Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
It's on a Twitter feed. Got moved 2x and now 6p supposedly. Trying to find confirmation. I'm getting little of my own work done lol. I need this to be over. I'm trying to be constant prayer warrior too. BC this is battle of good vs evil. Joe wasn't kidding when they said battle for America's soul!
I've thought about that before myself but I don't think they need to do that. The Donald Win is part of the greatest grassroots movement in political history. The largest think tank on the planet and they are most certainly watching . We have the best without question.
I’m very close to those at the heart of that movement. The premise of the new arguments against accurate crime stats is that crime committed by other races is under reported. They then use statistics to support that, namely the number of social media posts about it. Quite literally, they’re using the media narrative to support their side. “There has to be more crime committed by other races!! Everyone’s talking about it!” They turn Twitter and Facebook into statistics.
Haha, yes. They completely discount the seemingly endless social media accounts filled with “fuck da poe-lease” and people holding guns gangster style like they’re toys and all that.
Personally, I’d be fine arresting anyone that even has that all over their social media. Not like they’re going to go on to do something great one day. Imagine if there was an account going around doing that but saying “fuck the black people” and saying they were going to shoot black people. Or women. Instantly arrested.
Exactly! As I watched this and I’m not exactly the smartest person on the planet but I can understand what he’s describing as “too perfect of a vote count declining in heavy republican precincts too linear to be natural by far based mainly on “Straight Party” voters. That says A LOT. Problem is, even though a laymen like me can sort of “get it”, this isn’t the type of news formatted for CNN or other MSM because, not saying I know more than any others, but it’s not exactly exciting to most people who just want to tune in real quick and see what’s happening. They wouldn’t or maybe even couldn’t air this in an appropriate manner because they’re also trying to be concerned with their viewership and thus their bottom line. I guess goes back to the quip I made earlier when I first started watching this 3 minutes in, how could we use this to inform others? I would love suggestions because I know if I were to start talking about points made here, I would be tuned out real fast.
the MSM managed to silence architects that came out about 9/11 and how it was impossible, I'm sure they'll manage a way to have their followers doubt literal math.
Even though Fox is trash, Tucker needs to stick around. He’s got the highest watched show, ie he’s bigger than Fox itself. Even if the rest of the broadcasts suck he’s pulling people into the light, particularly older folks who aren’t as internet savvy.
Please, sticky this post. It goes beyond simply proving systematic fraud against Trump in Michigan but is an indictment on the US's voting system as a whole, as well as an indictment of the companies that made the voting software and the many organizations that supposedly "ensure voting integrity."
It also gives reasonable, easy to implement, common-sense solutions to fixing our broken voting system, and the answer isn't getting rid of the electoral college.
This country needs a massive overhaul in how we do voting.
Yup. If this info is true then the US and it’s current fake trending socials and news needs a reckoning (yes it does regardless I know). All the fabricated trending and news and bots to counter a nation full of actual Americans who’s voices are muted. Shut it all down
As for Election Day and counting, it's rather simple: (I had a longer list posted back in the day) Paper, Open Hours 1 day voting, no electronics required or desired for ballots or counting, lots of small precincts (like elemtary schools) all ballots into the counting center before start counting; all counting done within a hour or few. Real simple, real honest. Full Results before midnight.
Our President DJT keeps asking for this, and no one around him is giving him this info:
Gatekeepers going to gatekeep. Need help cutting through the noise. Need help cutting out the bluepilled and purple pilled narratives, even in legal filings.
For those that want to read the differences between Redpilled Strictly-Constitutional Legal grounds vs what most cases do, here's my comment 12 days ago:
The vast majority of Election Integrity Destruction comes from violating the "Guaranteed Republican Form of Government" clause in the US Constitution, as judges have pushed Democracy Party ideology & propaganda of democracy and marxism over/instead of a republic.
Having a Supreme Court which Strikes down the ASHWANDER RULES & returns to doing their key job of upholding their own Oaths and enforcing others to uphold their Oaths to Uphold the US Constitution as written; will solve 99% of our Nations policy/legal/justice problems by putting branches of gov back into their lanes; and our three layers of government back into their proper layers.
Yup, California is a shitshow when it comes to elections. No ID, No signature verification, now mass mail voting...no wonder these corrupt, old incumbent farts stay in their office for eons!
Trump was right in the 2016 election - this is where the "popular" vote comes from.
It's not that he invented the idea of sending a message over a computer network, he actually created the protocol that servers use to communicate with each other.
The reason we have over a million different email servers that can all send messages back and forth to each other, without a central server like facebook controlling it all, is because of his "invention of email."
In other words the "Holy Grail" of decentralized internet communication is still the original method of internet communication, and traced back to this guys patent.
POP1 was 1984, 2 years after his system which was fully functional which is impressive. SMTP is from the 1960's was 1 to 1 and in the 1970's small groups but did not have any of the features he claimed to have. Its like text messages versus email. They are both electronic communication of a form but wildly different in function.
The decentralized communication of the internet is more due to the early work by BBN to create ARPANET, and TCP/IP, which was invented by Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn. The general concept of email was around in the 60s, when ARPANET came along it quickly became possible to send messages to users on other networks. By the time Shiva wrote his "EMAIL" program, we were already seeing emoticons, using the "@" sign for addressing, and had seen the first spam mail. To be fair, I know nothing else of the guy's work, but I get pretty suspicious of a guy who makes a claim like "Inventor of EMAIL" in his Twitter name. Granted it's accurate as the program he wrote was literally named "EMAIL".
He filed for a copyright on a program named "email." I could file a copyright on a program named "time travel" but that was invented by three guys on the planet Gallifrey.
Apparently the first to patent it. The person they say "truely" invented it seems to have been referring to a text message system, not an electronic mail system.
That argument came about because Dr.Shiva is a pretty based dude who is 100% against censorship and centralized control of the internet. So they had to bullshit some way of taking his claim to fame away.
"Sending a message" was invented the very first time two computers were linked together. And before that it was invented with the telegram, and before that with hand written letters. There's always a first cause in the invention chain, and it's never actually the first invention. But sometimes, it is actually a new way of doing it.
Might as well credit the inventor of the internet, Al Gore (/s).
This all happened during Ron Paul's GOP primary. The same glitches happened and the data was crunched then showing an algorithm for vote swapping. It was left in the dust bin and forgotten.
He's not old enough to invent email as we know it (a distributed system, using SMTP over the Internet). That was invented back in the early 70's.
In the late 70's, Ayyadurai wrote a centralized email system that he called EMAIL. That's a different design and implementation, closer to a Microsoft Exchange Server.
Actually SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) server is a simple version of a Microsoft Exchange Server.
Simplistically an email message has a From: To: CC: BCC: Subject: and the text of the message. This is the interoffice mail system that Shiva invented by replicating the old INTEROFFICE MAIL system and he copyrighted EMAIL with the USPTO .
That's my understanding from reading his blog.
No voter registration card. No authentication. No receipt for the personal that
actually voted. Can YOU prove you voted in an election? Conclusion: No
definitive proof of your voting in an election.
6:55 Output
In input is 30 voters, say 10 voted for A, 20 for B. The output should give (30
ballots - 30 voters)
10 votes for A, 20 votes for B Provided the SYSTEM cannot change the OUTPUT
If that's possible, then there is ambiguity If output can be manipulated,
then we have no idea (e.g. "evidence" is not evidence, it is ambiguous) We
have no idea what the black box did, and we cannot REPRODUCE the input from
the output to verify!
7:58 Ballot Images
Tabulation machines scan images of the ballot. These images are what is counted
(and stored). They are "the ballot" since they are the only record. The images
are supposed to be (per fed law) maintained for 22 months. Many states ignore
this and delete the images, meaning we cannot count or audit the representations
of the phsyical ballots
by design from the states and in contravention of federal election law!
10:05 Weighted Race Feature
All digital voting tabulators since Diebold (the original) have a FEATURE called
"Weighted Race". This allows the vote counter to tell the system how to alter
the output according to some weights (e.g. distribute votes unevenly or play
with fractions).
11:04 Storing Our Votes as Decimals
This enables obfuscation of the system, since the output is represented in
decimal percentages by precinct. These are not INTEGER numbers (e.g. raw
counts), but percentages (e.g. floating point numbers stored on a computer).
This introduces both inaccuracy and ambiguity, since the system changes the
output (going from counting to imprecise fractional representation). This opens
the door for manipulating vote distributions. We see the results in older races
(like Shiva's in MA), where the total number of votes exceeded the number of
voters in ALL city/towns. Either by design or rounding error (wink).
Ex. As the total number of votes increased, they expect to see the actual
distribution stabilize (e.g. approaching the actual population of voter
percentage). In the hand-counted county, this occurs. In all other
machine-counted counties (again for Shiva's MA election), the percentage does
NOT converge, which is not natural, and indicative of fraud.
14:04 Executive summary
In three major counties analyzed, Trump's margin was reduced by a minimum of
138000 votes
Trump's vote total was decreased by 69K Biden's vote total was increased by 69K
In short, 69K votes from Trump were transferred to Biden in these 3 counties.
[Ed. note - there appears to be hard evidence for a weighted-race algorithm
employed to ensure that where Trump would be expected to do well proportionally,
e.g. in larger straight-ticket Republican precincts, he did the opposite!
This phenomenon repeated through multiple counties, and only "kicks in" when the
% of Republican straight ticket count is above 20-25%. Before the vote hacking
occurs, Trump substantially outperforms the straight ticket republican votes in
these assumably proportionally smaller Red precincts!]
23:54 Negative correlation with trump popularity vs. republicans in Oakland County
Odd that 45% straight party EV in Oakland County yielded 20% invidivual votes
only. Strong (almost perfect) negative correlation with straight party
Republican.
Implication (assuming straight ticket = individual candidate), 10% of trump
individual voters were given to biden. (200 votes) (not totally clear)
30:57 Noticed that Outliers on the negative correlation (adjacent) where trump
won, indicated vote trading from trump to biden.
Establishes a trend, which can be fit based on empirical data. 31:34 Total of
40K estimated EV transferred
LOL, Trump more population in 20% or less straight party line precincts
according to data, drastically less popular as a linear function OMG
"Too structured; too perfect" Reminds about weighted race feature from Diebold
and similar machines
33:30 Election Day voting, same exact phenomenon! LOL 20K estimated 60K vote
transfer overall for one county
34:52 Macomb, Trump does even better in the low range (up to 25%), then
correction kicks in....same stuff.
