I had never seen that.. Holy shit.. And thanks for the share! I guess I'll definitely have to make time to see the video posted up by the OP later today..
Well he did invent an email software that he named email in the 70's.
So worth a shot making the name, even if early internet was basically a private and public message board or email.
And the two other analysts on the call? Plus he asked for other people to give their own analyses whether it confirms or denies theirs, and he claimed the weighted voting feature was in the machines' operating manuals which would be easy to check.
Ah, right! I forgot you don't need the actual ballots which will be gone. If the data is still out there which it should be, great! Granted, this was a state where you had straight-ticket and individual options. In Texas, for example, that is no longer the case. I'd LOVE to see that.
I suspect with a modification of the analysis you could still see the effect in places that don't have the separate straight/individual options. If you iteratively compare the performance of each candidate in a head-to-head race vs their party's overall performance as the denominator, the ramp-function factor I think would still show up wherever it had been used (just maybe not quite as starkly strikingly clear).
But it never seems to have really been swinging elections before. I didn't have any fishy feelings on past elections like here, and even in 2000 it didn't look like some massive conspiracy.
2018 was their dry run for this election. It was blatantly obvious in so many races where the Democrat had a miraculous comeback to beat the Republican. Kysten Sinema, the John James 1st race, etc. It was always the same. 'Found' ballots and creative counting. They were testing it out. It was obvious then and nothing was done and they were emboldened. Couple that with their absolute hatred of Trump and they just got reckless.
Are you certain about that? Down ballot races can be swung easily with this method, and no one would be the wiser. Every down ballot race is now in question.
Bingo. Do you really think that the majority of people are actually voting for Pelosi or Maxine Waters? Do they love living on human shit covered streets surrounded by homeless drug addicts so much that they want MORE of that?
Or, is it more likely that these career politicians who have become multimillionaires are motivated to protect their cash cows and will pay for the services of certain voting software companies to ensure that happens. Oh, and it helps that said companies are all owned by people either directly related to their peers (Feinstein) or people who are very sympathetic or in fact even invested in the outcome (Soros).
Yes, people in California are legitimately voting for Pelosi. I'd still audit those votes, but understand that the left is in a bubble and they are completely ignorant about the right. They vaguely understand that there is a land mass between San Francisco brunch shops and New York taxis, they don't actually know what's there though.
Maricopa county sheriff was won by soros shill paul penzone in 2016 and 2020 with exact same margin. 56-44.... i bet county recorders office might be similar as well
yea the sinema election wasnt a split of down ballot races, it was split between the gov and the senate race. ballot data suggested 200k maricopa people voted sinema doucy in 2018... do you know any of these people???
Forgive me, I do not. I should have been clearer, I meant more that I got a very similar sense from Sinema's election, that they "just happened to find" just enough votes in the middle of the night kind of feeling. I was more sort of seconding the motion that they've been playing an array of dirty tricks for a long time.
This didn't exist in 2000. This did exist in 2016. Remember the Michigan recount demanded by the greens? Trump started gaining an even bigger lead and they called off the recount. Dominion is the reason. I'm not 100% this was the cause, but I believe it. There were definitely reports of problems with the voting machines then.
Yeah, that's when they 'find' 138,000 ballots that just happen to be all for Joe and ONLY voted for president.
If anyone thinks that Biden came back from being 700 THOUSAND votes down in PA they are on crack. PA was solid red, again, even with the fuckery in Philly.
Not so fast. Their entire talent pool is affirmative action hires. Ours is merit based. They're big headed ideologues, we're peaceful centipedes. We are the sleeping mongoose, they are the creeping cobra.
Some of them are smart, but all of them have a sneering imperiousness that repels decent people. We just gotta get ours woken up, and we'll shrug off this Lilliputian menace.
He really is giant. It'd be like the intro scene from LotR where Sauron is towering over his foes, cleaving his way through them https://youtu.be/sX5ff7W7IQQ?t=131 except the good guys and bad guys have switched places (to the libs I guess they'd see it exactly like this though lmao)
TLDR: if there's a recount, parties get to review the software, and they can say their opinions about it, but they can't reveal any "proprietary information" about the code (i.e. including actual formulas or source code).
That would be sloppy, there are better ways of doing it.
Once enough damage is done, or certain signal is not received, it deletes itself.
Easy to code and implement.
The NSA used to hack cables near cables they wanted to hack and eavesdrop using electrical interference from the cables being physically close to each other. I think they did that in the 90's. Better things now.
Doesn’t matter, republicans will have access to the version/code used during recount. If it’s a “clean” version then it will count the votes correctly and Trump wins. If it’s the same version used on election night, they’ll find the algorithm. Either way we win.
There is not "one" version when they are patching glitches and making corrections throughout the night. There are N number of versions equal to the number of deployments onto the machine. Even if they are declared to be the "same" version, only a full diff or a properly-implemented checksum would be able to confirm if this is true. Developers should also prove through their work what bugs were corrected and where they changed the code to correct the issues at hand and auditors should ask themselves whether their changes make any sense given the context of the election and also demand to see what tests were performed to ensure that their products were working properly.
If the machine was potentially exposed to an external source that could have been used to manipulate the count or the software itself (USB attacks, unsecured or open-gated access to the internet, etc), then the number of deployments made is completely immeasurable and unreliable to use in an election setting.
That is assuming the person receiving the subpoena has the code in question. An employee(s) could have rolled it out without saving it to a repository, possible even compiled on a personal computer and only put on the update server as a binary.
they should create a hash the compiled exe on the machine and compare it to a hash of a compiled version of the code they recieve to make sure it is the same code.
Bingo. A hash compare would tell if the code was the same. They should have hashes for all of their compiled code anyway to verify what is on the actual voting machines to begin with. If even one character is different the hash would be completely different.
I wonder if the demonrats have any kind of plan, for example knowing that people would find out, then while noones watching add more ballots/votes post-election. Then recounts make things look fine. Not even sure if this is likely...
Yup, and military speciality is compartmentalisation, I would imagine Trump has being creating compartments and setting up stings on spies for years. Just to create a recruiting and management apparatus that exists unobserved and can launch these operations.
Faderal Warrant, kick down the doors immediately, seize their servers, seize their source code, intercept and archive all of their Email and Text messages, dig into their financial records, the whole 10 yards.
It's funny, other than fuckery, what the fuck would be "proprietary" for tabulation? It's a fucking sorting and adding machine, there shouldn't be any "black magic" lines of code to sort and add, it should be straight forward.
Correct. Why do these machines even have an option for fractional voting or making two of Candidate A's votes only count as 1.5 vote, etc.
Imagine if banking software ran this way. You'd log into your bank, deposit $2000, but oops, now you only have $1500 and another account holder got the other $500. Whoops!
The media is gaslighting that "glitches are normal" but this is simple counting software. If glitches were this normal, no one would ever use online banking.
Ah no, you don't understand. It's very complicated. It's uh it's aggregate, so I'm talking about fractions of a vote here. And over time they add up to a lot.
I'm just talking about fractions of a vote here, but we do it from a much bigger election and we do it a couple of million times.
I firmly believe that someone who finished freshman year in a computer science degree could make a vote tallying application. Its literally just incrementing like 5 variables.
Yeah, you literally could. The code to actually scan the ballot may be a bit more complex, but the actual counting is just "if(vote == canidate_1) {canidate_1_votes++} else if(vote == canidate_2) {canidate_2_votes++} etc etc all the way down for each canidate. I'm sure it could be done more efficiently, but the point remains you're just taking a couple variables and adding 1 each time they get a vote. It's not rocket science.
If it was just dumb counting software, it should be relatively simple. What should just be a simple counting program with full paper logs of every action taken probably has morphed into something that tries to do way too much.
Enterprise software companies usually pile every random feature into their program, schmooze and wine and dine the executives in charge of making the final decision, and then give the purchaser easy justification for choosing the complicated software because they get treated like a king and can easily justify buying the complex software because it has more features.
Even besides manipulation and weighting functions, I'd imagine this software has lots of tools for communicating with other machines, sending and reporting data to central sources, being remotely controllable, and many other features that are unnecessary for the core functionality. Buried within this complexity it's easy to encounter actual bugs and hide manipulation functionality even from employees trained in this software's use.
What should be used is some kind of simple, open source counting software available on sites like Github and fully audited every year by multiple nerds.
Probably because there was customer demand for it. Then the source code can stay the same and the users can adjust the fractional percentage to what ever they “need”. The company can say “Hey, we had nothing to do with it, talk to whomever configured it.”
But these machines/companies get government contracts for this shit, so we need to look at who approved purchasing them. And states like Texas who said "hell no" to Dominion due to all of these vulnerabilities.
Thank you, we have a cabin here too! Such a great lake for fishing and boating. Most of it is not more than 4-5' deep. You can walk hundreds of feet out and still stand in sand.
Can't a blockchain be controlled by anybody who has 51%+ of the computing power on the blockchain network? My only problem with blockchains is that somebody like the NSA (or China) might be able to seize control through brute computing power, without anybody knowing.
You would see the attack happen in real time. Also, if you used the bitcoin network, you would need an incredible amount of processing power. Voters would also be able to view their transaction on the blockchain and confirm that its correct. Not saying it would be an absolutely perfect system, but it would be 1000x better than this mess.
One of the major pushes after this election should be to make all voting machine software open source. It is nearly as important as making all machines use and scan paper ballots.
That's how we do it in Canada. Everything is done with pencil and paper. Multiple parties must be present for the count and if there is a disagreement on a ballot it's put in a review queue to be analysed with more scrutiny. As a matter of fact, there are always people from multiple parties in the whole process, when they ID you, handle you the ballot and put it in the bin.
The sad part is that their main play here against these damning statistics is that most of their base has renounced math and never actually understood statistics, outside of how battery life percentages relate to how much time is left to use electronic devices.
“OF COURSE BIDEN WON!!! Look here! We have the stats! Biden got 99% of the vote!!! That’s a HUUUGE number!!! It’s almost 100!!! We believe in Science!!!”
No need, take the votes, hand count them, verify the count then run the machine. the counts should match.. IF the algorithm is true, ( I believe it is) then it will be obvious. Make damn sure to disconnect the machine first from the fucking internet... and why have these counting machines BEEN CONNECTED TO THE fucking internet?!
Also you could just run and external clock on the board dedicated solely to the cheat code. Code is invisible until the clock hits a certain time stamp. When the clock timer runs out it wipes itself.
Perhaps too James Bond / cynical, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were some kind of auto-revert to a benign programming that was automated into them.
You’re giving them too much credit. They didn’t plan on it going this far. They’re getting caught left and right for FAR bigger slip-ups than this.
Criminals always end up getting caught by their sloppiness in unexpected areas. And a true forensic computer scientist will be able to find if something fishy is up. No one is good enough to hide everything.
Yeah they dumped hundreds of thousands of ballots for only one candidate in multiple cities at the exact same time and these crazy, improbable ballot counts were livestreamed on all media networks while everybody watched...these are not the brightest bulbs
Which explains why all these MSM networks are attempting to scrub all footage of their live Election Night footage from the internet. It corroborates the evidence of this fraud.
Both Wisconsin and Michigan flipped by almost exactly 10,000 votes right at 4am, I believe after promising to not count anymore until the next morning. I guess I have different definition of next morning than the election board.
For real. We’re talking about the same people who hired Paul “Stonetear” Combetta, the guy who went on Plebbit to ask how to scrub the data of a “very VIP” user from his client’s (HRC’s) email server.
That looks like a good site and has great potential.
Having the ability to tag the videos would be nice so you can sort by subject.
I see tags are an available field, but the couple I looked at didn’t have any.
I bookmarked it and will be using it, thank you.
