20485
posted ago by TrumanBlack ago by TrumanBlack +20485 / -0

Hello brothers, I just wanna use this space to thank the hundreds and hundreds of patriots that helped the many groups and teams that exposed election fraud. You worked day and night, with sleep, no food, no rest, no pay. You did all this because you love this country and you deserve that people know what you did.

TY, ChesterAnthem, Epic, Bucky, Snow, Sailor, King and all the hundreds of you working behind the scenes thank you. You're the true heroes.

Patriots the 6 is the most important day of your life and if you're not in DC you're gonna regret it forever. Whatever happens that day will determine the future of our nation.

Warriors, stand together and pray to God. We will get through this together. I love you all.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

OG POST: EVERY THING YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ IS VERIFIED AND WAS MADE BY THIS PEDE [CENTIPEDE] HE DID ALL THE HEAVY WORK

πŸ† https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/ πŸ†

🚨🚨🚨🚨EDIT NOV 12: 🚨🚨🚨

UPDATED LIST: https://pastebin.com/X6sW2aew

EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it'll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it'll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I'm also confident in the results it gives.

https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script.

https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used.

Place both in the same folder.

FULL THREAD: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XQIWRs/-happening-ive-updated-the-switc/

The data shows serious IREGULARITIES and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened on election

🚨"Switched did happen for Biden to Trump, as some of you have pointed out, and they also happened from 3rd party to (mainly Biden) both.🚨 The results should disturb everyone.

.

REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR.

.........

I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json] and I found this damning evidence [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all.

EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far.

EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know.

Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.

Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.

There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes.

🚨🚨🚨WE DECIDED TO LEAVE THIS NUMBERS UP SO YOU CAN SEE HOW OUR RESEARCH HAS EVOLVED.🚨🚨🚨

Dominion Voting Systems :

Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248

New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20

Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456

Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882

New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213

Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574

Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102

Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023

California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989

Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0

Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650

Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0

Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0

Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730

Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408

Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0

Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0

New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116

Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477

New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610

Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730

Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.

Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557

Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154

Election Systems & Software :

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849

Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748

South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119

Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276

South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1

North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681

Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0

North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15

District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Unknown Systems:

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272

Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51

Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0

Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408

Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0

Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35

Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13

West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300

Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0

Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.

VERIFIED!!!!:

I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ]

And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ]

You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere.

EDIT: Those 2,324 were moved from Trump to Jorgensen.

Jorgensen votes = Total votes * (1 - Trump share - Biden share)

Nr.27 : 573,857 * (1 - 0.578 - 0.401) = 12,051

Nr.28 : 574,417 * (1 - 0.568 - 0.406) = 14,935

Jorgensen vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 14,935 - 12,051 = 2,884

Total vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 574,417 - 573,857 = 560

Jorgensen vote increase - Total vote increase = 2,884 - 560 = 2,324

SOURCES: Here is the data I used:

EDISON DATA: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p

The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well.

🚨🚨FROM THE EDISON WEBSITE "Vote Count The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races" 🚨🚨

httpss://i.maga.host/wvRRA9m.png

I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json ] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead.

Take this picture for example. [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]

It's like this:

Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888

Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32

Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost.

I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes.

Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh

[pede444wow] I took the json files that are included here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel:

python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N

result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK

[montag] Here's a GitHub repo of the same data source taken at incremental time periods. https://github.com/favstats/USElection2020-NYT-Results

[ComeAndTakeIt_Texas] Hey TrumanBlack, I crunched the 27/28 timestamp data you posted (specifically this - https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png), and uploaded a spreadsheet analysis here (https://i.maga.host/xbwnVuk.png). I do a worst-case and best-case rounding error to generate Max T Vote, Min T Vote, and Max B Vote and Min B Vote that shows if you have 0.578 share, the max number that would represent would be 0.57849999999, and the min number would be 0.5775. The specific pic highlighted here allows no possible way whatsoever that Trump did not lose votes. The smallest number of votes he could have lost assuming in 27 there is a worst case rounding error and in the 28 step there is a best case rounding error (extremely unlikely), Trump lost a 4846.353. In worst case, he lost 5994.627 votes. There is literally NO way anyone can explain this away. They can also not explain that away as an asynchronous issue, as the timestamp itself is later (1), and (2), the total vote count increased. This single time step is proof alone.

