not for Biden, because Biden is done. Those states illustrate it goes beyond him. Its "systemic".

5
dramagan 5 points ago +5 / -0

I live in New York and I think Trump really won New York. That's why they haven't updated the count in almost a week. Look at how many Trump votes were removed from the tally plus how many were switched from Trump to Biden. In addition the areas that haven't been counted are heavily pro Trump. I believe they don't know what to do and aren't updating because they want Trump not to realize how close he is in New York. Even with this fraud once they add in the other areas the margin will get even tighter. That's 29 electoral votes....

2
Douladeb1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I knew something wasn’t right with NY and they stopped counting. The numbers have basically stayed the same and stopped counting on election night. It stayed at 76% of the votes in for over a week almost 2 weeks. I lollies in NY and we are all so done here!! Cuomo is killing us!! Trumps caravans were 50 miles long just prior to Election Day.

1
Rowdy104 1 point ago +1 / -0

How come? I looked at it but I don't see the smoking gun.

46
deleted 46 points ago +54 / -8
30
Truglow 30 points ago +38 / -8

I dont like the smell of this. 2 day old account? We are dealing with deep state operations so have someone verify.

14
SchittsMethDealer 14 points ago +14 / -0

As far as I can tell, Dominion did not use any protection. No passwords. No Secure Network, nothing. It's like they don't pay programmers. Had them set up probably contract-basis. And has English major interns running the software. Attempt at plausible deniability? Or stupidity? I mean double-check the work, but don't see an angle how this could benefit the deep State. anons being red pilled as they dug. Remember, a lot of the anons are/were apolitical, this is just a fun rabbithole game to them, but saw a few anons get pissed at the corruption. Probably a big red pill when you discover (and see) the data. I did see one anon group that was likely deep state or Dems just doing a parody thread of an anon. easy to click somewhere else. Don't block posts unless they post something worth blocking. Better that than block a new pede--we'd be the same in their minds as Twitter then.

4
DJFG 4 points ago +6 / -2

TrumanBlack has posts more than a month old???

-35
deleted -35 points ago +21 / -56 (edited)
23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
22
iminlovewithtrump 22 points ago +33 / -11

Stfu shill, we don't need low energy in here

11
alucard13mmfmj 11 points ago +11 / -0

The media calls the president these days. Havnt you heard? So their data must be tip top.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
2
wilsoe2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are totally right to think critically on this data. I'm in the same boat. If this is legit deleting and swapping votes to fix the election then its the biggest political scandal in world history. Given those stakes, it seems "too easy" that the evidence for that is in plain site for eagle eyed observers.

Therefore, i'm thinking there is a reason for deleting votes? The Dominion manual says its a feature for if you accidentally run the same batch twice. That said, it does seem odd how many there are for NY and that some states have 0.

I watched the Dr Shiva video that seems to demonstrate how and when the algorithm kicks in to switch votes. The next layer of this analysis is the timing. If Dr Shiva is right, I want to understand the times in which he sees votes in MI being flipped. That should match the data we see here. My gut is telling me it won't though because there is just one time interval in which MI votes were swapped and it should be much longer than that according to Dr. Shiva's analysis.

41
MixedBlacknWhite 41 points ago +41 / -0

not the right link? site no worky

8
KristiNoemFaceFuck 8 points ago +9 / -1

Done

19
UpTrump 19 points ago +19 / -0

Me too!

16
keeponwinning 16 points ago +16 / -0

Two scoops!

8
NazisWereSocialist 8 points ago +8 / -0

What’s ridiculous is that this, 4chan screenshots, etc. will absolutely be Library of Congress entries...provided the world doesn’t end...

8
PeteButtplug 8 points ago +8 / -0

Do you want the typo as well?

10
OldGamerGuy 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yes, That way I can authenticate it as mine so some leftist doesn't try to steal it.

2
Pgledger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Me too!

42
CovefefeREEEE 42 points ago +42 / -0

"Ma! The meatloaf!"

35
hilboggins 35 points ago +35 / -0

Dan got ownership in conservative media companies, he can spread like no other.

16
TenScoops 16 points ago +16 / -0

Bologniarossa?

14
MixedBlacknWhite 14 points ago +14 / -0

Brad Pitt, Inglorious Basterds - "Bonginarino"

217
deleted 217 points ago +217 / -0 (edited)
135
OconusLurex 135 points ago +135 / -0

Can someone with a twitter please also send this to Rich Barris, @Peoples_Pundit - he's a brilliant & honest poll analyst in touch with Bannon & Trump team (I believe he's been in touch with POTUS himself.) He'll be familiar with all of the data sets and will have a lot of insight into this, and would help pass it along.

93
bekkiluvsit 93 points ago +93 / -0

TWEETED THE ABOVE RESULTS IN A LARGE INFOGRAPHIC TO @DonaldJTrumpJr

@RealJamesWoods

@Peoples_Pundit

@Project_Veritas

@dbongino

@RealRLimbaugh

43
Litehouse 43 points ago +43 / -0

OAN

37
bekkiluvsit 37 points ago +37 / -0

Okay, tweeted OANN

21
LowbloodHighEnergyRI 21 points ago +21 / -0

The Great One Mark Levin, Sebastian Gorka, Bannon???

10
bekkiluvsit 10 points ago +10 / -0

Okay, tweeted the Great One - Mark Levin and Seb Gorka. I think Bannon is banned from Twatter at the moment, but I'll try to connect via his website.

31
BuckyRancher 31 points ago +31 / -0

Good work. Godspeed

17
M4ster_Yoda 17 points ago +17 / -0

I sense glory upon us!

9
BuckyRancher 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes siree bob

16
OconusLurex 16 points ago +16 / -0

Thank you so much, patriot!

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
8
r4ptur3 8 points ago +9 / -1

Don't forget our Nephilim friend Bannon!

69
deleted 69 points ago +69 / -0
31
Methodmapper 31 points ago +31 / -0

I posted it on his locals page too

29
Trumper926 29 points ago +29 / -0

3rding Barris.

46
deleted 46 points ago +49 / -3
43
Boxcar_Overkill 43 points ago +43 / -0

What's compelling about this is the SIZE of the vote change in Penn.- It's higher than California, Texas, New York, and Florida added together...in fact:

THE NUMBER OF VOTE CHANGES IN PENNSYLVANIA IS ALMOST LARGER THAN THE ALL OF THE REST OF THE COUNTRY COMBINED.

13
FaddyMcSaddy 13 points ago +13 / -0

PA was the crown and it’s no coincidence

14
TheReal45 14 points ago +14 / -0

The Keystone. As the elders of yore spake.

6
PootiePoot 6 points ago +6 / -0

Virginia is even higher than Pennsylvania for lost/switched votes as a percentage of total reported votes.

West Virginia and New York are high too.

23
deleted 23 points ago +24 / -1
8
deleted 8 points ago +20 / -12
22
deleted 22 points ago +24 / -2
22
AndrewLB 22 points ago +23 / -1

It's already been proven that these dominion voting machines have switched 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden in a single county in a single county in Michigan. And since this "glitch" has also happened in Wisconsin and Georgia. If this same "glitch" is happening in every county in MIchigan, it would equal about 280,000 votes which is slightly more than what Biden needed to win the state. Coincidence?

The lying MSM which has already reported this problem as a glitch and only happened on that one michigan machine in order to stop additional inquiry, now that multiple 'glitches' are now discovered, they changed their story to it being "human error". lol.

13
DJTrump_MD 13 points ago +13 / -0

Sure, but then how do you explain why the numbers always go against Trump.

11
williammcfadden 11 points ago +11 / -0

Simple recount won't reveal if they then followed up with inserted paper ballots -- or intended to do so but then numbers became too great.

I witnessed this during the early 2016 dem primaries, the glitch downward adjustments against Bernie during the live vote reporting, but I wasn't watching too closely to follow up with research.

4
freedom2520 4 points ago +5 / -1

The glitches are the "order" for fakes to be inserted. They can only order what can be supplied.

22
pede-o-saurus 22 points ago +23 / -1

Hmm, did we find ourselves a few disinformation operatives in this thread? I think we did, but their downplaying was low-energy.

You know what to do, 'pedes.

-8
lapdants -8 points ago +5 / -13

The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage

This is not official results -- this is exit polling data. From Edison's web site:

Our 2020 general election coverage included election day exit polls at over 700 voting locations, in-person early-voter exit polls, and telephone surveys with absentee and early voters all around the country. In total, Edison Research interviewed over 100,000 voters in the 2020 general election

www.edisonresearch.com/election-polling

As we all know, the polling has been really bad, both in 2016 and in 2020. None of us have access to official state voting data right now, and anyone who says they do is lying.

10
mzog 10 points ago +11 / -1

This is not exit polling data. They also report the official poll data which is what this data set purportedly is. Here is info from NBC which says they get their election data from Edison/NEP.

That said. Nothing about Edison is official. Any mistakes they make in their reporting are not "official" and all analysis of the data set is subject to their garbage/glitches in addition to the state vote data.

3
Nunya__Biznus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Regardless of whether this is exit polling data OR some kind of vote vote feed, THIS is the data that "official sources" are using to call the election.

Get it?

1
trumpmixtape 1 point ago +1 / -0

youre glowing

1
Spatzy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Na the code has AP in it everywhere. And specifies every detail including absentee ballots etc. It’s definitely legit BUT I see the same error towards Biden as well. They basically rounded off the percentages (i.e 45.89744 to 45.9) for both Biden and Trump to simplify screen reporting which was a blonde move. It favored Biden far more but I don’t think this script calculates Biden’s deductions. To me, this was a media screwup and when the counts weren’t matching up with each state they froze the counting then scrambled to find ballots to make it look legit. I caught a change on Nov 4th between 7:32pm and 8:36pm in Pennsylvania of 32,615 votes reduced for Trump and just under 26k increased for Biden at same time. It wasn’t an exact equal flip. Going to see if I can find this in the data.

-25
clampie -25 points ago +7 / -32

Yeah, I'm not really impressed with this. It's a start but not really that informative.

-21
lapdants -21 points ago +4 / -25

It's exit polling data! Why is no one talking about this? Go to Edison Research's website, they are a marketing firm that does nationwide exit polling.

16
CodeMonkey 16 points ago +17 / -1

I went to their website. They very clearly offer a real time vote counting service in addition to exit polling. Not sure if you're blind or shilling.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0 (edited)
8
OconusLurex 8 points ago +8 / -0

Good thinking! I know Rich must be swamped right now. @LauraBaris

8
salvecitizen 8 points ago +8 / -0

And add @TracyBeanz because the Flynn's like her.

78
deleted 78 points ago +79 / -1
33
deleted 33 points ago +33 / -0
29
HossBonaventure 29 points ago +29 / -0

Kamala never stopped

15
Here_we_go 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yeah send to willie brown too

9
Tomboy_Patriot 9 points ago +9 / -0

I just LOL'ed

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
1
Bubbles38DDD 1 point ago +1 / -0

You will be president again . that bill was a joke and how they had 5000 pages of sneaky items in this bill. Lies throughout the complete campaign and spying on his campaign and then the problems they played the whole time he was president. Trump was not found to be doing anything with any dealings with any other countries. This is all crap and if I was him I would raise hell. Also the long time tring to impeachment him was a lie and caused the problems they made and yet after all was done and said nothing was proved about all these false statement and charges never met. Biden has done nothing and has deflected by biden refusing to answer any of these questions WHY. He's losing his mind and is totally unfit to be a janitor let alone a president. They are trying to make it seem like his off his rocker NO thats all fake news. Biden hasn't answered any of the questions he was asked by the president . That would be head lines if it was the other way around. Stop this story's lies about how Trump is crazy but he's not mentally fit to be president so don't believe this crap and lies . when will americans find out about the congress and senators and capitol Hill when Pelosi games being played. the hole time he was going to run. That when we knew he was on to what they tried to do to him right away. Saying he was involved with Russia NO it was the dem. that were dealing and having talks with them and we all seen who was receiving a lot of money and plans that the dem were up too. NOT THE PRESIDENT....

2
trumpmixtape 2 points ago +2 / -0

Been spamming him constantly. Got in immediately after one if his posts too. Twitter puts us all under "more replies", even if we're the only reply. Its infuriating.

2
Anus_Blenders_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like a good parody cover for The Who

1
masticatetherapist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to be confused with electric wizard

77
TennesseeScorpio 77 points ago +77 / -0

James Woods! That dudes a damn genius!!!

18
Slyhillary 18 points ago +18 / -0

Literally

12
traveravis 12 points ago +12 / -0

And has an enormous penis

14
CNN_is_ISIS 14 points ago +14 / -0

Can't confirm, but upvoting for the positive mental image

1
trumpmixtape 1 point ago +1 / -0

He singlehandedly skewed the "average" penis size so now all the lefties feels like they have small dicks.

20
repoman 20 points ago +20 / -0

Scott Presler, good dude and funny as hell.

14
chelthing 14 points ago +14 / -0

Angelic hair too

1
mrcoolj90 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope I can achieve near his hair length by next year into Trump's second term!

12
Methodmapper 12 points ago +12 / -0

posted it to a locals for the second person on this list...we will see if it get's approved

145
Methodmapper 145 points ago +145 / -0

Now, can you run that script on senate races???

196
Doth 196 points ago +196 / -0

in before we realize POTUS goes into his 2nd term with 72 senators

131
Trumper926 131 points ago +132 / -1

I truly love every one of you and continually am praying and fasting for all of you and our victory.

77
Texas_Rangers 77 points ago +79 / -2

Praying is the most important thing you can do right now. Second is spreading this to everyone.

39
Hairy_Mouse 39 points ago +42 / -3 (edited)

Praying is definitely not THE most important. If everybody did nothing about this except for pray, we wouldn't have ANY of this data or evidence.

Gathering evidence to build a case is THE most important thing right now.

You won't suddenly be bestowed a bulletproof case, God doesn't work like that.

WE have to put in the time and effort, then pray all will be revealed and America will be saved. Prayer is good, but don't use it as an excuse to get complacent.

40
AmazingFlightLizard 40 points ago +40 / -0

God wants to help us. But he also wants us to use the tools he gave us

28
You_Aint_Black 28 points ago +30 / -2

Praying is always the most IMPORTANT thing you can do, however right now it may not necessarily be the FIRST thing that you should do.

13
Trumper926 13 points ago +13 / -0

Agree. I have spiritual gifts and am fasting and praying for us. I'm doing my part.

1
trumpmixtape 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think he means praying is the most important you can do while not actively doing anything, if that makes sense.

7
LadyPersephone 7 points ago +8 / -1

Love you too! :D

100
commies0ride0free 100 points ago +100 / -0

And a GOP controlled House?

CUT ALL THE TAXES! ROLL BACK ALL THE REGULATIONS! CUT AL THE FOREIGN SPENDING! DRILL ALL THE OIL! REPEAL ALL THE ACA! DISBAND ALL THE ALPHABET AGENCIES AND END THE FED!

Omg I have so many more. THIS IS MAGA COUNTRY!!!

60
kornesque 60 points ago +61 / -1

EVERY COUNTY IN CA IS ACTUALLY RED!!

11
Test_user21 11 points ago +11 / -0

According to OP?

26
kornesque 26 points ago +26 / -0

Nope, just voicing my desires with parent OP. But I bet with only citizens voting with ID it would be likely.

55
DCdeplorable 55 points ago +55 / -0

Number one should be FAIR ELECTIONS. Purge all voter rolls, ban non military absentee voting, mandatory voter id, paper ballots, mandatory auditing.

If the votes were counted fairly democrats would never have a majority again.

23
ClownTamer 23 points ago +24 / -1

I just came.

20
deleted 20 points ago +22 / -2
12
Phil_DeGraves 12 points ago +12 / -0

DAS RAAAYYYCIIIIISSSSSS, though! According to libtard anti-logic.

15
Tcrlaf1 15 points ago +16 / -1

White liberals know in thier hearts that blacks are ignorant and incapable, they must be led to and hand-fed everything. They NEED the guiding hand of the rich white liberal to show them the way. Quite insulting, and utterly racist.

12
HockeyMom4Trump 12 points ago +12 / -0

They've been cheating for years. CA is probably red. MN is red.

6
sagebrushfire 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not sure about MN. That state has put the β€œR” in retard since the 70s.

8
ImWithHearse 8 points ago +9 / -1

Voting verified by blockchain. We need a completely trust-less and decentralized environment. Not owned and built by a Clinton Foundation benefactor. One that you can independently verify that your vote went to the right person and got counted.

21
FliesTheFlag 21 points ago +21 / -0

This guy fucks, Freedom Boner Intensifies

18
AngryWriter 18 points ago +18 / -0

You know we could throw the democrats a bone and increase the size of the SCOTUS like they want, with 4 more Trump appointments.

11
itswood 11 points ago +11 / -0

While I understand your only making a joke...I want to point out how dangerous that would be. You appoint 4 new SCOTUS's and then the next election the democrats get elected nd now the precedent has been set.

No thank you. I value our Constitution and whole heartedly reject all fuckery, from either side of the aisle.

5
bubbletea 5 points ago +5 / -0

Soon everyone is a supreme court justice!

3
AngryWriter 3 points ago +3 / -0

My point is that if we can do it, they can. If both sides can do it, the constitution needs to be amended to fix that. Might as well change the law to "13 justices" while fixing the constitution at the same time so the number can not be increased without constitutional amendment.

14
ProgramNerd 14 points ago +19 / -5

This is an important viewpoint to keep in mind as we go into the close: remember the pedes that use cannabis. It's not talked about here much which is worrying. Repubs are all about states rights until they focus on something they disagree with, then they go full Dem on them. States rights are a crucially important part of our constitution and can't be ignored because it's inconvenient for you.

Sure roll back the national mandates on abortion and drug control, but be ready to lose the battle anyways in the blue states, just like the founding fathers intended.

Be the Lion party, not the Republican party.

26
WowStrongWinning 26 points ago +26 / -0

Drugs sure, abortion no. Protecting babies from being murdered is different than a dude sitting on his couch smoking a joint with a bag of Cheetos.

11
AmazingFlightLizard 11 points ago +11 / -0

Im still not down with other-than-prescription drugs, but if I have to choose between making those go away and saving babies’ lives, we would have another baby boom.

1
ProgramNerd 1 point ago +6 / -5

That's just your opinion. One I agree with, but still. Letifs ts will go Healthcare is a right. It's totally different than protecting a dude sitting on his couch smoking a joint with a bag of Cheetos. People die without it. Just like these babies. Will you be pushing for universal healthcare or are you a hypocrite?

Is abortion in the constitution? It's a not a new phenomenon.

Here's what you do, you vote it down in your state, and only your state, and you stay fuck out of federal laws. Then you make everyone else do the same. Then you go to a state with the laws you like and settle down there, while the aborters can go to their state. If all 50 states outlaw it individually then hell yeah, otherwise tough shit.

