Hello brothers, I just wanna use this space to thank the hundreds and hundreds of patriots that helped the many groups and teams that exposed election fraud. You worked day and night, with sleep, no food, no rest, no pay. You did all this because you love this country and you deserve that people know what you did.
TY, ChesterAnthem, Epic, Bucky, Snow, Sailor, King and all the hundreds of you working behind the scenes thank you. You're the true heroes.
Patriots the 6 is the most important day of your life and if you're not in DC you're gonna regret it forever. Whatever happens that day will determine the future of our nation.
Warriors, stand together and pray to God. We will get through this together. I love you all.
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
OG POST: EVERY THING YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ IS VERIFIED AND WAS MADE BY THIS PEDE [CENTIPEDE] HE DID ALL THE HEAVY WORK
🏆 https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/ 🏆
🚨🚨🚨🚨EDIT NOV 12: 🚨🚨🚨
UPDATED LIST: https://pastebin.com/X6sW2aew
EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it'll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it'll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I'm also confident in the results it gives.
https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script.
https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used.
Place both in the same folder.
FULL THREAD: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XQIWRs/-happening-ive-updated-the-switc/
The data shows serious IREGULARITIES and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened on election
🚨"Switched did happen for Biden to Trump, as some of you have pointed out, and they also happened from 3rd party to (mainly Biden) both.🚨 The results should disturb everyone.
.
REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR.
.........
I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json] and I found this damning evidence [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all.
EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far.
EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know.
Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes.
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.
Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.
There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes.
🚨🚨🚨WE DECIDED TO LEAVE THIS NUMBERS UP SO YOU CAN SEE HOW OUR RESEARCH HAS EVOLVED.🚨🚨🚨
Dominion Voting Systems :
Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248
New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20
Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456
Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882
New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213
Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574
Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102
Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023
California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989
Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0
Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650
Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0
Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0
Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730
Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408
Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0
Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0
New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116
Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477
New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610
Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730
Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.
Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557
Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154
Election Systems & Software :
Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849
Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748
South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119
Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276
South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1
North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681
Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0
North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15
District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Unknown Systems:
Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272
Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51
Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0
Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408
Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0
Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35
Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13
West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300
Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0
Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.
VERIFIED!!!!:
I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ]
And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ]
You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere.
EDIT: Those 2,324 were moved from Trump to Jorgensen.
Jorgensen votes = Total votes * (1 - Trump share - Biden share)
Nr.27 : 573,857 * (1 - 0.578 - 0.401) = 12,051
Nr.28 : 574,417 * (1 - 0.568 - 0.406) = 14,935
Jorgensen vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 14,935 - 12,051 = 2,884
Total vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 574,417 - 573,857 = 560
Jorgensen vote increase - Total vote increase = 2,884 - 560 = 2,324
SOURCES: Here is the data I used:
EDISON DATA: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json
https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p
The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well.
🚨🚨FROM THE EDISON WEBSITE "Vote Count The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races" 🚨🚨
httpss://i.maga.host/wvRRA9m.png
I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json ] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead.
Take this picture for example. [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]
It's like this:
Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888
Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32
Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost.
I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes.
Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh
[pede444wow] I took the json files that are included here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel:
python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N
result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK
[montag] Here's a GitHub repo of the same data source taken at incremental time periods. https://github.com/favstats/USElection2020-NYT-Results
[ComeAndTakeIt_Texas] Hey TrumanBlack, I crunched the 27/28 timestamp data you posted (specifically this - https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png), and uploaded a spreadsheet analysis here (https://i.maga.host/xbwnVuk.png). I do a worst-case and best-case rounding error to generate Max T Vote, Min T Vote, and Max B Vote and Min B Vote that shows if you have 0.578 share, the max number that would represent would be 0.57849999999, and the min number would be 0.5775. The specific pic highlighted here allows no possible way whatsoever that Trump did not lose votes. The smallest number of votes he could have lost assuming in 27 there is a worst case rounding error and in the 28 step there is a best case rounding error (extremely unlikely), Trump lost a 4846.353. In worst case, he lost 5994.627 votes. There is literally NO way anyone can explain this away. They can also not explain that away as an asynchronous issue, as the timestamp itself is later (1), and (2), the total vote count increased. This single time step is proof alone.
[warpigpede] Re: the data displayed inhttps://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png
I calculated number of lost Trump votes as 5738.57, exactly 1% of the total number of votes (573857) at record 27:
votes 27: 573857
trump fraction: 0.578
trump votes: 331689.346
biden fraction: 0.401
biden votes: 230116.657
votes 28: 574417
trump fraction: 0.568
trump vote: 325950.776
biden vote: 232985.942
biden fraction: 0.406
votes change: +560
trump votes change: -5738.57
Exactly 1% is an awfully curious value. I wonder if it is consistent across the entire dataset
When reading the code, I thought the same thing. Here's my improved code that checks for irregularities both ways: https://pastebin.com/SwXNmNbC It still shows massive irregularities that favor Biden in states like Pennsylvania, but lesser extremes in other states, and even a few where it favors trump.
