20485
posted ago by TrumanBlack ago by TrumanBlack +20485 / -0

Hello brothers, I just wanna use this space to thank the hundreds and hundreds of patriots that helped the many groups and teams that exposed election fraud. You worked day and night, with sleep, no food, no rest, no pay. You did all this because you love this country and you deserve that people know what you did.

TY, ChesterAnthem, Epic, Bucky, Snow, Sailor, King and all the hundreds of you working behind the scenes thank you. You're the true heroes.

Patriots the 6 is the most important day of your life and if you're not in DC you're gonna regret it forever. Whatever happens that day will determine the future of our nation.

Warriors, stand together and pray to God. We will get through this together. I love you all.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

OG POST: EVERY THING YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ IS VERIFIED AND WAS MADE BY THIS PEDE [CENTIPEDE] HE DID ALL THE HEAVY WORK

πŸ† https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/ πŸ†

🚨🚨🚨🚨EDIT NOV 12: 🚨🚨🚨

UPDATED LIST: https://pastebin.com/X6sW2aew

EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it'll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it'll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I'm also confident in the results it gives.

https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script.

https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used.

Place both in the same folder.

FULL THREAD: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XQIWRs/-happening-ive-updated-the-switc/

The data shows serious IREGULARITIES and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened on election

🚨"Switched did happen for Biden to Trump, as some of you have pointed out, and they also happened from 3rd party to (mainly Biden) both.🚨 The results should disturb everyone.

.

REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR.

.........

I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json] and I found this damning evidence [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all.

EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far.

EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know.

Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.

Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.

There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes.

🚨🚨🚨WE DECIDED TO LEAVE THIS NUMBERS UP SO YOU CAN SEE HOW OUR RESEARCH HAS EVOLVED.🚨🚨🚨

Dominion Voting Systems :

Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248

New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20

Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456

Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882

New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213

Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574

Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102

Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023

California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989

Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0

Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650

Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0

Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0

Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730

Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408

Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0

Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0

New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116

Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477

New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610

Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730

Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.

Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557

Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154

Election Systems & Software :

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849

Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748

South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119

Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276

South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1

North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681

Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0

North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15

District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Unknown Systems:

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272

Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51

Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0

Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408

Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0

Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35

Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13

West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300

Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0

Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.

VERIFIED!!!!:

I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ]

And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ]

You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere.

EDIT: Those 2,324 were moved from Trump to Jorgensen.

Jorgensen votes = Total votes * (1 - Trump share - Biden share)

Nr.27 : 573,857 * (1 - 0.578 - 0.401) = 12,051

Nr.28 : 574,417 * (1 - 0.568 - 0.406) = 14,935

Jorgensen vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 14,935 - 12,051 = 2,884

Total vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 574,417 - 573,857 = 560

Jorgensen vote increase - Total vote increase = 2,884 - 560 = 2,324

SOURCES: Here is the data I used:

EDISON DATA: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p

The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well.

🚨🚨FROM THE EDISON WEBSITE "Vote Count The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races" 🚨🚨

httpss://i.maga.host/wvRRA9m.png

I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json ] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead.

Take this picture for example. [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]

It's like this:

Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888

Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32

Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost.

I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes.

Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh

[pede444wow] I took the json files that are included here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel:

python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N

result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK

[montag] Here's a GitHub repo of the same data source taken at incremental time periods. https://github.com/favstats/USElection2020-NYT-Results

[ComeAndTakeIt_Texas] Hey TrumanBlack, I crunched the 27/28 timestamp data you posted (specifically this - https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png), and uploaded a spreadsheet analysis here (https://i.maga.host/xbwnVuk.png). I do a worst-case and best-case rounding error to generate Max T Vote, Min T Vote, and Max B Vote and Min B Vote that shows if you have 0.578 share, the max number that would represent would be 0.57849999999, and the min number would be 0.5775. The specific pic highlighted here allows no possible way whatsoever that Trump did not lose votes. The smallest number of votes he could have lost assuming in 27 there is a worst case rounding error and in the 28 step there is a best case rounding error (extremely unlikely), Trump lost a 4846.353. In worst case, he lost 5994.627 votes. There is literally NO way anyone can explain this away. They can also not explain that away as an asynchronous issue, as the timestamp itself is later (1), and (2), the total vote count increased. This single time step is proof alone.

