Hello brothers, I just wanna use this space to thank the hundreds and hundreds of patriots that helped the many groups and teams that exposed election fraud. You worked day and night, with sleep, no food, no rest, no pay. You did all this because you love this country and you deserve that people know what you did.
TY, ChesterAnthem, Epic, Bucky, Snow, Sailor, King and all the hundreds of you working behind the scenes thank you. You're the true heroes.
Patriots the 6 is the most important day of your life and if you're not in DC you're gonna regret it forever. Whatever happens that day will determine the future of our nation.
Warriors, stand together and pray to God. We will get through this together. I love you all.
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
OG POST: EVERY THING YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ IS VERIFIED AND WAS MADE BY THIS PEDE [CENTIPEDE] HE DID ALL THE HEAVY WORK
🏆 https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/ 🏆
🚨🚨🚨🚨EDIT NOV 12: 🚨🚨🚨
UPDATED LIST: https://pastebin.com/X6sW2aew
EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it'll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it'll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I'm also confident in the results it gives.
https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script.
https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used.
Place both in the same folder.
FULL THREAD: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XQIWRs/-happening-ive-updated-the-switc/
The data shows serious IREGULARITIES and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened on election
🚨"Switched did happen for Biden to Trump, as some of you have pointed out, and they also happened from 3rd party to (mainly Biden) both.🚨 The results should disturb everyone.
.
REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR.
.........
I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json] and I found this damning evidence [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all.
EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far.
EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know.
Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes.
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.
Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.
There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes.
🚨🚨🚨WE DECIDED TO LEAVE THIS NUMBERS UP SO YOU CAN SEE HOW OUR RESEARCH HAS EVOLVED.🚨🚨🚨
Dominion Voting Systems :
Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248
New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20
Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456
Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882
New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213
Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574
Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102
Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023
California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989
Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0
Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650
Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0
Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0
Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730
Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408
Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0
Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0
New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116
Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477
New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610
Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730
Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.
Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557
Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154
Election Systems & Software :
Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849
Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748
South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119
Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276
South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1
North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681
Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0
North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15
District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Unknown Systems:
Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272
Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51
Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0
Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408
Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0
Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35
Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13
West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300
Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0
Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.
VERIFIED!!!!:
I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ]
And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ]
You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere.
EDIT: Those 2,324 were moved from Trump to Jorgensen.
Jorgensen votes = Total votes * (1 - Trump share - Biden share)
Nr.27 : 573,857 * (1 - 0.578 - 0.401) = 12,051
Nr.28 : 574,417 * (1 - 0.568 - 0.406) = 14,935
Jorgensen vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 14,935 - 12,051 = 2,884
Total vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 574,417 - 573,857 = 560
Jorgensen vote increase - Total vote increase = 2,884 - 560 = 2,324
SOURCES: Here is the data I used:
EDISON DATA: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json
https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p
The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well.
🚨🚨FROM THE EDISON WEBSITE "Vote Count The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races" 🚨🚨
httpss://i.maga.host/wvRRA9m.png
I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json ] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead.
Take this picture for example. [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]
It's like this:
Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888
Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32
Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost.
I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes.
Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh
[pede444wow] I took the json files that are included here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel:
python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N
result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK
[montag] Here's a GitHub repo of the same data source taken at incremental time periods. https://github.com/favstats/USElection2020-NYT-Results
[ComeAndTakeIt_Texas] Hey TrumanBlack, I crunched the 27/28 timestamp data you posted (specifically this - https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png), and uploaded a spreadsheet analysis here (https://i.maga.host/xbwnVuk.png). I do a worst-case and best-case rounding error to generate Max T Vote, Min T Vote, and Max B Vote and Min B Vote that shows if you have 0.578 share, the max number that would represent would be 0.57849999999, and the min number would be 0.5775. The specific pic highlighted here allows no possible way whatsoever that Trump did not lose votes. The smallest number of votes he could have lost assuming in 27 there is a worst case rounding error and in the 28 step there is a best case rounding error (extremely unlikely), Trump lost a 4846.353. In worst case, he lost 5994.627 votes. There is literally NO way anyone can explain this away. They can also not explain that away as an asynchronous issue, as the timestamp itself is later (1), and (2), the total vote count increased. This single time step is proof alone.