The system was rigged against trump!. Also he called out Rockefeller and Murdock for funding and owning the election oversight. N.a.s.e.d. billionaires playing us as pawns.
Can someone answer some questions for me regarding Dr. Shiva's analysis? So in Michigan, you can vote in one of two ways, making a straight party selection or voting individually by race.
And their precincts report not only how many votes Trump (and Biden got), but what form those votes took, i.e., how many votes Trump received via voters making a "straight party Republican selection" vs. voters making an individual selection for Trump in the presidential race? Dr. Shiva's graphs looked at the total Trump vote percentage minus the straight Republican party percentage and graphed that against the Republican percentage of straight-party votes in that precinct? So if there were 200 votes in a precinct, 150 of which were via straight party voting, and Republicans (and thus Trump) got 100 of those votes and Democrats got 50 -- and then an additional 50 votes which were via individual voting and of which Trump and Biden each received 25, that would show up on the graph as a point at 66.7% on the x-axis (i.e., Trump's percentage of straight party voting, i.e., 100*150/200) and negative 4.2% on the y-axis (i.e., 62.5% - 66.7%)? Do I have that right?
The percentage of straight-party ticket votes for Trump is being used as a proxy for the "Republican-ness" of a particular precinct. Presumably you would get a similar result if you used different proxies for that quantity, e.g., the percentage of votes that were cast by voters who are registered as Republicans (or the percentage of total registered voters who are registered as Republicans)?
How well-established is the baseline as far as what this kind of graph "should" look like? They showed that Wayne county didn't have the pattern? Was that true of any other Michigan counties? What about counties in other states? Or the same or different counties in past presidential elections? That seems like a pretty key piece of information in terms of proving that there isn't an innocent / natural explanation for the phenomenon, no?
The problem is mostly in the fact that the effect is so linear. That is totally unnatural. I hope they put out their data or at least give us their linear regression results, otherwise this is all for nothing. We need to see their actual analysis in a data table so we can confirm.
They will probably give updates and I hope they are working with the Trump team.
You actually answered my question with your question!
Michigan I think is an edge case (although there may be other similar states) that break out straight-party vote versus individual ones. Therefore the slope indicating weighting and when it kicks in is fairly pronounced in Dr. Shiva's examples.
I imagine that we could use the percentage of total registered Republicans as a proxy for this, although it wouldn't be as exact. We know that Trump had high approval ratings in the Republican party, but of course it's not 100% and certainly not uniform from county to county. However, I think we could use a "fudge" number of 90% or so and if applied uniformly we could see similar adjustments being made by the voting system. As the number of registered Republicans in a county increased, if this weighting algorithm holds true, we should see that same downward slope kick in at a certain percentage -- again, just not as perfect a line as Michigan.
It's 2024 and the nightmare of the Trump junta is almost over. Our brave goverment in exile have emerged onto the San Francisco streets to greet the prospective liberation front that will be running against Trumpler in the upcoming mock elections.
"Yeeeeeaaaah, we're gonna need you to go back to your basement, yeeeeaaahhh. If you can just pack up your trunalimunumaprzure, that be greeeaaat, mmmkaaay, greeeaaat."
I really hope people exposing and figuring this shit out are being provided security from the trump administration. All of these whistle blowers and normal people providing a great service to their country need to be protected.
I hope they aren't, Trump already has enough really smart people on his team, they already know the good stuff. SO much of the stuff that gets a lot of attention here turns out to be baseless, if people sent every new "smoking gun" that gets upvotes Trump would spend all his time chasing down red herrings.
Which is probably what the left wants now that I think about it.
spez - ok, rereading your comment maybe I misunderstood your point. If you watch the whole video, he says at the end he's already been in touch with a ton of people (that he can't name) and *this *analysis is just to share with the general public. I was saying we pedes shouldn't clog up the campaign's channels with this stuff, but you're right that the creator should get in touch (and sounds like he has).
This 100%. The whistleblowers are named in the court docs - I would hope those are fake names to protect their identities, but maybe not. Those sick, evil leftists are going to torment and likely try to harm them.
I think the sticky is better data.
I had a friend on FB question this, which had me actually question and punch numbers in.
Not what you want to hear, but if we assume a fixed % of R voters didn't want Trump, the way the data is set up would trend down like this. The flat trend they present works assuming the leftover voters vote the same as the other data, but if on average 5% of Republicans voted R except, then the trend would still be down. The fact that both happen is suspicious.
There is a chance they multiplied the trend. Trump has record approval ratings among Republicans, so their assumptions might be correct, but they have cover. Just from graphs and raw numbers, unfortunately, it is difficult to prove.
We really need the raw physical ballots or their images for manual recounting to see the real results.
My understanding of the charts was that a certain percentage of dislike for Trump would've appeared as a flat line below the 0% threshold.
Instead what we're seeing is that the percentage increase in "not voting for Trump" increased linearly with the percentage increase in Republican voters.
That isn't saying "Oh, 10% of Republicans didn't like Trump", it's saying that deep red areas... somehow... didn't like Trump, but light red or even blue areas did. That's what doesn't make sense.
If 5% R went away consistently, then consider at only 10% R straight ticket, 9.5% of the non-straight ticket R votes Trump.
9.5% - 10% = -0.5%
At 20% R straight ticket, losing 5% of the R vote still
19% - 20% = -1%
At 40% R straight ticket, still losing 5%
38% - 40% = -2%
At 60% R straight ticket
57% - 60% = -3%
So it is a very gradual line, but the way it is set up naturally leads to a line with a negative slope when anything less than 100% party support.
I agree, 5% is the upper limit, and even then it barely goes down, so I think they clearly siphoned off votes (a straight percentage of R, with some fuzz added in), but the Romneys and Kamalas can say "I guess your polling is wrong, 20% of Rs in MI can't stand Trump!"
And their base will buy it.
You're right and they even address this exact issue in their presentation. The poster above you is wrong.
Certainly not all Republicans will vote for Trump (although he does have historically high approval ratings). However, we would not see a perfectly linear decrease that grows as the number of Republicans in a district increases. Besides, the downward slope is too perfect which allows Dr. Shiva to precisely predict the number of votes transferred to Biden.
I thought like you, then I started to do the math and realized one of my friends was right, it does naturally go down when set up that way in the situation that a percentage of R voters consistently don't vote Trump. Look at my other comment to see numbers worked out.
Obviously all those voters will not be in the straight ticket, so they will go to the y-axis, and it will gradually slope down. It isn't 1-1 straight ticket R to non-straight ticket R, because anyone who doesn't want Trump (or Biden for D) will always be distributed into the non-straight ticket section that is graphed in the y-axis.
The problem is how quickly it sloped down, clearly higher than 5%.
I think that slope is about how the same data would look sorting by Biden voters with no siphoning, but the principle holds: if a stable portion of dems walked away, with this graph set up, the more dems in a district, % D biden - % D straight ticket
would trend linearly down.
He needs to connect with these guys, they have taken this even further. They are taking the third digit and giving it to biden (superman scam, ie Office Space). Ie, take the 6 from this (.546) and give it to biden, which is tens of thousands of votes. At next post, trump has only .54 of the vote and biden picked up .XX6. They applied this to all states and it validates/reproduces every time. This also aligns with the 'glitch' ie THIS IS THE GLITCH.
This is not hammer and scorecard at work. Those are used to compromise machines. These are dem controlled machines working fraudulently as intended. An inside job. You don't need to hack a machine that's already doing what you want. Sydney just brought up these exploits as real world examples of how elections are and could be rigged, not saying that's the case here.
Michigan lets you vote individual candidates, or a "straight party" option.
Each blue dot is a precinct. The more "straight party" Republican votes in a precinct, the more % of Trump votes were siphoned to Biden.
100% this is a computer algorithm, because the data shows that the % of votes siphoned to Biden increases perfectly linearly, the more straight party Republican votes, across all the precincts.
For example, a precinct that had 85% straight republican votes, had 20% of Trump votes siphoned to Biden - leaving Trump with 65% in that precinct.
Wayne County (Detroit) did NOT show evidence of an algorithm. Only Republican precincts had votes siphoned. It looks like the algorithm didn't kick in unless the precinct had 20% or more straight republican ballots.
It also explains how Trump can do better than last election in the places he lost but somehow do worse Republican districts. People really think Trump somehow turned blue voters but lost people who voted for him last election.
A little more analysis, if you want to understand the graphs in the video.
In the video, fast-forward to 36:30 - these are the results for Kent County. What you see here is:
Precincts that voted....
40% Republican: ~5% Trump siphoned off
50% Republican: ~10% Trump siphoned off
60% Republican: ~15% Trump siphoned off
70% Republican: ~20% Trump siphoned off
80% Republican: ~25% Trump siphoned off
The precincts aren't all precisely that amount, but they follow that linear trend very closely. The variation could be attributed to a little variation programmed into the algo, slight differences in timing of the votes being counted, I'm not a statistician so I'm not sure. But the trend and overall is very clear.
I don't think that's the right take. Assuming that the President Only voters voted at an even 50%, irrespective of straight-line outcome, a downward sloping graph is precisely what you'd expect.
Sure but I don't think all precincts would vote 50%. It would be weird if precincts that voted 20 Rep/80 Dem or 80 Rep/20 Dem to all be 50% T. you'd expect them to be similar
In Wisconsin one can vote by party, so all Republican or all Democrat, and skip having to fill in the bubble for each candidate. The higher the percentage of votes in a precent voting all-Republican the lower the Trump vote percentage among non-partisan voters. The correlation is linear and with a linear relationship that is same for different counties. There is no good explanation for this naturally occurring, this strongly appears artificial.
Not only is it linear; it also appears to only "turn on" once the percentage of straight-party Republican voting hits 20%. The logic there may have been that in precincts that are already voting overwhelmingly Democrat, there weren't enough Trump votes to steal to make it worth the risk of detection. And conversely, that the more heavily a precinct was voting Trump, the more Trump votes (in percentage terms) they could safely steal without arousing suspicion.
I was thinking this too at first, but this is looking at percentiles of “non-partisan” voters. I don’t see why there would be such a linear correlation on percentage of non-partisan voters.
Sure, I think the basis of your claim is absolutely valid but that should manifest simply as a random rate of non-partisans voting less for Trump. We don’t see this though, we see a very clear linear correlation (with added randomness so it wouldn’t be super obvious) that non-partisan voters voted against Trump. This shouldn’t be conflated with voting straight-Democrat.
The more prone a voting precinct is to vote republican, the less that they vote for Trump and vote for Biden instead. Which makes no logical sense anywhere.
That particular graph in context of the video was just an exageration for the purpose of example.
The actual graphs start with a sizeable and steady Trump lead, then at the 20% mark, everything travels in a steep downhill trend. This behavior is duplicated in multiple counties as if on cue.
Republicans not voting the party ticket were not necessarily voting against Trump. In my own voting, I do this when I want to vote for a candidate in a local race who is not a Republican. There's a way to test it - just compare graphs from a deep red state that doesn't use this type of machine
Only individual voters (non straight party) are represented on the y-axis. In your example, those 1,000 remaining votes needs to be reduced by the voters going straight democrat, leaving only the individual voters behind to determine the y-axis value. So why would the remaining individual voters lean more democrat simply because the area is more republican?
Your x-axis value in this scenario would be 39.47%, which is the RSP percentage of the total votes cast (150/380). The y-axis value would be 10.53%.
Subtracting x from y really should not show any slope in either direction (if we trust the RSP % to give an accurate representation of a precinct’s demographics).
Yeah, there might be a problem here. If you are in a highly Republican precinct, you would probably be more likely to vote down the ticket rather than pick Trump individually. That means that it wouldn't be strange for Democrats to dominate individual votes because there might be far fewer individual votes cast in general. This is especially true if all Trump voters in that precinct vote down the ticket.
