20485
posted ago by TrumanBlack ago by TrumanBlack +20485 / -0

Hello brothers, I just wanna use this space to thank the hundreds and hundreds of patriots that helped the many groups and teams that exposed election fraud. You worked day and night, with sleep, no food, no rest, no pay. You did all this because you love this country and you deserve that people know what you did.

TY, ChesterAnthem, Epic, Bucky, Snow, Sailor, King and all the hundreds of you working behind the scenes thank you. You're the true heroes.

Patriots the 6 is the most important day of your life and if you're not in DC you're gonna regret it forever. Whatever happens that day will determine the future of our nation.

Warriors, stand together and pray to God. We will get through this together. I love you all.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

OG POST: EVERY THING YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ IS VERIFIED AND WAS MADE BY THIS PEDE [CENTIPEDE] HE DID ALL THE HEAVY WORK

πŸ† https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/ πŸ†

🚨🚨🚨🚨EDIT NOV 12: 🚨🚨🚨

UPDATED LIST: https://pastebin.com/X6sW2aew

EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it'll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it'll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I'm also confident in the results it gives.

https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script.

https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used.

Place both in the same folder.

FULL THREAD: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XQIWRs/-happening-ive-updated-the-switc/

The data shows serious IREGULARITIES and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened on election

🚨"Switched did happen for Biden to Trump, as some of you have pointed out, and they also happened from 3rd party to (mainly Biden) both.🚨 The results should disturb everyone.

.

REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR.

.........

I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json] and I found this damning evidence [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all.

EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far.

EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know.

Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.

Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.

There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes.

🚨🚨🚨WE DECIDED TO LEAVE THIS NUMBERS UP SO YOU CAN SEE HOW OUR RESEARCH HAS EVOLVED.🚨🚨🚨

Dominion Voting Systems :

Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248

New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20

Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456

Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882

New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213

Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574

Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102

Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023

California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989

Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0

Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650

Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0

Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0

Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730

Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408

Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0

Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0

New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116

Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477

New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610

Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730

Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.

Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557

Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154

Election Systems & Software :

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849

Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748

South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119

Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276

South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1

North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681

Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0

North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15

District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Unknown Systems:

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272

Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51

Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0

Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408

Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0

Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35

Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13

West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300

Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0

Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.

VERIFIED!!!!:

I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ]

And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ]

You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere.

EDIT: Those 2,324 were moved from Trump to Jorgensen.

Jorgensen votes = Total votes * (1 - Trump share - Biden share)

Nr.27 : 573,857 * (1 - 0.578 - 0.401) = 12,051

Nr.28 : 574,417 * (1 - 0.568 - 0.406) = 14,935

Jorgensen vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 14,935 - 12,051 = 2,884

Total vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 574,417 - 573,857 = 560

Jorgensen vote increase - Total vote increase = 2,884 - 560 = 2,324

SOURCES: Here is the data I used:

EDISON DATA: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p

The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well.

🚨🚨FROM THE EDISON WEBSITE "Vote Count The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races" 🚨🚨

httpss://i.maga.host/wvRRA9m.png

I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json ] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead.

Take this picture for example. [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]

It's like this:

Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888

Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32

Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost.

I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes.

Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh

[pede444wow] I took the json files that are included here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel:

python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N

result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK

[montag] Here's a GitHub repo of the same data source taken at incremental time periods. https://github.com/favstats/USElection2020-NYT-Results

[ComeAndTakeIt_Texas] Hey TrumanBlack, I crunched the 27/28 timestamp data you posted (specifically this - https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png), and uploaded a spreadsheet analysis here (https://i.maga.host/xbwnVuk.png). I do a worst-case and best-case rounding error to generate Max T Vote, Min T Vote, and Max B Vote and Min B Vote that shows if you have 0.578 share, the max number that would represent would be 0.57849999999, and the min number would be 0.5775. The specific pic highlighted here allows no possible way whatsoever that Trump did not lose votes. The smallest number of votes he could have lost assuming in 27 there is a worst case rounding error and in the 28 step there is a best case rounding error (extremely unlikely), Trump lost a 4846.353. In worst case, he lost 5994.627 votes. There is literally NO way anyone can explain this away. They can also not explain that away as an asynchronous issue, as the timestamp itself is later (1), and (2), the total vote count increased. This single time step is proof alone.