[warpigpede] Re: the data displayed inhttps://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png
I calculated number of lost Trump votes as 5738.57, exactly 1% of the total number of votes (573857) at record 27:
votes 27: 573857
trump fraction: 0.578
trump votes: 331689.346
biden fraction: 0.401
biden votes: 230116.657
votes 28: 574417
trump fraction: 0.568
trump vote: 325950.776
biden vote: 232985.942
biden fraction: 0.406
votes change: +560
trump votes change: -5738.57
Exactly 1% is an awfully curious value. I wonder if it is consistent across the entire dataset
This is an important viewpoint to keep in mind as we go into the close: remember the pedes that use cannabis. It's not talked about here much which is worrying. Repubs are all about states rights until they focus on something they disagree with, then they go full Dem on them. States rights are a crucially important part of our constitution and can't be ignored because it's inconvenient for you.
Sure roll back the national mandates on abortion and drug control, but be ready to lose the battle anyways in the blue states, just like the founding fathers intended.
Be the Lion party, not the Republican party.
Drugs sure, abortion no. Protecting babies from being murdered is different than a dude sitting on his couch smoking a joint with a bag of Cheetos.
Im still not down with other-than-prescription drugs, but if I have to choose between making those go away and saving babies’ lives, we would have another baby boom.
The downside is they'd mostly be black babies. Add 30 million blacks to America and we break from the financial strain and Republicans never win again.
Its literally a plant given by God to make people fucking relax. Its not even physically addicting.
Source: smoked for 2 years straight, np quitting whenever I want. Nicotine on the other hand?? Impossible.
Also no one fuckin dies from weed, but alcohol/sugar/abortions????
That's just your opinion. One I agree with, but still. Letifs ts will go Healthcare is a right. It's totally different than protecting a dude sitting on his couch smoking a joint with a bag of Cheetos. People die without it. Just like these babies. Will you be pushing for universal healthcare or are you a hypocrite?
Is abortion in the constitution? It's a not a new phenomenon.
Here's what you do, you vote it down in your state, and only your state, and you stay fuck out of federal laws. Then you make everyone else do the same. Then you go to a state with the laws you like and settle down there, while the aborters can go to their state. If all 50 states outlaw it individually then hell yeah, otherwise tough shit.
Anti abortion is in the constitution: life, liberty, pursuit of happiness.
"So is healthcare for all yet you guys don't give a shit about it. It literally says it twice. How do you expect people to pursue happiness when they aren't even healthy?"
And so on. Does it say abortion? No. Don't stretch it into word games to fit your opinions.
Is there any question that the war on drugs has been an abysmal multi trillion dollar failure?
We have no choice but to try something different. People should be free to do what they want as long as other citizens don’t have to pay for their mistakes like becoming a drug addict.
"As long as other citizens don't have to pay..."
Well, they do. In every state that has legalized it, we pay for losers mistakes.
If all the heroin disappeared tonight, the junkies wouldn’t just get up and go find jobs.
Drug users can work, shit most heroin addicts aren’t even that obvious. Drug use falls into a pareto distribution.
10% of the addicts do 90% of the drug in question. So for every 100 coke users, 90 are just “well we are in vegas, fuck it” once in a blue moon users. 9 use regularly but maintain jobs. And one is a crackhead sucking dicks for 5$.
What mistakes did we pay for where legalized? How many hundreds of times more do we pay when it's illegal?
what r u talking about?
We pay for every drug addict collecting government checks. The ghettos are full of multi-generstions of do nothing drug abusers.
LEGALIZE ALL THE WEED
Wegalize all the Leed!
Off topic to data thread but to straighten things out for you.