Election day, he's doing even better ~22% on election day, then hack kicks
in....
Total 33K
36:22 Kent County.... Same correction, 45K hacked votes 85% republican, Trump is
at 25%? NO WAY
Linear phenomenon is unnatural, should be clustered.
38:07 Wayne County
Different result (probably different algorthim). Trump does even better in
ostensbily low republican counties, much higher yield for individual Trump.
Clear that Trump does better.
39:48 Results
Algorithm moves Trump votes to BIDEN As precincts increase with more % of
Republican straight ticket, greater % of trump votes transferred to BIDEN.
SLOPE IS THE ~SAME FOR EACH COUNTY! Wayne County had no Trump hack algorithm
detected (at least not the same)
41:50 Discussion
Algorithm is assumed to be a weighted race allocation method. Transfer a % of
votes from one candidate to another THe % is a "Weighted" decimal value Weighted
Race is a documented feature in ALL vendors (including Dominion) Assume derived
from original Diebold stuff (featured).
Why are more % of Trump votes transferred to BIDEN precincts that have more
Republicans?
Are BOTH republicans and democracts involved in supporting this algorithm?
Are BOTH parties aware of such features in these voting systems?
Is it Possible that this pattern is normal, and explains a normal voting
pattern?
Is Mitt Romney right? Since Republicans stayed Republican, but no longer liked
Trump?
45:17 If that were true, you would expect to see a more uniform decrease with
losses, not a LINEAR decrease that worsens proportional to Republican
representation! (KILLER)
47:30 Phil - What % chance what we're seeing is not an algorithm?
Benny - Rarely would say 0%, 1%. It's just not something you would see again.
The engineering is reversing the organization of the precincts. As they grow in
size, at some point, you're supposed to strike an average. (Diverges!). Not
germane to something that's natural, must be artificial.
Are BOTH parties Democrats and Republicans aware of the algorithmic process? Is
a coup underway? Who is behind such a coup: Democrats, Republicans, or BOTH? Or,
did BIDEN win?
50:00 Conclusion
Inputs and outputs to our voting systems are unverifiable. Need for: verifiable
inputs (permanent voter registration card) open source software handmarked paper
ballots Viable solution because if at any point you want to remove the computer
from the process, you can still arrive at an output. Voter intent is enshrined
with hand-eye coordination.
The documented feature of a weighted election is such a bad idea. The only
verifiable to us is the input.
Think that what happened was in MI, they saw something was wrong in some
counties (flat curve) and hand counted. In bigger counties, left it with the
machines and produced a curve.
The image of the ballot is what the machine counts. That ballot image IS the
ballot. Those ballot images (in many states) are DELETED. There is no way to
reproduce. Saving of ballot images is a factory setting. Ballot voting companies
are trying to be compliant with federal law (save all records for election for
22 months). Places like MA don't save. They claim that MA state has a different
law that allows them to delete the images.
[Has copies of email conversations with MA secretary of state, shared on
twitter, SOS got Shiva banned for 21 days!, went for injunction pro se, judge
Mark Wolf agreed that SOS had induced twitter! Learned of National Organization
of Sate Election Directors controlled by Rockerfeller Bros and Murdoch Co. NASED
also contated Twitter to have Shiva banned! WTF!]
save ballot images pursuant to federal law publish ballot images publicly (allow
for public recount) automatic audits - audit every election publish precinct
leel data (poll tapes) on election night.
I am a humble farmer, tending my memes. I think the presentation is cogent and damning, but it probably needs to be cleaned up a LOT before normies can consume it. Something like the Milke Shake meme would be apropos.
As a masshole, I wondered what Shiva sort of half-heartedly running for congress repeatedly was all about. Interesting to find he's been working on election data collection.
I voted for Jeff Deihl but I still have a "only a real Indian can beat a fake Indian" bumper magnet
Another TLDW: The data looked at at the precinct level shows as the precincts grow is size of "Straight Republican Voters" - the popularity of Trump shrinks, linearly. This makes NO sense at all - so it must be artificial. The software has a "weighting" function - which could be programmed to inject this artificiality into the voting results.
If some set percentage of republicans didn't like Trump, you'd see a "flat" line. But the line goes downward, which shows Trump's popularity decreases the more republican an area is. This is, of course, ridiculous,
No, it's a fail safe. If one method doesnt work/gets called out/falls short, they use other methods. It's all important. Here's the bottom line, this shit wasn't enough. The scorecard/hammer/dominion glitches that flip votes were not enough to come close to beating trump. They made this realization late in the evening and stopped the election. Somehow. And then flew in 100s of 1000s of ballots all for Biden with no down ballot votes at all
I forget the name of the heavy democrat example they game that showed trump actually around a 7% increase among them? With this info, is it safe to assume that the algorithm was not put into place for any heavy dem precincts??
Also, if it’s the case..is this increase in trump votes in heavy dem precincts a huge reason why it was so close anyway with all the manipulation?
It's not clear where/how the algorithm worked. But yes, it appears that it wasn't "turned on" at heavy dem precincts. Probably no need to.
Yes, the heavy Trump turnout in Dem areas (above 2016 performance) definitely helped Trump. It points to the fact that Trump could not have lost. He gained ground in every area of support - but lost? Nope.
Maybe it's because they figure the heavy democrat counties are the MOST LIKELY to be audited or investigated for fraud. But there would be no detection of this problem by looking at just those counties!!
It doesn't just shrink linearly; You can see a visible band of noise "around" the center of the curve fit, e.g. there appears to be a function sampling from some distribution (maybe gaussian) to create the appearance of naturalness. Yet the halfwidth for the error appears constant as you follow the fit. So messed up.
That noise is natural. That's the only part of the data that looks legit. (That plus the first/lefthand 15 percent or so where Trump is polling about 8 percent higher than expected in "non-republican" precincts.
...based off that fact of him polling better in non republican precincts...did those dem heavy precincts who voted for trump at a 8% increase basically save the election as far as allowing recounts/audits and also making the algorithm more obvious to heavy republican precincts?
It was a lot of cool info but my knowledge is elementary on the subject
Well, the MIT guy seems to think the vote changing algorithm didn't kick in until they got to heavier Trump areas (guarateed 20 percent R voting). The dem heavy precincts just show a strong showing for Trump - doesn't really influence the "fraud" findings. It's the high republican areas where Trump should have down much better but didn't.... that's where it's obviously fraudulant.
They didn't really want to flip Republican counties too much. Just the ones on the margins. Their chief goal was silently stealing from rural counties and securing statewide offices. The weird thing is it was only used for the Presidential ticket. Dr. Shiva points out a possible theory that both Republicans and Democrats have been using this system to decide beforehand who will win the Presidency... So perhaps they let the rest of offices fall as they may, but arrange the Presidency to avoid spending too much money on it or whatever.
That's not the noise I'm talking about. After the linear trend sets in, instead of a dense, straight line (way too artificial), they still have some spread, although it's eerily constant in width as you walk down the trend. To me, it looks like the function that's generating the offset is something like
f(x) = -0.5701x + 13.692 + normal(10,10)
Where the normal(10,10) is just a random sample from a normal distribution with mean of 10 and standard deviation 10. This is a cheap trick to have the "linearity" of the downward slope appear less obvious (inject some noise in there....like nature right).
I produced a plot here that looks pretty damn close to the phenomenon Shiva showed. I think they just pencil whipped the noise
Well, I think the final vote count in each precinct is related to the actual vote count in that precinct. That actual vote count has noise - so when you look at multiple precincts you see that noise that is natural.
Maybe their function was "flip x percent of Trump votes to biden" where x was a function of expected republicanism. Execute that on every batch uploaded to the central system - or AFTER it's at the central system (which would account for the videos showing results.. then having the results change with numbers from trump going to biden)
I just want to point out that if such a receipt were provided, it would greatly facilitate (illegally) paying someone to vote for a particular candidate since they could actually prove that they did what they were being paying to do.
There are ways to inject some blindness into the system, while retaining substantially better verification. The fact that they delete any record of the ballots (wipe images) creates an irreproducible system from the start. It cannot be observed the same way twice, ever, since there is not an unambiguous mapping of inputs to outputs.
How is this not a smoking gun? If you found these kinds of patterns when looking for bank fraud/money laundering, they'd have someone in cuffs by sundown.
I'm a normie when it comes to math. I have a doctorate, but it's not in math. I only took geometry and algebra 1 in high school and got a D in both. I took statistics in college and got a C. I was easily able to follow and understand this.
The hurdle isn't normies being too dumb to follow this, it's broken down very well and is easy to follow and understand. The hurdle, in my opinion, is twofold; (1) actually getting people to watch the entire video, and (2) getting people to not instantly disregard it as a lie because the media said there was no voter fraud.
Yep that's it. I have a math background and I've been telling anyone who will listen for days, the statistical anomalies ALONE are enough to warrant a MASSIVE investigation.
And they accuse US of not listening to science. How are their heads not exploding from all the cognitive dissonance? Oh yeah that's right, the MSM Gestapo sticks their fingers in their ears to anything that doesn't fit their agenda.
Vegas employs statisticians all the time in casinos to detect cheaters. If they saw stats 1/1000th as fishy as Biden’s, that person’s ass would be on the street before you could say, “Blackjack.”
Where there’s smoke, there’s fire. And these stats are putting off more smoke than the Marlboro Man at a bonfire.
Their only play against this is falsely claiming it has been debunked, and saying ‘there is no direct evidence’, which is wrong and entirely misses the point.
This data is as if you found the name ‘Joe Biden’ spray painted on the walls of the Republican precincts. The only way for it to get there is if someone spray painted it there. It’s not a naturally occurring phenomenon like rain. Their only way out is akin to trying to argue that somehow the walls of all the buildings of the Republican voting areas had miraculously warped in precisely the same manner to display the name ‘Joe Biden’. That would only be possible in the sense that if a 100 trillion years went by, maybe in one of those scenarios it happened by chance.
Thanks. Do most people in your field typically lean right or left? I always hear that those with college education lean left but so do union workers, miniorities and poor. It just sounds like BS everyone is a democrat?