[warpigpede] Re: the data displayed inhttps://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png

I calculated number of lost Trump votes as 5738.57, exactly 1% of the total number of votes (573857) at record 27:

votes 27: 573857

trump fraction: 0.578

trump votes: 331689.346

biden fraction: 0.401

biden votes: 230116.657

votes 28: 574417

trump fraction: 0.568

trump vote: 325950.776

biden vote: 232985.942

biden fraction: 0.406

votes change: +560

trump votes change: -5738.57

Exactly 1% is an awfully curious value. I wonder if it is consistent across the entire dataset

Comments (4385)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
448
Texas_Rangers 448 points ago +455 / -7

Spread this infographic to EVERYONE:

https://imgur.com/a/ZoDUx8N

131
deleted 131 points ago +132 / -1
114
Texas_Rangers 114 points ago +115 / -1

Work now? I forgot the 45

83
deleted 83 points ago +85 / -2
2
Hairy_Mouse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm pretty sure this is actually legit.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Justice101pt2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wrote a thread about this same data set (https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8SpJWq5/looking-for-more-election-data-t/)

I created a visualization that identifies every time either Republicans, Democrats, or Others "lose votes" from the previous time period:

https://public.tableau.com/profile/justice8491#!/vizhome/ElectionIrregularities/ElectionIrregularities

I'm looking for more granular data at the county level if anyone can help. If anyone wants help visualizing their evidence to make it clearer let me know.

1
dannyb75180 1 point ago +1 / -0

bit.ly is a url shortener, not a domain registrar.

55
Gwot0412 55 points ago +55 / -0

Can you do this at state level? If Dems are emboldened enough to do this on a Presidential election, then they have been doing it for awhile in the Senate and House races.

How awesome would it be to discover we have a 70% majority in the Senate and House too?

4
lovetogarden 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, it's crucial to do the Senate. Especially the Senate!

3
lilome33 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just got on here, but heard the first digital data drops gave Biden 3% first click. If same applies to Senate races, then McSally in AZ and Peters in MI may have won cause final numbers were less than 3 %. If the dude could do even one of those states and flip it, then the Repubs have 51 senators and who gives a crap what happens in GA. Sorry, just wanted to get this out there but not familiar how to do things on this site. Thanks.

2
Rowdy104 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was thinking the same thing about House and Senate races yesterday. We all know that the Dems would do this to House and Senate races.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

I want my mandate of the people!

103
114
2
lovetogarden 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gateway Pundit said they did not audit the numbers themselves. Shouldn't they have done that? They need to do that ASAP.

2
PolackThunder 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck man, why did you send this to them. They've done nothing but discredit us by saying, "Bombshell release tomorrow" and either A. The bombshell never gets released or B. The "Bombshell" is really not that much of a "Bombshell".

2
Tellman125 2 points ago +2 / -0

AWESOME JOB!!!!!!!!

1
BSnatch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Saw that. Thats fucking sick. WE ARE THE NEWS!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
127
DefundCNN 127 points ago +128 / -1

I think the Nebraska switch is actually the smoking gun in all of this.

189
deleted 189 points ago +192 / -3
120
PiratePatriot 120 points ago +120 / -0

88% is an unusually high voter turnout. That alone deserves an audit.

https://www.1011now.com/2020/11/04/live-at-130pm-recap-of-nebraska-general-election/

Nebraska exceeded its previous turnout record in terms of total votes cast, which was in the 2016 Presidential General Election, by about 68,000 votes. The unofficial overall turnout was 936,106, which is 74 percent of votes cast.

Thirty-four counties had a turnout of more than 80 percent. Four counties had a turnout of 88 percent. The turnout will increase as 20,000 - 25,000 early ballots that were dropped off Tuesday still need to be processed along with provisional ballots.

Early ballots that were mailed in or dropped off totaled 436,269.

2
dullcare 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes and how did Congressman Bacon get more votes than Trump? Usually the downballet rides on Presidents coat tails, not the other way around.

2
jjdub7 2 points ago +2 / -0

88% is an unusually high voter turnout. That alone deserves an audit.

THAT would explain the "lost votes" - dumping some so that the turnout ratio wouldn't trigger any alarms.