Republican Redpills to the answers you seek:
All controlled substances should be by prescription; with alcohol (and maybe tobacco depending on State/local ordinances), being dispensed via the usual methods (but the licensing etc. can be simplified to follow the prescription model), and all others through (real) pharmacies.
Eventually, all prescription drugs (likely except addictive substances), will be covered(paid zero direct price) with a Republican Strict-Constitutional version which is 180 degrees opposite of 44NoCare or Single-payer leftie crap. Also includes drug treatment programs.
For law enforcement activities, If it's drugs, it should be D.E.A. not the FBI, and DEA should be moved from DOJ, to FDA and HHS. Same with A.T.F. should have the F removed, and A.T. moved with D.E.A. and to HHS.
Don't be trying to split the Republican Party. DJT is the political head of the Republican Party. He studied and the whole 3rd party thing many times, and he made the choice and decision it was best to vote and JOIN the REPUBLICAN PARTY. MAGA DJT shortened from *"Let's Make America Great Again!" - Ronald Reagan's campaign.
MAGA! And back to our Data thread, which I wish people & Pedes would take the redpills on, from those of us whom have been through this rodeo before.
Americans aren't going to roll over on what they want just because you come at them with some strong language. We wouldn't have Trump in office now if it worked like that.
My right to use cannabis to medically help myself is just as crucial to me as your gun rights. My ability to use it not medically is as important to me as your free speech rights and entertainment rights. All have to do with liberty. You're just suppressing it at that point. Law enforcement agencies? The ones that regularly bust your average Joe in legal states, just so they can re-up on their slush funds? Those guys that turn aroun, literally when BLM attacks. The ones that take your guns? you want me to trust law enforcement. That's RINO thinking. Fittingly, since your bold plan is "change nothing."
Controlled substances are just another way for the government to take control over you. "Leave alcohol out" said the incredible hypocrite. One of the most harmful, addictive, life-destroying substances out there. "But it's fine cause my beers, MAGA!" as he jiggles his hard won belly into an early grave. Those damn cannabis-users and their cheetos though, amirite?
You don't even touch upon the huge issue of whether or not it should be a controlled substance to begin with. "All controlled substance should be prescription" Except alcohol. Again. I''m not even sure how to engage such a warped idea. It's entirely double think from start to finish, covered up by brazenly invoking Donald Trump's name as if that makes your argument less faulty.
Sorry I should have written more clearly above.
I didn't say you didn't have a right to medically help yourself; I said controlled substances are regulated as all controlled substances are, aka creates a uniform method and accountability, and removes all the street drugs (the cartels or growers can go legit and become pharma companies, making drugs).
I didn't say you can't have a moonshine whiskey still and make your own for your own consumption on your own property.
I said all controlled substances are by prescription, I didn't leave alcohol out. I said where alcohol is sold/distributed (and likely tobacco too) would be likely the same as today: aka bars, stores, etc, but when you go to purchase, you slide your ID just like today(ID and or payment) when buying at a restaurant, store, or pharmacy refill; but (with streamlined licensing, auditing, inventory/taxation, for the businesses, etc.) The rest (non alcohol non tobacco) controlled substances, would be dispensed via (real) pharmacies (i.e. just like medicine is.) and yes this means medical professionals can do what they do with it (like in home healthcare, the nurse can pick it up from the pharmacy and administer or bring to the patient, but the whole substance and chain of custody and quality of the drug is "controlled" aka no black market needed or required).
I put in the law enforcement part so you can see that it becomes a health pharma issue NOT a law enforcement criminal code issue. Just like someone who dispenses heart medicine illegally, or fraudulent ingredients, etc. The enforcement side is on dispensing illegally to others; or in the quality/licensing of manufacture/transport/taxation/etc
You mixing in issues with police dept accountability into your topic; and for those of us whom have been on the receiving end of Rodney King vs an armed mob, ya it doesn't make all depts bad or all officers bad. There are very real and simple things to fix this, most lay at the feet of the Supreme Court, who over decades has cobbled together a crapload of crap caselaw, which dictates much of how officers have to spend their time and conduct their actions, which doesn't make them, the public, or suspects any safer or better.