It depends on where you go to school. I've been to colleges in the deep South where it was more conservative and college in the heart of a major city in the Northeast where it was overwhelmingly left.
The vast majority of the teachers and administrators at all schools I've been to were far-left, many were even outspoken, anti-constitutional Marxists. I had only 1 teacher who was an outspoken libertarian.
The student body varied depending on where the school was. In the South, the students were split pretty evenly, with maybe a slight advantage to conservatives. In the Northeast, only about 2-3% of students were conservatives or libertarians. Most were lefties, and most of them were outspoken Marxists as well.
But it's really hard to get a true gauge of those things in academia, especially for students, because anyone that isn't a leftist is at a true risk of having their grades and future career harmed. I was an outspoken libertarian and it objectively hurt me academically.
I would say the legal profession runs the gamut of political beliefs and would most likely correlate with the general public. I don't believe it runs heavily one way or the other. I think that is because most people going to law school are already politically minded so the education system's Marxist indoctrination really doesn't have an effect.
However, the true problem is in schools and industries where the students are less politically inclined. In those places, the Marxist indoctrination does take hold. I'm thinking particularly of medical schools. Med schools are a hotbed of Marxist indoctrination at shockingly high levels. Particularly because most med students don't care about politics, they just love medicine and science and want to help people.
Although I can't speak to this personally, I have three medical doctors in my immediate family who can. But even outside of speaking with my family I have seen the effects. I had two close friends who went to medical school, both of which were completely apolitical. Before they went to medical school they never brought up politics or cared to discuss it when I brought it up. Both left 100% indoctrinated Marxists.
The medical education industry is by far the hardest hit by Marxist indoctrination. What makes it even worse is Medical Doctors aren't allowed to unionize or fight back against the Marxist bullshit going on in healthcare. If an investigative journalist wanted to become famous over-night all they would have to do is go into med schools around the country and document the Marxist indoctrination. It's insane.
Normies don't need to understand it. A judge needs to and the court can demand hand counting of ballots or force the company to show the code the computers are using (thus proving fraud and invalidating results). Not sure of Michigan law but hopefully something can be done.
I am a mathematical moron and I could completely comprehend this. Dr. Shiva explained it very well. I think if people watch and pay attention they will understand it.
I have a background in math and unfortunately this video is bogus. Look towards the bottom of the comments for in depth discussion, but suffice to say Shiva has set up the charts in a way that they are guaranteed to result in a linear pattern with a negative slope.
This is what the hell I want to know. It is ridiculous to not have a paper trail for this shit. This is the age of Cloud storage and they can't be fucked to store the digital ballots SOMEWHERE, ANYWHERE? That is criminal.
People here keep insisting we need to find enough votes to invalidate so that Trump will get over the top. No this is FUBAR and information like this shows that our entire election system is jacked. Nothing short of a revote should suffice. Sorry Branch Covidians and Democrats who can't be assed to leave their couch in order to vote. This time you have to be there in person to count and no machines PERIOD until this shit gets solved. Or ever, preferably.
That is why(except because they are shitty programmers) it would be almost completely undetectable by the precinct. Because there was such a harsh flip in heavy Republican precincts it literally flipped the precinct.
But in most cases, it would simply syphon off a percentage of Trump voters across a bunch of precincts, giving Biden just enough to flip the states.
Probably why political operatives were pushing the "Republicans for Biden" signs.
We should probably track down whoever was responsible for the Republicans for Biden signs...
I want to clarify that we are seeing two types of fraud in this election. The first is with the voting machines, which as you said is switching Trump votes to Biden in Republican areas. The second is with absentee ballots in heavily democrat areas.
I guess that could also be the purpose of the voting machine algorithm, it doesn't want to cheat too much in the democratic areas, because that might create a suspiciously high vote percentage, so they cheat more in the more heavily republican areas where there won't be as much absentee ballot fraud.
That is the clever part; people normally would look at republican districts for pro-democrat fraud last.
I have to wonder if California is heavily impacted by a similar form of fraud. I get that CA probably is blue, but I've seen indications that it's not quite as blue as we're lead to believe. If you used an algorithm like this one, you could effectively neuter red areas, ensuring they never quite overcome the support in blue areas.
If I understand correctly, a manual recount would help, but it sounds like the ballot images keep getting wiped out so no one can double-check any of it.
Normally, you would expect fraud in the Democratic areas.
They're already giving Biden 90% or more in dem areas with fake mail in ballots, they literally couldn't steal the election without taking from the Republican areas.
Ideally, I agree with you but I feel like the software manipulation is probably going to be the biggest bang for our buck. With the urgency of time and scarce energy - I hope we allocate our resources effectively for the sake of our country. Whatever exposes the truth and prevents civil war most effectively is my hope.
You shouldn't need more than a handful of documented, verified cases where one person's vote was diluted by a fraudulent vote to throw out the results of an election and declare a re-vote.
Unfortunately we seem to live in an absolutely stupid society who need to see that enough dead people voted to make up the full margin of victory. Where are all the Branch Covidians who declare "if it saves one life, lockdowns are worth it!" now? If it saves one vote from being suppressed then no cases of election fraud should be accepted.
From what I've seen using Math and Statistics has been presented in a whole lot of documented court cases and was legally determined to be able to be used to prove something. Benford's law being the most common one, it was used to prove Enron was cooking the books.
Yes, this sort of expert testimony is used all the time in a variety of cases, from calculating the damages due to an injured person or the non-breaching party to a contract to valuing corporate shares and prosecuting financial fraud.
The good news is that this bs was done in republican counties with republican clerks, which means that the ballots will be preserved and dealt with correctly (hopefully). We need a hand count of all of these counties. We also need to recount brown and Waukesha counties in Wisconsin as well. Out of 181 voting locations, trump did worse in 176 of them. There’s no way people hate trump that much in a deep republican county.
That's been the problem all along. They always stopped counting once it flipped and never bothered to look at the deep red counties. Why waste the time and money if the election turned out the way you wanted? I hope once Trump is in he takes the time to actually do the dirty work and we get this fixed.
That is a big relief. I wanted to show this video to my mother, who teaches math, but I was afraid that youtube would delete it before I had the chance!
They thought that D+ districts would swing against trump, So by lowering the R+ areas it would create a flat line and not look suspect. Except, in D+ areas Trump did well and it showed how the system is rigged.
This methodology is not convincing. He made assumptions about what a "normal" pattern looks like, and implied that the Wayne County data was actually normal, and we know that the Wayne County data is suspect AF and had a lot of shenanigans going on. So looking at that county as an example of an 'unweighted' sample doesn't pass the smell test for me.
He also glossed over the question of "is this a normal voter pattern?" by making an assumption about what a normal voter pattern using that methodology should be, not showing us what a normal voter pattern actually is. It should be simple to show what a normal voter pattern looks like by showing us normal voter patterns in other states where we know some of these shenanigans didn't appear to happen. Show us Ohio. Show us South Carolina. Show us Florida.
Additionally, he appeared to assume that the % of party line voters and non-party voters was roughly equivalent in identifying how many votes were 'siphoned', and that may not be the case at all. For example, you could have an 80% party-line voter republican margin that is also 80% of all of the votes, while only 20% of the votes were non-party line tickets, meaning any deviation of votes from Trump would be very small. It is conceivable to me that this is a normal pattern as the votes increase.
Also, he should have done the same analysis with Biden & Democrat party line votes to see if the reverse pattern holds for Biden.
I found this presentation unconvincing, especially the part about Wayne County being even remotely considered unweighted.
Maybe, but he didn't include data samples other than the 4 MI counties. It might be a normal pattern - and he mentions that in his video (44:27). But his elimination of that possibility is not convincing. That's the key problem I have with it. Seeing a trend line in a sample of data is insufficient. He needs to show the same trend line does not appear with Biden & democrat-line voting. He needs to show the same trend line does not appear in a place not suspected of having irregularities.
The most curious part of the video is where he looks at Wayne county and sees a very different pattern. We KNOW Wayne county had significant fraud, yet per his data algorithm it doesn't indicate that at all. What seems more likely to me, is that the trend line IS actually a normal pattern, and its Wayne county that is abnormal.
Speculating like that makes it less convincing, not more convincing. And that's the problem. I'm a very scientific, data-minded person and his argument was not convincing to me. I felt like it was a bit on the manipulative side. I would expect someone with a PhD to understand that you need to demonstrate that the trend line is abnormal, and he never did that. He just showed it and said "I would assume it should be like this..." and then showed it wasn't like that, and then spent a bunch of time talking about how strange that was, and then concluded that there was only one possibility.
That's not how science and good arguments work. He needs to show data of why it is abnormal, using other data that is commonly understood to be non-suspect.
There is control (baseline) in this presentation. Without that, we can't really know whether it is normal or not. Take for example the Benford's law data we saw. It was convincing because they showed what "normal" data looks like by showing Trump, Biden, Jorgenson together and and various different cities data, and then showed how certain cities had abnormal patterns. we had the control (normal cities) and the suspect data (the abnormal cities). That didn't happen here. We only saw abnormal data and he tried to explain away what normal data would look like without providing evidence that normal data actually looks like that.
I do agree, he did not provide enough evidence to support that point. personally I still believe he is correct but it would require more to "prove" it.
A graph of Biden & democrat lined voting would look like a rotated 180° image. Both axes include dems and biden. X is of % Rep to Dem, Y is % Trump to Biden
No, it would look almost exactly the same. Because Biden cannot possibly do better than a high straight-party ticket than trump can', and the more straight-party it gets, the more likely that there will be variance.
I agree his methodology is not convincing and won't help to convince normies. There are alternate theories to the data, such as "Regression to the mean":
In precincts that are redder, the independent individual candidate voters tend to be closer to the mean than the whole precinct, i.e. if the precinct is 80% straight party republican, the individual candidate voters are closer to the mean and only vote Trump 60% of the time, and likewise, if a precinct is 20% straight party republican, the individual candidate voters are closer to the mean, and vote trump 40%.
The only two conclusions you can draw from this data is either the software is stealing votes from republican districts or trump is splitting tickets in a very bad way.
I don't need to. Burden of proof is on the person making the claim. Insufficient proof to convince is just that. If you want to sell normies that this is happening, this isn't good enough.
It doesn't have to be absolute proof, or beyond a reasonable doubt proof, just reasonable to a person proof that there is shenanigans afoot, and they should either audit the count, throw out the votes in court, or the legislatures take responsibility to overrule the fraud.