1
ronaldcamillo123 1 point ago +1 / -0

88% is totally normal...in North Korea.

1
glasscrawler 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is, but on the other hand democrats have been pushing people to "mail in nao!" since September. Reps of course knew they had to come out to counter their vote.

In my district, I estimated 80% of registered voters cast a ballot. Combination of mail-in, in person, and provisional. Normally we get ~55% in a presidential election.

My list of mail-in voters had a lot of people I never heard of, but I figured the publicity got a lot of younger people to register.

73
Texas_Rangers 73 points ago +74 / -1

Send this to to your legislatures.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
1
timferriss296 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is very helpful. Use this list to ctrl+f your state, then write to your local legislators (including at the state level), your secretary of state, county recorder, and governor. Here's a website to look up your state reps, complete with their email addresses. Perhaps only contact Republicans? (avoid RINO'S)

https://openstates.org/find_your_legislator/

72
PlzCoolerMe 72 points ago +72 / -0

Nebraskan here... Nobody I know understood how in the world Sasse could get more votes than Trump. Half the republicans here despise Sasse. It didn’t pass the eye or smell test.

2
Tired_of_Winning_NOT 2 points ago +2 / -0

For transparency, my mom is a terminal TDS patient, but voted for Sasse... because he criticized trump.

Just returned from a visit to Lincoln. It's a weird town now.

47
dullcare 47 points ago +48 / -1

agree. its likely more of a dominion play... Nebraska probably runs a more honest operation at its polling / counting centers. It probably doesn't have Tamany hall-like egregious in your face fraud like in Philly. Not as many dead voters and torn up ballets etc. So the fraud is more of a pure play electronic fraud by Dominion / Scorecard / Hammer.

2
Modernturnkey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jesus fucking Christ, could they have picked a more evil, insidious, obviously bad-guy name for their software? Dominion? Really?

1
stork 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nebraska (Omaha) poll worker here. Can confirm. All above board, very by the book at my ward/precinct. Only worked election day though, we weren't opening or scanning ballots, but everything else was by the rules, equal representation, nothing shady.

1
WETX 1 point ago +1 / -0

As additional evidence, the Benford's Law analysis of the vote counts from the 93 counties in NE also strongly indicate fraud. The first digits do not follow the natural pattern, indicating something hinky happened in the Nebraska vote.

85
deleted 85 points ago +88 / -3
75
Cirruspede 75 points ago +76 / -1

Yep. I’m in Omaha and was confused how Biden won.

3
JKillen 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm in Orlando and im confused how Biden won anything in the Midwest.

2
PlzCoolerMe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Uhhhhh.... depending on where those 30k plus votes were switched from...

I just looked and Biden beat Trump by just under 30k in NE2. Sound fishy???

2
QSWO1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Council Bluffs.

53
kekkk 53 points ago +53 / -0

LOL @ New York

I bet Cuomo was so terrified of Trump turning NY red.

1
sumguyaj1 1 point ago +1 / -0

hell yea, i live in BK and aside from some karens and joggers, the rest of us were pissed.

1
Zara101 1 point ago +1 / -0

I live in NY everyone I know voted red lol it was happening usually Ny is 65-36 for dem

This year tons of house races switched back to R and trump only lost 55-44

48
Ladybug87 48 points ago +48 / -0

With that we don't need PA or MI.

229 + 3(AK) + 10(WI) + 16(GA) + 11(AZ) + 1 (NE2) = 270

2
Frog_Anne 2 points ago +2 / -0

But we won them and we want them! None of this fraud gets a pass, especially the massive fraud in PA.

2
vegaspatriot1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

fuck that. we want them all corrected!

1
angryamerican1964 1 point ago +1 / -0

we need AZ and its dammed close

1
BestTimeToBAlive 1 point ago +1 / -0

and now we know why they stole this 1 point in NE

1
TXrunner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lost Arizona :(

31
DefundCNN 31 points ago +31 / -0

And it's in somewhere people would normally assume no one would care, and there is no easy way to rationalize another explanation for why it happened, but proportionally, the vote swing is Massive compared to the others, and it just happened to be in a hard red area that was a key area for the electoral college despite no campaiging. There was also a much bigger difference between Trump's vote vs the GOP vote there.

