In Wisconsin one can vote by party, so all Republican or all Democrat, and skip having to fill in the bubble for each candidate. The higher the percentage of votes in a precent voting all-Republican the lower the Trump vote percentage among non-partisan voters. The correlation is linear and with a linear relationship that is same for different counties. There is no good explanation for this naturally occurring, this strongly appears artificial.
Not only is it linear; it also appears to only "turn on" once the percentage of straight-party Republican voting hits 20%. The logic there may have been that in precincts that are already voting overwhelmingly Democrat, there weren't enough Trump votes to steal to make it worth the risk of detection. And conversely, that the more heavily a precinct was voting Trump, the more Trump votes (in percentage terms) they could safely steal without arousing suspicion.
I was thinking this too at first, but this is looking at percentiles of “non-partisan” voters. I don’t see why there would be such a linear correlation on percentage of non-partisan voters.
Sure, I think the basis of your claim is absolutely valid but that should manifest simply as a random rate of non-partisans voting less for Trump. We don’t see this though, we see a very clear linear correlation (with added randomness so it wouldn’t be super obvious) that non-partisan voters voted against Trump. This shouldn’t be conflated with voting straight-Democrat.
The more prone a voting precinct is to vote republican, the less that they vote for Trump and vote for Biden instead. Which makes no logical sense anywhere.
That particular graph in context of the video was just an exageration for the purpose of example.
The actual graphs start with a sizeable and steady Trump lead, then at the 20% mark, everything travels in a steep downhill trend. This behavior is duplicated in multiple counties as if on cue.
Republicans not voting the party ticket were not necessarily voting against Trump. In my own voting, I do this when I want to vote for a candidate in a local race who is not a Republican. There's a way to test it - just compare graphs from a deep red state that doesn't use this type of machine
Only individual voters (non straight party) are represented on the y-axis. In your example, those 1,000 remaining votes needs to be reduced by the voters going straight democrat, leaving only the individual voters behind to determine the y-axis value. So why would the remaining individual voters lean more democrat simply because the area is more republican?
Yeah, there might be a problem here. If you are in a highly Republican precinct, you would probably be more likely to vote down the ticket rather than pick Trump individually. That means that it wouldn't be strange for Democrats to dominate individual votes because there might be far fewer individual votes cast in general. This is especially true if all Trump voters in that precinct vote down the ticket.
The voting machine nerds allegedly programmed a virus on their own voting machines to quietly steal votes from Trump and give them to Biden. But they forgot a bug that screws up in an obvious way when the idiot media gets the polls wrong by seven points or more. So now they're in panic mode instead of calmly recounting the votes.
Not gonna lie, I do not understand this graph.
In Wisconsin one can vote by party, so all Republican or all Democrat, and skip having to fill in the bubble for each candidate. The higher the percentage of votes in a precent voting all-Republican the lower the Trump vote percentage among non-partisan voters. The correlation is linear and with a linear relationship that is same for different counties. There is no good explanation for this naturally occurring, this strongly appears artificial.
Not only is it linear; it also appears to only "turn on" once the percentage of straight-party Republican voting hits 20%. The logic there may have been that in precincts that are already voting overwhelmingly Democrat, there weren't enough Trump votes to steal to make it worth the risk of detection. And conversely, that the more heavily a precinct was voting Trump, the more Trump votes (in percentage terms) they could safely steal without arousing suspicion.
Thanks pede!
You're great
Except Trump's base is overwhelmingly those people, and the Republicans who don't like him are the milquetoast faggots living in blue areas.
I was thinking this too at first, but this is looking at percentiles of “non-partisan” voters. I don’t see why there would be such a linear correlation on percentage of non-partisan voters.
Sure, I think the basis of your claim is absolutely valid but that should manifest simply as a random rate of non-partisans voting less for Trump. We don’t see this though, we see a very clear linear correlation (with added randomness so it wouldn’t be super obvious) that non-partisan voters voted against Trump. This shouldn’t be conflated with voting straight-Democrat.
The never Trumper Republican is more media myth than reality. I’m sure some exist but IRL they are not so common.
The more prone a voting precinct is to vote republican, the less that they vote for Trump and vote for Biden instead. Which makes no logical sense anywhere.
Thanks, that makes sense (re: the graph). I was trying to reconcile the graph with the headline and failing.
This explains the really weird results in the WOW counties around Milwaukee.
That particular graph in context of the video was just an exageration for the purpose of example.
The actual graphs start with a sizeable and steady Trump lead, then at the 20% mark, everything travels in a steep downhill trend. This behavior is duplicated in multiple counties as if on cue.
Republicans not voting the party ticket were not necessarily voting against Trump. In my own voting, I do this when I want to vote for a candidate in a local race who is not a Republican. There's a way to test it - just compare graphs from a deep red state that doesn't use this type of machine
Only individual voters (non straight party) are represented on the y-axis. In your example, those 1,000 remaining votes needs to be reduced by the voters going straight democrat, leaving only the individual voters behind to determine the y-axis value. So why would the remaining individual voters lean more democrat simply because the area is more republican?
Yeah, there might be a problem here. If you are in a highly Republican precinct, you would probably be more likely to vote down the ticket rather than pick Trump individually. That means that it wouldn't be strange for Democrats to dominate individual votes because there might be far fewer individual votes cast in general. This is especially true if all Trump voters in that precinct vote down the ticket.
There's a YouTube video that breaks it all down.
Thanks! I'll search it out tonight.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk&ab_channel=Dr.ShivaAyyadurai
Here it is. Started watching and ended up watching the whole thing. Fascinating stuff. Big if true. (watched at 2x speed)
The voting machine nerds allegedly programmed a virus on their own voting machines to quietly steal votes from Trump and give them to Biden. But they forgot a bug that screws up in an obvious way when the idiot media gets the polls wrong by seven points or more. So now they're in panic mode instead of calmly recounting the votes.
Allegedly.