7
Comntrinchief 7 points ago +7 / -0

Is there any question that the war on drugs has been an abysmal multi trillion dollar failure?

We have no choice but to try something different. People should be free to do what they want as long as other citizens don’t have to pay for their mistakes like becoming a drug addict.

2
Cacciali_Via 2 points ago +2 / -0

"As long as other citizens don't have to pay..."

Well, they do. In every state that has legalized it, we pay for losers mistakes.

6
commies0ride0free 6 points ago +7 / -1

LEGALIZE ALL THE WEED

6
RedditCantCensorMe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wegalize all the Leed!

1
540k-Again 1 point ago +1 / -0

Off topic to data thread but to straighten things out for you.

Republican Redpills to the answers you seek:

  • All controlled substances should be by prescription; with alcohol (and maybe tobacco depending on State/local ordinances), being dispensed via the usual methods (but the licensing etc. can be simplified to follow the prescription model), and all others through (real) pharmacies.

  • Eventually, all prescription drugs (likely except addictive substances), will be covered(paid zero direct price) with a Republican Strict-Constitutional version which is 180 degrees opposite of 44NoCare or Single-payer leftie crap. Also includes drug treatment programs.

  • For law enforcement activities, If it's drugs, it should be D.E.A. not the FBI, and DEA should be moved from DOJ, to FDA and HHS. Same with A.T.F. should have the F removed, and A.T. moved with D.E.A. and to HHS.

  • Don't be trying to split the Republican Party. DJT is the political head of the Republican Party. He studied and the whole 3rd party thing many times, and he made the choice and decision it was best to vote and JOIN the REPUBLICAN PARTY. MAGA DJT shortened from *"Let's Make America Great Again!" - Ronald Reagan's campaign.

MAGA! And back to our Data thread, which I wish people & Pedes would take the redpills on, from those of us whom have been through this rodeo before.

1
ProgramNerd 1 point ago +3 / -2

Americans aren't going to roll over on what they want just because you come at them with some strong language. We wouldn't have Trump in office now if it worked like that.

My right to use cannabis to medically help myself is just as crucial to me as your gun rights. My ability to use it not medically is as important to me as your free speech rights and entertainment rights. All have to do with liberty. You're just suppressing it at that point. Law enforcement agencies? The ones that regularly bust your average Joe in legal states, just so they can re-up on their slush funds? Those guys that turn aroun, literally when BLM attacks. The ones that take your guns? you want me to trust law enforcement. That's RINO thinking. Fittingly, since your bold plan is "change nothing."

Controlled substances are just another way for the government to take control over you. "Leave alcohol out" said the incredible hypocrite. One of the most harmful, addictive, life-destroying substances out there. "But it's fine cause my beers, MAGA!" as he jiggles his hard won belly into an early grave. Those damn cannabis-users and their cheetos though, amirite?

You don't even touch upon the huge issue of whether or not it should be a controlled substance to begin with. "All controlled substance should be prescription" Except alcohol. Again. I''m not even sure how to engage such a warped idea. It's entirely double think from start to finish, covered up by brazenly invoking Donald Trump's name as if that makes your argument less faulty.

0
ProgramNerd 0 points ago +2 / -2 (edited)

Where are you getting this info from? You've completely killed by MAGA boner and you could see from my months of posts it was the most raging hard-on before this.

So I'd like to confirm that this is Trump's plan for myself. Your sources?

"Back in 1990 at a luncheon held by the Miami Herald, Trump called the United States’ drug enforcement policy a β€˜joke’ and was quoted as saying β€œWe’re losing badly the war on drugs. You have to legalize drugs to win that war. You have to take the profit away from these drug czars.'"

In a leaked recording from 2018, Trump was heard to say marijuana makes people β€œlose IQ points” and at an opioid summit that same year at the White House, Trump advocated the death penalty for drug dealers, equating the provision of lethal drugs with murder. He was quoted as saying β€œSome countries have a very, very tough penalty β€” the ultimate penalty β€” and by the way, they have much less of a drug problem than we do”.

Wow, so is Trump going to legalize everything or turn us into North Korea? Kill the drug dealers, hang them from the street corners?

Trump vs Trump who's right?

13
Homsi2 13 points ago +13 / -0

Better if he had 69 lmao

6
Data 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nice.

2
SoAngryRanger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Niiiicce

1
CNN_is_ISIS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jazz Club!

4
TheJake 4 points ago +4 / -0

68...It means you do me and I owe ya one

1
rattrigger82 1 point ago +1 / -0

77 69 and I get 8 more

3
Shakakka99 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd shit down both legs.

50
thebest2020 50 points ago +50 / -0

House races.!!!!

47
The_Litehaus_Abides 47 points ago +47 / -0

I'm sure we won the House and I want it. The American people voted to give President Trump his mandate and a way to accomplish it. We won the House.

35
Nomoralcompass89 35 points ago +35 / -0

Supermajority goes brrrrrt.

12
kudupoo 12 points ago +12 / -0

You have 1150 Brts to play with Pede..

Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrt! Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrttttrrrrrrrrrttttttttt!

6
FliesTheFlag 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is that an A10 Warthog in your pocket!

17
Light_HIV_Effect 17 points ago +17 / -0

That would be great. I'd love to see some of these squad thrown out on their asses.

15
TrumpLover 15 points ago +16 / -1

Winning the house means we can pass national blockchain for all future elections.

7
thebest2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lets start with national 2nd amendment. Then we can go into vote blockchains.

9
thereal____ 9 points ago +9 / -0

Idk, right now I’m feeling that we are one election fraud away from no 2nd. At least we all have the chance to go scuba diving to look for our long lost guns and ammo that fell overboard. There are no do overs from full commie.

2
thebest2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

So invest in scuba gear.. got it!!

4
ImWithHearse 4 points ago +4 / -0

Absolutely! Segwit wallet with one satoshi in it. You could do a decentralized election for 330 million votes for about $58,000

2
TrumpLover 2 points ago +2 / -0

The 2nd amendment makes all gun laws illegal. We don't need the house for that, the supreme court could declare it tomorrow.

1
DaytonaGreg 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is why BIDEN is dangerous. Packing the court and no #2A

2
DonnieTurnip 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why not both.

2
thebest2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because!!! No reason not to!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
11
CovefefeREEEE 11 points ago +11 / -0

πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘† This.

38
deleted 38 points ago +38 / -0 (edited)
13
AmazingFlightLizard 13 points ago +13 / -0

John James needs that seat because ARMY AVIATION ALL THE WAY!

Ahem, but yeah, he seems a good dude and a worthy man to put in the seat.

5
CNN_is_ISIS 5 points ago +5 / -0

Happy Veteran's Day, lad!

16
CornandSoybeans 16 points ago +16 / -0

Can we go back to 2018 and run it. Sorry I'm like a like a special Olympian in the real Olympics when it comes to being a computer athlete.

6
45ACP 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don't worry pede, that's most of us here. Our job is to spread the info.

10
Tcrlaf1 10 points ago +10 / -0

My thought as well. How many HOUSE races did they flip with this?

3
GEOTUS_JR 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not enough – we are going to take it!

94
TrumpDynastyForever 94 points ago +95 / -1

Twitter fucking deleted our followers, suspended our account, and unfollowed us from everyone we were following last night for tweeting out a meme about their censorship. We don't know when we'll be back but we'll blast it out to our 0 followers asap. @electionwatch13

23
TruuthSeeker 23 points ago +24 / -1

You have now joined an elite club.

15
kudupoo 15 points ago +15 / -0

They did the same to mine. In their defense, I did have a Patriot Lion as my icon patch, The Constitution, bullets and Flag as my header pic and spelled out my alliegence veeeery clearly in my bio.

10
TruuthSeeker 10 points ago +10 / -0

Mine was a kenosha kid meme, and 2020meme war banner. But I verified my phone number 4-5 times. I stand by everyword.

5
CornandSoybeans 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same here. Small fry and being somewhat careful on what I redpill with. Locked account under review

32
butte_weippe 32 points ago +32 / -0

also each state GOP leader

249
Granite_MAGA 249 points ago +250 / -1

Can someone tell me why in the fuck they are using two or three decimal places of precision to multiply 6 digit numbers then telling us we're within less that for margins?

Anyone else seeing this? Are they really moving votes around by simple ratios?

What on the gluten-free fuck is going on here?

175
deleted 175 points ago +177 / -2 (edited)
46
Do_u_ev3n_lift 46 points ago +46 / -0

Did he look at the softwares source code? how did he get it?

38
Capitalism_Fuck_Yeah 38 points ago +38 / -0

JSON data that is used to populate the nyt's election map. They get it from the same place a lot of news outlets get it from.

11
makethemwatch 11 points ago +11 / -0

This though just makes this a display error and not a vote tabulation error. The news gets the vote count to 3 significant figures but that doesnt mean the underlying votes are stored to 3 significant figures

13
stagolee 13 points ago +13 / -0

Actually if you watch Dr Shiva's video today, they do in fact store votes as decimal numbers. The voting machines allow "weighted voting" as a feature so you can allocate votes as 2.0 to 0.5 between the candidates. It's in there by design. He had official data from previous elections showing totals that were fractional. It's absurd.

8
makethemwatch 8 points ago +8 / -0

I saw the video, the problem is Edison is only reporting the percentage to 3 decimal places, but the vote totals are in the millions. If we want to convert the decimal to integers accurately we would need the percent to 7 decimal places

3
PatrickHangry 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dr. Shiva's presentation shows they're stored as double-precision floats though, not 3-digit decimals.

Doubles can store every exact positive integer up to 2^53 before they start jumping in larger amounts...and they can similarly store percentages to way beyond the precision necessary to get exact vote totals (after rounding) from each candidate based on percentage of the total vote.

The underlying data type shown in Dr. Shiva's presentation is more than sufficient for perfect precision, but it's still suspicious that it's used at all. A simple and correct voting machine would just use 32-bit or 64-bit integer accumulators (the latter for future-proofing against worldwide elections...shudder). The only reason to use a double seems to be to support the [should-be-illegal] ratio-based voting feature in the laziest possible way (too lazy to ever convert back to integer totals for storage).

4
TDaccount841 4 points ago +4 / -0

If the underlying data the fake news orgs is using can be called into question, so can this coronation.

31
deleted 31 points ago +40 / -9
25
abstr4ct 25 points ago +26 / -1

Then why is it always the third decimal amount?

-28
deleted -28 points ago +9 / -37
32
SellTheSun 32 points ago +33 / -1

however that can be just a data entry.

If it was simply data entry, than some Biden votes would be flipped to Trump as well. This is ONLY happening with Trump votes being switched to Biden votes - how is that just a data entry issue?

9
deleted 9 points ago +12 / -3
-1
roytheboy -1 points ago +4 / -5

This isn't only happening with Trump to Biden votes. Check it out yourself, I was looking through Wisconsin the other day trying to catch fraud and in fact Biden lost significantly more votes than Trump did in that state.

It's garbage data.

14
aaaronsohn 14 points ago +18 / -4

Cope harder, Biden boy.

5
iminlovewithtrump 5 points ago +9 / -4

Get out shill

22
SqRt7744 22 points ago +23 / -1

Really just pure coincidence then that all these "data issues" only benefit Biden πŸ˜‚πŸ‘

3
kallebanen 3 points ago +4 / -1

Look at the script, it's programmed that way.

1
SqRt7744 1 point ago +1 / -0

It just finds the differences, and they never benefit Trump. The code isn't biased.

1
LauraTrumpette 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it looking at ALL differences and they never benefit Trump, or is it looking for only the differences that favor Biden and we don't know if any favored Trump?

Thanks!

2
bubadmt 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nothing to see here, move along fellow raci-- I mean, millipede.

2
LauraTrumpette 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do we know that they only benefit Biden? I'm not seeing a number of votes that switched FROM Biden TO Trump, and I don't know if it's because there were none, or because no one has looked.

There's no way in hell that true "glitches" only favor Democrats, even if that's what history shows...

1
SqRt7744 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct, it's deliberate fraud, not a bug. The algorithm they were using has been reverse engineered.

15
pede-o-saurus 15 points ago +16 / -1

Are you just concern trolling? This is the map of fraud. That data comes from vote tabulating machines and they keep a timestamped record of their counts. Lawyers will use this map to file discovery to seize those machines' logs and we'll see how they match. Maybe there's a consolidation or reporting error here or there in the database but this many isn't feasible as a collection of one-off errors. And it also shows how votes can be skimmed between states, and it spot-checks with ground observers and news reports. Elections have been overturned on less. This is the map.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +5 / -9
12
pede-o-saurus 12 points ago +13 / -1

Nice try, disinfo agent. This is what it actually says on Edison's site: "A proven source for accurate and timely nationwide vote tabulation:

In an effort to improve quality, streamline data collection, and expand election coverage in 2018, ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News ended their arrangement with the Associated Press for vote tabulation and now partner with Edison Research for these data.

For the 2018 General Election, Edison Research provided the NEP with a fast and accurate vote count throughout the nation, providing data for all statewide races and all House races."

Tabulation is counting. Everybody has access to official data right now because it's POSTED ON THE COUNTY ELECTION WEBSITES OF EVERY COUNTY, Edison just aggregates it.

Deport this guy.

5
Texas_Rangers 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep deport u/lapdants. His concern trolling all throughout this thread. They're getting scared.

3
PatrickHangry 3 points ago +4 / -1

I just did a search. The .json file has a field called edison_exit_polls_page pointing to a web URL, but it's mixed in with other random web URL's. They have more references to tabulation, e.g. "Released as a separate subtotal at the end of tabulation" shows up a couple times, and a third with an abbreviation.

This doesn't appear to be exit poll data. It appears to be actual tabulated data, albeit presented in a lossy 3 significant figure format.

We need to be really careful with drawing inferences about dropped/switched votes from calculating Trump/Biden votes from percentages with only 3 significant figures, because anything beyond those figures is basically going to be random noise from timestamp to timestamp.

I suspect the OP's calculations for switched votes are bunk because of this unless he took it into account and gave the "minimum possible swing" or something, but there are still some major abnormalities in the data. The OP pointed one of them out too: There's a 0.6% drop in Trump votes, or 6 ticks of the least sig fig, when the vote total jumped by only 54 from 2984468 to 2984522...that's way outside of rounding error.

-22
deleted -22 points ago +3 / -25
29
pede-o-saurus 29 points ago +29 / -0

Yes.

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
5
UndocumentedUpvote 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep, what we are seeing here is the final approved for release version of the data, which is already rigged by the algorithm. However that 1M vanished votes come from mathematically, it's a product of data tempering of historic proportions.

-9
deleted -9 points ago +3 / -12
6
idshukhov 6 points ago +7 / -1

4 years ago I would not. Look at your behaviour lately and tell me again how you're not capable of this.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
-14
deleted -14 points ago +7 / -21
-9
lapdants -9 points ago +5 / -14

Well, so this is an aggregate data piblished by edison research

This is EXIT POLLING. Straight from Edison Research:

Our 2020 general election coverage included election day exit polls at over 700 voting locations, in-person early-voter exit polls, and telephone surveys with absentee and early voters all around the country. In total, Edison Research interviewed over 100,000 voters in the 2020 general election.

This is not official vote tallies and people are acting incredibly responsibly in this thread.

10
dullcare 10 points ago +11 / -1

they say they interview over 100,000 voters, not millions of voters.. so how do they get millions in the election data counts? Are you implying that these are running estimate of votes that are extrapolated from 100K exit interviews and that they keep adjusting on the fly?... and that they were interviewing shadowy voters in Detroit and Philly at 4 and 5am? Maybe they interviewed a few thousand in the dark of night to get to 138,000 Biden votes and 0 Trump votes?

9
pede-o-saurus 9 points ago +9 / -0

lapdants is a shill. Deport.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
10
deleted 10 points ago +12 / -2
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
8
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
VioletU53 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree

66
BrookieDragon 66 points ago +66 / -0

So like...the money scam they pulled on Office Space but this time with votes instead of pennies?

38
Harambe4K 38 points ago +38 / -0

The fuckers who did this better not get a minimum security prison with conjugal visits.

29
iamjohnwick 29 points ago +29 / -0

No no. I see Federal-Pound-Them-In-The-Ass prison in their futures.

8
Phil_DeGraves 8 points ago +8 / -0

"Mother shitter! Son of an ass!"

"Peter! Watch out for your cornhole, dude!"

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
7
FreedomAintFreeYo 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wouldn't surprise me - the idea of going after Flynn with the Logan act came from Law and Order.

4
WassermanSchultz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thought it was West Wing?

2
FreedomAintFreeYo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't watch any network tv and couldn't remember, so I guessed. I was hoping someone knew - thanks!

1
WassermanSchultz 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've never seen Law and Order or West Wing. I only know about it because Bongino talked about it sometime in the summer.

4
plasmaburnz 4 points ago +4 / -0

When I saw the vertical lines in Biden's totals, I knew someone screwed up. That was too obvious. One possibility is that they programmed it to transfer votes over time, but they forgot to account for pauses in the counting. So for the hours when they stopped counting, the fraud software didn't. They couldn't admit the software was flawed, that would trigger an investigation. They couldn't repudiate the votes, they needed them for Biden to win. The only thing they could do was try to bluff their way through and hope their propaganda machine could cover them.

1
Noadhominem 1 point ago +1 / -0

Best theory yet.

15
Matthew419 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is the best analogy to share with normies to understand what has happened here.. Everyone has seen office space and knows that scene about shaving pennies.

3
Comntrinchief 3 points ago +3 / -0

So you’re stealing.

15
JohnMcCainsTumors 15 points ago +15 / -0

They need some time in federal pound me in the ass penitentiary

8
Granite_MAGA 8 points ago +8 / -0

yes

63
deleted 63 points ago +63 / -0
20
SobekRa 20 points ago +21 / -1

Watch this shit catch on in other countries. Many governments' sloppy frauds will be resurfacing like floating turds

9
Sporadica 9 points ago +9 / -0

Evidently my country uses dominion counting machines. now im concerned

4
SobekRa 4 points ago +5 / -1

If the electoral data gets purged in the coming days, you know what's up

Would be very interesting to see full independent audits worldwide

9
FreedomAintFreeYo 9 points ago +9 / -0

How many elected officials in this country weren't actually elected...

7
Shit_tyrone 7 points ago +7 / -0

The importance of this needs to be stated. You can't fucking have 0.88 votes. That's bullshit and they use it to steal elections.

36
deleted 36 points ago +36 / -0
110
PedeInspector 110 points ago +111 / -1

Seeing that the Antrim county glitch can be found in the data, it is basically guaranteed that the data matches the real numbers.

11
Do_u_ev3n_lift 11 points ago +11 / -0

Where did you get that snippet of code? Is that from the dominion voting machines? some website?

