26
posted ago by ThreeGuysGameStudio +26 / -0

I am reposting this for visibility =)

Hi there - I am u/stophboy7 from Reddit, faithful member of The_Donald since its infancy. Why might you remember me? I made a post that went viral and was one of the catalysts which led to the PizzaGate investigation.

Wayback Link:

https://web.archive.org/web/20170601010235/https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5aqvr4/this_is_the_secret_of_the_fbi_tweets_this_is_what/

Why am I telling you this? To [hopefully] build some credibility when I tell you that I have a humble suggestion which, if we do it, will likely end this election fraud debate, because to some extent I understand how to craft stories based on truth to make things spread.

The reasons are two fold:

  1. it will mathematically prove fraud assuming lackeys filled out BIDEN ONLY BALLOTS LATE to close his gap with Trump and...

  2. [very important because, as you know, we've already proven tons of fraud and it hasn't made enough of a dent yet] this strategy also embodies the thing that's most needed to carry a stormfront to mainstream virality: a story that has clear, emotional, visual imagery. And that makes all the difference.


First, the math. What we need to do is prove, mathematically, that the vast majority of BIDEN ONLY BALLOTS [No other down ticket votes] were counted LATE. This is the key. Even though the fact he got a billion of them is very suspicious, it can be explained away by "well, I guess lots of people just wanted to get Trump out and didn't care about much else". Ok, sure.

But if all those votes were counted LATE, mathematically speaking, we DO have proof. If they were legitimate votes, they would be evenly distributed throughout the count, and there is no mathematical way around this fact.

From a statistical standpoint, there is no reason for a mail-in voter to be more likely to be a BIDEN ONLY BALLOT than an in person voter. In fact, the chance should be equivalent to a coin flip - as in, the number of BIDEN ONLY BALLOTS found to be mail-in vs. the number found to be in person should resemble flipping a coin. If, say, the 450,000 BIDEN ONLY BALLOTS we've heard about are 99% mail-in (which can be proven by showing WHEN they were counted), that's the equivalent of flipping a coin 450,000 times and getting 99% heads. In other words, proof of fraud.

And this is where the real clincher lies: if we prove those ballots were counted LATE, that tells a visual story. A story about how, once realizing Biden was defeated with an insurmountable vote count (500kish in Penns), they got to work in the dark of night filling out ballots. They didn't have time to fill out the entire ticket - no, they had far too many to make up for - fill in one circle, sign it, on to the next. Then deliver as many as they could at 4am. Biden up 100k. Next day, keep filling out, one circle, on to the next, 4am, Biden up 100k.

The story is what will sell this proof, Pedes. And while the proof is 100% convincing, the story is what will make it impossible to ignore.


So, HOW do we do this? There are options, and they vary depending upon your connections and/or access to data.

  1. Run a comparison of Biden votes coming in over time with votes for Democratic Senators coming in over time. This is perhaps the least convincing, but easiest to do with available data. We should be able to show that Biden gets spikes, LATE ONLY, that Dem Senators do not. In the case of no fraud, the distribution will be even (Biden gaining at an even rate over applicable senator)

  2. If there is some data out there that actually logs the timing of individual votes, that could be used, but I am not aware of whether there is - it's a question for data Pedes.

  3. The Scantron machines keep image records of every vote scanned. If someone can FOIA or get access to these images, we're going to see Ballot after Ballot after Ballot of BIDEN ONLY BALLOTS. This would be the most convincing, but hardest to obtain - though I imagine Trump's people could get it.

  4. There is also the "Sherlock Holmes" approach, which tends to work really well IF there's no way you're wrong. You make the accusation first (aka Tell the Story of what happened in the dark of night), then, once they say "you lunatic, you have no evidence!", you spring on them, "Ah, but I do, dear Watson! If we walk our asses over to this ward in Philly & check the vote counting machine cache, we will undoubtedly find thousands upon thousands of single vote Biden ballots, all in close proximity, all coming during late counting."

Do not forget, though, that while the math must be done, it is the PRESENTATION of the story that will make it viral. Lead with the story of what happened, THEN supply the proof as backup. There is no reasonable argument against this 1/2 punch, and it has the potential to go the distance (by my estimation). Even if it just proves PA, it doesn't matter, because a domino effect of all the other fraud will happen based upon just one visual story being irrefutably true.

And you know the great part? While this strategy should definitely be a high priority, by no means does it mean all of the other great work being done can't still be done. This is just one strategy of many, and we are millions! Also, it's probably inevitable that Trump will prove fraud and win, but the sooner the better.

All I'm asking is you guys get this upvoted enough to be seen by enough people who can engage the mission.

Good luck guys!

Comments (0)
sorted by: