Hello brothers, I just wanna use this space to thank the hundreds and hundreds of patriots that helped the many groups and teams that exposed election fraud. You worked day and night, with sleep, no food, no rest, no pay. You did all this because you love this country and you deserve that people know what you did.
TY, ChesterAnthem, Epic, Bucky, Snow, Sailor, King and all the hundreds of you working behind the scenes thank you. You're the true heroes.
Patriots the 6 is the most important day of your life and if you're not in DC you're gonna regret it forever. Whatever happens that day will determine the future of our nation.
Warriors, stand together and pray to God. We will get through this together. I love you all.
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
OG POST: EVERY THING YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ IS VERIFIED AND WAS MADE BY THIS PEDE [CENTIPEDE] HE DID ALL THE HEAVY WORK
🏆 https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/ 🏆
🚨🚨🚨🚨EDIT NOV 12: 🚨🚨🚨
UPDATED LIST: https://pastebin.com/X6sW2aew
EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it'll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it'll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I'm also confident in the results it gives.
https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script.
https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used.
Place both in the same folder.
FULL THREAD: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XQIWRs/-happening-ive-updated-the-switc/
The data shows serious IREGULARITIES and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened on election
🚨"Switched did happen for Biden to Trump, as some of you have pointed out, and they also happened from 3rd party to (mainly Biden) both.🚨 The results should disturb everyone.
.
REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR.
.........
I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json] and I found this damning evidence [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all.
EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far.
EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know.
Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes.
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.
Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.
There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes.
🚨🚨🚨WE DECIDED TO LEAVE THIS NUMBERS UP SO YOU CAN SEE HOW OUR RESEARCH HAS EVOLVED.🚨🚨🚨
Dominion Voting Systems :
Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248
New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20
Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456
Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882
New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213
Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574
Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102
Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023
California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989
Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0
Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650
Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0
Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0
Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730
Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408
Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0
Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0
New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116
Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477
New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610
Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730
Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.
Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557
Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154
Election Systems & Software :
Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849
Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748
South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119
Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276
South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1
North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681
Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0
North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15
District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Unknown Systems:
Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272
Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51
Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0
Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408
Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0
Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35
Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13
West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300
Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0
Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.
VERIFIED!!!!:
I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ]
And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ]
You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere.
EDIT: Those 2,324 were moved from Trump to Jorgensen.
Jorgensen votes = Total votes * (1 - Trump share - Biden share)
Nr.27 : 573,857 * (1 - 0.578 - 0.401) = 12,051
Nr.28 : 574,417 * (1 - 0.568 - 0.406) = 14,935
Jorgensen vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 14,935 - 12,051 = 2,884
Total vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 574,417 - 573,857 = 560
Jorgensen vote increase - Total vote increase = 2,884 - 560 = 2,324
SOURCES: Here is the data I used:
EDISON DATA: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json
https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p
The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well.
🚨🚨FROM THE EDISON WEBSITE "Vote Count The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races" 🚨🚨
httpss://i.maga.host/wvRRA9m.png
I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json ] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead.
Take this picture for example. [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]
It's like this:
Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888
Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32
Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost.
I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes.
Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh
[pede444wow] I took the json files that are included here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel:
python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N
result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK
[montag] Here's a GitHub repo of the same data source taken at incremental time periods. https://github.com/favstats/USElection2020-NYT-Results
[ComeAndTakeIt_Texas] Hey TrumanBlack, I crunched the 27/28 timestamp data you posted (specifically this - https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png), and uploaded a spreadsheet analysis here (https://i.maga.host/xbwnVuk.png). I do a worst-case and best-case rounding error to generate Max T Vote, Min T Vote, and Max B Vote and Min B Vote that shows if you have 0.578 share, the max number that would represent would be 0.57849999999, and the min number would be 0.5775. The specific pic highlighted here allows no possible way whatsoever that Trump did not lose votes. The smallest number of votes he could have lost assuming in 27 there is a worst case rounding error and in the 28 step there is a best case rounding error (extremely unlikely), Trump lost a 4846.353. In worst case, he lost 5994.627 votes. There is literally NO way anyone can explain this away. They can also not explain that away as an asynchronous issue, as the timestamp itself is later (1), and (2), the total vote count increased. This single time step is proof alone.
[warpigpede] Re: the data displayed inhttps://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png
I calculated number of lost Trump votes as 5738.57, exactly 1% of the total number of votes (573857) at record 27:
votes 27: 573857
trump fraction: 0.578
trump votes: 331689.346
biden fraction: 0.401
biden votes: 230116.657
votes 28: 574417
trump fraction: 0.568
trump vote: 325950.776
biden vote: 232985.942
biden fraction: 0.406
votes change: +560
trump votes change: -5738.57
Exactly 1% is an awfully curious value. I wonder if it is consistent across the entire dataset
Can someone tell me why in the fuck they are using two or three decimal places of precision to multiply 6 digit numbers then telling us we're within less that for margins?
Anyone else seeing this? Are they really moving votes around by simple ratios?
What on the gluten-free fuck is going on here?