The voting machine nerds allegedly programmed a virus on their own voting machines to quietly steal votes from Trump and give them to Biden. But they forgot a bug that screws up in an obvious way when the idiot media gets the polls wrong by seven points or more. So now they're in panic mode instead of calmly recounting the votes.
He says vote for the real indian with warren in headress. I almost fell over laughing the first time the bus drove by with that ad. I posted here today if you check my posts.
I would like to see this as well. And I want to see the opposite curves i.e. the ones that show Biden vs Democrat votes. These graphs should add up with the Trump curves. It is a nice consistency check.
Well the opposite in the counties that the video shows is just an inverses. Also in the video they show what the graph looks like in a county they don't think was manipulated. Here is the link if you want to watch. They show the normal graph at like ~38mins
This is a terrible picture to take to represent the presentation. I watched the full thing. This picture shows something else. The fraud itself are seceral other graphs presented. Any one of them would have been perfect. This picture represents what we would have seen under a certian circumstance(he covers it later in the video), not the fraud itself.
The freeze frame in this post is not even one of the real plots. The real plots in the video show multiple counties (using hundreds of voting precincts as data points) where Trump was getting X% of the votes until a certain threshold, at which point a linear modifier started transferring votes to Biden. Nice linear relationships are pretty spectacular to see in statistical analysis, so to find the same trend in multiple major Michigan counties is almost certainly artificial according to these PhD software developers.
In Michigan they give voters the option to vote a straight GOP vote. So press one button a d all GOP affiliated people running for office from potus to dog catcher are selected.
What the data shows that in 3 of 4 counties, the more republican voters in a precinct, the fewer that didn’t take the straight GOP vote. Instead they voted for Biden and then the rest of the offices they voted Republican.
What graph does is take the percentage of straight GOP ballots m and subtracts the from that the percentage of ballots that voted Biden and the rest of the offices GOP.
If Trump was uniformly hated by Republican voters then would expect the trend live to be flat no matter how many Republican voters there were in a precinct.
But instead the vote shows that the more Republican voters in a precinct the more hate for Trump.
It doesn’t make any sense.
So 3/4 counties showed this. One county looked at did not. Instead it showed that if anything, there were a consistent percentage of Democrat voters who didn’t vote Biden and instead voted Trump.
The other difference is that those 3 counties used machines to count ballots. The 4th county that showed a Trump wave used hand counting.
So the Dems actually thought they could just make a computer script to give themselves votes. Holy shit. This is literally justification to publicly execute every person involved if this is proven in court. They are so fucking complacent and brazen and comfortable that they do not fear any consequences for their actions anymore, no matter how extreme and malicious, especially since all MSM and social media covers for them and lies for them and silences anyone criticising them This needs to be answered with extreme punishment.
What is really fishy is that Trump improved the GOP vote in blue states, even to the point of coat tails that turned 7 or so Democrat house seats to the GOP. New York is trending to swing state ffs.
I’ve never heard of a President lose an election and have coat tails.
Okay. I'm an engineer. I've watched this video 4 times now. It doesn't add up. He is plotting mixed ballot Trump vote percentages, minus the straight republican ballot percentage, on the Y-axis. Then plotting straight Republican ballot percentages by themselves on the X-axis. Then he's saying there's an anomaly that is a negative linear slope. Well yes, of course there's a negative linear slope, his equation is subtracting a linear number (X-axis value) from a percentage of Trump voters who filled out a mixed ballot - which should be a fairly constant value after it initially gains from zero. The only way this result stays horizontal (not sloped) is for the percentage of Trump voters casting mixed ballots to equal the corrosponding X-axis value at that precinct. But we should think that there is a limit to the growth of mixed ballot Trump voters no matter where they live. I gotta be honest, unless I'm missing something this data analysis seems pretty quacky. It gets really quacky at the 30 min mark where he does an analysis of 2000 voters in a 45% republican straight ballot precinct - but then somehow forgets that and says that Trump only got 45% of 1000. He then jumps with no explanation to suddenly Trump is losing 25K votes and Biden is adding them. He really lost me there. Some Pede tell me where I'm wrong but this Shiva's logic and numbers aren't adding up for me.
Also engineer, also reached same conclusion. Will copy paste reply from earlier I made.
I'm going to go full doomer here. Doesn't this just mean in precincts where Republicans used the straight ticket option more, there were less available people to vote Trump? Inversely, in places where, let's say 20% of people voted straight R, the remaining 80% of people could have voted Trump for prez then down ballot for dems? Wouldn't that make sense for largely democrat areas where Trump has won people over? In order words, in largely dem areas where no one would use RSP, Trump literally has no where to go but up. If 0% use RPS, the number of Trump-RSP has to be positive or zero. I think that's why these charts start with X<20% and Y being positive.
A downtrend being observed is not surprising at all. If 100% of Trump voters voted RSP, then Trump-RSP would have nowhere to go but down. In fact if 100% of Trump voters voted RSP, Trump then gets NO individual votes which I think would be a -100% score.
Also I caught that trick at 38:50 The X axis only goes to 35% so the effect I'm describing above would not take noticeable effect yet. Compare that chart to other charts when >35% is cropped out.
Doesn't this just mean in precincts where Republicans used the straight ticket option more, there were less available people to vote Trump?
I thought so at first too, but realize he said the independent votes and straight party votes were separate data sets. Each data set should have proportions that add up to 100%.
The X axis expresses "how Republican is the precinct" as inferred by the percentage of precinct voters that chose the Straight Republican option.
The Y axis shows if the Individual Candidate voters were "more or less favorable to Trump". They do this by plotting the difference between these voters' Trump % to the the straight Republican voters' split.
For example, in a precinct which had 80% Straight Republican (vs 20% Straight Democrat) but only 20% Individual Trump (vs 80% Individual Biden), you'd put that precinct as a -60% on the Y axis.
They do this by plotting the difference between these voters' Trump % to the the straight Republican voters' split.
This is the problem right here. He is creating a function with y dependent on x, and then acting surprised that there is a relationship between y and x.
The function for Y is chosen to make the visualization clear. You could also express it as the split between Trump and Biden for Individual Choice voters, and you’d see a trend after 20ish% of X where Y skews towards Biden linearly.
Not an engineer, but took the time to makes sure I followed everything and the problem seems to be that the percentage of Trump votes that are straight republican ticket votes is assumed to be the same as the percentage of Trump votes that are individual filled in. That's what the red line above is showing. Having an assumption as your baseline cannot be good math. It seems that this graph could also be showing that as partisanship increases, voters are more likely to vote "straight ticket"
You're correct that as straight Republican ballot percentages approach 100% then the surplus Trump vote percentage must approach 0%, for the sum of both cannot be greater than 100%.
But that doesn't explain the near uniformity of the slope of the problematic counties, nor the fact that the algorithm looks to be "if republican_straight_ticket > 20%, then force slope to -1/2"
The near uniformity of the slope could be explained by a constant President-Only/Mixed vote for Trump. If that number is assumed to be a constant 50% and orthogonal to the Straight Ballot share, then you'll see a constant 10% decrease for every 10% increase of Straight Ballot R share above 50%... linearly. Also, at below 20%, likely because of small N of straight R ballots.
I see the points being made by the arguments above, but similar to the video they all require that assumptions be made. The truth is that it is damn hard to prove anything either way at this point. If it is fraud, the people doing it aren't stupid and wouldn't make it easy to catch. This is a good resource to get people to question what is going on, maybe even freak out some people who may or may not be "in" on it. It is not a smoking gun. As always, we should keep our minds open to all possibilities in order to come to the best understanding of what is actually going on.
Thank you. I'm also an engineer and came to the same conclusion, but felt like I must be missing something.
TLDR: The guy set his y-axis as y = -x + t, where x is the number of straight ticket voters and t is the number of independent Trump voters. He himself said t should be constant, therefore he is plotting a linear function with a negative slope.
He is finding the difference between two percentages.
Y the percentage of Straight Republican Vote (SRV)
X being the percentage of Trump Individual Vote (TIV) - Y
He argues that in a normal case, the percentage of TIV would be close to percentage of SRV (+/- 7%). So when a precinct has a SRV of 65%, the TIV would be between 60-70%.
There's no reason to assume that the percentage of TIV would be a constant (say 50%), which would be what is required for this to be a linear negative slope.
Even in the case where the SRV approaches 99%, the TIV should also be corespondent - because ultimately it's tracking the same population.
The basement dweller code monkeys would brag when there were pretty women in the room, that the NSA brass had no idea what they were doing with their side hustles for cash. Writing code glitches like that were their favorite for easy money from unknown buyers. Typical brag from these skinny jeans wearing soy kids : "Fat stacks baby! Fat stacks! I live with my parent's in Maryland because they have a dope pad and I will inherit anyway. Let me show you this weekend, they are going away to our place in Rehoboth Beach." (Think the red headed kid with braces on Family Guy)
Forwarded the info to the OIC for the record. She said, "Who cares. Don't waste my time."
D.C. is a swamp... indeed. Even the military has deep seated problems there.
What it basically means is that in GoP heavy areas, they slowly siphon votes from the GoP candidate to the Dem candidate just enough to reduce the candidate's "lead" in an area.
Here's a very rough idea of how it affects things. (Intentionally oversimplified as requested.)
Let's say a state has a 2 counties.
One Country county gets 150 votes for Trump and 25 for Biden.
The City county gets 275 for Biden and 250 for Trump.
Now, the results in this case would be 400 for Trump and 300 for Biden. Trump only wins 1 county but the whole state. You with me so far?
Now let's say you wanted the machine to "cheat" but not make it obvious. You know Trump won't win the City and Biden won't win the Country. So what do you do?
You tell the machine, late at night when nobody's watching, to take 50 of those "Country" votes and put them in Biden's bucket. Trump still "beats" Biden in the countryside, but now the totals are like this: 350 Biden 350 Trump.
It's basically embezzling votes. You take a little bit where they "won't notice", over and over again, in county after county after county, until Trump's lead from the rest of the state is pretty much nullified, and the "city" votes (legit or not) are the only ones being "counted".
But what if the President's lead is so huge you can't get away with it?
Well, just sit around Detroit manufacturing votes, of course!
Embezzling is a good analogy that's easy to understand. That's exactly what they did, only it was votes - not money.
The machines were coded so that when Trump's lead got to a certain percentage, a certain small percentage of Trump votes would be quietly, and automatically, moved over to Biden.
Do that often enough and you win - as long as nobody looks too closely.
I'm about 40 minutes into it and I understand it. One question I have is doesn't this data mean that John James didn't do as well as Trump? It seems like Trump easily won Michigan if they were to reverse these votes, but none of these votes were actually taken away from John James? Now I believe James would still win in a fair election but this data doesn't address the huge influx of dead votes and other avenues of cheating.
People keep asking if Trump knew the fraud was going to happen, why didn't he do something to stop it? 4D chess. Now that we have mountains of evidence that shows exactly how they've been stealing elections we can fix the broken system, and hopefully provide lots of free helicopter rides.
If this proves true no wonder it became so rampant that they had to scramble to start making hard copies of ballots with only biden filled out. Trump was going to win in such a blow it blew up their algorithm. Trump landslide.
To them the ends justify the means. Getting rid of Trump is more important than reducing voting in the United States to the level of Banana Republics and former Soviet nations. What matters to them is the RIGHT people win, and they decide who the right person is.
This is exactly what they did to Bernie in Iowa. It was a test run. Think about it. How hard could it possibly be to code an app to count votes? The hard part was siphoning away votes from Bernie and equally distributing them to the other candidates without looking suspicious.
Does anyone really think these globalists powers will just throw their collective hands up and declare "Okay, you got us. So sorry. We're guilty as hell. Trump wins."
They control 90+% of the media - television, radio, Internet, etc.
They continue to ignore the story (See Biden crime family story as well) so that very few realize what is happening. If it isn't reported it didn't happen. It will take a ton more work to break through that wall and frankly, a lot of Americans just don't care enough. That's what the globalists are counting on - tens of millions too busy doing Tic-Tok dances, watching porn, playing video games, etc.
China plays the long game and has its grip on nearly every facet of American government and culture. We Americans have the attention span of fruit flies and they know that.
God Bless President Trump. He has managed to push back against this destruction of America from within better than most ever could but if you think Dr. Shiva's "I found the algorithm" thing will be enough you are allowing yourself to be as deluded as the left when they kept repeating "Trump is finished" day after day, week after week, month after month.
Holy shit this explains the down-ballot anomaly. The evidence in this video shows that the greater the number of Republicans in a precinct, the more votes the algorithm took from Trump and gave to Biden. This means that a huge number of straight tickets for republican got the president vote switched from Trump to Biden but the rest of the ticket stayed republican. I'd love to see an analysis done on the down ballot ratios to see if they match the algorithm for the vote switching.
I passed this along to a family member with a PhD in the field.
She also voted for Biden, so take that with a grain of salt.
Thoughts?
I don’t see how what he’s suggesting makes sense. There are a number of issues with this.
First, you can’t say that because X% of people were straight party Republican voters, that means that X% of voters in that precinct are Republican. Instead, that means that X% of the straight party voters were Republican. But what proportion of voters voted straight party? Without knowing what the denominator is, this is meaningless. E.g., if only 10% of all voters in that precinct were straight party voters, then this means that X% of that 10% were Republican. More specifically, if 20% of straight party voters were Republican, but only 10% of all voters voted straight party, this means that 2% of voters were straight party Republicans. This highlights how without providing the promotion of straight party vs. individual votes, he doesn’t give you enough detail to know what the political leanings are for that precinct. You just don’t have enough data.
Second, the y-axis values he uses are the differences between straight party and individual vote %s for Trump. But why does that matter? He argues that there’s a negative slope, such that as the % of straight party Republican voters increases, the % of individual voters decreases. This is entirely plausible. For instance, if people find a political candidate particularly unlikeable, you might see more willingness to use individual voting than straight party so that a person can deviate from their party in casting a vote for a particular candidate. E.g., one might generally vote Republican, but really despise Trump, so they cast their vote for Biden using the individual voting method. But again, without knowing what proportion of people were straight party vs individual voters, this is all pretty meaningless.
Third, his claim that you rarely see linear effects when plotting data is also nonsense. As a sample size increases, it becomes more likely that you’ll see more systematic effects emerge due to increased statistical power. Basically, as the number of cases increases, random error (or strange cases) will be less noticeable because the more typical effects will be much more numerous.
To be honest, I stopped watching at about the 35 minute point because the logic here was nonsense. And when he threw out an ungrounded statement about votes being given from one candidate to another without any evidence to support the claim, he completely lost me. So then I did a little research on who this person is, and now I’m even more confident that this presentation is nonsense.
I spotted that in a VA post earlier, when the trending went in the wrong direction Give_Biden_Trump_Votes.exe kicked in
please let that be the name of it when it get's discovered!!! please Lord! i'll never ask for anything ever again
I spoke with the Great Sky Father. It will be so.
Dam. Just watched Dr shiva blow it all up. Algorithm flipped thousands, if not millions of votes to biden. Holy fuck.
Reminds me of this
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5ZddmTqNUCNL/
I had never seen that.. Holy shit.. And thanks for the share! I guess I'll definitely have to make time to see the video posted up by the OP later today..
Seems down.
Well in case of videos, that method won't work. You need to use this program to download the video:
https://youtube-dl.org/
And then manually reupload the video file to bitchute, the only trustworthy video site.
https://qdownloader.io/
very few clicks to get videos from a multitude of vid sites
the youtubedl is great but it is more command line and not mouse in gui
I'm downloading the video (on mobile, so taking a while) & will repost/archive when done.
Thank you!
Diane Feinstein’s husband designed and owns the voting software used in 32 states btw!!! All the states Biden rigged for victory were included!
This is the guy who claims to have invented e-mail, and went around suing anyone who called him out on that bullshit.
Sorry, but this dude's not exactly a credible source for anything.
Well he did invent an email software that he named email in the 70's. So worth a shot making the name, even if early internet was basically a private and public message board or email.
Dang I guess that means he's wrong about everything else. Nice try!
No, it just means he's been a grifter for decades.
And the two other analysts on the call? Plus he asked for other people to give their own analyses whether it confirms or denies theirs, and he claimed the weighted voting feature was in the machines' operating manuals which would be easy to check.
THIS VIDEO RIGHT HERE IS WHY THE COMMIES KEEP CLAIMING THAT SOME STATES ARE PURPLE STATES.
This analysis needs to be run on every significant election back several years.
Anyone found to have had this "elect" them needs to be absolutely hounded out of public office. Forced to resign immediately.
Same here. And I think that feeling of physical sickness is just a temporary sensory overload from the sudden combination of:
Ah, right! I forgot you don't need the actual ballots which will be gone. If the data is still out there which it should be, great! Granted, this was a state where you had straight-ticket and individual options. In Texas, for example, that is no longer the case. I'd LOVE to see that.
I suspect with a modification of the analysis you could still see the effect in places that don't have the separate straight/individual options. If you iteratively compare the performance of each candidate in a head-to-head race vs their party's overall performance as the denominator, the ramp-function factor I think would still show up wherever it had been used (just maybe not quite as starkly strikingly clear).
Saved here
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZXzojS7MVm43/
It's already gone. 404.
<iframe width="640" height="360" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border: none;" src="https://www.bitchute.com/embed/ZXzojS7MVm43/"></iframe>
Thanks for the blessing.
You based savage
This is the way.
It's more likely something gay like "blacklivesmatter.exe" or "drumpfistoast.exe"
or BarrySwallowsBigMike.exe
NotaSmidgeonOfCorruption.exe
Scandalfree.exe
Dindunuffin.exe
That's the one they run when their fraud is overturned.
mostlypeacfulcorruption.exe
10forthebigguy.exe
Underrated comment
This is more likely
run orangemanbad.bat -resist
DianeFeinsteinsChinaDriver.exe
MostlyLegal.exe
TotallyRussianVirus.exe
Iwuzhacked.exe
i'mwithher-->.exe
More like "concentratedvoterfraud.exe" or maybe "localvoterfraud.exe" as long as it isn't widespread I think we'll be fine. Right, guys?
keepcaliforniabluecheat.exe
"Hi, I'm here for the rump fist"
This has been going on a lot longer than this election.
no doubt
But it never seems to have really been swinging elections before. I didn't have any fishy feelings on past elections like here, and even in 2000 it didn't look like some massive conspiracy.
Id bet it's been in light use for a long time, but Trump really pushed them over the edge.
They needed the house, so used it in 2018 generously, then REALLY needed it in 2020. They made it too obvious.
2018 was their dry run for this election. It was blatantly obvious in so many races where the Democrat had a miraculous comeback to beat the Republican. Kysten Sinema, the John James 1st race, etc. It was always the same. 'Found' ballots and creative counting. They were testing it out. It was obvious then and nothing was done and they were emboldened. Couple that with their absolute hatred of Trump and they just got reckless.
Are you certain about that? Down ballot races can be swung easily with this method, and no one would be the wiser. Every down ballot race is now in question.
Exactly. The inner city thugs are making sure they retain their fiefdoms
Bingo. Do you really think that the majority of people are actually voting for Pelosi or Maxine Waters? Do they love living on human shit covered streets surrounded by homeless drug addicts so much that they want MORE of that?
Or, is it more likely that these career politicians who have become multimillionaires are motivated to protect their cash cows and will pay for the services of certain voting software companies to ensure that happens. Oh, and it helps that said companies are all owned by people either directly related to their peers (Feinstein) or people who are very sympathetic or in fact even invested in the outcome (Soros).
Yes, people in California are legitimately voting for Pelosi. I'd still audit those votes, but understand that the left is in a bubble and they are completely ignorant about the right. They vaguely understand that there is a land mass between San Francisco brunch shops and New York taxis, they don't actually know what's there though.
Maricopa county sheriff was won by soros shill paul penzone in 2016 and 2020 with exact same margin. 56-44.... i bet county recorders office might be similar as well
THIS. And that terrible Krystyn Sinema or however she spells her name. Oh look, teehee, I guess I DID win after all nonsense just like this.
yea the sinema election wasnt a split of down ballot races, it was split between the gov and the senate race. ballot data suggested 200k maricopa people voted sinema doucy in 2018... do you know any of these people???
Forgive me, I do not. I should have been clearer, I meant more that I got a very similar sense from Sinema's election, that they "just happened to find" just enough votes in the middle of the night kind of feeling. I was more sort of seconding the motion that they've been playing an array of dirty tricks for a long time.
This didn't exist in 2000. This did exist in 2016. Remember the Michigan recount demanded by the greens? Trump started gaining an even bigger lead and they called off the recount. Dominion is the reason. I'm not 100% this was the cause, but I believe it. There were definitely reports of problems with the voting machines then.
...
I'd like to point out that Dominion acquired DIEBOLD's Election Systems division in 2003.
That would include DIEBOLD's special relationships with legislators.
Exactly!
And Romney lost entire precincts in PA. And I mean LOST ENTIRE, like zero votes. Cuck never had the balls to do anything about it.
If they do it right, the race is close and the steal is undetectable. It’s when there’s a blowout that the fraud becomes obvious.
Yeah, that's when they 'find' 138,000 ballots that just happen to be all for Joe and ONLY voted for president.
If anyone thinks that Biden came back from being 700 THOUSAND votes down in PA they are on crack. PA was solid red, again, even with the fuckery in Philly.
This analysis needs to be run on every significant race going back 20 years.
Anyone who "won" with this pattern needs to be hounded out of office.
This is the way
Sho me dah wey
This guy gets it. ☝
I took one JAVA class and I'll never program again for as long as I live.
(I'm also the type of student who does better focused on ONE subject. Read: Autist)
Your OP does remind me of a CS joke.
There are only two hard problems in CS: Cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors.
Many programmers strongly encourage kepping lambda calculus and side effects mutually exclusive.
You could say they're advocates for the separation of Church and state.
...I'll show myself out.
Lol, it's so clumsy! How the hell did these retards think TD wouldn't notice? Well done, Dr. Shiva!
They never assumed the vote turnout would be this much.
It even blew out my prediction of 68+ million for Trump by a considerable margin lol
They also know they own the media
Dunning-Kruger effect in many cases I think. They're not smart enough to realize they're not very smart.
Not so fast. Their entire talent pool is affirmative action hires. Ours is merit based. They're big headed ideologues, we're peaceful centipedes. We are the sleeping mongoose, they are the creeping cobra.
Some of them are smart, but all of them have a sneering imperiousness that repels decent people. We just gotta get ours woken up, and we'll shrug off this Lilliputian menace.
Chin up, sometimes I feel the same. The truth is having your eyes open and being able to see is a worth the burden.
It may be nice to be stupid, right up until the point you realize your being loaded into a box car. And I don’t mean that in any anti-Semitic way.
This is why they went with Dementia Joe. They knew this would be a huge risk. Biden is the fall guy.
also, make this a meme!!!
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O469rl/
mic squelch
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD
click
OOooops. They left footprints!
They even look like footprints.
Now analyze their code for the final nail in their coffin.
Is their code open source?
highly doubt it. Trump team needs to "acquire" the software somehow.
Barron Recon mission
Deploy the expert.
