BuzzFeed News found that McCafferty was ejected for repeatedly disobeying rules against filming inside the location, and he was at the location as an official Republican-affiliated observer.
.
The video clips shared online by supporters of President Trump presented a disturbing tale: Brian McCafferty, an official observer of the vote count in Philadelphia, had been ejected from the Pennsylvania Convention Center for trying to expose the “coup” going on inside.
“I got thrown out because I took video of corrupt people trying to undermine the president,” McCafferty said in a clip.
Republicans including Donald Trump Jr., Rudolph W. Giuliani and Sen. Ted Cruz (Tex.) shared his videos, one of which was removed for violating Twitter’s rules. McCafferty later recounted his experience on Tucker Carlson’s prime-time Fox News show.
Those sharing the clips highlighted that McCafferty was a registered Democrat, suggesting that any observer expressing doubt over the integrity of the count risked being banished.
There could always be more than one with that name.
Maybe not.
He got in, but not for long.
A city spokesman said he was ejected for breaking a rule against filming.
Everyone is filming. People have their cameras taking pictures of their votes. An official observer is filming a, possible, crime and they are stopped.
But McCafferty was just on Tucker tonight and explained how difficult the Democrats in Philly are making it on people who are there to observe, saying the closest desk for you to observe is 30 feet away and the furthest is about 150 feet away. He says you can’t observe anything because it’s all too far away. Not to mention the observers are behind steel bars like they are in prison.
McCafferty says he was at the convention center yesterday to observe when he noticed how difficult Democrats were making it on them to do their job. So today when he went back, he began recording video and that’s when they kicked him out of the convention center.
I know emotions are high and a lot of us want to get as much evidence as possible, but this sheet looks fake to me. If it's a list of people to not let in, why make the list so damn incriminating? Why have a column for "Republican" and have each name list "[NO ENTRY!]" etc, when it could just be a simple list of names?
I know these are Democrats I'm talking about, but this looks fake.
Okay... who's mccafferty and why were they presumably an exception
.
Republicans including Donald Trump Jr., Rudolph W. Giuliani and Sen. Ted Cruz (Tex.) shared his videos, one of which was removed for violating Twitter’s rules. McCafferty later recounted his experience on Tucker Carlson’s prime-time Fox News show.
There could always be more than one with that name.
Maybe not.
He got in, but not for long.
Everyone is filming. People have their cameras taking pictures of their votes. An official observer is filming a, possible, crime and they are stopped.
.
https://therightscoop.com/watch-registered-democrat-tells-tucker-about-the-blatant-corruption-at-philadelphias-vote-counting-center/
He was on Tucker.
Never Trumper probably
Affidavits are evidence.
It is evidence when you have 100s of them all saying the same thing.
Not when they support Trump's argument
They can be but not always.
There's also no evidence of Republican poll watchers being booted and cheered on the way out.
Source please?
When I share with liberals it's good to have the story of who took the picture, where, etc..
It says Philly Election Canvas...
Also, their Excel proficiency makes it even more obvious the level of sloppiness in this fraud attempt
Everyone involved with putting together that piece of paper needs to go to jail.
...I’ll be honest this photo by itself means nothing, it’s too close to the lens, no way to prove from the photo if the claim is true or not.
I won’t be shocked if this is true but a lawyer would destroy this if it was presented as evidence
We should all aspire to be on a democrats no admit list.
I know emotions are high and a lot of us want to get as much evidence as possible, but this sheet looks fake to me. If it's a list of people to not let in, why make the list so damn incriminating? Why have a column for "Republican" and have each name list "[NO ENTRY!]" etc, when it could just be a simple list of names?
I know these are Democrats I'm talking about, but this looks fake.
ok no knock raids and shit when?
Hmm I notice a pattern /s
saved
There's no war in Ba Sing Se
This isn't evidence. Anyone could have printed this at home and posted it. This kind of evidence just makes us look foolish.