9581
Comments (756)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
149
You_Aint_Black 149 points ago +150 / -1

Is their code open source?

261
Colorado-Living 261 points ago +261 / -0

highly doubt it. Trump team needs to "acquire" the software somehow.

302
deleted 302 points ago +302 / -0
117
deleted 117 points ago +117 / -0
54
dfponysoldier 54 points ago +54 / -0

Barron Recon mission

4
KAG_FTW 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Expert has arrived

39
theneverman 39 points ago +39 / -0

if they keep it on the upper-top most shelf, we got a chance with Barron

12
Thehonkswamp 12 points ago +12 / -0

He really is giant. It'd be like the intro scene from LotR where Sauron is towering over his foes, cleaving his way through them https://youtu.be/sX5ff7W7IQQ?t=131 except the good guys and bad guys have switched places (to the libs I guess they'd see it exactly like this though lmao)

3
BigMikesBlackCock 3 points ago +4 / -1

Was defeated by a ma'am

6
ButAtLeastWeDontHave 6 points ago +6 / -0

Pence clones

70
71
T__X 71 points ago +71 / -0

TLDR: if there's a recount, parties get to review the software, and they can say their opinions about it, but they can't reveal any "proprietary information" about the code (i.e. including actual formulas or source code).

Did I read that right?

78
Colorado-Living 78 points ago +78 / -0

1000% the malicious code is inserted on election night then removed.

23
BoJo 23 points ago +23 / -0

Yeah but that protection wouldn't help if there was evidence of crimes...

9
Iwasacheesemaker 9 points ago +9 / -0

I would bet they show a code release that doesnt contain the "glitch" so that it looks fine.

2
Shamb3 2 points ago +2 / -0

they should create a hash the compiled exe on the machine and compare it to a hash of a compiled version of the code they recieve to make sure it is the same code.

2
defnotarobit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I highly doubt that adding votes is "proprietary information"

15
IsrorOrca 15 points ago +15 / -0

You'll quickly see WI be conceded by the Biden team to avoid this.

1
T__X 1 point ago +1 / -0

Too late.

Biden bought the ticket, now he gets to take the ride.

12
darkhorsereddit3 12 points ago +12 / -0

Holy fuck pede!!!!!

5
thethrax 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wonder if the demonrats have any kind of plan, for example knowing that people would find out, then while noones watching add more ballots/votes post-election. Then recounts make things look fine. Not even sure if this is likely...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
5
HungNavySeal300Kills 5 points ago +7 / -2

Yup, and military speciality is compartmentalisation, I would imagine Trump has being creating compartments and setting up stings on spies for years. Just to create a recruiting and management apparatus that exists unobserved and can launch these operations.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
18
ChuckedBeef 18 points ago +18 / -0

Faderal Warrant, kick down the doors immediately, seize their servers, seize their source code, intercept and archive all of their Email and Text messages, dig into their financial records, the whole 10 yards.

DO IT NOW!

4
geocitiesuser 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's authorized. So that's something. plays bagpipes

4
Dieselslacker 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think veritas or someone posters about a reward for some firmware. Let's find some

48
Meatball2112 48 points ago +49 / -1

No. He states in his analysis that the software is NOT open source on the machines

86
DrCowboyPresident 86 points ago +86 / -0

I love proprietary NWO Big Tech companies running my elections in a black box!

So awesome! Yeah!

51
Lunatic_Fringe_PhD 51 points ago +51 / -0

Bro, you can trust them because they're owned by some of our richest politicians.

14
PhantomShield72 14 points ago +14 / -0

Sweet! Those are the best ones to have in charge of it all!

33
Dirk_Diggler 33 points ago +33 / -0

It's funny, other than fuckery, what the fuck would be "proprietary" for tabulation? It's a fucking sorting and adding machine, there shouldn't be any "black magic" lines of code to sort and add, it should be straight forward.

33
lake-koshkonong 33 points ago +33 / -0

Correct. Why do these machines even have an option for fractional voting or making two of Candidate A's votes only count as 1.5 vote, etc.

Imagine if banking software ran this way. You'd log into your bank, deposit $2000, but oops, now you only have $1500 and another account holder got the other $500. Whoops!

The media is gaslighting that "glitches are normal" but this is simple counting software. If glitches were this normal, no one would ever use online banking.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
FraudInsurance 3 points ago +3 / -0

For security reasons you might want to keep encryption methods secret.

...but that's exactly why the ties to the establishment are extremely suspect.

"Don't worry about us hacking the bank servers, we're just in close contact with the people who built them + set the password."

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
22
T__X 22 points ago +22 / -0

This is something to fix via legislature: voting software MUST be open source.

Updates to software must be publically published at least X-number of days/weeks before being uploaded to any computers/machines used during election.

6
ImWithHearse 6 points ago +6 / -0

Better yet just use the blockchain. Nobody owns the software, the network, or the ledger data.

1
goodatlife123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
Proda 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well Trump can reverse engineer it...

24
Megascandal 24 points ago +24 / -0

If it was, they'd already be in jail.

One of the major pushes after this election should be to make all voting machine software open source. It is nearly as important as making all machines use and scan paper ballots.

13
Proda 13 points ago +13 / -0

Or just count paper ballots by hand in a joint session with representatives of every party doing the counting

1
TheBestDuck 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's how we do it in Canada. Everything is done with pencil and paper. Multiple parties must be present for the count and if there is a disagreement on a ballot it's put in a review queue to be analysed with more scrutiny. As a matter of fact, there are always people from multiple parties in the whole process, when they ID you, handle you the ballot and put it in the bin.

1
TheBestDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm fully confident we elected a commie cuck not because we were cheated, but because we are commie cucks.

1
moissien11 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus, so you guys really did re-elect blackface?

6
You_Aint_Black 6 points ago +6 / -0

That is so fucked up. Wow.

19
Shitposter69 19 points ago +19 / -0

Even if it was, since so many of them got connected to the internet, who knows if a major code change was made.

15
You_Aint_Black 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's fucking nuts that this is even a thing.

6
Shitposter69 6 points ago +6 / -0

They should have a special motherboard pcb without any traces for i/o like that. Then you'd really have to be trying to do shit like that.

15
mnguy12000 15 points ago +15 / -0

Thats why TX said NO. No open ports ie USB and NO INTERNET.

6
Philmor_Tittus 6 points ago +7 / -1

YEAH!..... and then used a company owned by Dominion....

5
Brickwell 5 points ago +5 / -0

It is not open sourced code. He says so in the presentation.