10
Capitalism_Fuck_Yeah 10 points ago +10 / -0

Voting machines need open source code and all output needs to be public knowledge. Full crazy level auditing the processing code

3
makethemwatch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its impossible the vote_share is not precise enough, you cant get a raw vote with the percentage to only 3 significant figures

-7
deleted -7 points ago +2 / -9
75
PedeInspector 75 points ago +77 / -2

It's not exit polling data, you can find glitches from videos with this data too, if you see a glitch live on CNN, you can find it in this data.

1
makethemwatch 1 point ago +4 / -3

You only have the 3 decimal places for vote share which is not precise enough to find errors on the order of thousands in the data you posted. You need more significant digits for vote_share otherwise you are generating precision out of thin air

1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Btw, did you perform the reverse experiment where we can see potentially how many votes switched from Trump to Biden (and not just vice versa). Please tell me you checked this.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0 (edited)
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
20
deleted 20 points ago +23 / -3
24
SHALL_NOT 24 points ago +25 / -1

Hey sorry, retard here. Whats up with the decimal place thing? I've seen it around a fair amount recently. And what is being multiplied?

27
Shit_tyrone 27 points ago +27 / -0

http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1/ this website explains it all. It also explains how they fuckin cheat elections with it.

8
SHALL_NOT 8 points ago +8 / -0

Wow this is crazy. I knew the voting systems were corruptible but to see it laid out this way is eye opening.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
yourbrother 6 points ago +6 / -0

Congratulations. Welcome to 2 decades ago.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
PatrickHangry 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, it's pretty apparent that he just "beat the cheating" in 2016, because they believed their BS polls too much to go "all out" like they did this year. Even this year they still underestimated the amount of mail-in ballots to fake in advance, and they were only able to cover the difference with a ton of egregious last-minute panic cheating, which was too obvious to go unpunished.

3
Comntrinchief 3 points ago +3 / -0

HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!!! RED ALERT!!

This explains everything!

Does anyone know if fractional voting and weighted voting is being used? The article says it could be and no one would know.

1
BSnatch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, thats fucking slimee as shit

16
CodeMonkey 16 points ago +16 / -0

The data set, instead of having the vote counts for each candidate, has a total number of votes and a fraction for each candidate.

It looks roughly like this: votes: 1234567 biden: 0.654 trump: 0.321

When you're dealing with a 6 or 7 digit number and multiply by a 3 digit decimal, precision is lost; you don't know exactly how many votes go for each candidate.

Looking at the fake example above, 0.001 of 1,234,567 is 1,235.

Biden's actual vote count could be anywhere between 807,406 and 808,641.

Trump's actual vote count could be anywhere between 396,296 and 397,530.

12
SHALL_NOT 12 points ago +12 / -0

Gotcha, so basically in tight races coming down to a 0.1 point margin the actual results could be different from the reported results.

In general terms, it would seem this is not the most accurate way to count, nor is it the easiest since it requires the candidate votes divided by total votes, rounded to the nearest 0.1%. All while they could do the easier and more accurate thing by reporting the unprocessed raw counts.

In your example it looks like the last sigfig is the thousands place and we don’t actually know how many hundreds went to either candidate.

1
Comntrinchief 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thank you for this. It makes more sense now. I wasn’t sure how they were going from 3 decimal places can equate to 1 or 2 votes to thousands.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
PatrickHangry 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the kind of attention to detail we need. Good job.

185
IncredibleMrE1 185 points ago +186 / -1

OP did tell one lie. This is not a nuke, this is the MOTHER OF ALL NUKES.

192
PantsJihad 192 points ago +192 / -0 (edited)

Oh shit it gets even better. Dr Shiva Ayyadurai is crunching these numbers too and they've more or less reverse engineered the math they used to siphon votes. This is going to blow up HUGE.

This ain't a MOAB, we're getting into Tsar Bomba territory here.

EDIT: I'm not sure how to embed a periscope link, but here's his twitter feed that has it all: https://twitter.com/va_shiva?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Eembeddedtimeline%7Ctwterm%5Eprofile%3Ava_shiva&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fvashiva.com%2Fdr-shiva-live-election-fraud-in-massachusetts%2F

It looks like they had a system set up to siphon trump votes in districts with greater than 25% trump turnout. The idiots didn't even vary it up, used same math on all cheated counts. Its consistant.

74
DonJr2024 74 points ago +74 / -0

I pray for this. One big nuke that just overturns several states in one go and lands people in front of congress and then in jail.

39
kd5ywa 39 points ago +39 / -0

This isn't "in front of congress stuff". This is insurrection act, thrown in jail immediately crap.

2
Snypr18 2 points ago +2 / -0

As if anyone with the authority to do that actually has the balls to see it done.

18
KingMoonRacer 18 points ago +18 / -0

There are several layers of fraud here. The voting machines are only one.

39
StraightWhiteCisMale 39 points ago +40 / -1

u/DCdeporable did an infographic on this just now. This guy (Dr. Ayyadurai) is an MIT PhD, this is huge.

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2y2SY/

1
UpTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

I made a genuine attempt to understand this, but I'm not PhD-level smart. ELI5 anyone?

30
deleted 30 points ago +32 / -2
13
kornesque 13 points ago +13 / -0

Anyone else having trouble viewing that stream? I've got it small and on on a good connection and it won't play for more than a few seconds before stalling indefinitely.

22
CroatianRepublican 22 points ago +22 / -0

It's on Dr. Shiva's youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk&feature=emb_title

The video is incredibly concise and easy to understand. The evidence is damning.

8
kornesque 8 points ago +8 / -0

Youtube

Screw it, as long as it works. Plus the swamp is hosting facts that will kill their candidate, guess I'll take glee in that.

Money link, thanks.

11
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 11 points ago +11 / -0

That’s called an unintentional TD.win DDOS.

7
Hi_Im_Dave 7 points ago +7 / -0

I have downloaded the entire video. It's 1.5GB, so Streamable won't take it. But for users that have ffmpeg, you can grab just about any streaming social media video from the internet by using its .m3u8 playlist file.

For example, in Firefox, if you open his Periscope video, which is the source for the clip on twitter, and then right click it and inspect it, you can find this file.

Right click on video > inspect > Network Tab > Click Reload> then at the top type m3u8 to filter it down.

Click on that m3u8 line and it will open the the url for the m3u8 file.

Now, with ffmpeg, you can grab the entire video to archive, share, watch or whatever. For linux, the ffmpeg command and link for this particular clip is

ffmpeg -i "https://canary-video-us-east-1.pscp.tv/Transcoding/v1/hls/rKWyxg889j4JUHD0KEsyj0kl-HE9Vn8eFx8CZWu8Ccsja84cE-TdFDrN1iD5FKf3Mud0ppwygX71jDplylg7iw/non_transcode/us-east-1/periscope-replay-direct-prod-us-east-1-public/playlist_16841709147873874030.m3u8" -c copy output.mkv

3
kornesque 3 points ago +3 / -0

"All your bitstream are belong to us."

3
patriotblend 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now that it's been reprocessed it's only about 400 mb

4
Thepeter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Put it up on the Maga video hosting site so youtube can't take it down

https://video.maga.host/

5
patriotblend 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's already there by someone named joe.biden.sniffs.children, so let it be written

1
Hi_Im_Dave 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't even think to re-encode it. Apparently that type of critical thinking is above my pay grade I guess!

1
patriotblend 1 point ago +1 / -0

Youtube encodes videos and streams to a tighter compression after they sit for a bit. Now for 720p it shows a 286 MB vp9-codec video file or a 330 MB h.264. Put together with the 65 MB audio file and it's under 400 MB.

It's something you wouldn't notice unless you ran into it before. There's no noticeable difference to the viewer.

2
MakeArdernGoAway 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same here, absolutely no surprises that you can't watch it on twatter.

5
3sigma_gal_for_Trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thanks, saved it to watch later tonight.

19
Da_Willis_28 19 points ago +19 / -0

If my tally is correct as the total stands right now its 542,178 votes that have been switched and 2,865,807 votes lost. This is the mother of all nukes.

16
kennedyc5217 16 points ago +16 / -0

The β€œMOAN”

7
CandyBarr 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm moaning just thinking about it

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
iamkats 7 points ago +7 / -0

Might one say, a MOAB?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
96
deleted 96 points ago +96 / -0
35
3sigma_gal_for_Trump 35 points ago +35 / -0

This data does appear on the nytimes site - you can still access it. What is unclear to me is how Edison obtains this data and if all the vote reversals are "glitches" like the Antrim county one or maybe some happen for other reasons. The fact that the Antrim glitch has been identified does make it seem very real. Hoping some pedes running the script will verify the Oakland county glitch is well.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +2 / -8
9
UndocumentedUpvote 9 points ago +9 / -0 (edited)

Edison Research also does vote counts so what is your point?


β€œVote Count The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races. The NEP vote count from Edison Research is the only service continuously updated after Election Day. We track every vote until results are certified by all states. Vote count data is available for statewide results, vote by Congressional District, county vote data breakouts for statewide races, and all U.S. House races.”

3
pede-o-saurus 3 points ago +5 / -2

His point is to try to blunt the impact through disinformation because he's a shill and that's his job. Your job is to push the deport button below his post ;)

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)
2
pede-o-saurus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course we need contrary opinions to figure out where we're wrong; you're absolutely right. But there are also disinfo agents who leap into action whenever something is found saying it's a nothingburger or wrong, typically by continuously re-posting an easily-verified-to-be-wrong statement - in this case "it's exit polling data" (it's the data that drives NYT's counter, they obviously use collected counts not exit polling). The difference is subtle and the point of downvotes and the deport button is they harness collective intelligence of many users to figure out whether it's one of the other, which the mods then use human judgement on. So if it seems like a dumb argument, push the downvote button; if you feel that the pattern of behavior is intentionally deceptive, push deport.

8
UnderCoverTrumper 8 points ago +9 / -1

yis. am also but a humble humanities pede.

52
deleted 52 points ago +53 / -1
21
TrumpDynastyForever 21 points ago +22 / -1

We were suspended, our followers were deleted, and they removed our follows from everyone we were following last night for sharing a meme about twitter's censorship.....ironic, isn't it? @electionwatch13 if we ever make it back

1116
TrumpTrain2020 1116 points ago +1129 / -13

Dear God,

y u no make me smart like dis?

Thanks,

Me

592
440
TrumpTrain2020 440 points ago +440 / -0

u/PedeInspector - God bless you, Pede.

231
trump_45 231 points ago +232 / -1

u/PedeInspector - God bless you, Pede. MAGA!!!

162
namechangearoo 162 points ago +163 / -1

u/PedeInspector - God bless you, Pede.

104
EDDIT_IS_CUCKED 104 points ago +105 / -1

u/PedeInspector - God bless you, Pede.

81
blubberdong 81 points ago +82 / -1

u/PedeInspector - Serious MAGA work, pede!

28
doug2 28 points ago +30 / -2

My alt, no biggie.

(Kidding)

10
bothloveocean 10 points ago +11 / -1

u/PedeInspector - God bless you, Pede! MAGA!!!

51
kornesque 51 points ago +52 / -1

u/PedeInspector - You should never buy your own beer ever again. God bless you, pede.

18
jaybo500 18 points ago +19 / -1

God bless you, Pede.

10
Nameless 10 points ago +11 / -1

Bill Clinton

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
64
Postal 64 points ago +64 / -0

Can I buy this dude lunch or something because I want to get him something for this work

57
Trumper926 57 points ago +57 / -0

Lunch? I'm buying him his own Taco Bell.

27
magastrophysicist 27 points ago +27 / -0

In the future, all restaurants are Taco Bell.

This is a good investment.

11
Aoikaze2000 11 points ago +11 / -0

eh.... i'd rather have Chipotle....

At least the food's real there =P

12
magastrophysicist 12 points ago +12 / -0

GIBS THIS DUDE A CHIPOTLE, STAT!

3
EatShitCommie 3 points ago +4 / -1

No way. Chipotle is extra cucked and took a gigantic shit on the American Farmer a few years ago with extremely misleading youtube videos.

Fuck Chipotle.

-Iowan in the Ag industry

2
Lovepede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Make chipotle not upcharge for everything again!

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
magastrophysicist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hashtag me too

2
Anus_Blenders_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Taco Bell?! =D

18
SHALL_NOT 18 points ago +18 / -0

Peace is the prize

12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
34
Trumper926 34 points ago +34 / -0

u/PedeInspector, May the fire of the Holy Spirit continue to enlighten your mind.

1
fiercemodern 1 point ago +1 / -0

u/PedeInspector is obviously one of the most based humans ever to have lived.

70
deleted 70 points ago +71 / -1
139
PedeInspector 139 points ago +140 / -1

Yeah, but all the data can be checked by other coder pedes, they can get the data straight from the source too, they don't have to use the one I downloaded, and if they check it, they'll see that everything matches.

51
deleted 51 points ago +51 / -0
40
deleted 40 points ago +41 / -1
16
limbaughnomicon 16 points ago +17 / -1

They should compare notes...

10
Haitianbychoice360 10 points ago +10 / -0

THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS!!!!

7
WowStrongWinning 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ok, I just did the math, let me know if there is an error. The system shows a difference of 54 votes from the first tabulation to the second. However, in order for the vote ratio to change as the system shows, that would mean that Trump would have lost 17,876.57 votes and Biden gained 17,929.81 votes. But since there was only a 54 vote difference between the two tabulations it’s impossible for those ratios to change by 17,000 since 17,000 != 54.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
56
Based_psychologist 56 points ago +56 / -0

Worth noting

41
kekNation 41 points ago +41 / -0

Probably someone in a country that desperately wants Trump yo win because they are tired of all the wars our other presidents are starting.

Maybe someone in middle east who has actually been paying attention to the incredible peace deals Team Trump are striking and who has seen the peaceful way Trump has decimated Iran and N. Korea.

Possibly someone in a developed country tired of having China steal all their patents and undermine every other countries ability to win any sort of manufacturing business by using stolen technology, child labor, and no worker’s rights.

A lot of non Americans are rooting for Trump because he is good for the whole non-commie world.

16
Trumper926 16 points ago +16 / -0

Amen to this.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
35
3sigma_gal_for_Trump 35 points ago +35 / -0

The good thing is that what he posted is 100 percent verifiable, since the data is online for everyone to download, and other programmer pedes are already working on it. The only outstanding issue is whether the vote switches identified are all the same in nature as the Antrim ones or if there were some other type of glitches that may have been data feed issues and not genuine vote switches.

3
Texas_Rangers 3 points ago +4 / -1

I wish we could narrow the issues to certain counties.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
42
deleted 42 points ago +42 / -0
93
PedeInspector 93 points ago +95 / -2

Yep, it's all in that workupload link above, every single state.

33
VinceVonVroom 33 points ago +33 / -0

Just checking and maybe someone else asked it, but did you run the same test to see if Biden votes were switched to Trump? Is it possible the events were occurring both ways?

14
Tantalus4200 14 points ago +14 / -0

Upvoted to solidify the truth

3
Texas_Rangers 3 points ago +5 / -2

There were some switching from Biden to Trump, but it was overwhelmingly the opposite.

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
13
LRRP 13 points ago +13 / -0

Dewd... amazing

9
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 9 points ago +10 / -1

Dumb question, but you have sent this to everyone in the trump orbit, right? If you have I'm gonna need more popcorn

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
0
ContaigeousSuicide 0 points ago +2 / -2

You have changed the world.

35
DonJr2024 35 points ago +38 / -3

Have we checked for the opposite - Biden votes lost to Trump? Just to see if there is some randomness to it?

23
Trumper926 23 points ago +24 / -1

Yes but they are much smaller.

15
DonJr2024 15 points ago +16 / -1

Yup saw he said that. We need to get the exact numbers.

We need to change "glitch" into "fraud" and we need the full data to show that.

5
Walleyevision 5 points ago +13 / -8

Deport!!! Concern troll!!!! Shill!!!! /s

30
DonJr2024 30 points ago +30 / -0

Fuck, it is pretty bad at times lately.

PedeInspector did answer that he saw in PA about 20,000 (vs 200,000 for Biden) go Trump's way. I asked him to check other states. It's important data.

22
doug2 22 points ago +22 / -0

Absolutely. I'm the biggest Trump fan their is but we need an honest count. Jesus that should go wo saying.

9
Barbs 9 points ago +9 / -0

The framework upon which we hash out our differences should be fair and transparent to everyone. We can bicker and argue about politics all day long, but it’s the ballot box that ultimately determines the direction of our country.

So I’m with you, I want to see it all. There’s a reason that neither side really pushes for more secure voting, and it’s because they both want to retain the option to cheat. We need to uncover all of it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
friedchicken 4 points ago +4 / -0

You asked a valid question, that ADDS TO THE CASE. Anyone who did this might want plausible deniability and/or leave some reasonable doubt.

THE PROSECUTION MUST TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Kek_The_World 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don jr... is that really you;/-

9
DonJr2024 9 points ago +9 / -0

Sorry, I'm not even American. Just a Canadian who dreams more and more of moving down there. I'm sure Don Jr is around here though.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
friedchicken 2 points ago +3 / -1

EXCELLENT QUESTION!

Answer is YES, and it is SIGNIFICANTLY less.

25
DJT_JR6544 25 points ago +25 / -0

https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector This is amazing! Thank you!

95
Doth 95 points ago +95 / -0

God tailor-made each of us to a purpose. Find your strength and use it in service to others, it is rewarding and fulfilling to find your place in the world!

21
friendofno1 21 points ago +22 / -1

Indeed. I’m sadly not math-minded enough to help figure this numbers shit out, but God blessed me with an eye for good design. I can use that to persuade for good instead of evil, unlike most artists.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
1
Ragnar_Danneskjold 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol at least you still have a fiancee. My purpose in life is to fail at everything I've tried and end up 37 and alone.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
73
Loiuzein 73 points ago +73 / -0

We all have differing strengths :)

40
TrumpTrain2020 40 points ago +40 / -0

You're my favorite Pede.

15
Loiuzein 15 points ago +15 / -0

(ΰ²Έβ€Ώΰ²Έ)

16
Filo76 16 points ago +16 / -0

Is biting sarcasm a strength? Because I have that in spades.

7
Loiuzein 7 points ago +7 / -0

hell yeah it is! sarcasm and insults in general are strong teaching mechanisms as well as general entertainment!

3
Haitianbychoice360 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hey! Whatever works. Lol

2
loverat 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm a sarcastic and caustic bitch - I love eviscerating libtards with words. We are the infantry battling on the front lines of the Info war.

1
lilome33 1 point ago +1 / -0

I say when you take the mask off you have an airgasm.

2
UnoriginalNickname 2 points ago +2 / -0

Make memes with biting sarcasm

1
Onebadmoth 1 point ago +2 / -1

Remember, tact is for people who aren't witty enough to be sarcastic

9
ex67v 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is the true "diversity". It's not based on where you come from, or the tint of your skin, or which tribe you affiliate with. We're stronger because our skills and experience compliment one another, not because we have an even distribution of identity groups.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
39
Here_we_go 39 points ago +40 / -1

He seriously fucked me by being dyslexic

35
Nomoralcompass89 35 points ago +35 / -0

Don't feel too bad, there's people out there that suck at breathing.

