Me except the last part! I don't understand why blockchain couldn't be used to enhance chain-of-custody issues. Mail-in ballots should absolutely have some sort of identifier to verify when it was sent out, etc. I would really like to know how states like Florida do it.
Ah, right! I forgot you don't need the actual ballots which will be gone. If the data is still out there which it should be, great! Granted, this was a state where you had straight-ticket and individual options. In Texas, for example, that is no longer the case. I'd LOVE to see that.
I suspect with a modification of the analysis you could still see the effect in places that don't have the separate straight/individual options. If you iteratively compare the performance of each candidate in a head-to-head race vs their party's overall performance as the denominator, the ramp-function factor I think would still show up wherever it had been used (just maybe not quite as starkly strikingly clear).
THIS VIDEO RIGHT HERE IS WHY THE COMMIES KEEP CLAIMING THAT SOME STATES ARE PURPLE STATES.
This analysis needs to be run on every significant election back several years.
Anyone found to have had this "elect" them needs to be absolutely hounded out of public office. Forced to resign immediately.
Same here. And I think that feeling of physical sickness is just a temporary sensory overload from the sudden combination of:
Me except the last part! I don't understand why blockchain couldn't be used to enhance chain-of-custody issues. Mail-in ballots should absolutely have some sort of identifier to verify when it was sent out, etc. I would really like to know how states like Florida do it.
Ah, right! I forgot you don't need the actual ballots which will be gone. If the data is still out there which it should be, great! Granted, this was a state where you had straight-ticket and individual options. In Texas, for example, that is no longer the case. I'd LOVE to see that.
I suspect with a modification of the analysis you could still see the effect in places that don't have the separate straight/individual options. If you iteratively compare the performance of each candidate in a head-to-head race vs their party's overall performance as the denominator, the ramp-function factor I think would still show up wherever it had been used (just maybe not quite as starkly strikingly clear).
Thank you for that - yes, sounds good!