Did he look at the softwares source code? how did he get it?
JSON data that is used to populate the nyt's election map. They get it from the same place a lot of news outlets get it from.
This though just makes this a display error and not a vote tabulation error. The news gets the vote count to 3 significant figures but that doesnt mean the underlying votes are stored to 3 significant figures
Then why is it always the third decimal amount?
Really just pure coincidence then that all these "data issues" only benefit Biden 😂👍
Look at the script, it's programmed that way.
Nothing to see here, move along fellow raci-- I mean, millipede.
Do we know that they only benefit Biden? I'm not seeing a number of votes that switched FROM Biden TO Trump, and I don't know if it's because there were none, or because no one has looked.
There's no way in hell that true "glitches" only favor Democrats, even if that's what history shows...
Are you just concern trolling? This is the map of fraud. That data comes from vote tabulating machines and they keep a timestamped record of their counts. Lawyers will use this map to file discovery to seize those machines' logs and we'll see how they match. Maybe there's a consolidation or reporting error here or there in the database but this many isn't feasible as a collection of one-off errors. And it also shows how votes can be skimmed between states, and it spot-checks with ground observers and news reports. Elections have been overturned on less. This is the map.
This is EXIT POLLING. Straight from Edison Research:
This is not official vote tallies and people are acting incredibly responsibly in this thread.
they say they interview over 100,000 voters, not millions of voters.. so how do they get millions in the election data counts? Are you implying that these are running estimate of votes that are extrapolated from 100K exit interviews and that they keep adjusting on the fly?... and that they were interviewing shadowy voters in Detroit and Philly at 4 and 5am? Maybe they interviewed a few thousand in the dark of night to get to 138,000 Biden votes and 0 Trump votes?
Hes still here https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/
Agree
So like...the money scam they pulled on Office Space but this time with votes instead of pennies?
The fuckers who did this better not get a minimum security prison with conjugal visits.
No no. I see Federal-Pound-Them-In-The-Ass prison in their futures.
"Mother shitter! Son of an ass!"
"Peter! Watch out for your cornhole, dude!"
Wouldn't surprise me - the idea of going after Flynn with the Logan act came from Law and Order.
Thought it was West Wing?
Best theory yet.
This is the best analogy to share with normies to understand what has happened here.. Everyone has seen office space and knows that scene about shaving pennies.
So you’re stealing.
They need some time in federal pound me in the ass penitentiary
yes
Watch this shit catch on in other countries. Many governments' sloppy frauds will be resurfacing like floating turds
Evidently my country uses dominion counting machines. now im concerned
If the electoral data gets purged in the coming days, you know what's up
Would be very interesting to see full independent audits worldwide
How many elected officials in this country weren't actually elected...
The importance of this needs to be stated. You can't fucking have 0.88 votes. That's bullshit and they use it to steal elections.
Seeing that the Antrim county glitch can be found in the data, it is basically guaranteed that the data matches the real numbers.
Where did you get that snippet of code? Is that from the dominion voting machines? some website?
Voting machines need open source code and all output needs to be public knowledge. Full crazy level auditing the processing code
Its impossible the vote_share is not precise enough, you cant get a raw vote with the percentage to only 3 significant figures
It's not exit polling data, you can find glitches from videos with this data too, if you see a glitch live on CNN, you can find it in this data.
Hey sorry, retard here. Whats up with the decimal place thing? I've seen it around a fair amount recently. And what is being multiplied?
http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1/ this website explains it all. It also explains how they fuckin cheat elections with it.
Wow this is crazy. I knew the voting systems were corruptible but to see it laid out this way is eye opening.
Congratulations. Welcome to 2 decades ago.
HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!!! RED ALERT!!
This explains everything!
Does anyone know if fractional voting and weighted voting is being used? The article says it could be and no one would know.
Wow, thats fucking slimee as shit
The data set, instead of having the vote counts for each candidate, has a total number of votes and a fraction for each candidate.
It looks roughly like this: votes: 1234567 biden: 0.654 trump: 0.321
When you're dealing with a 6 or 7 digit number and multiply by a 3 digit decimal, precision is lost; you don't know exactly how many votes go for each candidate.
Looking at the fake example above, 0.001 of 1,234,567 is 1,235.
Biden's actual vote count could be anywhere between 807,406 and 808,641.
Trump's actual vote count could be anywhere between 396,296 and 397,530.
Gotcha, so basically in tight races coming down to a 0.1 point margin the actual results could be different from the reported results.
In general terms, it would seem this is not the most accurate way to count, nor is it the easiest since it requires the candidate votes divided by total votes, rounded to the nearest 0.1%. All while they could do the easier and more accurate thing by reporting the unprocessed raw counts.
In your example it looks like the last sigfig is the thousands place and we don’t actually know how many hundreds went to either candidate.
Thank you for this. It makes more sense now. I wasn’t sure how they were going from 3 decimal places can equate to 1 or 2 votes to thousands.
This is the kind of attention to detail we need. Good job.