63
deleted 63 points ago +64 / -1
23
Dialectic 23 points ago +23 / -0

Mmmmm delectable spice

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
2
Whatyougotson 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just had a flashback to spiceworld

10
SHALL_NOT 10 points ago +10 / -0

No, thats breefing

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0 (edited)
5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
5
kornesque 5 points ago +5 / -0

rimshot

2
TrumpTrain2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

audible lol achieved

4
SoAngryRanger 4 points ago +5 / -1

Well you don’t need to brag about it.

(D y s l e x i a = sex daily; dyslexic joke)

3
Megladonald 3 points ago +4 / -1

Sti lla doog ym dneirf, erew no eht pmurt nairt dna erew annog NIW!

2
TrumpTrain2020 2 points ago +3 / -1

OCOH HOOC

2
zipodk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I get this isn't a magic solution but did you try a font made for dyslexia such as https://www.opendyslexic.org/

14
leakmouth 14 points ago +16 / -2

Pound me 2 God

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
902
PedeInspector 902 points ago +910 / -8

u/TrumanBlack

Damn, you're better than me at getting attention lol.

Btw, update the thread with the numbers here : https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O0gyAf/huge-evidence-glitches-all-over-/

Those are the updated numbers with the bugs fixed, and way more states affected.

Also delete the part where I mention the bug, otherwise once you update the thread with the good numbers, pedes might think they are still the wrong numbers.

445
Oback_Barama 445 points ago +445 / -0 (edited)

So let me get this straight. The voting software occasionally takes the vote total, and then calculates the percent of the vote for the opposition candidate to the third digit, and then drops the third digit, and give it to the preferred candidate? and redistributes?

So if there are 4,000,000 votes in and DJT has 51.7% of the vote that means he has 2,068,000 votes. It then shifts that .7% of the vote to Biden?

So now DJT has 2,040,000 votes with exactly 51% of the vote?

Do this three or four times over the course of the night and hope no one notices the rounding error and you can shift a state at least 2% towards your favor.

I'm guessing that they had this going in ALL STATE using this software and still lost several. As the Election Night went on, and it was clear they were losing the MUST WIN STATES that's when they stopped the count and disturbed the emergency Biden Only Ballots.

TLDR: The Dem's were using Lex Luthor's The Superman 3 plan to get rich off of banking rounding errors to steal the election. Only we turned out the vote so hard they had to manufacture extra ballots.

Is that right?

Edit: Office Space, Yes

244
IsrorOrca 244 points ago +244 / -0

I equate it more to Office Space. They were stealing a fraction of a penny, but they fucked up; they either didn't carry a 1 or didn't count on the sheer volume of vote Trump was going to get. They got greedy.

101
leakmouth 101 points ago +101 / -0 (edited)

wasnt the bad guy in the movie "Ghost" doing that then Roadhouse found out but bad guy had Roadhouse killed by a weird looking black guy that also looked hispanic (kinda like Juan Williams) and tried to fuck G.I. Jane when she was still hot but looked too butch with that Backstreet Boys haircut before Roadhouse came back as an ass-kicking ghost?

Peter Griffin: "Roadhouse..."

34
feraxil 34 points ago +34 / -0

Can you switch every instance of "Demi" with "G.I. JANE"?

11
leakmouth 11 points ago +11 / -0

I got ya fam

8
feraxil 8 points ago +8 / -0

Thanks!

24
Spudster 24 points ago +24 / -0

You should write movie reviews for a living.

4
leakmouth 4 points ago +4 / -0

Kind of reminds you of the tangeants Patrick Bateman would go off on except more retarded

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
IAbsolutelyDare 10 points ago +10 / -0

I want to see this movie now...

6
bigdickhangsright 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah but then the bartender from TNG talked to the dirty dancer and decided to cash his check because he sang a repetitive song.

2
novanleon 2 points ago +2 / -0

You mean Whoopi who also happens to be a co-host on The View, aka. the worst daytime talk show that ever existed, and coincidentally also an avid Trump-hater?

2
bigdickhangsright 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah how'd you guess it

2
novanleon 2 points ago +2 / -0

That settles it. We've successfully connected the rampant voter fraud of the 2020 presidential election to Whoopi Goldberg... I think our job it done here boys!

2
Ifififififokeydoke 2 points ago +2 / -0

Finally something I can understand in this post!!

35
Skogin 35 points ago +36 / -1

Didn’t the Office Space scam copy the Superman scam? It’s all the same scam.

28
Sporadica 28 points ago +28 / -0

They literally said in the movie "like from superman 3", I watched it a couple weeks ago. great movie.

3
brassmule 3 points ago +3 / -0

All I know is, we better see some Dem crooks and Dominion coders going to Federal Pound Me In The Ass Prison.

23
TeddyIndeed 23 points ago +23 / -0

Wasn't that Richard Pryor in Superman 3? Being sloppy got him busted too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7JBXGkBoFc

7
Oback_Barama 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes, thank you! I forgot it was Superman 3

7
TeddyIndeed 7 points ago +7 / -0

I remembered it was Richard Pryor (red Ferrari) but totally forgot it was a Superman movie. First I went to The Toy, then Brewster's millions.

Full disclosure: this is about the limit of my forensic abilities - but I'll gladly volunteer it all for TheDonald & DJT!!!!

16
deleted 16 points ago +17 / -1
17
feraxil 17 points ago +17 / -0

I think it was Super Man 3.

15
OGTD1 15 points ago +15 / -0

I hesitate to post with all the stats experts in here but yes the car scene in Office Space came to mind. β€œSo your stealing right?”

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
10
2008RonPaul2012 10 points ago +10 / -0 (edited)

The 7/11, right? You take a vote from the tray... From the crippled children?!?

No --no that's the jar. I'm talking about the tray, you know, the votes for everybody.

Ohhh for everybody, okay...

Yeah. Well those are whole votes. I'm just talking about fractions of votes here, okay? But we do it from a much bigger tray, and we do it a couple million times.

4
Herecomedatpresident 4 points ago +4 / -0

underrated comment

66
CornandSoybeans 66 points ago +66 / -0

Exactly what happened. Plus I'm sure they harvested ballots from registered individual that were very likely not to vote by running an algorithm to find them. These would have been mailed in on time and the only way to prove those fraudulent would be to find the voter and ask them if there result matches the way they voted. ( not likely).

49
Italians_Invented_2A 49 points ago +49 / -0

It can be done. Take Republicans that haven't voted in the last 2 or 3 elections, knock at their door, ask if they voted this time. If they say no, they could be asked to testify.

Trump's campaign has ground game, this can be done easily.

9
Shamb3 9 points ago +9 / -0

According to the Detroit lawsuit they just added names to the voter registration roll and ran the ballots that came from god knows where through.

6
brassmule 6 points ago +6 / -0

And ran some ballots through the counter 50+ times. That was always the most common way to scam votes in Wayne County and it's what crazy plant lady discovered in 2016.

During her recount, they had a tub of ballots that was supposed to have 500 and it only had like 36, as I recall. Because they'd turn them all through the optical scanner/tabulator dozens of times each.

9
Herecomedatpresident 9 points ago +9 / -0

big tech had way more to do with this than we realized. That is why Jack looked so unbelievably weird and smug at the congressional hearings.

8
RinoHuntersUnite 8 points ago +8 / -0

Check out the Voter Integrity Project.

They're literally doing this.

And they have phonebanks where they are calling people and asking them. Then sending someone to their home to get a sworn affidavit from them.

1
emeraldcity 1 point ago +1 / -0

re. contacting voters to see if they voted that way: I've seen this done before. It is possible.

37
XavierMiles 37 points ago +37 / -0

Sounds more like OfficeSpace where they forgot some mundane details.

24
KornHoLi0 24 points ago +24 / -0

This is not a mundane detail Michael!

14
Light_HIV_Effect 14 points ago +14 / -0

This is not some mundane detail, Michael!

7
Hilldawg4Prison 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is what I'm trying to understand as well.

6
usa_foot_print 6 points ago +6 / -0

What the actual fuck.

92
TrumanBlack [S] 92 points ago +92 / -0

Fixed! Is this better?

102
PedeInspector 102 points ago +103 / -1

Yep, nice.

56
TrumanBlack [S] 56 points ago +56 / -0

Great pede!

29
Granite_MAGA 29 points ago +29 / -0

Am I correct in seeing that we are losing precision using 2 and 3 decimal place ratios to move 6 digit votes around?

I think I know how to math, and you can drop a few 10k votes here and there that way.

Like, that's Office Space level decimal point fuckery.

11
Jojobelle 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm witnessing greatness you and Trumanbkack are doing gods work!! God bless

11
Sheepfuzz 11 points ago +11 / -0

You deserve a Nobel Peace Prize

31
Magus_Strife 31 points ago +31 / -0

Were there any times where Trump benefited, or 100% for Biden? I am not doubting here, I am just imagining that would be the defense from my normie and Lefty friends.

27
deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
15
KARMAAACS 15 points ago +16 / -1

Send this info to the campaign man and to RICO Rudy!

7
GorillaChannel1 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nice work Pede.

619
p8riot 619 points ago +622 / -3

The switch amounts we can double in terms of swing impact (100 votes switched = 200 point advantage for Biden)

So this would give PA to Trump outright

347
MakeAmericaLegendary 347 points ago +348 / -1

Along with the popular vote. Of course, all of this is somehow going to be our fault in the end because of course it is.

231
America_No_1 231 points ago +231 / -0

Racism drove the Democrats to cheat. They had to do it to defeat systemic racism, friend.

102
PantsJihad 102 points ago +103 / -1

My white penis makes them evil.

50
deleted 50 points ago +54 / -4
10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
30
Emper 30 points ago +31 / -1

The worst part is this shows they disenfranchised black voters more than any other group.

28
TeddyIndeed 28 points ago +29 / -1

They want generations of black Americans stuck in awful school systems and never breaking out.

School choice? NO FUCKIN' WAY.

That's the only plain systemic racism I can recognize and would like to fix.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
12
joker 12 points ago +12 / -0

Leechers union

10
Lovepede 10 points ago +10 / -0

This infuriates me. Charter schools don't cost tax payers any extra but are free to compete and achieves superior results. Beyond childhood nutrition, stable two parent household and employment it's the best chance a poor kid have to change their legacy.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
6
loveshock 6 points ago +6 / -0

Defeat systemic racism by systemic cheating.l

2
Major_Nutt 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll put $50 they try to use this as an excuse once the fraud evidence is indisputable for even the MSM. f

"Don't you people understand???? We HAVE to beat OrAnGe MaN in order to defeat racism, sexism, etc."

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
6
BoatingAccident 6 points ago +6 / -0

"YOU CHEATED!"

-The Left

5
Tocqueville 5 points ago +5 / -0

you mean the fault of every Trump voter? That's kind of the way the system should work

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
122
rebelde_sin_causa 122 points ago +122 / -0

Also gives VA to Trump easily. Gives us Nevada but close. Gives us Georgia. And comes close to forcing a recount in NY

107
-REEEEEEEDACTED- 107 points ago +108 / -1

MOTHER OF GOD -- can you imagine the poo-flinging galactic liberal chimpout if NY was ruled as a Trump victory?

52
cheesecakelove 52 points ago +52 / -0

It has to happen. We’re back to the status quo with Biden. That’s a road that leads to the death of America by small cuts.

I obviously want Trump to win, but not for the same reasons as others.

31
Trumper926 31 points ago +31 / -0

A recount in NY. Don't tease me like this.

2
America1stAndOnly 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need a recount everywhere. Did you see how close Texas was? I don't buy those numbers for a second.

1
cumonmaaan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do... i live here and the shitards are moving here in droves.

21
rvpilot 21 points ago +22 / -1

poo-flinging galactic liberal chimpout

LMAO!!! My sides! πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

12
reddeadpill 12 points ago +12 / -0

Mega chimpout coming!

Chimpout is seriously one of my favorite words of all time, it describes so many situations in perfect levels of sad irony.

14
-REEEEEEEDACTED- 14 points ago +14 / -0 (edited)

The best part is chimpout was used for the longest time to denote nothing more than the grandest of public freakouts.

Then some absolutely non self-aware racist-ass libshits heard the word chimp being used and immediately thought bLaCk pEopLe reeeee

Fucking weirdos.

9
reddeadpill 9 points ago +9 / -0

The left has always been the real racists.

-6
NeonNazis -6 points ago +2 / -8

Yea except us genuine racists have been using chimpout exactly how you describe it as for decades. It's ok though it's super fun to say

3
Emodius 3 points ago +4 / -1

Been thinking the same. How glorious lol

47
5minutes2midnight 47 points ago +47 / -0

Oh boy...I wanna see VA red again!!!

12
Cswanger22 12 points ago +12 / -0

It should have people were fired up here

17
TeddyIndeed 17 points ago +17 / -0

Recount NY. Long Island went from reddish to red, btw. Not an insignificant development.

10
Only_Rosie_ODonnell 10 points ago +10 / -0

Many other NY counties went red

You can compare this years elections to 2016 and 2012

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-elections/new-york-results

17
p8riot 17 points ago +18 / -1

I only see a 24k swing in VA, are you counting lost votes?

11
rebelde_sin_causa 11 points ago +11 / -0

yes

13
p8riot 13 points ago +14 / -1

Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.

This makes it sound like .. I'm not sure now actually

6
Trumper926 6 points ago +6 / -0

We need these numbers too. But I think this is the dam breaking.

10
Haitianbychoice360 10 points ago +10 / -0

I was wondering about NY. This is above my pay grade and can barely understand the ramifications of all of these numbers. LOL

31
lake-koshkonong 31 points ago +32 / -1

This is just incredible. Incredible work.

26
richmomz 26 points ago +26 / -0

It also makes up most if not all of the popular vote difference. I haven’t totaled the amounts but we’re looking at a net impact of at least 4 million votes.

11
p8riot 11 points ago +12 / -1

How are you counting "lost votes" ? Do we know how they're attributed?

11
richmomz 11 points ago +11 / -0

I assumed most if not all were β€œlost” from Trump’s tally, but I am not certain that is the case. OP (or his source) indicated there were instances where vote flips went the other way (from Biden to Trump) but they were tiny compared to the Trump to Biden flips.

3
RinoHuntersUnite 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's my understanding they were lost as in disappeared from the board totally. So they went missing from both counts - vanishing into the ether.

As votes are wont to do. Obviously.

534
keepituryens 534 points ago +542 / -8

Supreme Level Autist.

199
PantsJihad 199 points ago +200 / -1

Someone get this pede some more vaccinations! We shall make him an Ultra-Autist!

47
purple_nitrile 47 points ago +47 / -0

KEK!

7
philandy 7 points ago +7 / -0

Vaccineman!

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
16
MichellesHairyArms 16 points ago +16 / -0

It’s like he’s the Autist that has been foretold for eons.

2
Anon_Army 2 points ago +3 / -1

Attention! I made a master Excel file that is directly linked to the NYT data for every single state, each in a different tab, using Powerquery. For ease of use.

Plugging my post here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8lZwabh/important-please-upvote-i-took-t/

Please upvote and share. I think it is important will be useful. Also I made graphs of the PA and VA vote count on election night, with the ridiculous vote subtractions, I think they are powerful images. The true "Blue Wave!".

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
6
DemsFuckKids 6 points ago +6 / -0

?

508
__SILENT__MAJORITY__ 508 points ago +512 / -4

Upvoting bc y'all are madmen

98
Shakakka99 98 points ago +99 / -1

Upvoting bc I love Mad Men.

63
RetardFarts 63 points ago +63 / -0

Upvoting because I love men

58
Dialectic 58 points ago +58 / -0

We have the best gays

32
tendies 32 points ago +32 / -0

Macho Macho Men

47
Get-Em-Out 47 points ago +48 / -1

Went through and made sure every state was archived - here's the list:

Alabama - https://archive.is/NHIZG

Alaska - https://archive.is/JcYm7

Arizona - https://archive.is/I36BP

Arkansas - https://archive.is/42A9Y

California - https://archive.is/41zco

Colorado - https://archive.is/gW49A

Connecticut - https://archive.is/wip/kEKRh

Delaware - https://archive.is/tCDCy

Florida - https://archive.is/yLfsZ

Georgia - https://archive.is/n1UhH

Hawaii - https://archive.is/wip/Dibf8

Idaho - https://archive.is/GmBCc

Illinois - https://archive.is/AJSTF

Indiana - https://archive.is/wip/0vG6E

Iowa - https://archive.is/wip/CEXEk

Kansas - https://archive.is/wip/v6gvO

Kentucky - https://archive.is/wip/ZUeXW

Louisiana - https://archive.is/wip/zYbue

Maine - https://archive.is/wip/2RYJi

Maryland - https://archive.is/wip/0tVDy

Massachusetts - https://archive.is/wip/4lQBY

Michigan - https://archive.is/mZfg0

Minnesota - https://archive.is/o650P

Mississippi - https://archive.is/wip/copDa

Missouri - https://archive.is/PXkHB

Montana - https://archive.is/Nd3yT

Nebraska - https://archive.is/0NlNC

Nevada - https://archive.is/NFeG3

New Hampshire - https://archive.is/wip/A9kiy

New Jersey - https://archive.is/x26Jz

New Mexico - https://archive.is/wip/Msl9s

New York - https://archive.is/wip/RFFcV

North Carolina - https://archive.is/DZhlZ

North Dakota - https://archive.is/wip/L9C46

Ohio - https://archive.is/wip/dShvQ

Oklahoma - https://archive.is/wip/5eglW

Oregon - https://archive.is/wip/oiTCM

Pennsylvania - https://archive.is/6cj23

Rhode Island - https://archive.is/wip/rqSER

South Carolina - https://archive.is/wip/PIOZa

South Dakota - https://archive.is/T6dhh

Tennessee - https://archive.is/wip/jd4mW

Texas - https://archive.is/wip/M12O4

Utah - https://archive.is/8jrXl

Vermont - https://archive.is/SZ1ko

Virginia - https://archive.is/wip/zUEx2

Washington - https://archive.is/ZreS2

West Virginia - https://archive.is/Xi9aN

Wisconsin - https://archive.is/aVeQc

Wyoming - https://archive.is/wip/vrhqU

7
Build_the_wall 7 points ago +7 / -0

Very nice!

5
AnonVictorian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thank you for your service fellow Pede, I have also archived this list of archives https://archive.is/ZNTU5

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Virtigo31 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are awesome!

1
quasarn01 1 point ago +1 / -0

Links aren't working anymore...

3
Free-Ninety-Nine 3 points ago +3 / -0

Our keyboard warriors are better than anything on Madison Ave!