His theory seems a bit like statistical manipulation, and he didn't adequately rule out other explanations.
To be convincing, he would need to:
Show that the Biden pattern differs from the Trump pattern. All we saw was the Trump pattern.
Show that the pattern does not hold in other states or counties without suspected fraud.
Explain why Wayne county with all it's massive fraud did not show this pattern (and actually showed the opposite). Why was Wayne county a "normal" county in his data? He needs to explain that. He didn't. Instead of explaining it, he distracted by saying Trump gained with black voters. While interesting, that's irrelevant to explaining why Wayne was different.
I had the same thoughts. Why not run the algorithm in another state, or on another election year. And why not just find the % of R voter registration instead of inferring from straight party votes?
This is why the Benford’s Law analysis is so damning for Biden.
Exactly this. Apply the same methodology to other sets of data to show why the Michigan counties are irregular and have a bizarre pattern. He didn't do that, which makes it highly suspect. If his methodology and analysis is correct, it should be easy to show with other data sets. He didn't even do Biden's version of it (biden's diff from straight-party democrat tickets) for comparison. If there was vote siphoning happening, we should see a very different pattern for Biden's data.
Its coming from a guy who just claimed to hold the original patent for email. I want to think this is real, but I also want to see the math done in real time. I want to see how the districts are being placed on this graph on the stream.
I watched the whole thing, and I feel like this could just as easily be a study on the spread of disinformation.
If you're having trouble following this, jump to about 39:00 where he breaks it down. Basically, there is an algorithym that takes votes from Trump and gives them to Biden based on the % of republican voters in a precinct. If a precinct id 90% Republican, 20-25% of the votes seem to be taken from Trump and given to Biden. In heavily democrat precincts, the algorithm doesnt take action. *correct me if I got it wrong, but any way you look at it, this system is Fvcked.
It's OK to use computers to speed up the counting process. What should happen is after the initial votes are recorded is that an independent team of auditors (bipartisan CPAs) hand count the ballots afterwards to confirm the machine totals are correct.
Be careful, make sure this is real. A strategy they could use is to give rabbit holes to follow down into easily disproved investigations while following the original ones may have been better.
GET THIS VIDEO TO GUILIANI AND ANYONE ELSE INVOLVED WITH THE TRUMP LEGAL TEAM ASAP!
I wish had a direct line to them. Hopefully someone here does.
Don Jr is all over this site, we good
IT IS YOUR DUTY TO SPAM THIS OUT
YOU ARE VERY MUCH NOT GOOD
NOT GET THE OUT OF THAT FOX HOLE SOLIDER
AND SPREAD SPREAD SPREAD !!!
it's cool I'm a super spreader all my friends ignore my messages now
Just tell them at the end of the video, there’s a link to where they can sign up To be the first to get the new WuFlu vaccine. They’ll watch.
hahaha
Verp kamel toe is the reall super spreader 🤢🤮
Just be a Hippo, whip your tail around and just spread that shit!
username checks out
Dr. Ayyudurai is already working with the Trump Team. He Tweeted he was yesterday at least.
Link?
This Tweet seems to be him saying he’s going to present his info to the Trump Team: https://mobile.twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1325959071401390080
This is his first Tweet offering his services to the Trump Team: https://mobile.twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1324876363451478016
Cheers pede, hopefully he is contacting them through the fraud line too. Can’t let any evidence slip through the cracks
He said in the presentation that he's been speaking with people over the last few days but wouldn't name names.
Spread like cum-allah’s legs.
Don't hold the line! Fucking push!
That’s what I’ve been saying. Advance!! Grab them by their balls!
https://video.maga.host/videos/watch/916c52d3-f4d1-450d-a96b-87755c39491e
Backup
This is too damn important to risk it and hope he sees it. SPREAD IT EVERYWHERE!
TO THE ENDS OF THE EARTH
Keeping it stickied for a while should draw their notice.
Steve Bannon also visits here, so I’m sure it’ll reach them eventually.
Hello ;)
I wonder what his username is lmao
Did you hear there's a presser at 6pm from legal team supposedly about MI?
Good news, where did you hear that?
It's on a Twitter feed. Got moved 2x and now 6p supposedly. Trying to find confirmation. I'm getting little of my own work done lol. I need this to be over. I'm trying to be constant prayer warrior too. BC this is battle of good vs evil. Joe wasn't kidding when they said battle for America's soul!
I'm praying from Oz too
6pm ET or CT?
Probably ET
I think you can do a live chat with him on youtube lm not exactly sure though.
I think you can do a live chat with him if you go back to his youtube channel.
I've got a direct line to some folks, sent
⚠️ IMPORTANT ⚠️
Everyone retweet this to Trump's team and others
https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1326220987608621056
@SidneyPowell1
@DonaldJTrumpJr
@EricTrump
@RudyGiuliani
@RealJamesWoods
@Peoples_Pundit
@Project_Veritas
@dbongino
@RealRLimbaugh
Tweeted!
Don’t forget @LLinWood
jumping through this, there is some amazing content in there.
Yea I did the same. Anger inducing if it’s all legit. Now I can’t stop wondering wonder his total vote count would actually be
It's actually quite terrifying
done!
send it to Midge.
They are on this site, Trump Team probably run or pay for it.
If that's the case I want TheDonald platinum!
The REAL Platinum Plan
I've thought about that before myself but I don't think they need to do that. The Donald Win is part of the greatest grassroots movement in political history. The largest think tank on the planet and they are most certainly watching . We have the best without question.
If anyone has physical access to a Dominion Voting machine please get in touch ASAP. We would like to inspect the firmware on the device. https://parler.com/post/12eb6e0b4bd542599c8dd40555c18ad4
This needs more attention. This is the way.
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O45KeQ/if-anyone-has-physical-access-to/c/ Share far and wide
I think dr. Shiva already reached out to him.
He's been talking about this for a couple days and quite frankly, stuff like this is massive.
The amount of high-level staticians coming out with info like this, to me is the most damning of all.
MSM: "Here's why statistics is actually white supremacy."
Pretty sure we already saw that one somewhere? They've definitely got that angle covered already.
Yes this is basically the argument against crime statistics
I’m very close to those at the heart of that movement. The premise of the new arguments against accurate crime stats is that crime committed by other races is under reported. They then use statistics to support that, namely the number of social media posts about it. Quite literally, they’re using the media narrative to support their side. “There has to be more crime committed by other races!! Everyone’s talking about it!” They turn Twitter and Facebook into statistics.
Let me guess: they don’t compile bragging by all races - just some.
Haha, yes. They completely discount the seemingly endless social media accounts filled with “fuck da poe-lease” and people holding guns gangster style like they’re toys and all that.
Personally, I’d be fine arresting anyone that even has that all over their social media. Not like they’re going to go on to do something great one day. Imagine if there was an account going around doing that but saying “fuck the black people” and saying they were going to shoot black people. Or women. Instantly arrested.
Not enough black tranny Jew xir’s in Statistics, therefore it is racist and should be disregarded.
2+2=5 racist!
I've seen this way too much. NPC shills picking up their new lines every morning.
“But everyone needs to be assigned their opinions or Joe Biden can’t save the world!!!”
Exactly! As I watched this and I’m not exactly the smartest person on the planet but I can understand what he’s describing as “too perfect of a vote count declining in heavy republican precincts too linear to be natural by far based mainly on “Straight Party” voters. That says A LOT. Problem is, even though a laymen like me can sort of “get it”, this isn’t the type of news formatted for CNN or other MSM because, not saying I know more than any others, but it’s not exactly exciting to most people who just want to tune in real quick and see what’s happening. They wouldn’t or maybe even couldn’t air this in an appropriate manner because they’re also trying to be concerned with their viewership and thus their bottom line. I guess goes back to the quip I made earlier when I first started watching this 3 minutes in, how could we use this to inform others? I would love suggestions because I know if I were to start talking about points made here, I would be tuned out real fast.
My nephew keeps saying exactly this.
That is where you state didn't the COVID lock-downs and mandates recommendations come from statistical models?
the MSM managed to silence architects that came out about 9/11 and how it was impossible, I'm sure they'll manage a way to have their followers doubt literal math.
Even though Fox is trash, Tucker needs to stick around. He’s got the highest watched show, ie he’s bigger than Fox itself. Even if the rest of the broadcasts suck he’s pulling people into the light, particularly older folks who aren’t as internet savvy.
You got the juice on this one. The longer Tuck is on Fox the more power to the left.
When his contract is up (if he can't break it) he can go to OAN or start his own channel with Don Jr.
The 2016 "hacking the election" meme was just projection, like everything else.
Top current threat has a lot of links to places/methods of "getting raw votes"...
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/
!STICKY Please!
u/Shadowman3001, u/Ivaginaryfriend, u/Doggos, u/CovfefeBucks, u/zettapede, u/pray_for_kekistan, u/Katfish29, u/mivvan
Please, sticky this post. It goes beyond simply proving systematic fraud against Trump in Michigan but is an indictment on the US's voting system as a whole, as well as an indictment of the companies that made the voting software and the many organizations that supposedly "ensure voting integrity."
It also gives reasonable, easy to implement, common-sense solutions to fixing our broken voting system, and the answer isn't getting rid of the electoral college.
This country needs a massive overhaul in how we do voting.
Thanks mods!
I've been saying this since election night. Every state needs to be audited.
We're likely to discover that the whole country has been more conservative than we imagined for decades.
States we had just given up and assumed were blue may have had their true identity masked/stolen for a long time.
Let's get to the truth.
Cali isn't blue. We're disenfranchised.
I think you're right.
nodding rapidly...there goes my neck
I think you’re right
And the media just tells us, every election, that CA is D+99% so we just belive it when it goes Blue.
Yup. If this info is true then the US and it’s current fake trending socials and news needs a reckoning (yes it does regardless I know). All the fabricated trending and news and bots to counter a nation full of actual Americans who’s voices are muted. Shut it all down
MINNESOTA!
Yes! Take it back!
I just looked at maricopa county sheriff race. Paul penzone beat arpeio in 2016 by the exact same margin that he just beat sheridan by in 2020.