The Expert has arrived
if they keep it on the upper-top most shelf, we got a chance with Barron
He really is giant. It'd be like the intro scene from LotR where Sauron is towering over his foes, cleaving his way through them https://youtu.be/sX5ff7W7IQQ?t=131 except the good guys and bad guys have switched places (to the libs I guess they'd see it exactly like this though lmao)
Was defeated by a ma'am
Pence clones
Guess what happens if there's a recount in Wisconsin?
https://www.wisciviljusticecouncil.org/2020/05/11/dominion-voting-systems-inc-v-wisconsin-elections-commission-voting-software-confidentiality/
TLDR: if there's a recount, parties get to review the software, and they can say their opinions about it, but they can't reveal any "proprietary information" about the code (i.e. including actual formulas or source code).
Did I read that right?
1000% the malicious code is inserted on election night then removed.
That would be sloppy, there are better ways of doing it.
Once enough damage is done, or certain signal is not received, it deletes itself.
Easy to code and implement.
The NSA used to hack cables near cables they wanted to hack and eavesdrop using electrical interference from the cables being physically close to each other. I think they did that in the 90's. Better things now.
So does that mean nothing could be done about this? This code talk is out of my league
Doesn’t matter, republicans will have access to the version/code used during recount. If it’s a “clean” version then it will count the votes correctly and Trump wins. If it’s the same version used on election night, they’ll find the algorithm. Either way we win.
Unless votes were systematically destroyed.
Don't fall into this trap.
There is not "one" version when they are patching glitches and making corrections throughout the night. There are N number of versions equal to the number of deployments onto the machine. Even if they are declared to be the "same" version, only a full diff or a properly-implemented checksum would be able to confirm if this is true. Developers should also prove through their work what bugs were corrected and where they changed the code to correct the issues at hand and auditors should ask themselves whether their changes make any sense given the context of the election and also demand to see what tests were performed to ensure that their products were working properly.
If the machine was potentially exposed to an external source that could have been used to manipulate the count or the software itself (USB attacks, unsecured or open-gated access to the internet, etc), then the number of deployments made is completely immeasurable and unreliable to use in an election setting.
Werent wayne county machines miraculously connected.to the internet at 4am??
the code would have already been there, if anyone hacked it, it might have been the nsa watching it
Like with a cloth?
Yeah but that protection wouldn't help if there was evidence of crimes...
I wonder how many 3 letter agencies are involved?
Fixed that for you
Yes.
All.
I would bet they show a code release that doesnt contain the "glitch" so that it looks fine.
They might be willing to steal a national election, but I can't imagine that they would provide a decoy code to a court - that's just inconceivable.
But seriously, this is exactly why we need to be hearing about Roger Stone -style raids on Dominion's offices and servers like yesterday.
That is assuming the person receiving the subpoena has the code in question. An employee(s) could have rolled it out without saving it to a repository, possible even compiled on a personal computer and only put on the update server as a binary.
But then it would work... So far sounds like it doesn't.
they should create a hash the compiled exe on the machine and compare it to a hash of a compiled version of the code they recieve to make sure it is the same code.
Bingo. A hash compare would tell if the code was the same. They should have hashes for all of their compiled code anyway to verify what is on the actual voting machines to begin with. If even one character is different the hash would be completely different.
I highly doubt that adding votes is "proprietary information"
It's certainly their secret formula!
You'll quickly see WI be conceded by the Biden team to avoid this.
Too late.
Biden bought the ticket, now he gets to take the ride.
Holy fuck pede!!!!!
I wonder if the demonrats have any kind of plan, for example knowing that people would find out, then while noones watching add more ballots/votes post-election. Then recounts make things look fine. Not even sure if this is likely...
Yup, and military speciality is compartmentalisation, I would imagine Trump has being creating compartments and setting up stings on spies for years. Just to create a recruiting and management apparatus that exists unobserved and can launch these operations.
Faderal Warrant, kick down the doors immediately, seize their servers, seize their source code, intercept and archive all of their Email and Text messages, dig into their financial records, the whole 10 yards.
DO IT NOW!
It's authorized. So that's something. plays bagpipes
I think veritas or someone posters about a reward for some firmware. Let's find some
No. He states in his analysis that the software is NOT open source on the machines
I love proprietary NWO Big Tech companies running my elections in a black box!
So awesome! Yeah!
Bro, you can trust them because they're owned by some of our richest politicians.
Sweet! Those are the best ones to have in charge of it all!
It's funny, other than fuckery, what the fuck would be "proprietary" for tabulation? It's a fucking sorting and adding machine, there shouldn't be any "black magic" lines of code to sort and add, it should be straight forward.
Correct. Why do these machines even have an option for fractional voting or making two of Candidate A's votes only count as 1.5 vote, etc.
Imagine if banking software ran this way. You'd log into your bank, deposit $2000, but oops, now you only have $1500 and another account holder got the other $500. Whoops!
The media is gaslighting that "glitches are normal" but this is simple counting software. If glitches were this normal, no one would ever use online banking.
Ah no, you don't understand. It's very complicated. It's uh it's aggregate, so I'm talking about fractions of a vote here. And over time they add up to a lot.
I'm just talking about fractions of a vote here, but we do it from a much bigger election and we do it a couple of million times.
Been lurking a long time. Had to sign up so I could give you props for your Office Space reference.
Dems are taking votes from the crippled children!?
I firmly believe that someone who finished freshman year in a computer science degree could make a vote tallying application. Its literally just incrementing like 5 variables.
spez: typo
Yeah, you literally could. The code to actually scan the ballot may be a bit more complex, but the actual counting is just "if(vote == canidate_1) {canidate_1_votes++} else if(vote == canidate_2) {canidate_2_votes++} etc etc all the way down for each canidate. I'm sure it could be done more efficiently, but the point remains you're just taking a couple variables and adding 1 each time they get a vote. It's not rocket science.
If it was just dumb counting software, it should be relatively simple. What should just be a simple counting program with full paper logs of every action taken probably has morphed into something that tries to do way too much.
Enterprise software companies usually pile every random feature into their program, schmooze and wine and dine the executives in charge of making the final decision, and then give the purchaser easy justification for choosing the complicated software because they get treated like a king and can easily justify buying the complex software because it has more features.
Even besides manipulation and weighting functions, I'd imagine this software has lots of tools for communicating with other machines, sending and reporting data to central sources, being remotely controllable, and many other features that are unnecessary for the core functionality. Buried within this complexity it's easy to encounter actual bugs and hide manipulation functionality even from employees trained in this software's use.
What should be used is some kind of simple, open source counting software available on sites like Github and fully audited every year by multiple nerds.
Probably because there was customer demand for it. Then the source code can stay the same and the users can adjust the fractional percentage to what ever they “need”. The company can say “Hey, we had nothing to do with it, talk to whomever configured it.”
But these machines/companies get government contracts for this shit, so we need to look at who approved purchasing them. And states like Texas who said "hell no" to Dominion due to all of these vulnerabilities.
I've been on that lake... my uncle has a 100 year old cabin there... good catfish! The smaller ones, anyway.
Thank you, we have a cabin here too! Such a great lake for fishing and boating. Most of it is not more than 4-5' deep. You can walk hundreds of feet out and still stand in sand.
For security reasons you might want to keep encryption methods secret.
...but that's exactly why the ties to the establishment are extremely suspect.
"Don't worry about us hacking the bank servers, we're just in close contact with the people who built them + set the password."
This is something to fix via legislature: voting software MUST be open source.
Updates to software must be publically published at least X-number of days/weeks before being uploaded to any computers/machines used during election.
Better yet just use the blockchain. Nobody owns the software, the network, or the ledger data.
Can't a blockchain be controlled by anybody who has 51%+ of the computing power on the blockchain network? My only problem with blockchains is that somebody like the NSA (or China) might be able to seize control through brute computing power, without anybody knowing.
You would see the attack happen in real time. Also, if you used the bitcoin network, you would need an incredible amount of processing power. Voters would also be able to view their transaction on the blockchain and confirm that its correct. Not saying it would be an absolutely perfect system, but it would be 1000x better than this mess.
$LINK
Lol
Well Trump can reverse engineer it...
If it was, they'd already be in jail.
One of the major pushes after this election should be to make all voting machine software open source. It is nearly as important as making all machines use and scan paper ballots.
Or just count paper ballots by hand in a joint session with representatives of every party doing the counting
That's how we do it in Canada. Everything is done with pencil and paper. Multiple parties must be present for the count and if there is a disagreement on a ballot it's put in a review queue to be analysed with more scrutiny. As a matter of fact, there are always people from multiple parties in the whole process, when they ID you, handle you the ballot and put it in the bin.
I'm fully confident we elected a commie cuck not because we were cheated, but because we are commie cucks.
Jesus, so you guys really did re-elect blackface?
That is so fucked up. Wow.
Even if it was, since so many of them got connected to the internet, who knows if a major code change was made.
It's fucking nuts that this is even a thing.
They should have a special motherboard pcb without any traces for i/o like that. Then you'd really have to be trying to do shit like that.
Thats why TX said NO. No open ports ie USB and NO INTERNET.
YEAH!..... and then used a company owned by Dominion....
It is not open sourced code. He says so in the presentation.
the mainstream media: "yes, but what does MIT really know about math?"
"An Indian White Supremacist and Black White Supremacist present evidenced based data analysis of a voter fraud conspiracy theory without evidence."
The sad part is that their main play here against these damning statistics is that most of their base has renounced math and never actually understood statistics, outside of how battery life percentages relate to how much time is left to use electronic devices.
“OF COURSE BIDEN WON!!! Look here! We have the stats! Biden got 99% of the vote!!! That’s a HUUUGE number!!! It’s almost 100!!! We believe in Science!!!”
“Math is a white supremacist construct.” Karl Marx’s dying wish is that Joe Biden be President.
"Well they still subscribe to the deboinked white supremacist theory that 2+2=4, so no, they dont know math." - MSM
Well, someone did steal a USB that had the programs for them.
And a laptop from a place in philly.
Hopefully they have a whistleblower
No need, take the votes, hand count them, verify the count then run the machine. the counts should match.. IF the algorithm is true, ( I believe it is) then it will be obvious. Make damn sure to disconnect the machine first from the fucking internet... and why have these counting machines BEEN CONNECTED TO THE fucking internet?!
nah...it just "glitched" but only on November 3,4,5
There could be many ways to turn it on/off that don’t require Internet
Also you could just run and external clock on the board dedicated solely to the cheat code. Code is invisible until the clock hits a certain time stamp. When the clock timer runs out it wipes itself.
Yes but a hand recount, or a recount after the cheating software is wiped, would reveal the difference in votes, no?
Just feeding a ballot with a jinxed barcode could prompt the machine to rollback erase suppress. I think the proof is in the data set.
If anyone has physical access to a Dominion Voting machine please get in touch ASAP. We would like to inspect the firmware on the device. https://parler.com/post/12eb6e0b4bd542599c8dd40555c18ad4
Perhaps too James Bond / cynical, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were some kind of auto-revert to a benign programming that was automated into them.
Doesn’t matter if they have images of the ballots, or even better: the original paper ballots.
Just wouldn't be nearly as satisfying a definitive resolution as finding Change_Trump_votes_to_Biden.exe
Guarandamntee the same algorithm that does this copies a Biden ballot image over the Trump ballot image it is replacing.
Don’t doubt it, that’s why the paper ballots are so important.
There would be record of the changes. Logs. Timestamps, etc...
You’re giving them too much credit. They didn’t plan on it going this far. They’re getting caught left and right for FAR bigger slip-ups than this.
Criminals always end up getting caught by their sloppiness in unexpected areas. And a true forensic computer scientist will be able to find if something fishy is up. No one is good enough to hide everything.