"Controlled substances" is a way of saying, everyone recognizes that these substances have effects and affect human beings & families & society; as you said about you medically treating yourself proves the point that these substances have changes upon the human mind/body/etc. People can argue about what is say OTC (over the counter) vs "controlled substances"; (and redpill) one reason why drug companies want things OTC is so they make more money from it rather than prescription and in healthcare plans. But again this is a separate discussion of what is OTC (like peptobismol) vs prescription. [Again not being stupid, It it alters the mind, or is addictive, or is dangerous, or requires special handling/useage; it's going to be in the prescription model--this also puts that whole "underage drinking" thing and "underage drug use" into the medical realm rather than the law enforcement realm.
Society wasn't born yesterday, and even our Founders had governmental rules on such things; even with some being smugglers to avoid taxes, or people like George Washington being one of Americas largest distillers. "In 1799, George Washington's distillery produced nearly 11,000 gallons, making it one of the largest whiskey distilleries in America."
https://www.mountvernon.org/the-estate-gardens/distillery/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington%27s_Distillery
Me personally, I don't drink (even less than 2 glasses a year including toasts at weddings, etc.) and never smoked, not even a single puff of a cigarette. So again, don't project onto me things; I am just providing you with the way Republicans have solutions to what you brought up which do not fit as you described or assume to be the case.
I think you just like to hear yourself talk. I've read this four times and can't take away anything of value. I'm pretty sure you could have condensed it all into a single paragraph. And it would have been infinitely more understandable.
You speak in circles for hours and never reach a point. Blah blah blah.
I still don't know what you're saying the state of alcohol will be. You literally say it will change and then describe exactly the same situation with zero changes. That's just one part where you're completely incomprehensible. I've given up on trying to make sense of your other 5+ messages./
Most importantly where do you get off speaking about "republican redpills"?
Do you know anyone who is actually talking about policy like this and can you prove it? Or are you just talking out of your ass about fantasies you want? Because, thankfully, as of right now, the only one I've seen say anything like this is you.
I can tell you thought a lot about this, but that also that you've completely jumped the gun. You've already decided that we should do. What you're arguing about now is how to do it. We obviously should not be controlling them at all.
Inherently it distills down to this, you want to put controls on me. I don't want you to control me. Which one of these is more American? Hint: our founding fathers didn't secede because they were happy with their freedoms.
Why don't we put our burgers in pharmacies, all the candy? Sugar releases dopamine, that very much affects your mood. Sugar high anybody? Americans can't be trusted to feed ourselves, 50% of us are morbidly obese. I don't see you campaigning to take away the McDonalds.
You don't get to decide what I do, until I'm actually a direct threat to you in some way. That's the line. Driving drunk? big problem. Drunk to point of passing out in a corner? well that's my own damn business. Drink myself to deasth? Yeah that's really fucking sad, but I'm not taking away your guns because chicago kills 50 of themselves each weekend.
You deciding what I do, when it doesn't directly impact your freedom is the least American, least MAGA thing I have heard since I started thinking "wow this whole thing is kinda cool." Sincerely fuck off. What you're doing right now is the masculine form of "Weaponized Compassion."
Where are you getting this info from? You've completely killed by MAGA boner and you could see from my months of posts it was the most raging hard-on before this.
So I'd like to confirm that this is Trump's plan for myself. Your sources?
"Back in 1990 at a luncheon held by the Miami Herald, Trump called the United States’ drug enforcement policy a ‘joke’ and was quoted as saying “We’re losing badly the war on drugs. You have to legalize drugs to win that war. You have to take the profit away from these drug czars.'"
In a leaked recording from 2018, Trump was heard to say marijuana makes people “lose IQ points” and at an opioid summit that same year at the White House, Trump advocated the death penalty for drug dealers, equating the provision of lethal drugs with murder. He was quoted as saying “Some countries have a very, very tough penalty — the ultimate penalty — and by the way, they have much less of a drug problem than we do”.