56-43
this
To Restore Election Integrity: partial list of 25+ things (also in last link below in the whole enchillada):
https://thedonald.win/p/HrTaRe8O/-what-have-brought-our-country-t/
As for Election Day and counting, it's rather simple: (I had a longer list posted back in the day) Paper, Open Hours 1 day voting, no electronics required or desired for ballots or counting, lots of small precincts (like elemtary schools) all ballots into the counting center before start counting; all counting done within a hour or few. Real simple, real honest. Full Results before midnight.
Our President DJT keeps asking for this, and no one around him is giving him this info:
Gatekeepers going to gatekeep. Need help cutting through the noise. Need help cutting out the bluepilled and purple pilled narratives, even in legal filings.
For those that want to read the differences between Redpilled Strictly-Constitutional Legal grounds vs what most cases do, here's my comment 12 days ago:
https://thedonald.win/p/11PVyVHES9/x/c/19BaD16yMq
If you want a short redpilled hot-sauce version of legal grounds to win:
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpYdveev/x/c/1ATC9URhjt
The whole enchillada to clean it all up, is like this:
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EhtERu/for-everyone-who-wants-djtpence-/
Help Pedes, time is important, even to nimble, autist, time-travellers!
Remember, we're going to win so much, we're going to win, win, win, we're going to keep on winning, no stopping.
https://youtu.be/daOH-pTd_nk 52 sec Trump Winning Speech Video link thx to Pede Donger-Lord
We Won on Tues. Win yesterday. Win today. Win tomorrow... Win Win Win
WE WILL WIN <Ques up MACROSS in the final Battle for all the Gen X pedes out there>
.win
The vast majority of Election Integrity Destruction comes from violating the "Guaranteed Republican Form of Government" clause in the US Constitution, as judges have pushed Democracy Party ideology & propaganda of democracy and marxism over/instead of a republic.
Having a Supreme Court which Strikes down the ASHWANDER RULES & returns to doing their key job of upholding their own Oaths and enforcing others to uphold their Oaths to Uphold the US Constitution as written; will solve 99% of our Nations policy/legal/justice problems by putting branches of gov back into their lanes; and our three layers of government back into their proper layers.
TRUMP SHOULD HIRE HIM
Stolen votes in Blue States allow the ratcheting towards "More Blue".
California tries hard to be the "Arbiter of everyone's textbooks" ... for instance.
They stole votes everywhere.
Yup, California is a shitshow when it comes to elections. No ID, No signature verification, now mass mail voting...no wonder these corrupt, old incumbent farts stay in their office for eons! Trump was right in the 2016 election - this is where the "popular" vote comes from.
View and like the video on YouTube as well!
Dr. Shiva is a badass! He literally invented E-mail.
He invented an email system as a kid, but I highly doubt he was the first to do something like that.
I mean, they gave him the patent for it.
Seriously? Interesting.
It's not that he invented the idea of sending a message over a computer network, he actually created the protocol that servers use to communicate with each other.
The reason we have over a million different email servers that can all send messages back and forth to each other, without a central server like facebook controlling it all, is because of his "invention of email."
In other words the "Holy Grail" of decentralized internet communication is still the original method of internet communication, and traced back to this guys patent.
That he wrote when he was like 14.
"Why you not invent new internet communication protocol yet?"
"Mom, I'm 14."
"You want I disown you?"
"FINE."
Thank you.
Pedes, stop repeating this garbage about Shiva. His claim to be inventor of email is nonsense.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190518/23370542236/laying-out-all-evidence-shiva-ayyadurai-did-not-invent-email.shtml
Thomas Edison would argue "He who holds the patent, inherits the claim." .. Nikola Tesla would disagree.
POP1 was 1984, 2 years after his system which was fully functional which is impressive. SMTP is from the 1960's was 1 to 1 and in the 1970's small groups but did not have any of the features he claimed to have. Its like text messages versus email. They are both electronic communication of a form but wildly different in function.
The decentralized communication of the internet is more due to the early work by BBN to create ARPANET, and TCP/IP, which was invented by Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn. The general concept of email was around in the 60s, when ARPANET came along it quickly became possible to send messages to users on other networks. By the time Shiva wrote his "EMAIL" program, we were already seeing emoticons, using the "@" sign for addressing, and had seen the first spam mail. To be fair, I know nothing else of the guy's work, but I get pretty suspicious of a guy who makes a claim like "Inventor of EMAIL" in his Twitter name. Granted it's accurate as the program he wrote was literally named "EMAIL".
Correct.
Shiva is a nut, and even if he's got something here with the election data, there is no fucking way Trump team needs to associate with him.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190518/23370542236/laying-out-all-evidence-shiva-ayyadurai-did-not-invent-email.shtml
Oh, no, no.
This is all complete nonsense.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190518/23370542236/laying-out-all-evidence-shiva-ayyadurai-did-not-invent-email.shtml
He filed for a copyright on a program named "email." I could file a copyright on a program named "time travel" but that was invented by three guys on the planet Gallifrey.
No it was invented by the aliens from zeta reticuli
Apparently the first to patent it. The person they say "truely" invented it seems to have been referring to a text message system, not an electronic mail system.
That argument came about because Dr.Shiva is a pretty based dude who is 100% against censorship and centralized control of the internet. So they had to bullshit some way of taking his claim to fame away.
"Sending a message" was invented the very first time two computers were linked together. And before that it was invented with the telegram, and before that with hand written letters. There's always a first cause in the invention chain, and it's never actually the first invention. But sometimes, it is actually a new way of doing it.
Might as well credit the inventor of the internet, Al Gore (/s).
Nobody is taking away the fact that as a young guy, he wrote a functioning email system and named it email. In 1978.
Email has been around since 1971.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190518/23370542236/laying-out-all-evidence-shiva-ayyadurai-did-not-invent-email.shtml
Shiva has a real chip on his shoulder, and has real SJW tendencies about why nobody will accept his claim. (Rassissst!!!)
are you super cereal? ;)
This all happened during Ron Paul's GOP primary. The same glitches happened and the data was crunched then showing an algorithm for vote swapping. It was left in the dust bin and forgotten.
Yup, he even fought his own case against the corrupt Massachusetts deep state in court without a lawyer! Interesting stuff on the actual proceedings here https://vashiva.com/dr-shiva-files-complaint-against-suppression-of-his-first-amendment-rights/
Use also email to share this.
He's not old enough to invent email as we know it (a distributed system, using SMTP over the Internet). That was invented back in the early 70's.
In the late 70's, Ayyadurai wrote a centralized email system that he called EMAIL. That's a different design and implementation, closer to a Microsoft Exchange Server.
Actually SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) server is a simple version of a Microsoft Exchange Server.
Simplistically an email message has a From: To: CC: BCC: Subject: and the text of the message. This is the interoffice mail system that Shiva invented by replicating the old INTEROFFICE MAIL system and he copyrighted EMAIL with the USPTO . That's my understanding from reading his blog.
Shiva is full of it. His claims about email are absurd.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190518/23370542236/laying-out-all-evidence-shiva-ayyadurai-did-not-invent-email.shtml
Spez: downvoting facts - come on, man!
Rather than point to some fake article, please explain why in your OWN words so we can have an intelligent discussion. C'mon man!
Fake article?
Are you serious?
My own words:
Shiva claims he "invented email" in 1978.
Email was invented in 1971.
Shiva is full of shit.
He is so intelligent and attractive! Bennie, too!
TLDW (WITH TIMESTAMPS)
6:12 Input
No voter registration card. No authentication. No receipt for the personal that actually voted. Can YOU prove you voted in an election? Conclusion: No definitive proof of your voting in an election.
6:55 Output
In input is 30 voters, say 10 voted for A, 20 for B. The output should give (30 ballots - 30 voters)
7:58 Ballot Images
Tabulation machines scan images of the ballot. These images are what is counted (and stored). They are "the ballot" since they are the only record. The images are supposed to be (per fed law) maintained for 22 months. Many states ignore this and delete the images, meaning we cannot count or audit the representations of the phsyical ballots
10:05 Weighted Race Feature
All digital voting tabulators since Diebold (the original) have a FEATURE called "Weighted Race". This allows the vote counter to tell the system how to alter the output according to some weights (e.g. distribute votes unevenly or play with fractions).
11:04 Storing Our Votes as Decimals
This enables obfuscation of the system, since the output is represented in decimal percentages by precinct. These are not INTEGER numbers (e.g. raw counts), but percentages (e.g. floating point numbers stored on a computer). This introduces both inaccuracy and ambiguity, since the system changes the output (going from counting to imprecise fractional representation). This opens the door for manipulating vote distributions. We see the results in older races (like Shiva's in MA), where the total number of votes exceeded the number of voters in ALL city/towns. Either by design or rounding error (wink).
Ex. As the total number of votes increased, they expect to see the actual distribution stabilize (e.g. approaching the actual population of voter percentage). In the hand-counted county, this occurs. In all other machine-counted counties (again for Shiva's MA election), the percentage does NOT converge, which is not natural, and indicative of fraud.
14:04 Executive summary
In three major counties analyzed, Trump's margin was reduced by a minimum of 138000 votes
Trump's vote total was decreased by 69K Biden's vote total was increased by 69K
In short, 69K votes from Trump were transferred to Biden in these 3 counties.
[Ed. note - there appears to be hard evidence for a weighted-race algorithm employed to ensure that where Trump would be expected to do well proportionally, e.g. in larger straight-ticket Republican precincts, he did the opposite!
This phenomenon repeated through multiple counties, and only "kicks in" when the % of Republican straight ticket count is above 20-25%. Before the vote hacking occurs, Trump substantially outperforms the straight ticket republican votes in these assumably proportionally smaller Red precincts!]
23:54 Negative correlation with trump popularity vs. republicans in Oakland County
Odd that 45% straight party EV in Oakland County yielded 20% invidivual votes only. Strong (almost perfect) negative correlation with straight party Republican.
Implication (assuming straight ticket = individual candidate), 10% of trump individual voters were given to biden. (200 votes) (not totally clear)
30:57 Noticed that Outliers on the negative correlation (adjacent) where trump won, indicated vote trading from trump to biden.
Establishes a trend, which can be fit based on empirical data. 31:34 Total of 40K estimated EV transferred
LOL, Trump more population in 20% or less straight party line precincts according to data, drastically less popular as a linear function OMG
"Too structured; too perfect" Reminds about weighted race feature from Diebold and similar machines
33:30 Election Day voting, same exact phenomenon! LOL 20K estimated 60K vote transfer overall for one county
34:52 Macomb, Trump does even better in the low range (up to 25%), then correction kicks in....same stuff.