21
Donald_Farage 21 points ago +21 / -0

This is even better than winning on election night. We let them taste victory, only to snatch it from them. The riots are going to be insane.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
458
Wyopepe 458 points ago +465 / -7

For transparency and safety of this, put your code somewhere safe (pastebin, github, etc).

Download and save everything.

Protect your info/id anyway you can.

201
Phil_DeGraves 201 points ago +202 / -1

Save to thumb drive, another thumb drive, maybe an external SSD or hard drive too. Unplug 'em all. Impossible to hack into or delete without breaking and entering your house.

To heck with the "cloud data storage" services.

164
LUXURY_USERNAME 164 points ago +164 / -0

hammer and chisel the 1s and 0s into the foundation of your house!

66
JarretGax 66 points ago +66 / -0

So let it be saved.

So let it be chiseled

38
The_Almighty_Kek 38 points ago +38 / -0

I'm sent here by the autistic one

10
TheLastPresident 10 points ago +10 / -0

To kill the crackhead born son

8
plasmaburnz 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm avenging Seth.

1
covfefe_energy 1 point ago +1 / -0

name checks out

9
Minarchist_Manlet 9 points ago +9 / -0

In 1000 years historians will decipher the stone markings to discover that this is when America restored its republic.

6
censorthisss 6 points ago +6 / -0

πŸ˜‚

3
skiduzzlebutt 3 points ago +4 / -1

I had the 1’s and 0’s spliced into my DNA,

I AM THE DATA!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hammer and Chisel to avoid Hammer and Scorecard.

1
philandy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or into the Georgia Guidestones.

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
8
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 8 points ago +8 / -0

Do people still have cd drives?

6
friedchicken 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes

5
VinnyMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

My computer is about 6 years old. It has two DVD-r drives. I only use it for porn it'll last another decade! Lmao

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
13
shall_notbeinfringed 13 points ago +13 / -0

cloud = 'someone else's computer' - do it offline, not cloud

6
Trumper926 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just don't let these thumb drives show up in a police car at 4am.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
49
artifex_mundi_x 49 points ago +49 / -0

github = microsoft now so be safe.

37
Wyopepe 37 points ago +37 / -0

The main idea is to put in multiple places so they can’t wipe them all.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
27
BehindTheLines 27 points ago +28 / -1 (edited)

github is radical left code of conduct trash. gitlab was created as an alternative when the mass bans started happening on there for wrongthink.

Unfortunately, gitlab has also gotten infested. magahost should have a git hosting service if it doesn't already.

9
Dereliction 9 points ago +9 / -0

^^^^^

2
Minarchist_Manlet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Already started.

2
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gitlab is just as liberal and ridiculous. Read what they stand for, it's straight SJW propaganda.

2
BehindTheLines 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just checked and you're definitely right. It wasn't like that before. Christ, nothing is safe.

33
BecMonTchew 33 points ago +34 / -1

Mail the only copy to Tucker. /s

9
CNN_is_ISIS 9 points ago +9 / -0

Upvoting for making me kek out loud, also for pre-Nov 3 reference ... seems like years ago.

26
You_Aint_Black 26 points ago +26 / -0

NO GITHUB

13
Wyopepe 13 points ago +13 / -0

Fair enough, just get it in multiple places.

4
Amaroq64 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why not github?

11
You_Aint_Black 11 points ago +11 / -0

They're woke.

10
MakeAmericaLegendary 10 points ago +10 / -0

Archive it all!

413
TrumpTrain2020 413 points ago +420 / -7

STICKY STICKY STICKY

81
p8riot 81 points ago +81 / -0

Paging u/mivvanu/Doggos

30
Graey 30 points ago +30 / -0

And leave it sticky until the big guys crunching numbers get it exposed on the media.

29
DecentComments 29 points ago +29 / -0

WEAPONIZED AUTISM

9
TrumpTrain2020 9 points ago +9 / -0

It really is amazing to see sometimes.

4
KAG_FTW 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's beautiful

10
oEMPYREo 10 points ago +10 / -0

Sticky icky icky β€” ooooh ooooh

6
Cole_Dedhand 6 points ago +6 / -0

Beat me to it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
409
Hairy_Mouse 409 points ago +413 / -4 (edited)

This MAY just be the most important post we have seen since the election. This MUST be stickied, and this MUST be delivered to the Trump team!

There's no reason meme/spice posts should be stickied over something like this.

90
HumasTaint 90 points ago +92 / -2

Trump was watching this in real time at the Eisenhower Building.

54
BurtReynolds 54 points ago +54 / -0

Explain?

75
HumasTaint 75 points ago +76 / -1

Supposedly there is a SCIF there. He watched the flip. That's where he was during election night. All this other stuff is great, but he had them dead to rights as soon as the numbers started coming in. A SCIF is a surveillance network or something, it's just a theory though.

62
Roo_Rocket 62 points ago +62 / -0

A Senstive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) is just a room where Secret/Top Secret computers and the like are stored and used.

27
HumasTaint 27 points ago +27 / -0

Yep.

19
mntrump2020_SMS 19 points ago +19 / -0

there are multiple SCIFS at the white house. all of the top secret briefings are done in SCIFS.

source: i had a security clearance when i was active duty.

8
HumasTaint 8 points ago +8 / -0

His war room was at Eisenhower Building.

2
HumasTaint 2 points ago +3 / -1

I don't think he can use the WH for election stuff.

12
Dereliction 12 points ago +12 / -0

(source) A Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF; pronounced "skiff"), in British and United States military, national security/national defense and intelligence parlance, is an enclosed area within a building that is used to process Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) types of classified information.

4
HumasTaint 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep.

4
SellTheSun 4 points ago +4 / -0

The counter to this argument is that there are SCIF's all over the white house and it's not really significant there is one in the room Trump watched the election results in.

-2
HumasTaint -2 points ago +1 / -3

So he was completely clueless and wasn't watching himself. Figured a tipline would save the election? War rooms are to monitor the election, that's where he had his at and believe it, this election was monitored.

3
SellTheSun 3 points ago +3 / -0

I never said any of that...

0
HumasTaint 0 points ago +2 / -2

If he was caught using the WH for that he may have broken some laws I think.

1
Hairy_Mouse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Naawwww... he's only been talking about this and the fraud magnet ballots for the last 6 months.

Plus, he's ONLY the President after all...

19
45semiautosp 19 points ago +19 / -0

he was in the SCIF watching the results come in. the theory is he was watching the changes happen with the data guys telling him what changed and when.

17
realPierreDelecto 17 points ago +17 / -0

Not confirmed

11
HumasTaint 11 points ago +12 / -1

He used the building as his war room and dipped over there. He only needed to see a minute or two. You can confirm it was his war room and he went there for a bit by just doing a simple google search.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
0
HumasTaint 0 points ago +1 / -1

His war room was set up at the Eisenhower. The voting machines were communicating online to each other to be able to implement the fixes wherever it was needed. The tools at his disposal are beyond our knowledge. DHS and MI were watching and could turn a closet into a center if they had to.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
3
krissstofer 3 points ago +3 / -0

As horrific as it is, they actually are.

1
Greengrassgrow1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are. CISA continues to deny it. This guy explains it all. Team made up of former 3 letter officials β€œdiscouraged” by what they saw going on in the former administration.

System has no protections either. They were able to get into it within 3 minutes from one of the investigators cell phones in the parking lot.

https://youtu.be/ficae6x1Q5A

32
TheNewRepublic 32 points ago +34 / -2

This is the most definitive proof I’ve seen so far, the dead ppl will amount to only so much, Trump hinted at this with the retweet.

29
MAGA1775 29 points ago +31 / -2

How can we ensure Trump's legal team gets this? Submitting it via a site or hotline, I don't trust they'll see it. Hope someone on here has direct connections to Trump's sons or team.

35
Whatyougotson 35 points ago +36 / -1

They are on this site. They will see it.

2
UpTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's now the most upvoted post ever on this site

19
Bandana_Jones 19 points ago +20 / -1

If the Mods don't keep this up I have to assume that this whole platform is to keep us in a zoo

1
philandy 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was said earlier since the Hitlary and Pedosta dumps.

304
Stumpycake 304 points ago +309 / -5 (edited)

DDOS attack as soon as this comes up. It means they're scared of this.

102
meta_meta_noia 102 points ago +102 / -0

there are no coincidences anymore

51
Sumsuch 51 points ago +51 / -0

Never were.

22
m0r1arty 22 points ago +24 / -2

Always was.

7
meta_meta_noia 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's just a coincidence that you said that right then

2
philandy 2 points ago +2 / -0

That wasn't the intent, so the coincidence doesn't exist. Never did.

13
CameraWheels 13 points ago +13 / -0

There never was. Coincidence theorists are the worst.

25
mrs.rose 25 points ago +25 / -0

I noticed that too

8
raikkonen 8 points ago +8 / -0

i think TD.win is just having trouble loading the thread cause it's grown so big tbh.

2
Khalaris 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, even with the first few comments in, this thread was not easily accessed.

17
TheRoyalRob 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yep..

13
Mrwrn2010 13 points ago +13 / -0

Exactly. Over the target!

7
EndHumanTrafficking2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes, it all makes sense now!

Stumpycake's comment needs to be higher up.

298
Prayingforus20 298 points ago +304 / -6

Fuck.. Biden is going to lose 1,5 million votes between the hacks and fraudulent mail ins.

179
TrumanBlack [S] 179 points ago +181 / -2

It's not enough he needs to lose 5 million

149
AceOfTrumps 149 points ago +150 / -1

Popular vote doesn't matter

103
rentfREEEE_since2016 103 points ago +103 / -0

He knows. He’s making a point about the extent of the fraud.

72
KARMAAACS 72 points ago +72 / -0

Correct, Trump just needs to have 214,019 votes corrected for him to carry Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Yes, that includes +1 vote in all three of those states. 1.5 million in the right states is overkill, but a landslide victory nonetheless.

37
Do_u_ev3n_lift 37 points ago +37 / -0

Less. He's only down by 160k or so in michigan. 81k flipped will do it.

6
KARMAAACS 6 points ago +6 / -0

Isn't that only half???

9
HonestAbe 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes, but it would be -80k for Biden, which then move to Trump up +80k. So the net difference is 160k.
Imagine Biden has 560k votes. And Trump has 400k votes. If Biden loses 80k, his new total is 480k. Then those 80k go Trump, and his new total is 480k. So a flip of 81k would put Trump over... idk if that makes sense

2
Joeret 2 points ago +2 / -0

It does make sense.

1
KARMAAACS 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're right. My head is so fucked right now with so much information in it.

1
Do_u_ev3n_lift 1 point ago +1 / -0

Flip one from Biden to Trump and it’s a net 2 vote change, so it only takes half

49
VirtueVeritas 49 points ago +50 / -1

It doesn’t but it fucks with the lefts narrative that the EC should be discarded in favor of the popular vote

27
Light_HIV_Effect 27 points ago +27 / -0

Fucking hilarious if that happens

14
aaafirefly123 14 points ago +15 / -1

As long as California, New York, and Illinois exist, Republicans will never win the popular vote.

Or rather as long as New York City, Chicago, Las Angeles, and San Francisco exist, Republicans will never win the popular vote.

11
Undercover 11 points ago +11 / -0

These numbers show that it’s possible NY is a swing state!!

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
3
Arden 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump is going to teach them how to win ;)

1
Food4thought 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not with that attitude

1
America1stAndOnly 1 point ago +1 / -0

We don't actually know that though. We assume that the people that live there are all diehard blue, but how much of that reported blue is actually fake votes? We need to find out.

14
uzi5v2 14 points ago +14 / -0

It doesn’t but at the same time what’s fair is fair.

13
ObongoForPrison2020 13 points ago +15 / -2

It does this year.

10
Blinker-Aerospace7 10 points ago +11 / -1

I don't know why people even bring it up. Its not the game. It does correlate, but it doesn't really matter -> like shots in a hockey game. If the winner was the team that took more shots, both teams would play the game very differently. Plenty of teams have won games or built strategies around giving up shots but not goals.

*by "people", I mean both sides. Its a useless argument

10
ObongoForPrison2020 10 points ago +10 / -0

For the record, I agree with you and u/AceOfTrumps. I would just love to get the popular vote also to shut these obnoxious fucks up.

1
America1stAndOnly 1 point ago +1 / -0

This isn't hockey, this is an election and accurate reporting of votes will play a part in determining the culture of our country. Imagine the difference over the next 4 years between a 2nd term Trump that squeaks by versus one that he won by a huge landslide.

1
Blinker-Aerospace7 1 point ago +1 / -0

squeaks by versus one that he won by a huge landslide

As determined by the EC votes

changing the rules changes how people participate, so while the pop vote may correlate, there are TONs of people on both sides who don't vote because they live in an area where it 'won't matter'

63
MyNewToy 63 points ago +63 / -0 (edited)

This is just in the servers. We don't know how many the counting machines swapped votes before the data was entered into the servers yet.

36
GorillaChannel1 36 points ago +36 / -0

We'll never know how many the deranged libshit commies outright threw away.

17
kag-2020- 17 points ago +17 / -0

And fraudulantly filled out. It's crazy how well he did in spite of the obstruction.

10
MyNewToy 10 points ago +10 / -0

It wouldn't have been so obvious if it wasn't a landslide for Trump. If it had been a close race nobody would have went back and looked. They have been doing this for years

5
lockxirup 5 points ago +5 / -0

The mass outpouring of love and support from our great nation to GEOTUS completely to them by surprise. They can’t comprehend it, because all of their politicians are so unlikeable. The level of voting Trump received was beyond their wildest nightmares.

21
artifex_mundi_x 21 points ago +21 / -0

This is just the swing state votes. Biden barely got 40M if you count all states.

6
Conor330 6 points ago +7 / -1

I need this to be proven, I win 2 grand if Joe gets <40% of the popular vote haha

2
artifex_mundi_x 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think it can be proven because they can't prove all the fraud, like the thrown out ballots etc. But should be enough to flip the result.

1
Conor330 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes I feel that is how it will go. But as long as Trump manages to strut back in for a 2nd term and destroys the DNC I'm happy.

1
America1stAndOnly 1 point ago +1 / -0

This 1,000 times over. It's the point I've been trying to get across to everyone saying that the popular vote doesn't matter. How do you think we'd be able to move forward as a society with a Trump victory that showed something like 105 million to 40 million as opposed to a 75 million to 70 million Trump victory?

Yes, Trump wins the presidency either way, but the 1st is important in sending a message to all our enemies, and making many people on our side realize that there's a lot more of us than any expected.

4
trump_45 4 points ago +4 / -0

They's no way they're taking dead away from him.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
248
deleted 248 points ago +263 / -15
103
discnct 103 points ago +107 / -4

When reading the code, I thought the same thing. Here's my improved code that checks for irregularities both ways: https://pastebin.com/SwXNmNbC It still shows massive irregularities that favor Biden in states like Pennsylvania, but lesser extremes in other states, and even a few where it favors trump.

67
TrumpTrainWooWoo 67 points ago +69 / -2

At the very least something here is definitely suspect and warrants an investigation and manual recount.

The big question is how and where is Edison Research getting these numbers? Is Edison Research performing any additional calculations (like determining the percentages) or just reporting raw data?

Because there's so much data and the count is updated mostly every minute, sometimes even within seconds, there's no way this isn't automated. And since it's automated, somebody's system done fucked up and the answer is in the code. Furthermore, since the errors are persistent, that would suggest the data source itself is most likely suspect.

Going further down the rabbit hole... if the source is straight from the voter machines then they need to subpoena the shit out of these companies! I want to see the revision and check in logs, I want to see company emails and communications, everything. Either these companies run some shitty operation and didn't test the code well enough and don't deserve our tax dollars... Or what's even more likely is there's some goblins hiding in the code.

Could you imagine if they released the code base for us to review? I'd use up some sick days and personally volunteer. This has always driven me crazy that the voting machines that WE THE TAXPAYERS are paying for are not available for audit. There is no fucking reason good enough for why the code integral to our functioning Republic is not open source. Especially for those States that are fully electronic (touchscreens) and don't have a paper trail. Allowing these voting machines to be a giant black box and you're just asking for vote fraud as it would be so easy to slip some shitty ::barf:: "glitch" in there to completely steal an election. Sadly it wouldn't be that hard for them to also cover their tracks and overwrite the code and hide enough of the evidence to maintain reasonable doubt either.

TL;DR: AUDIT THE FUCKING VOTER MACHINES AND RELEASE IT TO THE PUBLIC! I WANNA SEE THE CODE!

32
Techrev 32 points ago +32 / -0

I'm going to say that I was skeptical, but looking through that data - it feels like a slot machine, or something. With the odds set to favor one side, I dunno. I'm going to say that I haven't dissected and studied this like others in here, but wtf? It's not right at all.

7
Averon 7 points ago +7 / -0

Work computers, something like massive voter fraud is bound to happen eventually. Does anyone honestly think there aren't people or there that would hate Trump enough to put malicious vote switching code in?

Those companies definitely need to have their source control repositories subpoenaed so that if vote stitching code exists our did exist at some point, that we could see when and who checked it in.

Want there an update just before the elections? I suppose someone found make a build of the software outside of source control and put that in an update package to be sent to the machines just before elections and then just delete the code, but I have a feeling it's a more permanent feature built into the software.

The machines weren't supposed to have internet connectivity anyway, There's a reason for that, but from what I've read, those laws/rules probably went followed.

3
SteadyRockin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course, do you think Antifa and BLM are sitting idle? They are cheating as much as possible.

12
ProfessorOak 12 points ago +12 / -0

If you haven't seen this, check it out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&feature=youtu.be&t=145

Apparently, you're grandmother's old desktop that runs windows xp is more secure than our election system.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
NavyGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Still got mine. Love it.

6
Trumpman1 6 points ago +11 / -5

I hear you. But open source would mean EVERYBODY in the WORLD could access the code. Not sure that would pass security checks. I hear one of these companies is partly owned by the Clintons or some shit like that. All these machines should be able to be audited, as you say, but by some brilliant people on BOTH sides of the aisle, each sworn to secrecy, etc. Personally, I say count the paper ballots by hand, one by one. You put this shit in the cloud, this is what you get.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
4
Trumpman1 4 points ago +4 / -0

I do see your point. Kinda like Linux, right? It's out there, but it's pretty secure. This site is probably running on it.

2
philandy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cough cough IE6 lock in cough cough. I still can't believe MS had a team that couldn't even write an HTML 4 parser.

1
limestealingjerk 1 point ago +2 / -1

More transparent yes. However I do not regard open source systems as necessarily more secure. E.g. Shellshock bug, very nasty one, was around since the 80s and discovered in 2014. Windows systems had their fair share of ugly bugs and so did Linux.

In this case, for the sake of transparency, yes; code must be released. Otherwise do like my .5 million population country and count everything by hand with observers half a meter behind you separated by clear perspex.

12
TrumpTrainWooWoo 12 points ago +13 / -1

I wouldn't be opposed to no electronic voting machines, but there's going to be security vulnerabilities no matter how you count votes.