[warpigpede] Re: the data displayed inhttps://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png

I calculated number of lost Trump votes as 5738.57, exactly 1% of the total number of votes (573857) at record 27:

votes 27: 573857

trump fraction: 0.578

trump votes: 331689.346

biden fraction: 0.401

biden votes: 230116.657

votes 28: 574417

trump fraction: 0.568

trump vote: 325950.776

biden vote: 232985.942

biden fraction: 0.406

votes change: +560

trump votes change: -5738.57

Exactly 1% is an awfully curious value. I wonder if it is consistent across the entire dataset

Comments (4385)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
15
pede-o-saurus 15 points ago +16 / -1

Are you just concern trolling? This is the map of fraud. That data comes from vote tabulating machines and they keep a timestamped record of their counts. Lawyers will use this map to file discovery to seize those machines' logs and we'll see how they match. Maybe there's a consolidation or reporting error here or there in the database but this many isn't feasible as a collection of one-off errors. And it also shows how votes can be skimmed between states, and it spot-checks with ground observers and news reports. Elections have been overturned on less. This is the map.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +5 / -9
12
pede-o-saurus 12 points ago +13 / -1

Nice try, disinfo agent. This is what it actually says on Edison's site: "A proven source for accurate and timely nationwide vote tabulation:

In an effort to improve quality, streamline data collection, and expand election coverage in 2018, ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News ended their arrangement with the Associated Press for vote tabulation and now partner with Edison Research for these data.

For the 2018 General Election, Edison Research provided the NEP with a fast and accurate vote count throughout the nation, providing data for all statewide races and all House races."

Tabulation is counting. Everybody has access to official data right now because it's POSTED ON THE COUNTY ELECTION WEBSITES OF EVERY COUNTY, Edison just aggregates it.

Deport this guy.

5
Texas_Rangers 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep deport u/lapdants. His concern trolling all throughout this thread. They're getting scared.

2
America1stAndOnly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Deport him? Are you sure? I mean I just checked his account and he's been on this site for 9 whole hours. 9 hours! Clearly he's the most fervent Trump supporter of us all.

3
PatrickHangry 3 points ago +4 / -1

I just did a search. The .json file has a field called edison_exit_polls_page pointing to a web URL, but it's mixed in with other random web URL's. They have more references to tabulation, e.g. "Released as a separate subtotal at the end of tabulation" shows up a couple times, and a third with an abbreviation.

This doesn't appear to be exit poll data. It appears to be actual tabulated data, albeit presented in a lossy 3 significant figure format.

We need to be really careful with drawing inferences about dropped/switched votes from calculating Trump/Biden votes from percentages with only 3 significant figures, because anything beyond those figures is basically going to be random noise from timestamp to timestamp.

I suspect the OP's calculations for switched votes are bunk because of this unless he took it into account and gave the "minimum possible swing" or something, but there are still some major abnormalities in the data. The OP pointed one of them out too: There's a 0.6% drop in Trump votes, or 6 ticks of the least sig fig, when the vote total jumped by only 54 from 2984468 to 2984522...that's way outside of rounding error.

-22
deleted -22 points ago +3 / -25
29
pede-o-saurus 29 points ago +29 / -0

Yes.

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
5
UndocumentedUpvote 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep, what we are seeing here is the final approved for release version of the data, which is already rigged by the algorithm. However that 1M vanished votes come from mathematically, it's a product of data tempering of historic proportions.

-9
deleted -9 points ago +3 / -12
2
patriotblend 2 points ago +2 / -0

Greed is a cruel and blinding master. This is why we save paper ballots my frens

1
jiggy 1 point ago +1 / -0

They rely on media to cover

1
Noadhominem 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hence why they needed to claim victory so quickly and posture SJB as authoritative standing in front of a faux β€œOffice of the President Elect” sign. May as well be SNL.

6
idshukhov 6 points ago +7 / -1

4 years ago I would not. Look at your behaviour lately and tell me again how you're not capable of this.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
-14
deleted -14 points ago +7 / -21
3
idshukhov 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not sure what to believe at this point. Given the Democrat Party's history I'd go with what you mentioned, sure. But, you did ask if its possible a recount could reveal a million votes stolen and I'm not certain anymore.

Its now okay to wiretap your opponents campaign, censorship is accepted, and we have sub 3rd world levels of vote security. Who can say what is possible?

1
AndrewLB 1 point ago +1 / -0

Considering Biden didn't even show up to campaign and when he eventually did it was just a few staffers, or dealership owned Jeep vehicles, it s quite clear the dems needed masssive fraud. Even here in California almost everyone at my polling place was a republican and the poll workers said its been very light. Then i went to a friends place which is in Orange County, and their polling place had a line down the street. OC is very republican. Also, probably half the democrats i know were voting Trump.

1
Mainecenti 1 point ago +1 / -0

simple, there was likely not one giant conspiracy but lots of little ones. If someone was rigging the computer, the local folks wouldn't know that, they would keep playing their little local fraud games. and if people looking for fraud find the little things, they dont care, the big computer games are where the real numbers are. and it just ended up that the fraud program still underestimated the shifts required to make Biden win. If shivas analyis is correct they did not apply it to all coutnies, just ones they though they could hide things in. if they were not adjusting in real time, the counties they did not modify had enough trump votes they had to hand dump in mass votes overnight, as the rest of the precints had already been publically reported.

1
Whatyougotson 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was BOTH!