Election day, he's doing even better ~22% on election day, then hack kicks in....
Total 33K
36:22 Kent County.... Same correction, 45K hacked votes 85% republican, Trump is at 25%? NO WAY
Linear phenomenon is unnatural, should be clustered.
38:07 Wayne County
Different result (probably different algorthim). Trump does even better in ostensbily low republican counties, much higher yield for individual Trump. Clear that Trump does better.
39:48 Results
Algorithm moves Trump votes to BIDEN As precincts increase with more % of Republican straight ticket, greater % of trump votes transferred to BIDEN.
SLOPE IS THE ~SAME FOR EACH COUNTY! Wayne County had no Trump hack algorithm detected (at least not the same)
41:50 Discussion
Algorithm is assumed to be a weighted race allocation method. Transfer a % of votes from one candidate to another THe % is a "Weighted" decimal value Weighted Race is a documented feature in ALL vendors (including Dominion) Assume derived from original Diebold stuff (featured).
Why are more % of Trump votes transferred to BIDEN precincts that have more Republicans?
Are BOTH republicans and democracts involved in supporting this algorithm?
Are BOTH parties aware of such features in these voting systems?
Is it Possible that this pattern is normal, and explains a normal voting pattern?
Is Mitt Romney right? Since Republicans stayed Republican, but no longer liked Trump?
45:17 If that were true, you would expect to see a more uniform decrease with losses, not a LINEAR decrease that worsens proportional to Republican representation! (KILLER)
47:30 Phil - What % chance what we're seeing is not an algorithm?
Benny - Rarely would say 0%, 1%. It's just not something you would see again. The engineering is reversing the organization of the precincts. As they grow in size, at some point, you're supposed to strike an average. (Diverges!). Not germane to something that's natural, must be artificial.
Are BOTH parties Democrats and Republicans aware of the algorithmic process? Is a coup underway? Who is behind such a coup: Democrats, Republicans, or BOTH? Or, did BIDEN win?
50:00 Conclusion
Inputs and outputs to our voting systems are unverifiable. Need for: verifiable inputs (permanent voter registration card) open source software handmarked paper ballots Viable solution because if at any point you want to remove the computer from the process, you can still arrive at an output. Voter intent is enshrined with hand-eye coordination.
The documented feature of a weighted election is such a bad idea. The only verifiable to us is the input.
Think that what happened was in MI, they saw something was wrong in some counties (flat curve) and hand counted. In bigger counties, left it with the machines and produced a curve.
The image of the ballot is what the machine counts. That ballot image IS the ballot. Those ballot images (in many states) are DELETED. There is no way to reproduce. Saving of ballot images is a factory setting. Ballot voting companies are trying to be compliant with federal law (save all records for election for 22 months). Places like MA don't save. They claim that MA state has a different law that allows them to delete the images.
[Has copies of email conversations with MA secretary of state, shared on twitter, SOS got Shiva banned for 21 days!, went for injunction pro se, judge Mark Wolf agreed that SOS had induced twitter! Learned of National Organization of Sate Election Directors controlled by Rockerfeller Bros and Murdoch Co. NASED also contated Twitter to have Shiva banned! WTF!]
save ballot images pursuant to federal law publish ballot images publicly (allow for public recount) automatic audits - audit every election publish precinct leel data (poll tapes) on election night.
You are a champion!
I am a humble farmer, tending my memes. I think the presentation is cogent and damning, but it probably needs to be cleaned up a LOT before normies can consume it. Something like the Milke Shake meme would be apropos.
Um
Hes one of you!
Proud of him!
As a masshole, I wondered what Shiva sort of half-heartedly running for congress repeatedly was all about. Interesting to find he's been working on election data collection.
I voted for Jeff Deihl but I still have a "only a real Indian can beat a fake Indian" bumper magnet
He baited the traitors. He just wanted to unobtrusively examine their fraudulent systems.
Thank you very much.
Another TLDW: The data looked at at the precinct level shows as the precincts grow is size of "Straight Republican Voters" - the popularity of Trump shrinks, linearly. This makes NO sense at all - so it must be artificial. The software has a "weighting" function - which could be programmed to inject this artificiality into the voting results.
If some set percentage of republicans didn't like Trump, you'd see a "flat" line. But the line goes downward, which shows Trump's popularity decreases the more republican an area is. This is, of course, ridiculous,
I wonder if dead voters are a decoy, to lead and exhaust our efforts down dead end roads and make us look crazy.
No, it's a fail safe. If one method doesnt work/gets called out/falls short, they use other methods. It's all important. Here's the bottom line, this shit wasn't enough. The scorecard/hammer/dominion glitches that flip votes were not enough to come close to beating trump. They made this realization late in the evening and stopped the election. Somehow. And then flew in 100s of 1000s of ballots all for Biden with no down ballot votes at all
MAGA turnout was larger than anticipated and would have resulted in a repeat of 2016.
They were ready with the backup methods this time and hoped Trump would just conceded when he realized the fix was in, Fucking morons.
I forget the name of the heavy democrat example they game that showed trump actually around a 7% increase among them? With this info, is it safe to assume that the algorithm was not put into place for any heavy dem precincts?? Also, if it’s the case..is this increase in trump votes in heavy dem precincts a huge reason why it was so close anyway with all the manipulation?
It's not clear where/how the algorithm worked. But yes, it appears that it wasn't "turned on" at heavy dem precincts. Probably no need to.
Yes, the heavy Trump turnout in Dem areas (above 2016 performance) definitely helped Trump. It points to the fact that Trump could not have lost. He gained ground in every area of support - but lost? Nope.
Maybe it's because they figure the heavy democrat counties are the MOST LIKELY to be audited or investigated for fraud. But there would be no detection of this problem by looking at just those counties!!
Wasn't it Wayne County (Detroit)? He said it didn't look like they used the algorithm there because the data stayed linear.
Yea it was one of the four—I just forgot which one. Wild stuff
It doesn't just shrink linearly; You can see a visible band of noise "around" the center of the curve fit, e.g. there appears to be a function sampling from some distribution (maybe gaussian) to create the appearance of naturalness. Yet the halfwidth for the error appears constant as you follow the fit. So messed up.
That noise is natural. That's the only part of the data that looks legit. (That plus the first/lefthand 15 percent or so where Trump is polling about 8 percent higher than expected in "non-republican" precincts.
...based off that fact of him polling better in non republican precincts...did those dem heavy precincts who voted for trump at a 8% increase basically save the election as far as allowing recounts/audits and also making the algorithm more obvious to heavy republican precincts? It was a lot of cool info but my knowledge is elementary on the subject
Well, the MIT guy seems to think the vote changing algorithm didn't kick in until they got to heavier Trump areas (guarateed 20 percent R voting). The dem heavy precincts just show a strong showing for Trump - doesn't really influence the "fraud" findings. It's the high republican areas where Trump should have down much better but didn't.... that's where it's obviously fraudulant.
They didn't really want to flip Republican counties too much. Just the ones on the margins. Their chief goal was silently stealing from rural counties and securing statewide offices. The weird thing is it was only used for the Presidential ticket. Dr. Shiva points out a possible theory that both Republicans and Democrats have been using this system to decide beforehand who will win the Presidency... So perhaps they let the rest of offices fall as they may, but arrange the Presidency to avoid spending too much money on it or whatever.
Could it be a foreign hack of our system? It would matter to some countries only that Trump lost.
Got ya thanks
That's not the noise I'm talking about. After the linear trend sets in, instead of a dense, straight line (way too artificial), they still have some spread, although it's eerily constant in width as you walk down the trend. To me, it looks like the function that's generating the offset is something like
f(x) = -0.5701x + 13.692 + normal(10,10)
Where the normal(10,10) is just a random sample from a normal distribution with mean of 10 and standard deviation 10. This is a cheap trick to have the "linearity" of the downward slope appear less obvious (inject some noise in there....like nature right).
I produced a plot here that looks pretty damn close to the phenomenon Shiva showed. I think they just pencil whipped the noise
Well, I think the final vote count in each precinct is related to the actual vote count in that precinct. That actual vote count has noise - so when you look at multiple precincts you see that noise that is natural.
Maybe their function was "flip x percent of Trump votes to biden" where x was a function of expected republicanism. Execute that on every batch uploaded to the central system - or AFTER it's at the central system (which would account for the videos showing results.. then having the results change with numbers from trump going to biden)
Sure. Piggyback on the natural noise works too. There's probably some parameters (like a wet/dry mix for reverb) to guide the signal.
Ugly screenscrape of presentation (I couldn't find a download version)
https://f.maga.host/8YIXoxp.pdf
I just want to point out that if such a receipt were provided, it would greatly facilitate (illegally) paying someone to vote for a particular candidate since they could actually prove that they did what they were being paying to do.
There are ways to inject some blindness into the system, while retaining substantially better verification. The fact that they delete any record of the ballots (wipe images) creates an irreproducible system from the start. It cannot be observed the same way twice, ever, since there is not an unambiguous mapping of inputs to outputs.
How is this not a smoking gun? If you found these kinds of patterns when looking for bank fraud/money laundering, they'd have someone in cuffs by sundown.
The only hurdle is normies are mostly too dumb to understand it.
I'm a normie when it comes to math. I have a doctorate, but it's not in math. I only took geometry and algebra 1 in high school and got a D in both. I took statistics in college and got a C. I was easily able to follow and understand this.
The hurdle isn't normies being too dumb to follow this, it's broken down very well and is easy to follow and understand. The hurdle, in my opinion, is twofold; (1) actually getting people to watch the entire video, and (2) getting people to not instantly disregard it as a lie because the media said there was no voter fraud.
Yep that's it. I have a math background and I've been telling anyone who will listen for days, the statistical anomalies ALONE are enough to warrant a MASSIVE investigation.
And they accuse US of not listening to science. How are their heads not exploding from all the cognitive dissonance? Oh yeah that's right, the MSM Gestapo sticks their fingers in their ears to anything that doesn't fit their agenda.
Vegas employs statisticians all the time in casinos to detect cheaters. If they saw stats 1/1000th as fishy as Biden’s, that person’s ass would be on the street before you could say, “Blackjack.”