At the very least get rid of these touch screens. There needs to be a paper trail for manual recounts and audits.

15
stoic_troll 15 points ago +15 / -0

Can you post the results?

12
PatriotTech 12 points ago +12 / -0 (edited)

It is due to their use of only 3 digit precision for the vote share. Needs to be 7 digit.

Using only 3 digit leads to very odd things occuring in the data feed. Very suspect as any programmer or data analyst would know you can't be accurate in your calc if your multiplying a large number by only 3 decimal places.

I suspect this is done to hide the tabulation vote shaving but too much was going on and caused wild swings.

In truth we don't know what really was going on unless we can get access to the raw data feeds.

However this along with everything else leads to only one conclusion.... The vote tabulation and counting was being messed with on multiple fronts.

11
JohnScott 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's possible that at least some of these are naturally occurring (either a corrected typo or just a weird quirk of how Edison compiles the data). But it's also possible that some of these are a result of malicious interference. Really no way to prove it one way or the other without getting hands on the source code. And whoever did it likely updated the source code remotely and didn't save it in official repositories.

6
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think you need to identify which code, because it looks like interacting systems.

3
JohnScott 3 points ago +3 / -0

And then there's that, too.

2
pink_virtuoso 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice code. Well done

46
Tseliteiv 46 points ago +51 / -5

Good info. This data always looked meh to me. If your data is accurate pushing this data forward will just make us look stupid and give a better case to Biden.

7
MemeWarVeteran69 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think also this would mean even without mass cheating in mail in ballots that Trump should be 600-700k votes ahead. So if these numbers are taken at face value it would mean Trump won PA by ~1 mil when including fraud and this glitch. No way Trump was ever going to win by that margin. Realistically this could maybe account for 50k ish votes if its true

3
Food4thought 3 points ago +3 / -0

Joe biden went on stage and claimed he was going to end rhe oil industry... that could sway a lot of votes

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
Tseliteiv 4 points ago +4 / -0

There has been some editing to the original post since my comment and the person above's comment.

Is the data posted accurate? Yes. The problem is that we don't really know what the data means.

What is lost/switched exactly?

In any event, the issue with looking at the absolute values of lost/switched is that it shows big numbers but what does that mean for the end result? The user above me compared switches to Biden and switches to Trump then losses for Biden and losses for Trump. You'll see that in Ohio where Trump won, there were more votes shifted to Trump despite losses than for Biden. Trump won Ohio. Does that mean Trump cheated? If we assume Trump didn't cheat then the fact Biden has more votes shifted to him despite losses in PA for example proves absolutely nothing. To suggest this proves Biden cheated means Trump must have also cheated by the same principal.

What need a breakdown of total shifts to Biden and from Biden as well as total losses from Biden and Trump for each state to then do a comparison to truly see if this is any anomalies. Looking at absolute values of the two combined could be meaningless if the end result is relatively equal gains for Trump as Biden.

So what exactly are we looking at then? As of right now what we're looking at means absolutely nothing but it is something that warrants more investigation. it just isn't anything to get as excited about as everyone has been because it doesn't actually prove anything yet.

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're missing something very obvious.

If the vote counts go up and down for both candidates, it simply means that the numbers are bullshit.

So whoever won the election, cheated.

It's that simple.

Unless they can explain exactly why each candidate was gaining and then losing votes, we must assume that all counts are fraudulent. The fact the Biden lost more vote means nothing. They might have simply decided to give Ohio to Trump to make it look more like it's normal to go up and down. But it isn't.

cc u/TrumanBlack

2
Tseliteiv 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's if the "stolen" and "lost" votes are actually "stolen" and "lost" votes. There might be a missing connection here. They might not actually be "stolen" or "lost" votes and something else entirely.

But this is also why this information is dangerous the way it has been presented. If we say double-down on this information and go look Biden cheated! And everyone is convinced this data proves cheating. What if once a state by state breakdown is uncovered, the end result shows that Trump benefited more than Biden from this "cheat"?

Now you've given ammunition to the other side to say no look Trump cheated that means Biden won despite Trump cheating!

Until we truly understand just what exactly this "stolen" and "lost" means as well as how exactly it applies to the election, it is dangerous to presume too much.

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

It simply means that the machine counts need to be discarded.

1
LauraTrumpette 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd be very interested to see the shift patterns for all states, AND broken down by counties. It seems that cheating would happen more in a few counties in any state, not in all counties -- Not everyone is willing to risk going to prison for their candidate. unless it really is programmed into the software and people didn't know.

Anyhow -- what I wanted to say about the differences in PA vs. OH is that you have a much larger quantity of shifts in PA (more votes) so I would expect the number of shifts to be closer to even between the two candidates.

In Ohio there were only 10 shifts. They favored Trump 7 to 3, which could be fishy, but I find 7 to 3 more believable than I would 700 to 300.

I would love to hear an explanation of the data, shifts, and losses from an expert on the voting software.

29
deleted 29 points ago +30 / -1
29
JohnScott 29 points ago +29 / -0

Yeah, it's weird. This guy is just saying that it's weird both ways. More investigation is needed. This isn't quite a smoking gun yet. I think there might be something here if we pair this analysis with Dr. Shiva's findings.

8
DonJr2024 8 points ago +8 / -0

Dr Shiva's findings are way more likely though. If you were going to rig the thing, would you make it randomly alter a chunk of numbers all of a sudden? That is super obvious. Or would you make it just literally flip single votes right when they are made, not always, but here and there to just shift the results in your favor.

3
JohnScott 3 points ago +3 / -0

Completely agree. It would totally make sense to siphon off votes in heavy Republican areas so that those areas don't flip blue, but in the aggregate flip the state blue.

18
deleted 18 points ago +22 / -4
11
2020REBOUND 11 points ago +12 / -1

Where the fuck is it switched supposedly anyway?

What has the NYT to do with it? Shouldnt the vote be switched at the voting computer?

OP needs much more clarifications or be labbeled as "research thread"

10
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 10 points ago +10 / -0

That's actually the million dollar question. This data is from a compiling system. I think we'll find votes going both ways at multiple levels but, of course, netting for Joe Biden. It gives plausible deniability for them that way.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0 (edited)
1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

My data shows that the data is very chaotic, votes are gained and lost in all directions.

And this proves that there is fraud.

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/x/c/1BjFX20AiY

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

What?

Explain again a plausible scenario for the vote count going down please.

What's this thing about cache? It didn't display an old count that hasn't been refreshed, it just gave one candidate less votes.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
7
deleted 7 points ago +14 / -7
4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
1
NostalgicFuturist 1 point ago +1 / -0

OP's stats are gaining legs here and on Twitter. Here on TDW, this 4-hour-old post:

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8ShL7R4/will-twitter-shutdown-this-compa/c/

Links to this:

https://twitter.com/SysEnfor/status/1326396385651023873/photo/2

The Tweet reproduces TrumanBlack's "switch/lost vote" table exactly, it's a screenshot apparently.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
NostalgicFuturist 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think he just took a screenshot of OP's table. Not original research.

1
LauraTrumpette 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is what caught my attention -- even if someone was cheating and padding things for Biden, there would still be natural glitches where things switched both ways. I asked a few times in here and one or two people told me votes ONLY switched to Trump. But they didn't have a link to any of the data analysis people explicitly saying that.

I still think somethings very fishy in PA and MI at the very least. If someone who knew the truth held a gun to my head and told me I had to guess accurately if there was massive Dem cheating, I would guess YES.

0
day221 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because the data shows this happens just as frequently!

Not just as frequently. Also it's still possible that updates which give both candidates votes are tainted too to bias one of the other, just not detectable in this way.

13
makethemwatch 13 points ago +13 / -0

We only have the vote % to 3 decimals which isnt precise enough to get the raw votes. If Trump gets 54.3% of 5,433,211 votes, we know he got somewhere around 2.95 million votes but we dont know how many tens of thousands of votes he got without a more accurate percentage.

2
Techrev 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yeah, some of it is probably rounding, but some of the differences go beyond that.

2
makethemwatch 2 points ago +2 / -0

if you have the lot ids to point to in the data I would be happy to look, but this significant figures issue can easily cause discrepancies in the tens of thousands

1
Techrev 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

Well, I'm not sure what the lot numbers are, but down further in the thread, someone else also noticed it. Unless it's been explained somewhere else, this looks like a 36,000 vote shift over a minute (Could be a lot of votes subtracted from Trump, while a similar number came in from Biden) -

{"trumpd":0.566,"bidenj":0.42},"votes":2984468,"eevp":42,"eevp_source":"edison","timestamp":"2020-11-04T04:07:43Z"},{"vote_shares":

{"trumpd":0.56,"bidenj":0.426},"votes":2984522,"eevp":42,"eevp_source":"edison","timestamp":"2020-11-04T04:08:51Z"},{"vote_shares":

Also, is there a way to get to the real raw data, then? Because, yeah, other than the ~400,000 votes around 2:05 am, and this .006 thing, there's not a lot of accuracy in these dumps with only 3 decimal points. I would want to dig further into it, and do more complicated comparisons.

12
oh_hi_solidarity 12 points ago +13 / -1

Caching. 2 different caching servers, each had pulled results from a central DB at slightly different times. The first request hit server #1, the second request hit server #2

This is the most plausible "legit" explanation I think

What the analysis should do is compare results from 1 request, to results 10 minutes later. No cache should refresh that slowly. If there is a pattern of vote loss across that time frame, that would be meaningful.

7
Lovepede 7 points ago +7 / -0

Then why is it so widely different by state?

1
oh_hi_solidarity 1 point ago +2 / -1

To play devils advocate, if states all have different data systems. Some would tend to expose more strongly consistent data than others.

2
Puppetbones 2 points ago +2 / -0

This was exactly my first thought when seeing this post. However, that doesn't explain the switching behavior.

If you're pulling from multiple servers and one is lagging behind the other(s), you would expect the votes count to subtract from all candidates, then be added back to all candidates once it pulls from the up-to-date server.

But what we saw on live TV, and in this data, is 19,958 votes getting swapped from Trump to Biden in PA.

Additionally, the Michigan software "glitch" is captured in this data, adding to its credibility.

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
3
oh_hi_solidarity 3 points ago +4 / -1

If your Json dump is generated from many single api requests, and your api requests are hitting different caching servers on the provider side, then it could be like that.

This is hypothetical and I'm playing devils advocate, but I want to cover our bases

1
deleted 1 point ago +5 / -4
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
24
Win4Don 24 points ago +26 / -2

I certainly think more analysis is needed, from official sources. I'm certainly no stat expert but if fraud has been baked into the software, I would think it will be a little more difficult to discover. No offense to anyone, because I think OP is on the right track. The large leads, the no down ticket votes, unbelievable turnout, etc. It's multiple forms of fraud, the software is just a component. They're not gonna put all their eggs in one baaket. The software is probably the fail safe when the other means seemed to be falling short.

10
deleted 10 points ago +19 / -9
9
Pepbrandt 9 points ago +10 / -1

I think what's going on is... People are tying the OPs find into what they saw on their TV screens, where in fact it did appear votes switched from Trump to Biden. Thats where "switch" is coming from?

4
PatriotTech 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, as this edison data feeds is what was populating the news networks graphic feeds.

Also the rounding errors never fully recover after multiple updates. Its not the source of the fraud, but i beleive designed to try and obfuscate the fraud on two fronts.

Keep the data feed quality down, so one could ideally not see the votes move around and any issues chalked up to rounding error of stream.

Second, allow easily manipulation of the data on all news feeds to fit desired narrative.

Problem i beleive, like in 2016, polls and turnout were way off, and thus the algorithms began to faulter.

Weighted voting, shaving has to be calibrated to hide it, otherwise signs of manipulation show themselves.

https://youtu.be/Ztu5Y5obWPk

1
NahNovaBrah 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd like to see what the data looks like before Edison does what they do and sell it to the media corporations.

18
TennesseePride 18 points ago +20 / -2

I haven't looked at this data myself, but something tells me that this is too easy of a find for it to mean anything.

245
Thy_Weapon_of_War 245 points ago +248 / -3

Thanks OP for the taking the time to do this. With all of us working together and most of all with God's help, we will help defeat this attempted steal.

130
TrumanBlack [S] 130 points ago +131 / -1

https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/ he Is the Chad but we need to get this trending so trump lawyers see it

39
Greenetarpaulin 39 points ago +39 / -0

Don’t be so humble. You’ve been working on this for a few days. Thanks to both of you and anyone else who helped in this.

29
Trump_Underground 29 points ago +29 / -0

Are you kidding me, Steve Bannon gave a shout out to the Donald today. They're at least watching the stickies. I guarantee he's still got contacts on the inside. He's too calm and collected for what's going on, he probably knows more than he's letting on/saw the Intel on the vote changing system.

9
TollboothWilly 9 points ago +9 / -0

He’s really more of a Charles today.

18
Bandana_Jones 18 points ago +18 / -0

If we can prove this, Biden has NO legitimacy

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
199
deleted 199 points ago +204 / -5
45
Kt_PEDE 45 points ago +45 / -0

I'm doing the same. But damn good work OP!

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
10
chodebabies 10 points ago +10 / -0

I really just want to bump the comment count, and want Trump to in. It's not much, but it's honest work

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
Lips2000 3 points ago +3 / -0

Count me in too!

2
dakin116 2 points ago +2 / -0

metoo

2
TwoPlusTwoEqualsFour 2 points ago +2 / -0

Choo Choo

2
oraoraoraora 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm doing my part!

1
JustAnotherLeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want to know more

9
Hilldawg4Prison 9 points ago +9 / -0

Haha, seriously, This is some great work.

7
ILuvPoms 7 points ago +7 / -0

ILuvPoms wuz here.

1
KAG_FTW 1 point ago +1 / -0

You were there the day the deep state died

6
masticatetherapist 6 points ago +7 / -1

hope this is all real, those on the outside think Trump and everyone here are just going through stages of denial. Even rinos on /r/conservative are saying this

3
kd5ywa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Rino faggots get the rope, too.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
OhNoThatSucks 4 points ago +5 / -1

This is turning out to be a good day.

190
deleted 190 points ago +194 / -4
57
Get-Em-Out 57 points ago +59 / -2

Went through and made sure every state was archived - here's the list:

Alabama - https://archive.is/NHIZG

Alaska - https://archive.is/JcYm7

Arizona - https://archive.is/I36BP

Arkansas - https://archive.is/42A9Y

California - https://archive.is/41zco

Colorado - https://archive.is/gW49A

Connecticut - https://archive.is/wip/kEKRh

Delaware - https://archive.is/tCDCy

Florida - https://archive.is/yLfsZ

Georgia - https://archive.is/n1UhH

Hawaii - https://archive.is/wip/Dibf8

Idaho - https://archive.is/GmBCc

Illinois - https://archive.is/AJSTF

Indiana - https://archive.is/wip/0vG6E

Iowa - https://archive.is/wip/CEXEk

Kansas - https://archive.is/wip/v6gvO

Kentucky - https://archive.is/wip/ZUeXW

Louisiana - https://archive.is/wip/zYbue

Maine - https://archive.is/wip/2RYJi

Maryland - https://archive.is/wip/0tVDy

Massachusetts - https://archive.is/wip/4lQBY

Michigan - https://archive.is/mZfg0

Minnesota - https://archive.is/o650P

Mississippi - https://archive.is/wip/copDa

Missouri - https://archive.is/PXkHB

Montana - https://archive.is/Nd3yT

Nebraska - https://archive.is/0NlNC

Nevada - https://archive.is/NFeG3

New Hampshire - https://archive.is/wip/A9kiy

New Jersey - https://archive.is/x26Jz

New Mexico - https://archive.is/wip/Msl9s

New York - https://archive.is/wip/RFFcV

North Carolina - https://archive.is/DZhlZ

North Dakota - https://archive.is/wip/L9C46

Ohio - https://archive.is/wip/dShvQ

Oklahoma - https://archive.is/wip/5eglW

Oregon - https://archive.is/wip/oiTCM

Pennsylvania - https://archive.is/6cj23

Rhode Island - https://archive.is/wip/rqSER

South Carolina - https://archive.is/wip/PIOZa

South Dakota - https://archive.is/T6dhh

Tennessee - https://archive.is/wip/jd4mW

Texas - https://archive.is/wip/M12O4

Utah - https://archive.is/8jrXl

Vermont - https://archive.is/SZ1ko

Virginia - https://archive.is/wip/zUEx2

Washington - https://archive.is/ZreS2

West Virginia - https://archive.is/Xi9aN

Wisconsin - https://archive.is/aVeQc

Wyoming - https://archive.is/wip/vrhqU

5
um_ya 5 points ago +5 / -0

Saved. Thanks.

4
PAPollok4truth 4 points ago +4 / -0

Okay, interesting-just went back to 04 popular vote stats, follow me here: 04-Kerry-59,027,115. Bush-62,039,572 08-Obama-69,498,516. McCain-59,948,323 12-Obama-62,611,250. Romney-59,134,475 16-Hillary-65,853,516. Trump-62,984,825 20-Biden-76,162,205. Trump-71,529,563. Okay, wow, really? Anything off on the popular vote counts?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
ChaplainTappman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you

1
sward1550 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can this program be ran on Governor races? I find it interesting that NC seems to have no major fraud on the Presidential election but Somehow over 50,000 Republicans switched over to vote for the Democratic Governor. Roy Cooper has destroyed our economy. Our number one industry is farming and I don't think many of our family farms and the restaurants we sell to can survive another lock down. He only won 4 years ago because of a so called bathroom scandal> I am certain he stole this election. Can someone help find out?

181
Jtbruen 181 points ago +187 / -6

What does the word dominion mean? Where is it’s most popular historical usage found? Why do these crazy people support killing babies? They are EVIL. We will not allow the US to be overthrown by a Chinese agent! 0% chance! Audit every state, military controlled hand recount! Dominion should change its name to domino

54
Isolated_Patriot 54 points ago +54 / -0

It has an evil connotation now, but it didn't necessarily used to. Canada used to be known as The Dominion of Canada, it was named such from Psalms 72:8 "He shall have dominion also from sea to sea, and from the river unto the ends of the earth.”

But it absolutely means "Control" and specifically "Absolute Control" not "Counting some numbers" or "Fair elections."

28
Jtbruen 28 points ago +29 / -1

You are correct, EVIL uses symbolism. The most popular historic use of "Dominion" is in the bible. Evil wants light to dark, good to bad.. Everything they do is on purpose.

13
Liberty_or_Death 13 points ago +14 / -1

They just want to repeat Babel in different ways.

Look at how they want to become false gods. Their desires to subvert what is good and holy is an affront to Him. This is no different. A symbol that they are in full control by the use of a word that has no place in a fucking vote managing or election rrlated company.

It's so brazen it's laughable.

7
The_Big_Guy 7 points ago +7 / -0

Just like they say, "Symbolism will be their downfall."

