He really is giant. It'd be like the intro scene from LotR where Sauron is towering over his foes, cleaving his way through them https://youtu.be/sX5ff7W7IQQ?t=131 except the good guys and bad guys have switched places (to the libs I guess they'd see it exactly like this though lmao)
TLDR: if there's a recount, parties get to review the software, and they can say their opinions about it, but they can't reveal any "proprietary information" about the code (i.e. including actual formulas or source code).
I wonder if the demonrats have any kind of plan, for example knowing that people would find out, then while noones watching add more ballots/votes post-election. Then recounts make things look fine. Not even sure if this is likely...
Yup, and military speciality is compartmentalisation, I would imagine Trump has being creating compartments and setting up stings on spies for years. Just to create a recruiting and management apparatus that exists unobserved and can launch these operations.
Faderal Warrant, kick down the doors immediately, seize their servers, seize their source code, intercept and archive all of their Email and Text messages, dig into their financial records, the whole 10 yards.
It's funny, other than fuckery, what the fuck would be "proprietary" for tabulation? It's a fucking sorting and adding machine, there shouldn't be any "black magic" lines of code to sort and add, it should be straight forward.
One of the major pushes after this election should be to make all voting machine software open source. It is nearly as important as making all machines use and scan paper ballots.
That's how we do it in Canada. Everything is done with pencil and paper. Multiple parties must be present for the count and if there is a disagreement on a ballot it's put in a review queue to be analysed with more scrutiny. As a matter of fact, there are always people from multiple parties in the whole process, when they ID you, handle you the ballot and put it in the bin.
The sad part is that their main play here against these damning statistics is that most of their base has renounced math and never actually understood statistics, outside of how battery life percentages relate to how much time is left to use electronic devices.
“OF COURSE BIDEN WON!!! Look here! We have the stats! Biden got 99% of the vote!!! That’s a HUUUGE number!!! It’s almost 100!!! We believe in Science!!!”
No need, take the votes, hand count them, verify the count then run the machine. the counts should match.. IF the algorithm is true, ( I believe it is) then it will be obvious. Make damn sure to disconnect the machine first from the fucking internet... and why have these counting machines BEEN CONNECTED TO THE fucking internet?!
Also you could just run and external clock on the board dedicated solely to the cheat code. Code is invisible until the clock hits a certain time stamp. When the clock timer runs out it wipes itself.
Now analyze their code for the final nail in their coffin.
Is their code open source?
highly doubt it. Trump team needs to "acquire" the software somehow.
if they keep it on the upper-top most shelf, we got a chance with Barron
He really is giant. It'd be like the intro scene from LotR where Sauron is towering over his foes, cleaving his way through them https://youtu.be/sX5ff7W7IQQ?t=131 except the good guys and bad guys have switched places (to the libs I guess they'd see it exactly like this though lmao)
Pence clones
Guess what happens if there's a recount in Wisconsin?
https://www.wisciviljusticecouncil.org/2020/05/11/dominion-voting-systems-inc-v-wisconsin-elections-commission-voting-software-confidentiality/
TLDR: if there's a recount, parties get to review the software, and they can say their opinions about it, but they can't reveal any "proprietary information" about the code (i.e. including actual formulas or source code).
Did I read that right?
You'll quickly see WI be conceded by the Biden team to avoid this.
Holy fuck pede!!!!!
I wonder if the demonrats have any kind of plan, for example knowing that people would find out, then while noones watching add more ballots/votes post-election. Then recounts make things look fine. Not even sure if this is likely...
Yup, and military speciality is compartmentalisation, I would imagine Trump has being creating compartments and setting up stings on spies for years. Just to create a recruiting and management apparatus that exists unobserved and can launch these operations.
Faderal Warrant, kick down the doors immediately, seize their servers, seize their source code, intercept and archive all of their Email and Text messages, dig into their financial records, the whole 10 yards.
DO IT NOW!
It's authorized. So that's something. plays bagpipes
I think veritas or someone posters about a reward for some firmware. Let's find some
No. He states in his analysis that the software is NOT open source on the machines
I love proprietary NWO Big Tech companies running my elections in a black box!
So awesome! Yeah!
Bro, you can trust them because they're owned by some of our richest politicians.
It's funny, other than fuckery, what the fuck would be "proprietary" for tabulation? It's a fucking sorting and adding machine, there shouldn't be any "black magic" lines of code to sort and add, it should be straight forward.
This is something to fix via legislature: voting software MUST be open source.
Updates to software must be publically published at least X-number of days/weeks before being uploaded to any computers/machines used during election.
Lol
Well Trump can reverse engineer it...
If it was, they'd already be in jail.
One of the major pushes after this election should be to make all voting machine software open source. It is nearly as important as making all machines use and scan paper ballots.
Or just count paper ballots by hand in a joint session with representatives of every party doing the counting
That's how we do it in Canada. Everything is done with pencil and paper. Multiple parties must be present for the count and if there is a disagreement on a ballot it's put in a review queue to be analysed with more scrutiny. As a matter of fact, there are always people from multiple parties in the whole process, when they ID you, handle you the ballot and put it in the bin.
That is so fucked up. Wow.
Even if it was, since so many of them got connected to the internet, who knows if a major code change was made.
It's fucking nuts that this is even a thing.
They should have a special motherboard pcb without any traces for i/o like that. Then you'd really have to be trying to do shit like that.
Thats why TX said NO. No open ports ie USB and NO INTERNET.
YEAH!..... and then used a company owned by Dominion....
It is not open sourced code. He says so in the presentation.
the mainstream media: "yes, but what does MIT really know about math?"
"An Indian White Supremacist and Black White Supremacist present evidenced based data analysis of a voter fraud conspiracy theory without evidence."
The sad part is that their main play here against these damning statistics is that most of their base has renounced math and never actually understood statistics, outside of how battery life percentages relate to how much time is left to use electronic devices.
“OF COURSE BIDEN WON!!! Look here! We have the stats! Biden got 99% of the vote!!! That’s a HUUUGE number!!! It’s almost 100!!! We believe in Science!!!”
“Math is a white supremacist construct.” Karl Marx’s dying wish is that Joe Biden be President.
"Well they still subscribe to the deboinked white supremacist theory that 2+2=4, so no, they dont know math." - MSM
Well, someone did steal a USB that had the programs for them.
And a laptop from a place in philly.
Hopefully they have a whistleblower
No need, take the votes, hand count them, verify the count then run the machine. the counts should match.. IF the algorithm is true, ( I believe it is) then it will be obvious. Make damn sure to disconnect the machine first from the fucking internet... and why have these counting machines BEEN CONNECTED TO THE fucking internet?!
nah...it just "glitched" but only on November 3,4,5
There could be many ways to turn it on/off that don’t require Internet
Also you could just run and external clock on the board dedicated solely to the cheat code. Code is invisible until the clock hits a certain time stamp. When the clock timer runs out it wipes itself.
Yes but a hand recount, or a recount after the cheating software is wiped, would reveal the difference in votes, no?
Just feeding a ballot with a jinxed barcode could prompt the machine to rollback erase suppress. I think the proof is in the data set.