Yeah they dumped hundreds of thousands of ballots for only one candidate in multiple cities at the exact same time and these crazy, improbable ballot counts were livestreamed on all media networks while everybody watched...these are not the brightest bulbs
Which explains why all these MSM networks are attempting to scrub all footage of their live Election Night footage from the internet. It corroborates the evidence of this fraud.
Both Wisconsin and Michigan flipped by almost exactly 10,000 votes right at 4am, I believe after promising to not count anymore until the next morning. I guess I have different definition of next morning than the election board.
For real. We’re talking about the same people who hired Paul “Stonetear” Combetta, the guy who went on Plebbit to ask how to scrub the data of a “very VIP” user from his client’s (HRC’s) email server.
Last minute update
I found doubt they've been that careful.
Well remember those laptops stolen in philly a few weeks ago?
Nothing shady about that at all.... And I'm sure Trump already has whitehats infiltrating these before election day.
Repost that and add - hey Georgia and Arizona. I have a feeling a few counties would reply.
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O45KeQ/if-anyone-has-physical-access-to/c/ I already made a post but it didn't get very far. Share far and wide.
https://youtu.be/Ztu5Y5obWPk
This is fucking insane. Is there a backup in case this gets clintoned?
Use a YT downloaded and save it on your computer
This. A web shutdown is possibly their last resort. Archive everything offline.
We should count on this. To some degree I'm fairly certain the net is going to fail in the next 6 months at some point.
A web shutdown will not be feasible, they will instead use a social media shutdown combined with social intimidation.
I think that's what I was meaning, the George Floyd and Net Neutrality "blackouts" were probably test runs, why they also blacked out tv channels too.
Back up important videos to the MAGA video hosting website:
https://video.maga.host
You don't even need to download it to your computer. You can just paste the link into the MAGA video site and it automatically backs it up.
Edit: I'm backing up this video already, so you don't need to back this video up. The link is just for reference.
Super helpful, thanks!
That looks like a good site and has great potential. Having the ability to tag the videos would be nice so you can sort by subject. I see tags are an available field, but the couple I looked at didn’t have any. I bookmarked it and will be using it, thank you.
yup, i downloaded it
upload it to video.maga.host
Thanks pede
Saving comment. Very helpful. Thanks!
I downloaded it
Thanks.
The system was rigged against trump!. Also he called out Rockefeller and Murdock for funding and owning the election oversight. N.a.s.e.d. billionaires playing us as pawns.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9ZrpfWfumuBM/
Can confirm. This is beyond the most disturbing thing I've ever seen.
Can someone answer some questions for me regarding Dr. Shiva's analysis? So in Michigan, you can vote in one of two ways, making a straight party selection or voting individually by race.
And their precincts report not only how many votes Trump (and Biden got), but what form those votes took, i.e., how many votes Trump received via voters making a "straight party Republican selection" vs. voters making an individual selection for Trump in the presidential race? Dr. Shiva's graphs looked at the total Trump vote percentage minus the straight Republican party percentage and graphed that against the Republican percentage of straight-party votes in that precinct? So if there were 200 votes in a precinct, 150 of which were via straight party voting, and Republicans (and thus Trump) got 100 of those votes and Democrats got 50 -- and then an additional 50 votes which were via individual voting and of which Trump and Biden each received 25, that would show up on the graph as a point at 66.7% on the x-axis (i.e., Trump's percentage of straight party voting, i.e., 100*150/200) and negative 4.2% on the y-axis (i.e., 62.5% - 66.7%)? Do I have that right?
The percentage of straight-party ticket votes for Trump is being used as a proxy for the "Republican-ness" of a particular precinct. Presumably you would get a similar result if you used different proxies for that quantity, e.g., the percentage of votes that were cast by voters who are registered as Republicans (or the percentage of total registered voters who are registered as Republicans)?
How well-established is the baseline as far as what this kind of graph "should" look like? They showed that Wayne county didn't have the pattern? Was that true of any other Michigan counties? What about counties in other states? Or the same or different counties in past presidential elections? That seems like a pretty key piece of information in terms of proving that there isn't an innocent / natural explanation for the phenomenon, no?
The problem is mostly in the fact that the effect is so linear. That is totally unnatural. I hope they put out their data or at least give us their linear regression results, otherwise this is all for nothing. We need to see their actual analysis in a data table so we can confirm.
They will probably give updates and I hope they are working with the Trump team.
You actually answered my question with your question!
Michigan I think is an edge case (although there may be other similar states) that break out straight-party vote versus individual ones. Therefore the slope indicating weighting and when it kicks in is fairly pronounced in Dr. Shiva's examples.
I imagine that we could use the percentage of total registered Republicans as a proxy for this, although it wouldn't be as exact. We know that Trump had high approval ratings in the Republican party, but of course it's not 100% and certainly not uniform from county to county. However, I think we could use a "fudge" number of 90% or so and if applied uniformly we could see similar adjustments being made by the voting system. As the number of registered Republicans in a county increased, if this weighting algorithm holds true, we should see that same downward slope kick in at a certain percentage -- again, just not as perfect a line as Michigan.
Why are Democrats such science deniers? I hereby declare MAGA the Party of Science and Truth and Reasoning.
In this house we believe Math is real Statistics don't lie People of any color can be assholes Peace is not worth submitting to tyranny
I'm kinda waiting for FOX to have to call AZ for Trumpy Bear, too.
Delicious.
Red Rider!
Back at you (username)!
I'm waiting for them to file for bankruptcy, possibly before that happens.
It ain't over until he's inaugurated.
It ain't over till the fat man leaves. Good luck getting him out Dems.
Almost like a worm that eats fractions of pennies....
WATCH YER CORNHOLE, BUD!
A tiny fraction of votes that algorithmically scales in direct proportion to how many votes Biden needs and how long the vote counting has gone on.
AT LEAST I DIDNT FUCK LUMBERGH!
We need an Office Space Force!
I believe you have my stapler
"Yeeeeeaaaah, we're gonna need you to go back to your basement, yeeeeaaahhh. If you can just pack up your trunalimunumaprzure, that be greeeaaat, mmmkaaay, greeeaaat."
I must have put a decimal point in the wrong place or something. Shit! I always do that. I always mess up some mundane detail
Isn't it Monday Morning detail?
Hopefully they all go to FEDERAL POUND ME IN THE ASS PRISON
FPMITAP
RELEVANTUSERNAME
I really hope people exposing and figuring this shit out are being provided security from the trump administration. All of these whistle blowers and normal people providing a great service to their country need to be protected.
I hope they are sending their findings TO the campaign. Just posting here and on YouTube isn't enough!
I hope they aren't, Trump already has enough really smart people on his team, they already know the good stuff. SO much of the stuff that gets a lot of attention here turns out to be baseless, if people sent every new "smoking gun" that gets upvotes Trump would spend all his time chasing down red herrings.
Which is probably what the left wants now that I think about it.
This makes no sense, sorry. These pedes did actual analysis that is beyond conjecture and tweeting.
spez - ok, rereading your comment maybe I misunderstood your point. If you watch the whole video, he says at the end he's already been in touch with a ton of people (that he can't name) and *this *analysis is just to share with the general public. I was saying we pedes shouldn't clog up the campaign's channels with this stuff, but you're right that the creator should get in touch (and sounds like he has).
This 100%. The whistleblowers are named in the court docs - I would hope those are fake names to protect their identities, but maybe not. Those sick, evil leftists are going to torment and likely try to harm them.
So basically a ridiculous landslide for Trump?
Always has been. [astronaut meme]
It looks like it. We are the majority by a HUGE margin. This is very encouraging. Lets all unite and destroy the swamp once and for all!
If we weren't, then this fraud would have been much more subtle. You think your vote doesn't count? Our mountain of votes exposed their fraud.
Damn straight! If we hadn't done our jobs and used our big dick energy, it would be way harder for anybody to detect this.
In this case, they had to totally jump the shark and it's obvious to anyone taking a look that those bastards have committed treason.
Fuck these assholes. I'm so damned pissed!
I hope OrangeManRad wins this and proceeds to go full-dragon with his second term.
"YOU get prison time, and YOU get prison time!!!"
Rosie sized.
Amy Schumer sized?
At least 10 Courics.
kek
The View once confirmed
Big Mike Bepis sized
Relevant.
Nixon McGovern levels
Is this similar to what the current sticky is outlining?
I believe its similar but two different people came to the same conclusion
I think it's pulled from the same interview
I think the sticky is better data. I had a friend on FB question this, which had me actually question and punch numbers in.
Not what you want to hear, but if we assume a fixed % of R voters didn't want Trump, the way the data is set up would trend down like this. The flat trend they present works assuming the leftover voters vote the same as the other data, but if on average 5% of Republicans voted R except, then the trend would still be down. The fact that both happen is suspicious.
There is a chance they multiplied the trend. Trump has record approval ratings among Republicans, so their assumptions might be correct, but they have cover. Just from graphs and raw numbers, unfortunately, it is difficult to prove.
We really need the raw physical ballots or their images for manual recounting to see the real results.
What?
My understanding of the charts was that a certain percentage of dislike for Trump would've appeared as a flat line below the 0% threshold.
Instead what we're seeing is that the percentage increase in "not voting for Trump" increased linearly with the percentage increase in Republican voters.
That isn't saying "Oh, 10% of Republicans didn't like Trump", it's saying that deep red areas... somehow... didn't like Trump, but light red or even blue areas did. That's what doesn't make sense.
Precincts that voted....
40% Republican: ~5% Trump siphoned off
50% Republican: ~10% Trump siphoned off
60% Republican: ~15% Trump siphoned off
70% Republican: ~20% Trump siphoned off
80% Republican: ~25% Trump siphoned off
That makes no sense at all.
If 5% R went away consistently, then consider at only 10% R straight ticket, 9.5% of the non-straight ticket R votes Trump. 9.5% - 10% = -0.5%
At 20% R straight ticket, losing 5% of the R vote still 19% - 20% = -1%
At 40% R straight ticket, still losing 5% 38% - 40% = -2%
At 60% R straight ticket 57% - 60% = -3%
So it is a very gradual line, but the way it is set up naturally leads to a line with a negative slope when anything less than 100% party support.
I agree, 5% is the upper limit, and even then it barely goes down, so I think they clearly siphoned off votes (a straight percentage of R, with some fuzz added in), but the Romneys and Kamalas can say "I guess your polling is wrong, 20% of Rs in MI can't stand Trump!" And their base will buy it.
You're right and they even address this exact issue in their presentation. The poster above you is wrong.
Certainly not all Republicans will vote for Trump (although he does have historically high approval ratings). However, we would not see a perfectly linear decrease that grows as the number of Republicans in a district increases. Besides, the downward slope is too perfect which allows Dr. Shiva to precisely predict the number of votes transferred to Biden.
Look at the video 44m in for a discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk&ab_channel=Dr.ShivaAyyadurai
I thought like you, then I started to do the math and realized one of my friends was right, it does naturally go down when set up that way in the situation that a percentage of R voters consistently don't vote Trump. Look at my other comment to see numbers worked out.
Obviously all those voters will not be in the straight ticket, so they will go to the y-axis, and it will gradually slope down. It isn't 1-1 straight ticket R to non-straight ticket R, because anyone who doesn't want Trump (or Biden for D) will always be distributed into the non-straight ticket section that is graphed in the y-axis.
The problem is how quickly it sloped down, clearly higher than 5%. I think that slope is about how the same data would look sorting by Biden voters with no siphoning, but the principle holds: if a stable portion of dems walked away, with this graph set up, the more dems in a district, % D biden - % D straight ticket would trend linearly down.