6
shadowoverme 6 points ago +6 / -0

Q said it would be biblical.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
5
StaffordH 5 points ago +5 / -0

Old Dominion

2
Hall 2 points ago +2 / -0

Moving vans...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
11
unexpected_gecko 11 points ago +12 / -1

If you really want to freak out, note that Dominion Voting System is aka DVS aka devious.

8
PleistoceneBeasts 8 points ago +9 / -1

https://starcraftfanfiction.fandom.com/wiki/Dominion

Internally, the Dominion rules through oppression, fear and surveillance and makes extensive use of propaganda in order to control its citizens.

πŸ€”

6
f_bastiat 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trump is our Jim Raynor

3
America1stAndOnly 3 points ago +3 / -0

To be clear, SC1 Raynor, not SC2 Simp Raynor.

3
f_bastiat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do you remember when Jim Raynor first met Kerrigan and she calls him a pig because she read his mind? I always wondered what Jim was thinking that got him in so much trouble, and now I know it was grabbing Karrigan by the pussy.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
friedchicken 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have got to be kidding me........

7
ChiKAGo 7 points ago +7 / -0
  1. Power or the use of power; sovereignty over something; stewardship, supremacy.

2.Predominance; ascendancy

3.Sometimes figurative A kingdom, nation, or other spheres of influence; governed territory.

Also, Dominion Voting Systems is abbreviated to DVS (Devious).

4
kag-2020- 4 points ago +4 / -0

An area of control. Which makes sense in a voting context since it dictates who controls the area it covers.

163
lestork 163 points ago +167 / -4 (edited)

just for the record: is there any votes switched from Biden-->Trump?

56
TrumanBlack [S] 56 points ago +83 / -27

All of them

107
lestork 107 points ago +107 / -0

you mean no Biden votes switched to Trump.

79
KARMAAACS 79 points ago +81 / -2

Yep, according to this, the "glitch" only went one way. Almost like it was by design.

The lost votes are for both candidates though.

9
Undercover 9 points ago +9 / -0

I think u/Pedeinspector said elsewhere that there were a small amount of votes that flipped the other way, like ~25k - but didn’t emphasize it because he wanted Trump team to see this right away.

6
oh_hi_solidarity 6 points ago +6 / -0

I want to get more info on how the JSON was generated, and how OP calculated lost votes.

I believe the lost votes could be an affect of accessing the data through a caching layer

I want to verify these findings, as this is potentially massive

6
CodeMonkey 6 points ago +7 / -1

The JSON is from NYT's API. The raw data comes from Edison Research. If caching were the issue you would see the vote totals revert to a previous number, not for votes to transfer from one candidate to another.

2
GainesvilleFlorida 2 points ago +2 / -0

This pede codes

1
oh_hi_solidarity 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats a good point and makes sense for a single read cache. I'm thinking of a system with multiple read/write caching servers, and the caching servers aggregate incoming update requests before sending a single update query to the db. You could then have a situation where one server has a pending update with mostly trump votes, while another has a pending update on mostly biden votes. They both won't know about the other's votes until they've sent their respective update queries to the db and have refreshed. If you read data from one or the other, it would look like vote switching.

All that said this is very hypothetical.. I wish we had some more info on the underlying systems at play here

2
anishr 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s almost like this is the exact information the FBI or journalists could look into given the power and access they have. Fucking sellouts.

49
__SILENT__MAJORITY__ 49 points ago +49 / -0

Every single vote switched from Trump to Biden?

9
KylesRifle 9 points ago +16 / -7

None of them according to OP! Lol.

10
Stukov 10 points ago +10 / -0

No some did, like in PA it was 20k compared to like 900k.

3
ttrain 3 points ago +4 / -1

I wonder if that is just algorithm adjusting itself

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
friendofno1 6 points ago +8 / -2

Rotten to the core, these folks

5
MakeAmericaLegendary 5 points ago +6 / -1

i think they're mistaken.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
6
TeddyIndeed 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wow. Important point.

4
sun_wolf 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah that makes a lot sense. β€œOops, we are cheating him too much, throw a few back his way until the next dump or else people will notice.”

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
6
Trumper926 6 points ago +6 / -0

I asked him in a previous post. For EG, Trump lost 220k votes to biden in pa but biden only lost 20k to trump. Or something like that.

7
deleted 7 points ago +10 / -3
9
Centipedealicious 9 points ago +9 / -0

What are you trying to say?

3
KuzoKevin 3 points ago +3 / -0

My bad. Deleted. Thanks

0
KylesRifle 0 points ago +2 / -2

That the votes were doubled back from trump to Biden then back the other way three times over.

1
MakeAmericaLegendary 1 point ago +1 / -0

I really don't think that this is the case.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
14
deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
7
TrumpTrain2020 7 points ago +14 / -7

just for the record: is there any votes switched from Biden-->Trump?

I think you meant the opposite of that.

57
keepituryens 57 points ago +57 / -0

No he means from Biden to Trump. Valid question.

39
ADAM_SCHITT 39 points ago +39 / -0

Yeah if these are legit "mistakes" or "glitches" then it should go both ways.

9
5minutes2midnight 9 points ago +10 / -1

Bill Binny of the NSA says glitches are really programs into the software, bugs are what happens every single time. Www.x22report.com episode 2323

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
1
Winrar_ChiknDinr 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can have glitches that use alphabetical order or dates, and things like that. It looks systematic, but it's just luck of the underlying order of the list.

26
TrumpTrain2020 26 points ago +27 / -1

It's literally the post though. From the OP:

Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.

A valid question would be asking the opposite to compare/contrast.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
8
TrumpTrain2020 8 points ago +8 / -0

The Pede I initially responded to was right with what they asked. My brain decided to be smooth momentarily and omitted the word "from" for some reason.

5
Trumper926 5 points ago +5 / -0

There were other swithces but much smaller, from what he said in a previous post. Its the first thing i asked in his immediate post.

1
patr10t 1 point ago +1 / -0

It appears some were, actually, from what I found, most were in Texas. For example

Biden: 0.509

Trump: 0.478

Votes: 7175487

Timestamp: 2020-11-04T01:42:46Z

Followed By

Biden: 0.508

Trump: 0.478

Timestamp: 2020-11-04T01:42:55Z

6
Centipedealicious 6 points ago +10 / -4

Yeah, but people are answering that all of them went from Biden to Trump. if that is the case, why are we contesting this....

14
MakeAmericaLegendary 14 points ago +14 / -0

People are confused for some reason. All of these went from Trump to Biden.

16
DonJr2024 16 points ago +16 / -0

No. We need to see if it ONLY went one way. or MASSIVELY one way.

If you look for the same going from Biden to Trump and find it, then this finding just means the systems are sketchy. But doesn't mean they are 100% intentionally giving Biden votes.

It's a HUGE question.

9
Trumper926 9 points ago +9 / -0

It went massively one way from what he said in a previous post.

2
KleineSchlachtmusik 2 points ago +3 / -1

Really it's only a huge question in the sense that we'd like to know in order to go after people for serious crimes in connection with it. If it was a botched update that only mostly gave Trump votes to Biden, I'm satisfied if the return of those votes to Trump means he wins.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
20
lestork 20 points ago +20 / -0

just wanted to make sure if there's "glitches" both ways or all of them benefit Biden...

20
TrumpTrain2020 20 points ago +20 / -0

Gawddammit - I'm the idiot here. My brain just totally overlooked the word "FROM".

As you were.

u/keepituryens

4
keepituryens 4 points ago +4 / -0

Always at attention. The erection won’t go away.

2
Trumper926 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its ok. For some reason I was doing the same thing. Brain farts are real.

6
jnathan2010 6 points ago +6 / -0

Have we seen an answer to this? Did a swap benefit Biden at any time?

5
Tracetopher 5 points ago +5 / -0

I would like to know as well

144
bellcurvestrikesback 144 points ago +146 / -2

Send this to the heavy hitters

85
CryptoMonger 85 points ago +86 / -1

I assure you,they are reading it right now.

33
KristiNoemFaceFuck 33 points ago +33 / -0

Top. Men.

14
LockThemUp 14 points ago +14 / -0

The best men, believe me

6
2scoops2terms4Trump 6 points ago +6 / -0

Based men

1
NotSoSilent 1 point ago +1 / -0

We got men you probably haven't even heard of looking at this right now

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
DrinkMoreLibTears 10 points ago +10 / -0

How do we know that they read this stuff on here? I'm semi-new here.

7
Matss 7 points ago +7 / -0

I only know that one of the new lawyers on Trump's team specifically referred to this site as a good resource

15
HumasTaint 15 points ago +16 / -1

What do you think GEOTUS was watching in the Eisenhower Building in real time?

12
Oskar 12 points ago +12 / -0

It wasn't The Gorilla Channel?

5
CampinAndBam 5 points ago +5 / -0

It wasn’t RT news

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Picture in picture.

13
SellTheSun 13 points ago +13 / -0

Being on the front page of this site is getting it to the heavy hitters.

3
WalkFastGoHome 3 points ago +3 / -0

1-800-LAW-1333

115
FreeSpeechMaster 115 points ago +116 / -1

Please sticky, PLUS, explain in laymens terms what this means for the results in the battleground states!

103
undef 103 points ago +104 / -1

The data that is driving CBS, ABC, NBC, Fox, NYT, and several other media outlets reflects tampering to the tune of switching votes and reducing the overall vote count.

If you undo this 'glitch', Trump has won the election outright.

75
Trumper926 75 points ago +76 / -1

Please Lord. Send your Holy Spirit upon America to annihilate this fraud and the traitors behind it once and for al.

27
ChiKAGo 27 points ago +27 / -0

Amen!

17
litux 17 points ago +17 / -0

Amen!

5
GainesvilleFlorida 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don’t think Holy Spirit brings death...the Angel of Death however πŸ‘€

3
Carry_Your_Name 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean no offense, friend, but I have to tell you that God doesn't "send" Holy Spirit. I know perfectly well where this idea comes from. "Holy Spirit you're welcom here, come and have your way." That's a cliche in almost every CCM song. That may sound awesome in face value, but unfortunately it's not a sound biblical teaching.

Here's a little theology lesson: Holy Spirit dwells in belivers and moves in their hearts. God guides you, leads you, helps you, but He certainly doesn't do any of those works for you, He redpills ordinary people and works his miracles through people. That's why He is a LIVING God. Just imagine, there's a big heavy box in the room that needs to be moved from point A to point B, and you're kind of relunctant to do that at the beginning, and then God motivates you as He suddenly makes this task your top priority. He gives you the strength and direction to lift up that box and move it toward the destination, but He won't magically lift it up into the air and move it around for you. Right now He's certainly moving in us as we're movitated to gather evidence and donate to the president. I hope His Holy Spirit is moving in the hearts of the lawyers and ultimately, the SCOTUS justices. They need to open their eyes to see beyond their self interests.

2
Trumper926 2 points ago +2 / -0

β€œI tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you. But if I go, I will send him to you”

But I mostly agree with what you said and I understand and take no offense!

2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +2 / -0

The thing is, He was addressing to His disciples, He was building his church that will become His body, His hands and feet. From there on, His disciples, His ecclesia, were fully devoted to preach His gospel to all four corners of the world. He didn't withdraw the Holy Spirit at some point and send it out again unto us. There was no do-over. In dark times like this, the Holy Spirit that already dwells in us wakes up as we wake up from our spiritual slumber.

1
Trumper926 1 point ago +1 / -0

True. I really do agree with you. I'm the most intellectually honest person you will ever come across. And I have a sense of peace reading this and I know its the truth.

But for clarification. I'm catholic. No idea what CCM is.

"Send" is the wrong word and I was using it too subjectively.

I've said in other posts that "the holy spirit is moving". I do believe he is rising in others.

1
Carry_Your_Name 1 point ago +1 / -0

CCM stands for Contemporary Christian Music, which is mostly pop and rock with "christian" lyrics. You may have heard of Chris Tomlin, Kari Jobe, Natalie Grant, Jeremy Camp, Casting Crown, and the most famous, Hillsong just to name a few. Most of the message in the lyrics is about how God's love sets you free and his spirit lifts you up, pretty generic and underwhelming. Some of them are just about inspiration and motivation with zero mention of any entity in the holy trinity. That being said, I still enjoy them and listen to them almost exclusively, because come on, at least the tune is joyful and uplifting, and the message is positive. There're some really good ones, though, like Sovereign Grace, Kirstyn Getty, Darlene Zschech and Selah, some of their songs are so beautiful, the lyrics are so poetic, full of deep biblical doctrine, they could be qualified as modern hymns.

23
2020REBOUND 23 points ago +23 / -0

So where did the votes switch? only at the media centers?

Or did they switch in the counting machines? OP is amazing I`m sure but no normie understands what really happend.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
5
RussianAgent13 5 points ago +5 / -0

We don't know. We know it happened before the media centers -> Edison Research.

But what happened between the precinct counting machines and Edison needs to be investigated. It's possible that if Trump hadn't challenged it, the state election boards would quietly "adjust" their numbers to match what was on TV. (or for those that don't, the media would just ignore it)

Who knows how long this has been going on.

4
Bandana_Jones 4 points ago +4 / -0

You sure? Is this confirmed? Are there switched votes enough for this? Do you take in account the lost votes?

42
deleted 42 points ago +42 / -0
24
CrookedRecords 24 points ago +24 / -0

They pulled an "Office Space!"

2
Big_cunt 2 points ago +2 / -0

And soon MIlton (BLM/ANTIFA) will burn down the building with all the evidence.

19
Regency 19 points ago +19 / -0

Did the libs really use scam from Office Space to try to steal the election? Megalulz

10
Myoldredditacct1311 10 points ago +10 / -0

Nahhh even the dude in Office Space said they did it in Superman 3. They had to go to the back of the playbook apparently

10
Greg-2012 10 points ago +10 / -0

But how could OP know this without analyzing the proprietary software used on the voting machines?

15
DiscoverAFire 15 points ago +15 / -0

You "black box" it. You treat the voting software as a black box, analyze what went in, and what came out.

So we can see that 50,000 votes @ 52.6% Trump 47.0% Biden flipped to 50,100 votes 52% Trump 47.6% Biden. Mathematically, that's not possible, so something in the software must have flipped it.

9
Greg-2012 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thanks, makes sense. Next, the cucks will be arguing that math is not logical.

3
spezisacuckold 3 points ago +3 / -0

They already argue that. They literally argue 2+2=4 is β€œracist” and that it’s really 2+2=5

3
2ScoopsMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well if they can’t agree on binary gender then interpreting binary code is hopeless.

10
MisterGuapo 10 points ago +10 / -0

You don't analyze the software, but the output that is sent to media, which is what he did.

6
IAbsolutelyDare 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

I'm computer illiterate, but it seems to me that any programmer could look at the code and find the specific bit that performs this function, right? And all these programs currently exist free for the asking in every Dominion voting machine, right?

Would the physical machines have to be secured to prevent tampering?

5
DiscoverAFire 5 points ago +5 / -0

This was probably in the software that collates the votes from the individual machines, so we'd need to get the server software, not the machine software. If we could get the source-code any competent programmer could figure it out in a day. If we can't we need to disassemble the code (convert it back from 1s and 0s into commands) - but the code that creates is very difficult to read by hand, tedious and a specialized skill. But there are people who specialize in reverse engineering code like this, so it's doable.

1
2ScoopsMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it possible this code was only set to run from a script in RAM on Nov 4th early morning and then delete itself afterward to avoid detection?

3
DiscoverAFire 3 points ago +3 / -0

They should have a master image. A digitized harddrive that they then cloned onto every voting machine. If the master image is intact, then it will show this script.

If they are smart (tbh kinda doubtful with how obvious this is - if it had been continuous instead of flipping in chunks it never would have been detected) they would use "arbitrary code execution" - a code block that will download a script off the internet and run it. This is why Tik Tok was so dangerous - Yes, it saved all your personal information, but it could also run brand new code off the CCP servers at any moment.

If Dominion has Arbitrary Code Execution we will see that it has the potential to run random scripts (which no voting software should ever have), but not what it actually did.

Our saving grace is either:

  1. They give us dirty code. We find the code and blast it to the world.

  2. They give us clean code. When we rerun the ballots we have 55% GEOTUS.

My guess is they play dumb, send the wrong programs several times, and just try to run out the clock to Dec 14

3
RussianAgent13 3 points ago +3 / -0

And all these programs currently exist free for the asking in every Dominion voting machine, right?

No, these are closed source systems. The state governments literally just trusted Dominion not to try any funny business, and nobody thought that was at all suspicious. (or they got a nice fat payout to look the other way)

DiscoverAfire explained the process of examining them. You can also do black box reverse-engineering to get a good idea of what it does, but not necessarily why.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
RussianAgent13 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you mean rating system?

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
2
DannySaySay 2 points ago +2 / -0

What you're looking at in OP's picture seems to be two data objects under the "timeseries" node of the presidential election data. This is not official data, but rather meta data used for display i.e. the data comes from somewhere.... is stored into this format, then the webpage/TV parses the data for display.

So the "timeseries" node appears to have updates for total votes and what percent each candidate has with a timestamp of when the update was recorded. In OP's picture we see the update from 4:07 UTZ had total votes of 2984468 with a .566 for trump and .42 for biden equating to roughly 1689209 votes for Trump and 1253476 votes for Biden

The next update, at 4:08 UTZ, the total votes are 2984522 and the ratios are .56 for trump and .426 for biden equating to 1671332 for trump (loss of 17876 votes) and 1271406 for biden (gain of 17930 votes).

What this does NOT mean: someone just flipped the .06 from trump to biden! The way that the data is organized is awkward: why not just store votes for Trump and votes for Biden? My guess is it's easier for parsing and display. Remember: this is just the data that was read in for display on the website/tv. The fact that it's .06 exactly is coincidental.

What this DOES mean: the source from where they were getting data had Trump and Biden at 1689208/1253476 at one point and then 1671332/1271406 about a minute later.

If you want to click through the JSON yourself, try an online viewer like this

2
DannySaySay 2 points ago +2 / -0

I pulled the data into a spread sheet and graphed it

Here is a full graph of PA with all the data points

Here is zoomed in on the two points OP has in the picture

Overall, doesn't look suspicious when you look at the whole graph, tbh. But who knows.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)
1
Techrev 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

Ok, I get what you're saying. But it still shows Trump lost votes, do we know why? Because, .006 x 2984522 comes out to be a shift of close to 36,000 votes difference from Trump to Biden in a minute's time, but with only 42 votes added overall.

1
DannySaySay 1 point ago +1 / -0

I made a graph of all data points for PA

You can see at the beginning that both candidates go up and down. I'm not saying OP isn't on to something, I'm just saying the data might need to be refined i.e. throw out the obvious erroneous data like at the start of the PA graph.

I graphed Michigan's data too and zoomed in on the infamous 138k votes. From one data point to the next the total vote increases by about 140k and Trump goes up by about 10k.

