9581
Comments (756)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shiva seems to be a huckster. I don't trust what he says about anything.

Why didn't he show us a normal, unmanipulated county? All he's really proved here is that if you make the voter pool smaller by removing reliable trump votes, trump doesn't do as well.

2
SpaceOlympian 2 points ago +2 / -0

He actually did show a county that appeared normal for comparison. It was Wayne or Kent county I believe. Watch it again. The difference between the counties is very obvious manipulation was going on with votes.

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kent has the same downtrend. Wayne is nothing like a republican county so using them as a baseline doesn't produce results because there are no (or very few) data points past where the algo would show up.

1
HiGloss 1 point ago +1 / -0

They discussed a county with manual ballot counting and highlighted the difference

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

But they didn't apply this test to it. They showed how a manually counted county didn't have the curve that machine counted counties have. It was one of the first slides.

1
Guffman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay Eeyore.

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd love to be wrong here but he gave us no controls to look at. Showing that dems started voting for trump in Wayne County isn't anything new.