Where there’s smoke, there’s fire. And these stats are putting off more smoke than the Marlboro Man at a bonfire.
You science deniers fail to respect our 72 genders.
Their only play against this is falsely claiming it has been debunked, and saying ‘there is no direct evidence’, which is wrong and entirely misses the point.
This data is as if you found the name ‘Joe Biden’ spray painted on the walls of the Republican precincts. The only way for it to get there is if someone spray painted it there. It’s not a naturally occurring phenomenon like rain. Their only way out is akin to trying to argue that somehow the walls of all the buildings of the Republican voting areas had miraculously warped in precisely the same manner to display the name ‘Joe Biden’. That would only be possible in the sense that if a 100 trillion years went by, maybe in one of those scenarios it happened by chance.
They make a point in the video of saying this isn't "voter fraud".
This is election fraud.
People are already spamming this instantly as 'disproven', I haven't heard how or why this is disproven
Bc it's not, it is just bullshit gaslighting.
What's your doctorate in?
Law
RedditModsAreFaggots, Esquire.
lol
Thanks. Do most people in your field typically lean right or left? I always hear that those with college education lean left but so do union workers, miniorities and poor. It just sounds like BS everyone is a democrat?
It depends on where you go to school. I've been to colleges in the deep South where it was more conservative and college in the heart of a major city in the Northeast where it was overwhelmingly left.
The vast majority of the teachers and administrators at all schools I've been to were far-left, many were even outspoken, anti-constitutional Marxists. I had only 1 teacher who was an outspoken libertarian.
The student body varied depending on where the school was. In the South, the students were split pretty evenly, with maybe a slight advantage to conservatives. In the Northeast, only about 2-3% of students were conservatives or libertarians. Most were lefties, and most of them were outspoken Marxists as well.
But it's really hard to get a true gauge of those things in academia, especially for students, because anyone that isn't a leftist is at a true risk of having their grades and future career harmed. I was an outspoken libertarian and it objectively hurt me academically.
I would say the legal profession runs the gamut of political beliefs and would most likely correlate with the general public. I don't believe it runs heavily one way or the other. I think that is because most people going to law school are already politically minded so the education system's Marxist indoctrination really doesn't have an effect.
However, the true problem is in schools and industries where the students are less politically inclined. In those places, the Marxist indoctrination does take hold. I'm thinking particularly of medical schools. Med schools are a hotbed of Marxist indoctrination at shockingly high levels. Particularly because most med students don't care about politics, they just love medicine and science and want to help people.
Although I can't speak to this personally, I have three medical doctors in my immediate family who can. But even outside of speaking with my family I have seen the effects. I had two close friends who went to medical school, both of which were completely apolitical. Before they went to medical school they never brought up politics or cared to discuss it when I brought it up. Both left 100% indoctrinated Marxists.
The medical education industry is by far the hardest hit by Marxist indoctrination. What makes it even worse is Medical Doctors aren't allowed to unionize or fight back against the Marxist bullshit going on in healthcare. If an investigative journalist wanted to become famous over-night all they would have to do is go into med schools around the country and document the Marxist indoctrination. It's insane.
Phd in Gender Studies? Good for you Xir
Courts bend to public pressure bullshit all the time. It absolutely matters.
Courts aren't impartial like you think.
Normies don't need to understand it. A judge needs to and the court can demand hand counting of ballots or force the company to show the code the computers are using (thus proving fraud and invalidating results). Not sure of Michigan law but hopefully something can be done.
I am a mathematical moron and I could completely comprehend this. Dr. Shiva explained it very well. I think if people watch and pay attention they will understand it.
Uh we saw 150 million promised to biden from the ccp so smoking guns are just that.
Of course Wikipedia slanders this man in the first two sentences of his Wiki page.
I have a background in math and unfortunately this video is bogus. Look towards the bottom of the comments for in depth discussion, but suffice to say Shiva has set up the charts in a way that they are guaranteed to result in a linear pattern with a negative slope.
It is a smoking gun. I'm sure the evidence is being deleted as we speak
WHY THE FUCK ARE THESE STATES DESTROYING / DELETING BALLOT IMAGES!!!! THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE STORED FOR 22 MONTHS PER LAW!!!
Simple: fraud.
Fraud mixed with "plausible deniability" oops we deleted it, oops the computer crashed, oops someone stole the flash drive
Any ballot without an image should be invalidated.
And if your ballot is invalidated, you get 1 month to fix by appearing in person with ID.
Yup!
This is what the hell I want to know. It is ridiculous to not have a paper trail for this shit. This is the age of Cloud storage and they can't be fucked to store the digital ballots SOMEWHERE, ANYWHERE? That is criminal.
Because it makes the fruad much harder, if not impossible, to prove.
And this what Republicans want.
"We're going after voter fraud".
Oh well, no evidence. I guess there's nothing we can do.
However, TRUMP:
If we can't prove the election is secure we have to do it again.
Difference between loser and WINNER.
This.
People here keep insisting we need to find enough votes to invalidate so that Trump will get over the top. No this is FUBAR and information like this shows that our entire election system is jacked. Nothing short of a revote should suffice. Sorry Branch Covidians and Democrats who can't be assed to leave their couch in order to vote. This time you have to be there in person to count and no machines PERIOD until this shit gets solved. Or ever, preferably.
This explains how votes were stolen in Michigan. The interesting parts to me were:
That is why(except because they are shitty programmers) it would be almost completely undetectable by the precinct. Because there was such a harsh flip in heavy Republican precincts it literally flipped the precinct.
But in most cases, it would simply syphon off a percentage of Trump voters across a bunch of precincts, giving Biden just enough to flip the states.
Probably why political operatives were pushing the "Republicans for Biden" signs.
We should probably track down whoever was responsible for the Republicans for Biden signs...
I always mess up some mundane detail.
And the DrUmPf lost the white male voter narrative as well....
Great points, especially the second one.
I want to clarify that we are seeing two types of fraud in this election. The first is with the voting machines, which as you said is switching Trump votes to Biden in Republican areas. The second is with absentee ballots in heavily democrat areas.
Trump's exposing it all!!!! Historic.
I guess that could also be the purpose of the voting machine algorithm, it doesn't want to cheat too much in the democratic areas, because that might create a suspiciously high vote percentage, so they cheat more in the more heavily republican areas where there won't be as much absentee ballot fraud.
That is the clever part; people normally would look at republican districts for pro-democrat fraud last.
I have to wonder if California is heavily impacted by a similar form of fraud. I get that CA probably is blue, but I've seen indications that it's not quite as blue as we're lead to believe. If you used an algorithm like this one, you could effectively neuter red areas, ensuring they never quite overcome the support in blue areas.
Would this mean that after a manual recount/audit the true vote count would be found? Also I hope Dr. Shiva is willing to testify in court about this.
If I understand correctly, a manual recount would help, but it sounds like the ballot images keep getting wiped out so no one can double-check any of it.
Also mail in ballots that got thrown out or destroyed
They're already giving Biden 90% or more in dem areas with fake mail in ballots, they literally couldn't steal the election without taking from the Republican areas.
Shiva, destroyer of libs.
Be wary of false traps like dead voters, they may be dummy decoys - “see, there’s no substantial fraud - you guys are fools !” Type of nonsense.
I thought the same thing, but read somewhere today there were 10,000 centurions who voted in MI.
State has a record of less than 2k people in the state over 100 y/o.
Might not be much but it is substantial in a tight state, when every verifiable vote counts.
My only hope is they hone in on half a dozen of these anomalies and the pattern nationwide is so obvious it cannot be ignored.
Ideally, I agree with you but I feel like the software manipulation is probably going to be the biggest bang for our buck. With the urgency of time and scarce energy - I hope we allocate our resources effectively for the sake of our country. Whatever exposes the truth and prevents civil war most effectively is my hope.
You shouldn't need more than a handful of documented, verified cases where one person's vote was diluted by a fraudulent vote to throw out the results of an election and declare a re-vote.
Unfortunately we seem to live in an absolutely stupid society who need to see that enough dead people voted to make up the full margin of victory. Where are all the Branch Covidians who declare "if it saves one life, lockdowns are worth it!" now? If it saves one vote from being suppressed then no cases of election fraud should be accepted.
Fired this over to my parents who are losing hope we can find proof enough to overturn the results. Very reassuring for them!
Electionoscopy 2020 is gonna be lit.
Third option: The vote tabulation is hopelessly contaminated and electors cannot be chosen.
The election is kicked to the House of Representatives.
Trump wins.
From what I've seen using Math and Statistics has been presented in a whole lot of documented court cases and was legally determined to be able to be used to prove something. Benford's law being the most common one, it was used to prove Enron was cooking the books.
Yes, this sort of expert testimony is used all the time in a variety of cases, from calculating the damages due to an injured person or the non-breaching party to a contract to valuing corporate shares and prosecuting financial fraud.
Quickest path to victory is a recount + an audit. An audit will have thousands of mail in ballots discarded.
The good news is that this bs was done in republican counties with republican clerks, which means that the ballots will be preserved and dealt with correctly (hopefully). We need a hand count of all of these counties. We also need to recount brown and Waukesha counties in Wisconsin as well. Out of 181 voting locations, trump did worse in 176 of them. There’s no way people hate trump that much in a deep republican county.
That's been the problem all along. They always stopped counting once it flipped and never bothered to look at the deep red counties. Why waste the time and money if the election turned out the way you wanted? I hope once Trump is in he takes the time to actually do the dirty work and we get this fixed.
Going from trump only having a fighting chance to Biden only having a fighting chance is pretty good news for a conclusion
If the courts fail us then our last option is the ammo box
That is a big relief. I wanted to show this video to my mother, who teaches math, but I was afraid that youtube would delete it before I had the chance!
youre a damn king thank you
That dude has what 4, 6 monitors? Damn.
HACKERMAN
reference: https://youtu.be/KEkrWRHCDQU
That's only like 1 monitor per MIT degree.
And 2 Rubik's cubes. One of which looks like a 4x4.
I have 4 monitors in my humble home office setup, Some of them are ridiculously old but they work for their purposes.
The monitor this web browser's on is from 2007 and has a max 1440 x 900 resolution.