He needs to connect with these guys, they have taken this even further. They are taking the third digit and giving it to biden (superman scam, ie Office Space). Ie, take the 6 from this (.546) and give it to biden, which is tens of thousands of votes. At next post, trump has only .54 of the vote and biden picked up .XX6. They applied this to all states and it validates/reproduces every time. This also aligns with the 'glitch' ie THIS IS THE GLITCH.
Edit, link https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/
This is not hammer and scorecard at work. Those are used to compromise machines. These are dem controlled machines working fraudulently as intended. An inside job. You don't need to hack a machine that's already doing what you want. Sydney just brought up these exploits as real world examples of how elections are and could be rigged, not saying that's the case here.
Great info and news if true but source?
TL;DR
Michigan lets you vote individual candidates, or a "straight party" option. Each blue dot is a precinct. The more "straight party" Republican votes in a precinct, the more % of Trump votes were siphoned to Biden.
100% this is a computer algorithm, because the data shows that the % of votes siphoned to Biden increases perfectly linearly, the more straight party Republican votes, across all the precincts.
For example, a precinct that had 85% straight republican votes, had 20% of Trump votes siphoned to Biden - leaving Trump with 65% in that precinct.
Wayne County (Detroit) did NOT show evidence of an algorithm. Only Republican precincts had votes siphoned. It looks like the algorithm didn't kick in unless the precinct had 20% or more straight republican ballots.
Yup, this algo would spit out a number telling folks EXACTLY how many Biden only tickets they'd need.
Holy shit, they hid the siphon in the districts where people wouldn't be looking.
It also explains how Trump can do better than last election in the places he lost but somehow do worse Republican districts. People really think Trump somehow turned blue voters but lost people who voted for him last election.
A little more analysis, if you want to understand the graphs in the video.
In the video, fast-forward to 36:30 - these are the results for Kent County. What you see here is:
Precincts that voted....
40% Republican: ~5% Trump siphoned off
50% Republican: ~10% Trump siphoned off
60% Republican: ~15% Trump siphoned off
70% Republican: ~20% Trump siphoned off
80% Republican: ~25% Trump siphoned off
The precincts aren't all precisely that amount, but they follow that linear trend very closely. The variation could be attributed to a little variation programmed into the algo, slight differences in timing of the votes being counted, I'm not a statistician so I'm not sure. But the trend and overall is very clear.
Did they run Wayne County looking at Joe Biden’s results? Because if it’s a horizontal line, it is a big f*ckin deal.
Yes. And yes.
I don't think that's the right take. Assuming that the President Only voters voted at an even 50%, irrespective of straight-line outcome, a downward sloping graph is precisely what you'd expect.
Sure but I don't think all precincts would vote 50%. It would be weird if precincts that voted 20 Rep/80 Dem or 80 Rep/20 Dem to all be 50% T. you'd expect them to be similar
Not gonna lie, I do not understand this graph.
In Wisconsin one can vote by party, so all Republican or all Democrat, and skip having to fill in the bubble for each candidate. The higher the percentage of votes in a precent voting all-Republican the lower the Trump vote percentage among non-partisan voters. The correlation is linear and with a linear relationship that is same for different counties. There is no good explanation for this naturally occurring, this strongly appears artificial.
Not only is it linear; it also appears to only "turn on" once the percentage of straight-party Republican voting hits 20%. The logic there may have been that in precincts that are already voting overwhelmingly Democrat, there weren't enough Trump votes to steal to make it worth the risk of detection. And conversely, that the more heavily a precinct was voting Trump, the more Trump votes (in percentage terms) they could safely steal without arousing suspicion.
Thanks pede!
You're great
Except Trump's base is overwhelmingly those people, and the Republicans who don't like him are the milquetoast faggots living in blue areas.
I was thinking this too at first, but this is looking at percentiles of “non-partisan” voters. I don’t see why there would be such a linear correlation on percentage of non-partisan voters.
Sure, I think the basis of your claim is absolutely valid but that should manifest simply as a random rate of non-partisans voting less for Trump. We don’t see this though, we see a very clear linear correlation (with added randomness so it wouldn’t be super obvious) that non-partisan voters voted against Trump. This shouldn’t be conflated with voting straight-Democrat.
The never Trumper Republican is more media myth than reality. I’m sure some exist but IRL they are not so common.
The more prone a voting precinct is to vote republican, the less that they vote for Trump and vote for Biden instead. Which makes no logical sense anywhere.
Thanks, that makes sense (re: the graph). I was trying to reconcile the graph with the headline and failing.
This explains the really weird results in the WOW counties around Milwaukee.
That particular graph in context of the video was just an exageration for the purpose of example.
The actual graphs start with a sizeable and steady Trump lead, then at the 20% mark, everything travels in a steep downhill trend. This behavior is duplicated in multiple counties as if on cue.
Republicans not voting the party ticket were not necessarily voting against Trump. In my own voting, I do this when I want to vote for a candidate in a local race who is not a Republican. There's a way to test it - just compare graphs from a deep red state that doesn't use this type of machine
Only individual voters (non straight party) are represented on the y-axis. In your example, those 1,000 remaining votes needs to be reduced by the voters going straight democrat, leaving only the individual voters behind to determine the y-axis value. So why would the remaining individual voters lean more democrat simply because the area is more republican?
Your x-axis value in this scenario would be 39.47%, which is the RSP percentage of the total votes cast (150/380). The y-axis value would be 10.53%.
Subtracting x from y really should not show any slope in either direction (if we trust the RSP % to give an accurate representation of a precinct’s demographics).
Yeah, there might be a problem here. If you are in a highly Republican precinct, you would probably be more likely to vote down the ticket rather than pick Trump individually. That means that it wouldn't be strange for Democrats to dominate individual votes because there might be far fewer individual votes cast in general. This is especially true if all Trump voters in that precinct vote down the ticket.
There's a YouTube video that breaks it all down.
Thanks! I'll search it out tonight.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk&ab_channel=Dr.ShivaAyyadurai
Here it is. Started watching and ended up watching the whole thing. Fascinating stuff. Big if true. (watched at 2x speed)
The voting machine nerds allegedly programmed a virus on their own voting machines to quietly steal votes from Trump and give them to Biden. But they forgot a bug that screws up in an obvious way when the idiot media gets the polls wrong by seven points or more. So now they're in panic mode instead of calmly recounting the votes.
Allegedly.
WAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA
PEOPLE ARE GOIN TO FUCKIN JAIL
LEMME REPEPAT
PEOPLE ARE GOIN TO FUCKIN JAIL
AHHAHAHAHAHAHHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAA
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH
GOD, I hope you are right.
Jokes on you. There's less poop in there than on their city streets. Less needles too.
GAME
SET
MATCH
Never been happier to have voted for someone. Other then trump..... You guys gotta see his ad.....
Hes was running against warren his ad said
"Vote for a real indian not a fake one" and had her in indian headdress ill look for it and post it
He's also based on covid measures, too. He'd get my vote for sure!
And if you saw his ads youd like him even more.
He says vote for the real indian with warren in headress. I almost fell over laughing the first time the bus drove by with that ad. I posted here today if you check my posts.
I would like to see this as well. And I want to see the opposite curves i.e. the ones that show Biden vs Democrat votes. These graphs should add up with the Trump curves. It is a nice consistency check.
Well the opposite in the counties that the video shows is just an inverses. Also in the video they show what the graph looks like in a county they don't think was manipulated. Here is the link if you want to watch. They show the normal graph at like ~38mins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk&feature=youtu.be
They showed one such county in the video. Kent County, MI was counted by hand and does not follow the linear curve that three other major counties do.
Do it for the entire country. It's 2020, we can break these numbers down.
Seriously this. Oklahoma or some place deep red that they didnt even bother with. Or hell, somewhere deep blue that they didnt bother with.
This is a terrible picture to take to represent the presentation. I watched the full thing. This picture shows something else. The fraud itself are seceral other graphs presented. Any one of them would have been perfect. This picture represents what we would have seen under a certian circumstance(he covers it later in the video), not the fraud itself.
Can anyone give me a layman's explanation of this graph?
The freeze frame in this post is not even one of the real plots. The real plots in the video show multiple counties (using hundreds of voting precincts as data points) where Trump was getting X% of the votes until a certain threshold, at which point a linear modifier started transferring votes to Biden. Nice linear relationships are pretty spectacular to see in statistical analysis, so to find the same trend in multiple major Michigan counties is almost certainly artificial according to these PhD software developers.
In Michigan they give voters the option to vote a straight GOP vote. So press one button a d all GOP affiliated people running for office from potus to dog catcher are selected.
What the data shows that in 3 of 4 counties, the more republican voters in a precinct, the fewer that didn’t take the straight GOP vote. Instead they voted for Biden and then the rest of the offices they voted Republican.
What graph does is take the percentage of straight GOP ballots m and subtracts the from that the percentage of ballots that voted Biden and the rest of the offices GOP.
If Trump was uniformly hated by Republican voters then would expect the trend live to be flat no matter how many Republican voters there were in a precinct.
But instead the vote shows that the more Republican voters in a precinct the more hate for Trump.
It doesn’t make any sense.
So 3/4 counties showed this. One county looked at did not. Instead it showed that if anything, there were a consistent percentage of Democrat voters who didn’t vote Biden and instead voted Trump.
The other difference is that those 3 counties used machines to count ballots. The 4th county that showed a Trump wave used hand counting.
So the Dems actually thought they could just make a computer script to give themselves votes. Holy shit. This is literally justification to publicly execute every person involved if this is proven in court. They are so fucking complacent and brazen and comfortable that they do not fear any consequences for their actions anymore, no matter how extreme and malicious, especially since all MSM and social media covers for them and lies for them and silences anyone criticising them This needs to be answered with extreme punishment.
It isn’t a very skillful fraud.
There is a chance that this is a software error.
What is really fishy is that Trump improved the GOP vote in blue states, even to the point of coat tails that turned 7 or so Democrat house seats to the GOP. New York is trending to swing state ffs.
I’ve never heard of a President lose an election and have coat tails.
Were any of the switched votes from trump to biden?
o brother dont be that stupid.
You are calling stupid because?
The more republican a district, the more trump votes they siphon to biden.
And it only kicks off once a certain threshold is passed, ie, Trump having too much of a lead on biden. BOOM.
ABSOLUTELY BASED MATH WIZARDS!!!!
Okay. I'm an engineer. I've watched this video 4 times now. It doesn't add up. He is plotting mixed ballot Trump vote percentages, minus the straight republican ballot percentage, on the Y-axis. Then plotting straight Republican ballot percentages by themselves on the X-axis. Then he's saying there's an anomaly that is a negative linear slope. Well yes, of course there's a negative linear slope, his equation is subtracting a linear number (X-axis value) from a percentage of Trump voters who filled out a mixed ballot - which should be a fairly constant value after it initially gains from zero. The only way this result stays horizontal (not sloped) is for the percentage of Trump voters casting mixed ballots to equal the corrosponding X-axis value at that precinct. But we should think that there is a limit to the growth of mixed ballot Trump voters no matter where they live. I gotta be honest, unless I'm missing something this data analysis seems pretty quacky. It gets really quacky at the 30 min mark where he does an analysis of 2000 voters in a 45% republican straight ballot precinct - but then somehow forgets that and says that Trump only got 45% of 1000. He then jumps with no explanation to suddenly Trump is losing 25K votes and Biden is adding them. He really lost me there. Some Pede tell me where I'm wrong but this Shiva's logic and numbers aren't adding up for me.
Also engineer, also reached same conclusion. Will copy paste reply from earlier I made.
I'm going to go full doomer here. Doesn't this just mean in precincts where Republicans used the straight ticket option more, there were less available people to vote Trump? Inversely, in places where, let's say 20% of people voted straight R, the remaining 80% of people could have voted Trump for prez then down ballot for dems? Wouldn't that make sense for largely democrat areas where Trump has won people over? In order words, in largely dem areas where no one would use RSP, Trump literally has no where to go but up. If 0% use RPS, the number of Trump-RSP has to be positive or zero. I think that's why these charts start with X<20% and Y being positive.