[warpigpede] Re: the data displayed inhttps://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png

I calculated number of lost Trump votes as 5738.57, exactly 1% of the total number of votes (573857) at record 27:

votes 27: 573857

trump fraction: 0.578

trump votes: 331689.346

biden fraction: 0.401

biden votes: 230116.657

votes 28: 574417

trump fraction: 0.568

trump vote: 325950.776

biden vote: 232985.942

biden fraction: 0.406

votes change: +560

trump votes change: -5738.57

Exactly 1% is an awfully curious value. I wonder if it is consistent across the entire dataset

Comments (4385)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
115
FreeSpeechMaster 115 points ago +116 / -1

Please sticky, PLUS, explain in laymens terms what this means for the results in the battleground states!

103
undef 103 points ago +104 / -1

The data that is driving CBS, ABC, NBC, Fox, NYT, and several other media outlets reflects tampering to the tune of switching votes and reducing the overall vote count.

If you undo this 'glitch', Trump has won the election outright.

75
Trumper926 75 points ago +76 / -1

Please Lord. Send your Holy Spirit upon America to annihilate this fraud and the traitors behind it once and for al.

27
ChiKAGo 27 points ago +27 / -0

Amen!

17
litux 17 points ago +17 / -0

Amen!

5
GainesvilleFlorida 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don’t think Holy Spirit brings death...the Angel of Death however πŸ‘€

3
Carry_Your_Name 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean no offense, friend, but I have to tell you that God doesn't "send" Holy Spirit. I know perfectly well where this idea comes from. "Holy Spirit you're welcom here, come and have your way." That's a cliche in almost every CCM song. That may sound awesome in face value, but unfortunately it's not a sound biblical teaching.

Here's a little theology lesson: Holy Spirit dwells in belivers and moves in their hearts. God guides you, leads you, helps you, but He certainly doesn't do any of those works for you, He redpills ordinary people and works his miracles through people. That's why He is a LIVING God. Just imagine, there's a big heavy box in the room that needs to be moved from point A to point B, and you're kind of relunctant to do that at the beginning, and then God motivates you as He suddenly makes this task your top priority. He gives you the strength and direction to lift up that box and move it toward the destination, but He won't magically lift it up into the air and move it around for you. Right now He's certainly moving in us as we're movitated to gather evidence and donate to the president. I hope His Holy Spirit is moving in the hearts of the lawyers and ultimately, the SCOTUS justices. They need to open their eyes to see beyond their self interests.

2
Trumper926 2 points ago +2 / -0

β€œI tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you. But if I go, I will send him to you”

But I mostly agree with what you said and I understand and take no offense!

23
2020REBOUND 23 points ago +23 / -0

So where did the votes switch? only at the media centers?

Or did they switch in the counting machines? OP is amazing I`m sure but no normie understands what really happend.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
5
RussianAgent13 5 points ago +5 / -0

We don't know. We know it happened before the media centers -> Edison Research.

But what happened between the precinct counting machines and Edison needs to be investigated. It's possible that if Trump hadn't challenged it, the state election boards would quietly "adjust" their numbers to match what was on TV. (or for those that don't, the media would just ignore it)

Who knows how long this has been going on.

4
Bandana_Jones 4 points ago +4 / -0

You sure? Is this confirmed? Are there switched votes enough for this? Do you take in account the lost votes?

42
deleted 42 points ago +42 / -0
24
CrookedRecords 24 points ago +24 / -0

They pulled an "Office Space!"

2
Big_cunt 2 points ago +2 / -0

And soon MIlton (BLM/ANTIFA) will burn down the building with all the evidence.

19
Regency 19 points ago +19 / -0

Did the libs really use scam from Office Space to try to steal the election? Megalulz

10
Myoldredditacct1311 10 points ago +10 / -0

Nahhh even the dude in Office Space said they did it in Superman 3. They had to go to the back of the playbook apparently

10
Greg-2012 10 points ago +10 / -0

But how could OP know this without analyzing the proprietary software used on the voting machines?