12
Pickles 12 points ago +12 / -0

I picked a random precinct in Douglas County(Nebraska), 8-12. Here is the breakdown for Rep, Dem and Ind (the 47 total votes for the Libertarian is close enough to the # of registered Libertarians so I didn't include them in this analysis)....

8-12 Registered R - 813 Registered D - 833 Registered I - 635

Voter turnout was 72%, so as unscientific as it is, lets just assume 72% across the board. And lets assume ALL Rs vote R and ALL Ds vote D.

Where the INDEPENDENTS voted: Trump 32% Biden 68% Republican Bacon 51.5% Democrat Eastman 48.5%

The Presidential and Congressional races were within 2 votes of eachother. Just for

For some reason the participation in the SENATE race for Douglas Co 8-12 was only 64.7% (compared to 72% for Pres and Con). Using the data in the same way would mean for the Senate race in Douglas Co 8-12, Independents voted....

Republican Sasse 73% Democrat Janicek 9.7% Libertarian Siadek 17.3%

This was 1 precinct that I chose randomly because the registration seemed to be pretty even and my theory would have been that Trump would get 95% of Republicans, 10-15% of Democrats and 50%++ of Independents and that voter turnout for Republicans would be higher than Dems because of enthusiasm, but I of course had a biased opinion, but I live in Nebraska and I see what I see.

2
jiggy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Guys I think there is an MIT guy independently fimding a similar thing in MI: pls have a look. They have a theory on how the algorithm operates. We need to see if other states match the precinct curves in MI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk&feature=share

40
Circus4One 40 points ago +40 / -0

Just curious why you think NE is the smoking gun. I live in Nebraska and couldn’t believe one of our votes went to Biden. Thanks.

45
arkylady 45 points ago +45 / -0

Not sure what he meant, but maybe since NE doesn't have massive election fraud from every direction happening at the same time, it would be easier to highlight the election software "glitch".

24
Wefoundyouremails 24 points ago +24 / -0

Not OP, but I don't even live in NE and I couldn't believe it! Makes me feel vindicated hearing it from someone else who lives there.

22
dullcare 22 points ago +23 / -1

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2xUQg/is-any-one-else-bothered-by-the-/

The fact that the republican in the NE2 congressional race got more votes in Douglas county than Trump is mighty fishy.

Living in Nebraska, can you explain why there would be a disconnect with the downballet voting? Do you think there are that many cross ballet voters?

1
Circus4One 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, there wouldn’t be many cross ballot voters although I do know people don’t like Ben Sasse because of some anti Trump campaign ads that were running and the Democrat that was running had been disowned by the party. The local radio station was pushing a vote for this democrat because he’s not really a democrat narrative.

16
Jeezy1879 16 points ago +17 / -1

Laughs in West Virginia

13
Ladybug87 13 points ago +13 / -0

With that we don't need PA or MI.

229 + 3(AK) + 10(WI) + 16(GA) + 11(AZ) + 1 (NE2) = 270

2
Hillarysbeefcurtains 2 points ago +2 / -0

That would be awesome if the NE2 switched to trump for 270. The dems here were bragging when they thought their one point went to biden.

1
day221 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even with 269 I think Trump wins because it goes to the house vote.

If he wins PA he just needs two of AZ, NV, MI, GA,WI I think.

1
ShadilayEveryDay 1 point ago +1 / -0

True, if we can win the WI and GA lawsuits and win AZ (very likely) this is all it would take

4
trumpmixtape 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think virginia and new york are.

Look how fucking close new york was. Imagine if democrats didnt have that hub of influence.

And Virginia is home to basically every dc crony. Look how overwhelmingly desperate they are.

Those states worry me not for Biden, because Biden is done. Those states illustrate it goes beyond him. Its "systemic".

5
dramagan 5 points ago +5 / -0

I live in New York and I think Trump really won New York. That's why they haven't updated the count in almost a week. Look at how many Trump votes were removed from the tally plus how many were switched from Trump to Biden. In addition the areas that haven't been counted are heavily pro Trump. I believe they don't know what to do and aren't updating because they want Trump not to realize how close he is in New York. Even with this fraud once they add in the other areas the margin will get even tighter. That's 29 electoral votes....