At the very least something here is definitely suspect and warrants an investigation and manual recount.
The big question is how and where is Edison Research getting these numbers? Is Edison Research performing any additional calculations (like determining the percentages) or just reporting raw data?
Because there's so much data and the count is updated mostly every minute, sometimes even within seconds, there's no way this isn't automated. And since it's automated, somebody's system done fucked up and the answer is in the code. Furthermore, since the errors are persistent, that would suggest the data source itself is most likely suspect.
Going further down the rabbit hole... if the source is straight from the voter machines then they need to subpoena the shit out of these companies! I want to see the revision and check in logs, I want to see company emails and communications, everything. Either these companies run some shitty operation and didn't test the code well enough and don't deserve our tax dollars... Or what's even more likely is there's some goblins hiding in the code.
Could you imagine if they released the code base for us to review? I'd use up some sick days and personally volunteer. This has always driven me crazy that the voting machines that WE THE TAXPAYERS are paying for are not available for audit. There is no fucking reason good enough for why the code integral to our functioning Republic is not open source. Especially for those States that are fully electronic (touchscreens) and don't have a paper trail. Allowing these voting machines to be a giant black box and you're just asking for vote fraud as it would be so easy to slip some shitty ::barf:: "glitch" in there to completely steal an election. Sadly it wouldn't be that hard for them to also cover their tracks and overwrite the code and hide enough of the evidence to maintain reasonable doubt either.
TL;DR: AUDIT THE FUCKING VOTER MACHINES AND RELEASE IT TO THE PUBLIC! I WANNA SEE THE CODE!
I'm going to say that I was skeptical, but looking through that data - it feels like a slot machine, or something. With the odds set to favor one side, I dunno. I'm going to say that I haven't dissected and studied this like others in here, but wtf? It's not right at all.
Work computers, something like massive voter fraud is bound to happen eventually. Does anyone honestly think there aren't people or there that would hate Trump enough to put malicious vote switching code in?
Those companies definitely need to have their source control repositories subpoenaed so that if vote stitching code exists our did exist at some point, that we could see when and who checked it in.
Want there an update just before the elections? I suppose someone found make a build of the software outside of source control and put that in an update package to be sent to the machines just before elections and then just delete the code, but I have a feeling it's a more permanent feature built into the software.
The machines weren't supposed to have internet connectivity anyway, There's a reason for that, but from what I've read, those laws/rules probably went followed.
Of course, do you think Antifa and BLM are sitting idle? They are cheating as much as possible.
If you haven't seen this, check it out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&feature=youtu.be&t=145
Apparently, you're grandmother's old desktop that runs windows xp is more secure than our election system.
Still got mine. Love it.
I hear you. But open source would mean EVERYBODY in the WORLD could access the code. Not sure that would pass security checks. I hear one of these companies is partly owned by the Clintons or some shit like that. All these machines should be able to be audited, as you say, but by some brilliant people on BOTH sides of the aisle, each sworn to secrecy, etc. Personally, I say count the paper ballots by hand, one by one. You put this shit in the cloud, this is what you get.
I do see your point. Kinda like Linux, right? It's out there, but it's pretty secure. This site is probably running on it.
Cough cough IE6 lock in cough cough. I still can't believe MS had a team that couldn't even write an HTML 4 parser.
More transparent yes. However I do not regard open source systems as necessarily more secure. E.g. Shellshock bug, very nasty one, was around since the 80s and discovered in 2014. Windows systems had their fair share of ugly bugs and so did Linux.
In this case, for the sake of transparency, yes; code must be released. Otherwise do like my .5 million population country and count everything by hand with observers half a meter behind you separated by clear perspex.
I wouldn't be opposed to no electronic voting machines, but there's going to be security vulnerabilities no matter how you count votes.
At the very least get rid of these touch screens. There needs to be a paper trail for manual recounts and audits.
Can you post the results?
It is due to their use of only 3 digit precision for the vote share. Needs to be 7 digit.
Using only 3 digit leads to very odd things occuring in the data feed. Very suspect as any programmer or data analyst would know you can't be accurate in your calc if your multiplying a large number by only 3 decimal places.
I suspect this is done to hide the tabulation vote shaving but too much was going on and caused wild swings.
In truth we don't know what really was going on unless we can get access to the raw data feeds.
However this along with everything else leads to only one conclusion.... The vote tabulation and counting was being messed with on multiple fronts.
It's possible that at least some of these are naturally occurring (either a corrected typo or just a weird quirk of how Edison compiles the data). But it's also possible that some of these are a result of malicious interference. Really no way to prove it one way or the other without getting hands on the source code. And whoever did it likely updated the source code remotely and didn't save it in official repositories.
I think you need to identify which code, because it looks like interacting systems.
And then there's that, too.
Nice code. Well done