4681 There’s just no evidence... (media.patriots.win) posted 158 days ago by barstoolkodi 158 days ago by barstoolkodi +4681 / -0 35 comments share 35 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (35) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 64 ▼ – gimmeabreak 64 points 158 days ago +64 / -0 Snope has determined this to be misleading. Since there is no hyphen between the words wide and spread, Snopes is unable to verify the claim made. This just in.....Fox News is projecting that Biden has won the great state of Puerto Rico and its 64 electoral votes. permalink save report block reply ▲ 24 ▼ – bledsawj 24 points 158 days ago +24 / -0 Wow, Puerto Rico is down to 64 electoral votes? I thought for sure they had 270 lol permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 10 ▼ – deleted 10 points 158 days ago +10 / -0 ▲ 5 ▼ – Long_time_lurker 5 points 158 days ago +5 / -0 I thought the Demoncrats bought them during the primaries? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – Thehonkswamp 4 points 158 days ago +4 / -0 Wide spread. I'm surprised Twatter's filters haven't flagged this for smearing Kamala Harris. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – WeWillRejoice 4 points 158 days ago +4 / -0 Sad that you watched fox news - you could have just gone to wikipedia instead permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – BobbyLee 2 points 158 days ago +2 / -0 Mostly false because there’s plenty of evidence of widespread journalistic integrity at Project veritas. permalink parent save report block reply
Snope has determined this to be misleading. Since there is no hyphen between the words wide and spread, Snopes is unable to verify the claim made.
This just in.....Fox News is projecting that Biden has won the great state of Puerto Rico and its 64 electoral votes.
Wow, Puerto Rico is down to 64 electoral votes? I thought for sure they had 270 lol
I thought the Demoncrats bought them during the primaries?
Wide spread. I'm surprised Twatter's filters haven't flagged this for smearing Kamala Harris.
Sad that you watched fox news - you could have just gone to wikipedia instead
Mostly false because there’s plenty of evidence of widespread journalistic integrity at Project veritas.