So stuff like that needs an answer. Where ever this data came from had a big increase in that one minute. Why? They're saying error? glitch? miss-entered data? How and why?

112
Helly 112 points ago +113 / -1

Can you open source the script you used for our CS autistic chads

42
Slyhillary 42 points ago +43 / -1

He gave the source already. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh

"He can't pull over any farther!"

https://youtu.be/KWN7UUpbjHk

Littering and littering and littering and

17
KILLARY4PRISON 17 points ago +17 / -0

Get this shit on Github and post to Hacker News ASAP.

4
ticl 4 points ago +4 / -0

HN is full of cucks anx cucksrvatives.

6
TownHallBall 6 points ago +6 / -0

Lol.

3
Eredea 3 points ago +3 / -0

The rar isn't working for me, can you post it on pastebin or github?

2
Slyhillary 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not mine. Did you ask OP?

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
98
deleted 98 points ago +98 / -0
54
Dereliction 54 points ago +54 / -0

I think it was Scott Adams who noted that the Left's major statistical analysis people have been stewing in abject quiet. There's no way they like what they see here.

22
greatagainagain 22 points ago +22 / -0

Confirmation bias. I know some VERY lefty statisticians, but none of them want to question the results as they stand. So they just go with the narrative.

20
Scroon 20 points ago +20 / -0

Science is actually more about the questions you ask than the answers you find.

1
UpTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

"WTF I HATE SCIENCE NOW"

  • the left
8
Tantalus4200 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yep

4
loveshock 4 points ago +4 / -0

The left can't meme...I mean math. Because objectivity and 2+2=4 is racism and white supremacy.

4
loveshock 4 points ago +4 / -0

They can't understand which bathroom to use and you want them to do data analysis?

86
MakeAmericaLegendary 86 points ago +87 / -1 (edited)

Do we have evidence that Edison Research had the correct vote counts? They may just as easily claim that they were correcting data as needed.

Also put me in the screencap.

33
JohnScott 33 points ago +33 / -0

That would be insane. It has to be automated. Too much data to keep track of in real time.

47
RussianAgent13 47 points ago +47 / -0

"We have fired the single intern responsible for all these mistakes. It won't happen again."

18
james43552352345 18 points ago +18 / -0

Me: "sir, you don't have any interns per the personnel file."

18
CrookedRecords 18 points ago +18 / -0

Hire an intern! Then fire them! Then shoot them!

12
litux 12 points ago +12 / -0

Ah, the Clinton way.

6
UndercoverCentipede 6 points ago +6 / -0

lol

5
nimble 5 points ago +5 / -0

Aaaaaand he's dead.

16
MakeAmericaLegendary 16 points ago +18 / -2

While I do agree, there are other explanations they might be able to point to. I want to make sure we have all of our i's dotted and t's crossed.

27
Ninjatude 27 points ago +30 / -3

Maybe call Edison research (1.908.707.4707) per their website claiming to be a reporter and ask them if they can clarify the irregularities.(If you call, record the hell out of it and fwd to Fitton)

They'll be looking to throw anyone else under the bus, if it comes out that the Edison data is bad on such a huge scale, nobody will ever trust that company again. If Edison throws Dominion under the bus, then we'll have evidence on tape.

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
20
MakeAmericaLegendary 20 points ago +21 / -1

Sure, but I'm less concerned with the media and more concerned with what our side can use in court.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
13
2020REBOUND 13 points ago +13 / -0

I mean the votes the media shows on TV must be at some point the same as in "voting centers" right there in the states?

I wish OP would find a way to explain what happened for normies. This will die if someone can't say what happened without talking about 0.05% and computer code..

1
MAGACountryResident 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. I want to send this around to fellow patriots and cucked friends who think Trump lost but if they asked me what it was I wouldn’t know how to explain it other than it is data of the election taken from code from a company called Edison that monitors vote counts real time and in the code it shows major errors of massive amounts votes switching from Trump to Biden and many more just flat out disappearing. But again most people wouldn’t know what they are looking at and would just say it’s bullshit and without a more detailed explanation I don’t think it would go very far with normies.

10
Reformation_brew 10 points ago +12 / -2

Yeah, that is my worry. Was there ever a manual input of the data by a human at any point before Edison data received it? The Ds will just claim accidental human clerical error.

13
EndHumanTrafficking2 13 points ago +13 / -0

I think the point is this forces manual recounts.

They can try and claim accidental error during their trials for election fraud, but in terms of the election result, whatever they claim is irrelevant if the manual recounts confirm these flips were fraudulently altering the totals.

2
Reformation_brew 2 points ago +3 / -1

So where did in the tabulation process did the algorithm change the votes, precinct level, county tabulation, or state tabulation?

My worry is that if we do a hand recount, then the same algorithm could change the votes the way on state tabulation.

I think Trump still has to get the illegal votes tossed in order to assure victory.

3
EndHumanTrafficking2 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's the software flipping votes, so a manual recount would take the software out of the equation.

But yes, we absolutely need to get the illegal votes tossed as well. At least, those that are identifiable.

74
pharmacyman848 74 points ago +75 / -1

Amy Schumer if true

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
5
Wyopepe 5 points ago +5 / -0

πŸ˜‚

Ham planet!

2
lyintedscrews 2 points ago +2 / -0

What do fat pigs have to do with this? This is more like big mike omg it's sooo big it won't fit...

66
alienjesus 66 points ago +66 / -0

This post goes up.

Site goes down!

IT’S HAPPENING!

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0 (edited)
66
queenicarius 66 points ago +67 / -1

Brilliant work. Thank you.

81
TrumanBlack [S] 81 points ago +82 / -1

It was all made by this pede https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/

We need to get this info circulating!!!

20
TLDC 20 points ago +20 / -0

yes, we need a STICKY!!

15
Jojobelle 15 points ago +15 / -0

Dear lord protect this Pede from the wrath of The Clinton Crime Family

64
brownguy 64 points ago +64 / -0

We have the best autists, folks, believe me.

42
28
brownguy 28 points ago +28 / -0

PedeInspector, you are a gentlepede and a scholar.

Respect.

53
deleted 53 points ago +53 / -0
15
Phil_DeGraves 15 points ago +15 / -0

Multiple copies on offline/unattached physical local media.

Try hacking into or deleting THAT!

13
The_Almighty_Kek 13 points ago +13 / -0

Put those drives in a Faraday cage!

5
Seeker_of_Firecrotch 5 points ago +5 / -0

But call it a Fear Cage. It frightens them.

2
Tellman125 2 points ago +2 / -0

Faraday -> Fear -> They Fearaday that Biden will no longer be President-SELECT but Trump will be the Supreme Court-recognized President-ELECT!!!!!

1
Seeker_of_Firecrotch 1 point ago +1 / -0

β€œPresident-Select”. LOVE IT!!!!

52
hocuspocusfocusjeep 52 points ago +52 / -0

STICKY THIS!!

51
LtPatterson 51 points ago +51 / -0

This should remain stickied for at least a day or more. We rotate too fast imo.

9
takemyenergym8 9 points ago +9 / -0

Agreed

-1
roytheboy -1 points ago +1 / -2

This one probably should never have been stickied in the first place. This was already stickied, then debunked a couple days ago - it was presented in a slightly different way, but the same idea, using the Edison database to find fraud.

It's an inaccurate database, and the switches go both ways just as often unfortunately.

(if anyone's curious and a little scared off by the .json, check out the CSV file - the last link in OP's post. You can import that into excel/google sheets and check out the data for yourself)

49
2020REBOUND 49 points ago +49 / -0

They needed to delete votes to keep the Turnout somewhat realistic!

14
TheRoyalRob 14 points ago +14 / -0

dude.. that's it.

7
weltbild 7 points ago +7 / -0

wow

11
WelcomeToCornPopCopy 11 points ago +11 / -0

Astute point.

1
Nunya__Biznus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Smart observation.

45
KuzoKevin 45 points ago +45 / -0 (edited)

Well done! Send to Trump Campaign and Project Veritas.

That's a shitload of votes.

13
Get-Em-Out 13 points ago +14 / -1

Went through and made sure every state was archived - here's the list:

Alabama - https://archive.is/NHIZG

Alaska - https://archive.is/JcYm7

Arizona - https://archive.is/I36BP

Arkansas - https://archive.is/42A9Y

California - https://archive.is/41zco

Colorado - https://archive.is/gW49A

Connecticut - https://archive.is/wip/kEKRh

Delaware - https://archive.is/tCDCy

Florida - https://archive.is/yLfsZ

Georgia - https://archive.is/n1UhH

Hawaii - https://archive.is/wip/Dibf8

Idaho - https://archive.is/GmBCc

Illinois - https://archive.is/AJSTF

Indiana - https://archive.is/wip/0vG6E

Iowa - https://archive.is/wip/CEXEk

Kansas - https://archive.is/wip/v6gvO

Kentucky - https://archive.is/wip/ZUeXW

Louisiana - https://archive.is/wip/zYbue

Maine - https://archive.is/wip/2RYJi

Maryland - https://archive.is/wip/0tVDy

Massachusetts - https://archive.is/wip/4lQBY

Michigan - https://archive.is/mZfg0

Minnesota - https://archive.is/o650P

Mississippi - https://archive.is/wip/copDa

Missouri - https://archive.is/PXkHB

Montana - https://archive.is/Nd3yT

Nebraska - https://archive.is/0NlNC

Nevada - https://archive.is/NFeG3

New Hampshire - https://archive.is/wip/A9kiy

New Jersey - https://archive.is/x26Jz

New Mexico - https://archive.is/wip/Msl9s

New York - https://archive.is/wip/RFFcV

North Carolina - https://archive.is/DZhlZ

North Dakota - https://archive.is/wip/L9C46

Ohio - https://archive.is/wip/dShvQ

Oklahoma - https://archive.is/wip/5eglW

Oregon - https://archive.is/wip/oiTCM

Pennsylvania - https://archive.is/6cj23

Rhode Island - https://archive.is/wip/rqSER

South Carolina - https://archive.is/wip/PIOZa

South Dakota - https://archive.is/T6dhh

Tennessee - https://archive.is/wip/jd4mW

Texas - https://archive.is/wip/M12O4

Utah - https://archive.is/8jrXl

Vermont - https://archive.is/SZ1ko

Virginia - https://archive.is/wip/zUEx2

Washington - https://archive.is/ZreS2

West Virginia - https://archive.is/Xi9aN

Wisconsin - https://archive.is/aVeQc

Wyoming - https://archive.is/wip/vrhqU

42
spicycentipede 42 points ago +42 / -0

Did you send it to [email protected]?

25
TrumanBlack [S] 25 points ago +25 / -0

Yes send them to them again!! They get so many emails that it could get lost

9
BrakeRemovalMechanic 9 points ago +9 / -0

I just sent it again. More people, please do the same.

41
bekkiluvsit 41 points ago +42 / -1

FELLOW PEDES, I SENT THIS TO THE GATEWAY PUNDIT AND THEY PUBLISHED IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-exclusive-analysis-election-night-data-states-shows-millions-votes-either-switched-president-trump-biden-lost/

5
pcme2 5 points ago +5 / -0

great job Patriot

2
Tellman125 2 points ago +2 / -0

History-altering decision right there. We will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, AGAIN.

2
anon1011101 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well done sir. Thanks for your service

40
SweetLeftardTears 40 points ago +40 / -0

My God. This is military grade autism. Good job!

37
burgundycapsule 37 points ago +37 / -0

My boy wicked smart

5
hysteria 5 points ago +5 / -0

smaht

1
GuacamoleTariff 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hi wayne

35
Get-Em-Out 35 points ago +36 / -1 (edited)

Went through and made sure every state was archived - here's the list:

Alabama - https://archive.is/NHIZG

Alaska - https://archive.is/JcYm7

Arizona - https://archive.is/I36BP

Arkansas - https://archive.is/42A9Y

California - https://archive.is/41zco

Colorado - https://archive.is/gW49A

Connecticut - https://archive.is/wip/kEKRh

Delaware - https://archive.is/tCDCy

Florida - https://archive.is/yLfsZ

Georgia - https://archive.is/n1UhH

Hawaii - https://archive.is/wip/Dibf8

Idaho - https://archive.is/GmBCc

Illinois - https://archive.is/AJSTF

Indiana - https://archive.is/wip/0vG6E

Iowa - https://archive.is/wip/CEXEk

Kansas - https://archive.is/wip/v6gvO

Kentucky - https://archive.is/wip/ZUeXW

Louisiana - https://archive.is/wip/zYbue

Maine - https://archive.is/wip/2RYJi

Maryland - https://archive.is/wip/0tVDy

Massachusetts - https://archive.is/wip/4lQBY

Michigan - https://archive.is/mZfg0

Minnesota - https://archive.is/o650P

Mississippi - https://archive.is/wip/copDa

Missouri - https://archive.is/PXkHB

Montana - https://archive.is/Nd3yT

Nebraska - https://archive.is/0NlNC

Nevada - https://archive.is/NFeG3

New Hampshire - https://archive.is/wip/A9kiy

New Jersey - https://archive.is/x26Jz

New Mexico - https://archive.is/wip/Msl9s

New York - https://archive.is/wip/RFFcV

North Carolina - https://archive.is/DZhlZ

North Dakota - https://archive.is/wip/L9C46

Ohio - https://archive.is/wip/dShvQ

Oklahoma - https://archive.is/wip/5eglW

Oregon - https://archive.is/wip/oiTCM

Pennsylvania - https://archive.is/6cj23

Rhode Island - https://archive.is/wip/rqSER

South Carolina - https://archive.is/wip/PIOZa

South Dakota - https://archive.is/T6dhh

Tennessee - https://archive.is/wip/jd4mW

Texas - https://archive.is/wip/M12O4

Utah - https://archive.is/8jrXl

Vermont - https://archive.is/SZ1ko

Virginia - https://archive.is/wip/zUEx2

Washington - https://archive.is/ZreS2

West Virginia - https://archive.is/Xi9aN

Wisconsin - https://archive.is/aVeQc

Wyoming - https://archive.is/wip/vrhqU

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
MAGAnifient 5 points ago +5 / -0

These are the actual JSON files of the data for each state. Having copies of these is crucial, thanks! Also maybe we should check them to see if they changed got scrubbed in last few days? They could plant false data

1
truthhurts2342 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have multiple local backups. Trying to find some blockchain storage and share here as well.

1
Virtigo31 1 point ago +1 / -0

You rock!

34
Gentlejerseybreeze 34 points ago +34 / -0

Kek

34
TrumpWinz 34 points ago +35 / -1

bump

34
whiskey_shitz 34 points ago +34 / -0

Wow. Thanks a lot man.

28
TrumanBlack [S] 28 points ago +28 / -0

HE Made IT!!! SYA something nice to him https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/

11
whiskey_shitz 11 points ago +11 / -0

Right on!

34
Ninexx 34 points ago +34 / -0

Needs sticky

32
stoned_equerry 32 points ago +32 / -0

you absolute wild asses i love you

22
TrumanBlack [S] 22 points ago +22 / -0

HE Made IT!!! SYA something nice to him https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/

10
Haitianbychoice360 10 points ago +11 / -1

On another note, its awesome how you are diligent about giving credit where credit is due. We are all in this together but dammit we have the best pedes folks! MAGA

29
GmaBain 29 points ago +30 / -1

Edit: but we would appreciate it if you could let us in on your β€œlingo”. Is PEDE like centipede? We like KEK and others and are enjoying the movie. We’re learning but old tradesmen and veterans.

I just want you to know how far this has gotten since it was posted. I’m a 50 yr. old woman, this was sent to me in a group chat of old patriots who are very grateful to all of you. We honestly didn’t β€œlearn to code” but many of us fought hard for this country. You are the new American freedom fighters and we just stopped in to say THANK YOU so much for picking up this battle!

We couldn’t be more proud of you!

12
WinterDog 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yes, "pede" is the shortening of "centipede" and is a colloquial term for the patriots that use this website.

10
TrumpTrain2020 10 points ago +10 / -0

MAGA doesn't see age, color, creed, or sexual orientation.

This is an amazing community that shares a few common traits :

We're high energy!

We love our country!

We love our president!

The Trump Train is all gas, no brakes!

Welcome to the party, Pede. Buckle up and get ready to MAGA for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!

4
Tellman125 4 points ago +4 / -0

THAT'S RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!

8
TrumanBlack [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Puede is centipede

7
Scrub_Anon 7 points ago +7 / -0

Correct! Pede as in centipede. So happy you all have found this safe haven. Once this is all done, you will soon realize we are not the silent majority, we are not divided...we are THE majority...we are UNITED. Be not afraid...you are not alone.

5
Benjamin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Welcome! And, keep spreading the word!

As for the origin of "Pede"

This is the original audio clip of the "Centipede is a predator": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anv4-AODw1s

In the early days before 2016, it was used in some of those crazy but funny Trump videos, such as this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKH6PAoUuD0

26
NotReddit2 26 points ago +26 / -0

I bet they regret telling people to learn to code now.

31
Minarchist_Manlet 31 points ago +31 / -0

Pennsylvania coal miners:

"Look at me.

I'm the data scientist now."

4
FLIBS 4 points ago +4 / -0

kek!

2
HillaryRodhamCunton 2 points ago +2 / -0

"LOOK AT ME.

IM THE DATA SCIENTIST NOW BITCH"

2
Tellman125 2 points ago +2 / -0

From mining coal to mining data

2
Tellman125 2 points ago +2 / -0

LearnToGlitch

26
CLANKDOM_SPOON 26 points ago +26 / -0

This reminds me of the scene on Das Boot where they are on the ground of the ocean, and finally raise to the top. So will do Trumps campain. He will win!

10
HillarysBeaverMunch 10 points ago +10 / -0

"Sea floor" and "ocean floor" are both acceptable terms in common use.

25
CommieCrats 25 points ago +25 / -0

DOMINION NUKED?

5
1
LunaC 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's about to get them stacks 😁

24
GregTheTraceur 24 points ago +24 / -0

This is so wild. It hardly feels real. It's like we're in a movie.

We're watching a coup d'etat unravel in real time. We're going to be talking about this for the rest of our lives.

I love you all.

22
IntrepidBurger 22 points ago +22 / -0

Based programmer 'pede. This is HUGE.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
11
TiredOfRedditBullshi 11 points ago +12 / -1

YEET

21
stormcloud 21 points ago +21 / -0

Take my upvote and my humble thanks.

20
p8riot 20 points ago +20 / -0

BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP

2
datagod 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am just here to have the last comment. Thanks.

1
shtpostinalotofmemes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hehe

1
Kekception 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get the last kek

1
ThinkPositivePwr 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am proud to be one of the 90+ Million American citizens and liberty and freedom lovers, who also, for the first time in decades and decades, actually and truly LOVES and ENDEARS and RESPECTS and is GRATEFUL for their president... Donald John Trump!!