Wow, so is Trump going to legalize everything or turn us into North Korea? Kill the drug dealers, hang them from the street corners?
Trump vs Trump who's right?
Just made another long comment explaining the above next to this comment.
The issue above by previous Pede, was The Republican Party, which as I say DJT is the head of, he doesn't write legislature (that's the Executive Branches job). And this year's Covid National Convention didn't even have a party platform. So I was expanding (redpilling) the Pede's understanding of the topic & Party, rather than the bluepilled/blackpilled narrative he/she wrote.
Simple fact is the above (and other longer comment) fit in both DJT quotes you mentioned as well as with many other quotes by many other Republicans over the years/decades.
The issue has for many years now been framed the issue of "legalization" vs "criminalization"; but there of course is a better option; and that's turning it into a "controlled substance".
This removes the users (or addicts) from criminalization; it removes the profit from the criminal underworld; and moves enforcement to illegal distribution, medical malpractice, medicine fraud, etc. just as with someone giving/selling/counterfitting any other drug.
And if/when combined into a Strictly-Constitutional Republican Healthcare Policy/Plan; then prescription drugs (with the exception of alcohol, tobacco, and likely other addictive substances) become zero consumer cost (and yes still free market, etc fully redpilled, NOT single payer etc).
Sorry didn't mean to deflate your MAGA boner! Back to the thread. From a data point of view and elections cheating point of view; I've examined a great many things over many decades; firsthand experiences in a few elections to say (including one I won by <5 votes as they phyically ran out of ballots to stuff when they locked themselves into a room to "count" without witnesses. I've been fighting these Dem/Commies for decades, my parents fought them, etc.
As well as I worked firsthand datasets including US Census, traffic data, financial data, weather data, etc. I found the Wells Fargo Account scandel stuff in the early 2000's, before even the federal lawsuit goes back to ONLY 2005. I've also worked polls many times. And worked many data collecting stuff firsthand; and in doing preliminary data analysis, I've found fraud(all admitted and verifed after) in every human-gathered dataset I've ever studied. Like some of the other autists Pedes here, we're likely in the top 100 in the US or world.
So yes this thread is good but the key problem is how the data is created in the first place. How the cheating and ballots are done. There are many ways they (mostly Dems) cheat; and how these ballots, vote counts, get tabulated, and how the tabulations are combined (at the local, regional, or State levels). Like if they take a box of REAL voted ballots, and run them through twice, the data can appear real, but obviously other than the vote totals, catching this wont occur at later auding processes. "Counting machines" which skim off votes or switch votes, again, at some places this wont show up downstream in the counting. As usually there is an aggrigate counting in between to pad/soften the numbers. Same with big fake ballot dumps; these are usually done (like the hour of the wolf dumps) in a different mannor. Same with ballots which ONLY have POTUS/VP selected are handed differently. Same with ballots which DO NOT have POTUS/VP on them to pad the rest of the downballot races to rig those.
Anyhow all these things together, mean harvesting the data off a datafeed, for which it wasn't intended to be, and it's not "hard data" which is used by the Sec. of State's totals of votes means it's mostly for "media/news" consumption. And this isn't a legal (Courtroom) or Legal (certifiying winner) issue; it's a news/narrative issue.
The legal fight, is on Constitutional Law; and the fraud is true and multi-level, but that takes much longer and is about the other contests; the Founding Fathers knew all this stuff which is why the invented and put in the Electoral College into the US Constitution (it makes such frauds irrelevant to POTUS/VP selection). The real fight is twofold 1.) Electors; and 2.) Cleaning up Election Integrity and all the other contests.
Both the quotes u showed can be true at the same time. The first shows a better solution to the problem, the second states the best outcome regarding the problem, and the problem is the drugs. Obviously you can't apply the second solution in USA because of its laws, but you cant deny its effect. So try again in your brain, you will get it. :)
They were 30 years apart. He just changed his mind.