A downtrend being observed is not surprising at all. If 100% of Trump voters voted RSP, then Trump-RSP would have nowhere to go but down. In fact if 100% of Trump voters voted RSP, Trump then gets NO individual votes which I think would be a -100% score.
Also I caught that trick at 38:50 The X axis only goes to 35% so the effect I'm describing above would not take noticeable effect yet. Compare that chart to other charts when >35% is cropped out.
I thought so at first too, but realize he said the independent votes and straight party votes were separate data sets. Each data set should have proportions that add up to 100%.
The X axis expresses "how Republican is the precinct" as inferred by the percentage of precinct voters that chose the Straight Republican option.
The Y axis shows if the Individual Candidate voters were "more or less favorable to Trump". They do this by plotting the difference between these voters' Trump % to the the straight Republican voters' split.
For example, in a precinct which had 80% Straight Republican (vs 20% Straight Democrat) but only 20% Individual Trump (vs 80% Individual Biden), you'd put that precinct as a -60% on the Y axis.
This is the problem right here. He is creating a function with y dependent on x, and then acting surprised that there is a relationship between y and x.
The function for Y is chosen to make the visualization clear. You could also express it as the split between Trump and Biden for Individual Choice voters, and you’d see a trend after 20ish% of X where Y skews towards Biden linearly.
Not an engineer, but took the time to makes sure I followed everything and the problem seems to be that the percentage of Trump votes that are straight republican ticket votes is assumed to be the same as the percentage of Trump votes that are individual filled in. That's what the red line above is showing. Having an assumption as your baseline cannot be good math. It seems that this graph could also be showing that as partisanship increases, voters are more likely to vote "straight ticket"
You're correct that as straight Republican ballot percentages approach 100% then the surplus Trump vote percentage must approach 0%, for the sum of both cannot be greater than 100%.
But that doesn't explain the near uniformity of the slope of the problematic counties, nor the fact that the algorithm looks to be "if republican_straight_ticket > 20%, then force slope to -1/2"
The near uniformity of the slope could be explained by a constant President-Only/Mixed vote for Trump. If that number is assumed to be a constant 50% and orthogonal to the Straight Ballot share, then you'll see a constant 10% decrease for every 10% increase of Straight Ballot R share above 50%... linearly. Also, at below 20%, likely because of small N of straight R ballots.
I see the points being made by the arguments above, but similar to the video they all require that assumptions be made. The truth is that it is damn hard to prove anything either way at this point. If it is fraud, the people doing it aren't stupid and wouldn't make it easy to catch. This is a good resource to get people to question what is going on, maybe even freak out some people who may or may not be "in" on it. It is not a smoking gun. As always, we should keep our minds open to all possibilities in order to come to the best understanding of what is actually going on.
Thank you. I'm also an engineer and came to the same conclusion, but felt like I must be missing something.
TLDR: The guy set his y-axis as y = -x + t, where x is the number of straight ticket voters and t is the number of independent Trump voters. He himself said t should be constant, therefore he is plotting a linear function with a negative slope.
That's not quite right.
He is finding the difference between two percentages.
Y the percentage of Straight Republican Vote (SRV) X being the percentage of Trump Individual Vote (TIV) - Y
He argues that in a normal case, the percentage of TIV would be close to percentage of SRV (+/- 7%). So when a precinct has a SRV of 65%, the TIV would be between 60-70%.
There's no reason to assume that the percentage of TIV would be a constant (say 50%), which would be what is required for this to be a linear negative slope.
Even in the case where the SRV approaches 99%, the TIV should also be corespondent - because ultimately it's tracking the same population.
Does this mean Trump could have flipped even states like NJ or NY? Maybe even WA?
Not sure about that, but Virginia, Minnesota, New Hampshire and Rhode Island would seem to come before NY, NJ or WA.
Worked a contract for the DoD in D.C.
The basement dweller code monkeys would brag when there were pretty women in the room, that the NSA brass had no idea what they were doing with their side hustles for cash. Writing code glitches like that were their favorite for easy money from unknown buyers. Typical brag from these skinny jeans wearing soy kids : "Fat stacks baby! Fat stacks! I live with my parent's in Maryland because they have a dope pad and I will inherit anyway. Let me show you this weekend, they are going away to our place in Rehoboth Beach." (Think the red headed kid with braces on Family Guy)
Forwarded the info to the OIC for the record. She said, "Who cares. Don't waste my time."
D.C. is a swamp... indeed. Even the military has deep seated problems there.
DECLASSIFY THE SOURCE CODE!!!
Why the hell is the source code not available for scrutiny?
seriously, this is all highly speculative and may not work from system to system.
What it basically means is that in GoP heavy areas, they slowly siphon votes from the GoP candidate to the Dem candidate just enough to reduce the candidate's "lead" in an area.
Here's a very rough idea of how it affects things. (Intentionally oversimplified as requested.)
Let's say a state has a 2 counties.
One Country county gets 150 votes for Trump and 25 for Biden.
The City county gets 275 for Biden and 250 for Trump.
Now, the results in this case would be 400 for Trump and 300 for Biden. Trump only wins 1 county but the whole state. You with me so far?
Now let's say you wanted the machine to "cheat" but not make it obvious. You know Trump won't win the City and Biden won't win the Country. So what do you do?
You tell the machine, late at night when nobody's watching, to take 50 of those "Country" votes and put them in Biden's bucket. Trump still "beats" Biden in the countryside, but now the totals are like this: 350 Biden 350 Trump.
It's basically embezzling votes. You take a little bit where they "won't notice", over and over again, in county after county after county, until Trump's lead from the rest of the state is pretty much nullified, and the "city" votes (legit or not) are the only ones being "counted".
But what if the President's lead is so huge you can't get away with it?
Well, just sit around Detroit manufacturing votes, of course!
Embezzling is a good analogy that's easy to understand. That's exactly what they did, only it was votes - not money.
The machines were coded so that when Trump's lead got to a certain percentage, a certain small percentage of Trump votes would be quietly, and automatically, moved over to Biden.
Do that often enough and you win - as long as nobody looks too closely.
Wow.
Thanks for explaining. I legit feel like that guy saying he was a neanderthal.
I've been out of school long enough that all I understand is work at this point.
As if leftist elites couldnt be any more derogatory towards people who live in rural areas
Oh, I'm sure they can find ways...🙄
I'm about 40 minutes into it and I understand it. One question I have is doesn't this data mean that John James didn't do as well as Trump? It seems like Trump easily won Michigan if they were to reverse these votes, but none of these votes were actually taken away from John James? Now I believe James would still win in a fair election but this data doesn't address the huge influx of dead votes and other avenues of cheating.
Good question, we need to run the same analysis on James
Sounds like they are starting the "what's yours is mine....for the greater good" socialism setup early 😆
This is huge!
People keep asking if Trump knew the fraud was going to happen, why didn't he do something to stop it? 4D chess. Now that we have mountains of evidence that shows exactly how they've been stealing elections we can fix the broken system, and hopefully provide lots of free helicopter rides.
If this proves true no wonder it became so rampant that they had to scramble to start making hard copies of ballots with only biden filled out. Trump was going to win in such a blow it blew up their algorithm. Trump landslide.
based american indian
SHIVA THE DESTROYER!
To them the ends justify the means. Getting rid of Trump is more important than reducing voting in the United States to the level of Banana Republics and former Soviet nations. What matters to them is the RIGHT people win, and they decide who the right person is.
Arrest the top 20 people at Dominion immediately!! Heck, arrest everyone who works there!!
This is exactly what they did to Bernie in Iowa. It was a test run. Think about it. How hard could it possibly be to code an app to count votes? The hard part was siphoning away votes from Bernie and equally distributing them to the other candidates without looking suspicious.
No question. I just watched the video. This is #YUUUUUUGE
This is the same "glitch" that u/pedeinspector uncovered in the Edison data.
Legit showed it to my Indian Co-workers
Worked like a fucking charm and slid under their TDS.
I knew all of this on election day.
I knew they were going to cheat, just not how overt it was going to be.
Diversity hires coded the algorithm. Should have made the chart flat across all precincts, instead of this switch into y = -1/2x crap lol
Excited to see this take off!
How does this compare to the happening post that is pinned right now?
HOLY SHIT THIS IS THE SMOKING GUN! GET THAT SOURCE CODE ASAP!
Comeonman.exe
No, it most definitely is NOT over.
Does anyone really think these globalists powers will just throw their collective hands up and declare "Okay, you got us. So sorry. We're guilty as hell. Trump wins."
They control 90+% of the media - television, radio, Internet, etc.
They continue to ignore the story (See Biden crime family story as well) so that very few realize what is happening. If it isn't reported it didn't happen. It will take a ton more work to break through that wall and frankly, a lot of Americans just don't care enough. That's what the globalists are counting on - tens of millions too busy doing Tic-Tok dances, watching porn, playing video games, etc.
China plays the long game and has its grip on nearly every facet of American government and culture. We Americans have the attention span of fruit flies and they know that.
God Bless President Trump. He has managed to push back against this destruction of America from within better than most ever could but if you think Dr. Shiva's "I found the algorithm" thing will be enough you are allowing yourself to be as deluded as the left when they kept repeating "Trump is finished" day after day, week after week, month after month.
Holy shit this explains the down-ballot anomaly. The evidence in this video shows that the greater the number of Republicans in a precinct, the more votes the algorithm took from Trump and gave to Biden. This means that a huge number of straight tickets for republican got the president vote switched from Trump to Biden but the rest of the ticket stayed republican. I'd love to see an analysis done on the down ballot ratios to see if they match the algorithm for the vote switching.
Trump may have received 90 million votes
I don't know enough about stats.
I passed this along to a family member with a PhD in the field.
She also voted for Biden, so take that with a grain of salt.
Thoughts?
I don’t see how what he’s suggesting makes sense. There are a number of issues with this.
First, you can’t say that because X% of people were straight party Republican voters, that means that X% of voters in that precinct are Republican. Instead, that means that X% of the straight party voters were Republican. But what proportion of voters voted straight party? Without knowing what the denominator is, this is meaningless. E.g., if only 10% of all voters in that precinct were straight party voters, then this means that X% of that 10% were Republican. More specifically, if 20% of straight party voters were Republican, but only 10% of all voters voted straight party, this means that 2% of voters were straight party Republicans. This highlights how without providing the promotion of straight party vs. individual votes, he doesn’t give you enough detail to know what the political leanings are for that precinct. You just don’t have enough data.
Second, the y-axis values he uses are the differences between straight party and individual vote %s for Trump. But why does that matter? He argues that there’s a negative slope, such that as the % of straight party Republican voters increases, the % of individual voters decreases. This is entirely plausible. For instance, if people find a political candidate particularly unlikeable, you might see more willingness to use individual voting than straight party so that a person can deviate from their party in casting a vote for a particular candidate. E.g., one might generally vote Republican, but really despise Trump, so they cast their vote for Biden using the individual voting method. But again, without knowing what proportion of people were straight party vs individual voters, this is all pretty meaningless.
Third, his claim that you rarely see linear effects when plotting data is also nonsense. As a sample size increases, it becomes more likely that you’ll see more systematic effects emerge due to increased statistical power. Basically, as the number of cases increases, random error (or strange cases) will be less noticeable because the more typical effects will be much more numerous.
To be honest, I stopped watching at about the 35 minute point because the logic here was nonsense. And when he threw out an ungrounded statement about votes being given from one candidate to another without any evidence to support the claim, he completely lost me. So then I did a little research on who this person is, and now I’m even more confident that this presentation is nonsense.