15
DiscoverAFire 15 points ago +15 / -0

You "black box" it. You treat the voting software as a black box, analyze what went in, and what came out.

So we can see that 50,000 votes @ 52.6% Trump 47.0% Biden flipped to 50,100 votes 52% Trump 47.6% Biden. Mathematically, that's not possible, so something in the software must have flipped it.

9
Greg-2012 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thanks, makes sense. Next, the cucks will be arguing that math is not logical.

10
MisterGuapo 10 points ago +10 / -0

You don't analyze the software, but the output that is sent to media, which is what he did.

6
IAbsolutelyDare 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm computer illiterate, but it seems to me that any programmer could look at the code and find the specific bit that performs this function, right? And all these programs currently exist free for the asking in every Dominion voting machine, right?

Would the physical machines have to be secured to prevent tampering?

5
DiscoverAFire 5 points ago +5 / -0

This was probably in the software that collates the votes from the individual machines, so we'd need to get the server software, not the machine software. If we could get the source-code any competent programmer could figure it out in a day. If we can't we need to disassemble the code (convert it back from 1s and 0s into commands) - but the code that creates is very difficult to read by hand, tedious and a specialized skill. But there are people who specialize in reverse engineering code like this, so it's doable.

1
2ScoopsMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it possible this code was only set to run from a script in RAM on Nov 4th early morning and then delete itself afterward to avoid detection?

3
RussianAgent13 3 points ago +3 / -0

And all these programs currently exist free for the asking in every Dominion voting machine, right?

No, these are closed source systems. The state governments literally just trusted Dominion not to try any funny business, and nobody thought that was at all suspicious. (or they got a nice fat payout to look the other way)

DiscoverAfire explained the process of examining them. You can also do black box reverse-engineering to get a good idea of what it does, but not necessarily why.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
RussianAgent13 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you mean rating system?

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
2
DannySaySay 2 points ago +2 / -0

What you're looking at in OP's picture seems to be two data objects under the "timeseries" node of the presidential election data. This is not official data, but rather meta data used for display i.e. the data comes from somewhere.... is stored into this format, then the webpage/TV parses the data for display.

So the "timeseries" node appears to have updates for total votes and what percent each candidate has with a timestamp of when the update was recorded. In OP's picture we see the update from 4:07 UTZ had total votes of 2984468 with a .566 for trump and .42 for biden equating to roughly 1689209 votes for Trump and 1253476 votes for Biden

The next update, at 4:08 UTZ, the total votes are 2984522 and the ratios are .56 for trump and .426 for biden equating to 1671332 for trump (loss of 17876 votes) and 1271406 for biden (gain of 17930 votes).

What this does NOT mean: someone just flipped the .06 from trump to biden! The way that the data is organized is awkward: why not just store votes for Trump and votes for Biden? My guess is it's easier for parsing and display. Remember: this is just the data that was read in for display on the website/tv. The fact that it's .06 exactly is coincidental.

What this DOES mean: the source from where they were getting data had Trump and Biden at 1689208/1253476 at one point and then 1671332/1271406 about a minute later.

If you want to click through the JSON yourself, try an online viewer like this

2
DannySaySay 2 points ago +2 / -0

I pulled the data into a spread sheet and graphed it

Here is a full graph of PA with all the data points

Here is zoomed in on the two points OP has in the picture

Overall, doesn't look suspicious when you look at the whole graph, tbh. But who knows.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Techrev 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, I get what you're saying. But it still shows Trump lost votes, do we know why? Because, .006 x 2984522 comes out to be a shift of close to 36,000 votes difference from Trump to Biden in a minute's time, but with only 42 votes added overall.

1
DannySaySay 1 point ago +1 / -0

I made a graph of all data points for PA

You can see at the beginning that both candidates go up and down. I'm not saying OP isn't on to something, I'm just saying the data might need to be refined i.e. throw out the obvious erroneous data like at the start of the PA graph.

I graphed Michigan's data too and zoomed in on the infamous 138k votes. From one data point to the next the total vote increases by about 140k and Trump goes up by about 10k.

So stuff like that needs an answer. Where ever this data came from had a big increase in that one minute. Why? They're saying error? glitch? miss-entered data? How and why?