I have another monitor that's only 13 inches and is a 1024 x 768 resolution, another that's 1600 x 900 and then my main monitor is 1920 x 1080p.
yeah I have three on swivel mounts and the setup is janky, all different sizes
Fancy electronic voting systems sound awesome.
Tech companies are always looking out for our best right? Just look at Twitter and Facebook.
It should be paper only closely watched and monitored.
Aye, that's why paper copies of important documents should always be kept. You can't remotely edit a book, only burn it if you have physical access.
TIL ballot machines make images of the ballots for tabulation. Also, MA deleted them.
I'd laugh my ass off if they locked the doors and a bunch of FBI agents storm in to arrest all of their asses. The journalists that is.
The only thing I want to hear once he wins is,
"Sorry to keep you waiting, complicated business."
Seems like this election is bringing out the data/statistics people similar to how Corona mask mania brought out the doctors calling BS
Once you learn statistics and how to truly apply them to the world around you, things start to get dark really quickly.
Liberals would rather live in their comfy, fluffy bubbles than face the fact that the world can be cruel and incredibly unfair.
But math is racist....
They thought that D+ districts would swing against trump, So by lowering the R+ areas it would create a flat line and not look suspect. Except, in D+ areas Trump did well and it showed how the system is rigged.
Hopefully I will be telling the young people the stories of how the Regeneron Rallies saved the Republic.
Behold the rare Red-then-Blue Mirage!
States turn red, then blue then red again.
Thank you! Everyone needs to watch this.
It was fascinating!
⚠️ IMPORTANT ⚠️
Everyone retweet this to Trump's team and others
https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1326220987608621056
@SidneyPowell1
@DonaldJTrumpJr
@EricTrump
@RudyGiuliani
@RealJamesWoods
@Peoples_Pundit
@Project_Veritas
@dbongino
@RealRLimbaugh
dont just tweet it. send it through official channels. election officias. its very important this gets in the right hands.
This methodology is not convincing. He made assumptions about what a "normal" pattern looks like, and implied that the Wayne County data was actually normal, and we know that the Wayne County data is suspect AF and had a lot of shenanigans going on. So looking at that county as an example of an 'unweighted' sample doesn't pass the smell test for me.
He also glossed over the question of "is this a normal voter pattern?" by making an assumption about what a normal voter pattern using that methodology should be, not showing us what a normal voter pattern actually is. It should be simple to show what a normal voter pattern looks like by showing us normal voter patterns in other states where we know some of these shenanigans didn't appear to happen. Show us Ohio. Show us South Carolina. Show us Florida.
Additionally, he appeared to assume that the % of party line voters and non-party voters was roughly equivalent in identifying how many votes were 'siphoned', and that may not be the case at all. For example, you could have an 80% party-line voter republican margin that is also 80% of all of the votes, while only 20% of the votes were non-party line tickets, meaning any deviation of votes from Trump would be very small. It is conceivable to me that this is a normal pattern as the votes increase.
Also, he should have done the same analysis with Biden & Democrat party line votes to see if the reverse pattern holds for Biden.
I found this presentation unconvincing, especially the part about Wayne County being even remotely considered unweighted.
That isn't what I came away with. The perfect linear that clicks into motion at a set point screams computer algorithm
Maybe, but he didn't include data samples other than the 4 MI counties. It might be a normal pattern - and he mentions that in his video (44:27). But his elimination of that possibility is not convincing. That's the key problem I have with it. Seeing a trend line in a sample of data is insufficient. He needs to show the same trend line does not appear with Biden & democrat-line voting. He needs to show the same trend line does not appear in a place not suspected of having irregularities.
The most curious part of the video is where he looks at Wayne county and sees a very different pattern. We KNOW Wayne county had significant fraud, yet per his data algorithm it doesn't indicate that at all. What seems more likely to me, is that the trend line IS actually a normal pattern, and its Wayne county that is abnormal.
They can be employing a different method of fraud in Wayne County or none at all if the county is deep blue.
Speculating like that makes it less convincing, not more convincing. And that's the problem. I'm a very scientific, data-minded person and his argument was not convincing to me. I felt like it was a bit on the manipulative side. I would expect someone with a PhD to understand that you need to demonstrate that the trend line is abnormal, and he never did that. He just showed it and said "I would assume it should be like this..." and then showed it wasn't like that, and then spent a bunch of time talking about how strange that was, and then concluded that there was only one possibility.
That's not how science and good arguments work. He needs to show data of why it is abnormal, using other data that is commonly understood to be non-suspect.
There is control (baseline) in this presentation. Without that, we can't really know whether it is normal or not. Take for example the Benford's law data we saw. It was convincing because they showed what "normal" data looks like by showing Trump, Biden, Jorgenson together and and various different cities data, and then showed how certain cities had abnormal patterns. we had the control (normal cities) and the suspect data (the abnormal cities). That didn't happen here. We only saw abnormal data and he tried to explain away what normal data would look like without providing evidence that normal data actually looks like that.
I do agree, he did not provide enough evidence to support that point. personally I still believe he is correct but it would require more to "prove" it.
A graph of Biden & democrat lined voting would look like a rotated 180° image. Both axes include dems and biden. X is of % Rep to Dem, Y is % Trump to Biden
No, it would look almost exactly the same. Because Biden cannot possibly do better than a high straight-party ticket than trump can', and the more straight-party it gets, the more likely that there will be variance.
I agree his methodology is not convincing and won't help to convince normies. There are alternate theories to the data, such as "Regression to the mean":
In precincts that are redder, the independent individual candidate voters tend to be closer to the mean than the whole precinct, i.e. if the precinct is 80% straight party republican, the individual candidate voters are closer to the mean and only vote Trump 60% of the time, and likewise, if a precinct is 20% straight party republican, the individual candidate voters are closer to the mean, and vote trump 40%.
Upvoting this because you make some good points.
The only two conclusions you can draw from this data is either the software is stealing votes from republican districts or trump is splitting tickets in a very bad way.
Fundamental rule in science: Correlation is not Causation.
Feel free to come up with another scenario.
I think the point here is the inability to prove its not that is not a valid proof that it is that.
I don't need to. Burden of proof is on the person making the claim. Insufficient proof to convince is just that. If you want to sell normies that this is happening, this isn't good enough.
So in the face of evidence, your response is "where's the evidence?"
Ok. You're right that no one will convince you that this is it, because you refuse to believe your eyes.
That isn't convincing evidence, for all the reasons previously stated.
It doesn't have to be absolute proof, or beyond a reasonable doubt proof, just reasonable to a person proof that there is shenanigans afoot, and they should either audit the count, throw out the votes in court, or the legislatures take responsibility to overrule the fraud.
His theory seems a bit like statistical manipulation, and he didn't adequately rule out other explanations.
To be convincing, he would need to:
Show that the Biden pattern differs from the Trump pattern. All we saw was the Trump pattern.
Show that the pattern does not hold in other states or counties without suspected fraud.
Explain why Wayne county with all it's massive fraud did not show this pattern (and actually showed the opposite). Why was Wayne county a "normal" county in his data? He needs to explain that. He didn't. Instead of explaining it, he distracted by saying Trump gained with black voters. While interesting, that's irrelevant to explaining why Wayne was different.
I had the same thoughts. Why not run the algorithm in another state, or on another election year. And why not just find the % of R voter registration instead of inferring from straight party votes?
This is why the Benford’s Law analysis is so damning for Biden.
Exactly this. Apply the same methodology to other sets of data to show why the Michigan counties are irregular and have a bizarre pattern. He didn't do that, which makes it highly suspect. If his methodology and analysis is correct, it should be easy to show with other data sets. He didn't even do Biden's version of it (biden's diff from straight-party democrat tickets) for comparison. If there was vote siphoning happening, we should see a very different pattern for Biden's data.
MAKE SURE THIS IS REAL.
Its coming from a guy who just claimed to hold the original patent for email. I want to think this is real, but I also want to see the math done in real time. I want to see how the districts are being placed on this graph on the stream.
I watched the whole thing, and I feel like this could just as easily be a study on the spread of disinformation.
It's real.
Solid analysis. The identical slope of the distribution curves are remarkable.
If you're having trouble following this, jump to about 39:00 where he breaks it down. Basically, there is an algorithym that takes votes from Trump and gives them to Biden based on the % of republican voters in a precinct. If a precinct id 90% Republican, 20-25% of the votes seem to be taken from Trump and given to Biden. In heavily democrat precincts, the algorithm doesnt take action. *correct me if I got it wrong, but any way you look at it, this system is Fvcked.
What is strange is that there are multiple people reaching the same conclusion more or less....
I'm talking about people who crunch the numbers. They're all noticing stuff is not right.
Good to get it stickied. This absolutely blew my mind.
Someone save it before Youtube deletes it
Got you fam. https://odysee.com/Shiva-analysis-US-voting:1
Trump should tweet this video out.
This is exactly why every election should only use in-person hand counted ballots with mandatory voter ID.
It's OK to use computers to speed up the counting process. What should happen is after the initial votes are recorded is that an independent team of auditors (bipartisan CPAs) hand count the ballots afterwards to confirm the machine totals are correct.
and record everything. That way if there is fuckery afoul then we can have it on camera to arrest the sons a bitches doing it.
Only just started watching and this guy knows his stuff.
This is brilliant.
Archive before this gets disappeared
Got it d/led and ready to reupload and spread far and wide.
This is a stunning analysis - to save time - here is the place to listen
downloaded !
Send this to the fraud hotline
Link to fraud hotline please
Sticky for days!!
sticky until december 14th or whatever day they plan on selling koolaid
Powerful stuff. There is meme here somewhere, I just can't see it. Al-Gore-rithm maybe?
23:00 mins + started to make my blood boil....wtf??????!!!
I voted for shiva as a write in on nov 3 in Massachusetts.
Be careful, make sure this is real. A strategy they could use is to give rabbit holes to follow down into easily disproved investigations while following the original ones may have been better.
We have pedes here who have done similar analysis. You can get the numbers from the direct source and crunch them yourself as well.
Math raycis
The glitch face sticky should not be higher in votes than this. People need to understand the severity of this.
Censorship incoming! Download the video ASAP - bitchute link please!
Get this to the Michigan GOP as well
This is the damn breaking!
I watched this livestream - was a very good analysis. Glad to have people like him on our side :)
We have to follow the science! Cmon man!
So an Indian guy, a black guy, and a white guy open a spreadsheet...