1
emeraldcity 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I do as well, or that it was close. I think there is voter suppression because people assume Democrats will win. If they knew how close it really was.....

2
Douladeb1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I knew something wasn’t right with NY and they stopped counting. The numbers have basically stayed the same and stopped counting on election night. It stayed at 76% of the votes in for over a week almost 2 weeks. I lollies in NY and we are all so done here!! Cuomo is killing us!! Trumps caravans were 50 miles long just prior to Election Day.

1
Rowdy104 1 point ago +1 / -0

How come? I looked at it but I don't see the smoking gun.

46
deleted 46 points ago +54 / -8
30
Truglow 30 points ago +38 / -8

I dont like the smell of this. 2 day old account? We are dealing with deep state operations so have someone verify.

14
SchittsMethDealer 14 points ago +14 / -0

As far as I can tell, Dominion did not use any protection. No passwords. No Secure Network, nothing. It's like they don't pay programmers. Had them set up probably contract-basis. And has English major interns running the software. Attempt at plausible deniability? Or stupidity? I mean double-check the work, but don't see an angle how this could benefit the deep State. anons being red pilled as they dug. Remember, a lot of the anons are/were apolitical, this is just a fun rabbithole game to them, but saw a few anons get pissed at the corruption. Probably a big red pill when you discover (and see) the data. I did see one anon group that was likely deep state or Dems just doing a parody thread of an anon. easy to click somewhere else. Don't block posts unless they post something worth blocking. Better that than block a new pede--we'd be the same in their minds as Twitter then.

1
KatyBarTheDoor 1 point ago +1 / -0

They want it to be open for hackers just like HRCs bathroom server

4
DJFG 4 points ago +6 / -2

TrumanBlack has posts more than a month old???

-35
deleted -35 points ago +21 / -56
23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Faithbrother 2 points ago +2 / -0

Published November 10, 2020 at 6:32pmΒ  Comments

22
iminlovewithtrump 22 points ago +33 / -11

Stfu shill, we don't need low energy in here

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
workinating 1 point ago +1 / -0

KEK

0
LegacyOfWinning 0 points ago +1 / -1

HIGH ENERGY!!!CUCKS BELONG IN REDDIT

11
alucard13mmfmj 11 points ago +11 / -0

The media calls the president these days. Havnt you heard? So their data must be tip top.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
2
Hillarys-discharge 2 points ago +3 / -1

This should be unsticky'd IMMEDIATELY. Please spread the word pedes, this will make us look extremely bad.

This smelled bad from the first post. Mostly because it felt like a Scooby Doo mystery being neatly solved in 5 minutes. In the real world it would take days and Daphne would be blowing Scooby while Fred would be blowing Shaggy.

1
Strzok_is_a_traitor 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're not broken datasets. The voting software converts votes from whole numbers to store it as decimals. It sets them as a "double" value.

All the tabulators are connected online to enable faster reporting of results. Edison is getting a direct feed of the counts.

2
wilsoe2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are totally right to think critically on this data. I'm in the same boat. If this is legit deleting and swapping votes to fix the election then its the biggest political scandal in world history. Given those stakes, it seems "too easy" that the evidence for that is in plain site for eagle eyed observers.

Therefore, i'm thinking there is a reason for deleting votes? The Dominion manual says its a feature for if you accidentally run the same batch twice. That said, it does seem odd how many there are for NY and that some states have 0.

I watched the Dr Shiva video that seems to demonstrate how and when the algorithm kicks in to switch votes. The next layer of this analysis is the timing. If Dr Shiva is right, I want to understand the times in which he sees votes in MI being flipped. That should match the data we see here. My gut is telling me it won't though because there is just one time interval in which MI votes were swapped and it should be much longer than that according to Dr. Shiva's analysis.

2
jiggy 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. It is not a time based switch. What they found is the algorithm activated in province going at least 20% for straight party Repub voting...and gets progressively more aggressive in eroding Trump votes as %Republican increases

41
MixedBlacknWhite 41 points ago +41 / -0

not the right link? site no worky

8
KristiNoemFaceFuck 8 points ago +9 / -1

Done